Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

My-helicopter-hell-Pensioner-wants-ASBO

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

My-helicopter-hell-Pensioner-wants-ASBO

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Jul 2009, 12:33
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bolton ENGLAND
Age: 79
Posts: 1,105
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
The paddock behind the gardens looks fairly big and down to hay, couldn't they get permission to clear an heli-pad there, say 100yards away from the houses?
On seeing the photograph, that was my initial reaction too.

Forgive me..
I cant tell from the photo if the house is doubled glazed...

If it isn't, how would the press and public respond to a large group of sympathetic pilots pitching in to double glaze the front of the old dears property...
Would help keep her warm in winter too.....
Double glazing, the type used to keep houses warm, does virtually nothing to create any form of sound proofing. To provide any measure of sound proofing the air gap needs to be about 10 cms........

Planemike

Last edited by Planemike; 21st Jul 2009 at 22:33.
Planemike is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2009, 13:06
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But imagine if it was a 47 landing there instead of that (relatively) quiet 269? Holy cow.
holy cow indeed

granted a straight stack 540 is veeeery loud, followed slowly by a straight out 435. for my money that is on a par with any 269 if not quiter than them, and of course the '47's get a lot quieter from there. 3B1's, to full on muffled types, none of which I have seen on 269's.

Holy Cow indeed, FH1100's aren't all quiet either.
topendtorque is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2009, 11:05
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: London
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sailor Vee
Where is FL?
I'm not allowed to advise on the law but ..... if there was a loophole such as you suggest then the law would be bizarre.


_________


A general comment, purely as a helicopter pilot and therefore interested in the restrictions which already exist and concerned about further restrictions which could be introduced:

Just because you can legally do something doesn't mean it's sensible to do it.
Doing something for short-term personal enjoyment may increase the size of the anti lobby and, in consequence, damage the long-term interests of helicopter pilots generally.

.
Flying Lawyer is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2009, 12:09
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,298
Received 521 Likes on 217 Posts
I'm surprised the old bitty has not complained about the Flag Pole!

I would think that being a 24 hour deal that would be more of a nuisance than the occasional helicopter.

The flapping, snapping, and such wind caused racket that would make would be a more reasonable complaint to me.

Not to mention....how unsightly it is!

It's not like he is flying the National Colours either!

FL,

Is not the use of Sharia Law instead of established law in the UK as odd as that Sailor Vee invites?
SASless is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2009, 12:16
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bizarrely you need planning permission for a flag pole in the UK!
rotorboater is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2009, 12:18
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Melbourne
Age: 54
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If I was sitting in my back yard having a beer with a few mates and that Helicopter arrived within 50ft of me the pilot better have a carton of beer with them. If not I would be complaining just like the lady in the article.

My opinion is it's too close to the neighbour and not a suitable HLS for frequent use.

Bloke
Helibloke is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2009, 15:36
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: On the Rump of Pendle Hill GB
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As I said on page one.... Unreasonable flying, creates problems for the rest of us!
Why risk close confines when there is a nice big Cow pasture within yards, seems a no brainer!

Peter R-B
Vfrpilot
VfrpilotPB/2 is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2009, 17:12
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Goathland
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmmm, but you can only land on agricultural land for a period of twenty eight days a year... Where as a garden is avaliable all year for you and ANY visiting heli.

Had this problem with my 47 in our one acre field way, away at the back of the house, the planning lot didn't like it and served an enforcement order on us even though I only used it every three weeks or so, forcing us to move to a house three doors up with a larger garden, now the 47 sits proudly in the front garden in full view... mind you I spent some time with the new couple from next door and arranged a flight for one of them, he loved it and we have no complaints - wonder why...

Strangely all the complaints that I did have in the village here all seem to be from people that have recently moved in, knowing I had a helicopter and other odd hobbies, having said that they also complain about the street lights, yellow lines, tourist, litter, price of fish, need I go on? Then they get the lawn mower and strimmer out for three hours every Sunday afternoon!

Kevin.
kevin_mayes is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2009, 17:17
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: earth
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree with the old lady on this one, who ever the pilot is, or how long they have been flying for. The simple fact is that helicopter is far to close to the neighbours house, any incident or accident can quite easily cause damage to the neighbours property or injury if the lady was outside. C'mon this is basic logic for a pilot. For the law that states you can, does not mean you should, LOOK at the safety implications.
And if the pilot says that sort of thing would not happen to me, then we already know. Its the kind of basic thought process if the aircraft is going to misbehave seriously now, is it safe for me to land 50ft away from a little old lady cutting a her hedge.!!!!
If these guys wanted to land and take off, even before attempting, full dimplomacy should have been taken to smooth the way.
fluffy5 is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2009, 08:57
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK/OZ
Posts: 1,888
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Double glazing, the type used to keep houses warm, does virtually nothing to create any form of sound proofing. To provide any measure of sound proofing the air gap needs to be about 10 cms........
Double glazing does virtually nothing?
Gatwick and Heathrow have schemes to subsidise instalation of double glazing as part of their residential noise insulation scheme.

BAA Heathrow noise website: FAQ's - night noise

One of the options is
"A fifty per cent contribution to high specification double glazed PVCu replacement windows, specially designed to reduce noise levels"



Mickjoebill
mickjoebill is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2009, 11:32
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No wonder she objects

OK Guys,

I'm no helicopter offcionando, but looking at the pictures, if that thing landed in my back yard, it is so ugly I would at least throw a bucket of water over it. No wonder the old girl is so depressed. Some recent postings on other threads from Australia have identified a local method for handling offensive helicopter landings...send in the crocodiles I say!

Toungue firmly in cheek.

blakmax
blakmax is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2009, 11:50
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 253
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Might I suggest that the HLS does not fulfill basic requirement of safe aviation practice?
ie 30m from nearest obstacle etc
Poor judgement by pilot IMHO - both in not taking the old girl for a flight and in choosing such a site in first place.
As FL mentioned - all because you can do it does not mean that you should - especially if you want to do it again again again
JulieAndrews is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2009, 17:35
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,298
Received 521 Likes on 217 Posts
Julie,

Where do you get your information from?

I believe you will find your rule would prevent most off shore landing sites from being used....as it would some lighthouses, most private sites, and more than a few heliports. I know for a fact it would prevent most bush flying.
SASless is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.