UK SAR 2013 privatisation: the new thread
Tell him you have questions about the Welsh version of the safety brief for Caernarfon, the Kernow version for Newquay and the Gaelic version for Stornoway. That should keep him out of the way for a bit.
Guest
Posts: n/a
The good news is that the CAA have indeed allocated an individual to oversee Rear Crew standards.
The bad news is he is also the CAA Chief Cabin Crew Safety Inspector. His background is as a flight attendant with no Rear Crew helicopter experience.
The bad news is he is also the CAA Chief Cabin Crew Safety Inspector. His background is as a flight attendant with no Rear Crew helicopter experience.
Last edited by snaggletooth; 13th Apr 2013 at 15:01.
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CAA Vs rear crew
Snaggle
Sorry no wind up, tis true
But if you feel so highly qualified perhaps you and One Square can apply for a position with them and oversee what has been happening quite well for 25+ years. OSM isn't really welcome in the new SAR picture if indeed he is even remotely qualified to apply.
Sorry no wind up, tis true
But if you feel so highly qualified perhaps you and One Square can apply for a position with them and oversee what has been happening quite well for 25+ years. OSM isn't really welcome in the new SAR picture if indeed he is even remotely qualified to apply.
Snaggle
The reason you are linked with OSM is that you too seem to suggest that civi (mostly ex mil) rearcrew need some form of validation that only you or he (or a trolly dolly from the CAA) can provide.
Just maybe thats the agenda that queueaitcheye is referring to?
I think you and a few others on this thread could do with a dose of your own medicine.
You are needed and will I am sure be welcome if thats where you want your career to go. Just be inclusive of the organisation that you might (MIGHT) be trying to join!
The reason you are linked with OSM is that you too seem to suggest that civi (mostly ex mil) rearcrew need some form of validation that only you or he (or a trolly dolly from the CAA) can provide.
Just maybe thats the agenda that queueaitcheye is referring to?
I try to be inclusive and judge people objectively on their merits. Try it one day. Just for a laugh.
You are needed and will I am sure be welcome if thats where you want your career to go. Just be inclusive of the organisation that you might (MIGHT) be trying to join!
Miles,
Somehow your post ended up in the wrong thread. You posted in the grown up, facts only, corporate knowledge based discussion but instead it ended up in the hysterical, wild ignorance based opinion, Daily Mail letters-esque thread.
Nice post though!
Somehow your post ended up in the wrong thread. You posted in the grown up, facts only, corporate knowledge based discussion but instead it ended up in the hysterical, wild ignorance based opinion, Daily Mail letters-esque thread.
Nice post though!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Aarhus
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As already stated maybe contributors should educate themselves. I added the BRS PowerPoint link and webcast link in the hope that interested would so just that . However it never ceases to amazes me how this thread can turn into pure BS. In some case some of the contributors only prove that they will not or cannot accept civil SAR but will still try and get a job when the the time comes. It's too small a world .
In relation to SAR crew external validation some of their skills sets may be receive external validation and auditing from the NHS / HPC .
In relation to SAR crew external validation some of their skills sets may be receive external validation and auditing from the NHS / HPC .
Last edited by meanttobe; 13th Apr 2013 at 21:48.
This thread would be humorous if it wasn't so full of ill-informed crassness.
Meanttobe, thanks for the links - I wish more had followed them! You're comments about how small a world it is are probably lost on some.......!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Aarhus
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
212 agree completely its lost on some. But not lost on the people who have being following this and the original SAR H thread over the years . I'd go as far as saying some of the contributors and their comments may have changed the entire rational about filling the bases with personal directly from the Raf and RN.
Quite! There are some individuals who have written themselves (literally) out of the equation. Some have gone very quiet of late.......
I'd go as far as saying some of the contributors and their comments may have changed the entire rational about filling the bases with personal directly from the Raf and RN.
What, you think the recruitment strategy will be HR based? You honestly think they will recruit 100 pilots for a SAR contract on anything other than a client based requirement? Gap-SAR will be a test, I think, based on other stakeholders demands.....