Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Another Attack On A Police Helicopter

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Another Attack On A Police Helicopter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th May 2010, 12:36
  #301 (permalink)  
Chief Bottle Washer
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: PPRuNe
Posts: 5,168
Received 187 Likes on 115 Posts
This thread is about attacks on Police helicopters. Chopjock's well known views on helicopter costs can be addressed in UK Police Helicopter budget cuts.
Senior Pilot is offline  
Old 19th May 2010, 13:54
  #302 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Alderney
Age: 62
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are there no Police HQ's in City centres that would allow helicopter operations off the roof?
I'm assuming there must be a good reason why this isn't done?
I would have thought the pros would outnumber the cons and immediately the security problem is solved and being based in City centres is very close to where the majority of crime is committed.
beaufort1 is offline  
Old 19th May 2010, 14:17
  #303 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 3,680
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Beaufort: welcome to the forum. Commercial helicopters (which is what police helos are, as they are fee paying passengers on board) need specific take off distances etc. This cannot invariably be achieved coming off roof tops. [It does happen, but is rare due to aircraft performance etc).
It's all about the engine failing shortly after takeoff and having to 'reject' back to its hover spot.
Thomas coupling is offline  
Old 19th May 2010, 14:52
  #304 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Alderney
Age: 62
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the welcome TC and the explanation. I should have worked that out for myself .
beaufort1 is offline  
Old 19th May 2010, 15:59
  #305 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Chop jock

Beaufort 1. There also is the issue of whether the structure is up to the additional weight of a roof top helipad, apparently it was looked at some time ago and our HQ isn't up to it.

Hi Small man. Doubt it would be cheaper, it's all go to be produced to the same standard
Mr_G_Box is offline  
Old 19th May 2010, 20:58
  #306 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rooftop ops etc

Are there no Police HQ's in City centres that would allow helicopter operations off the roof?
I'm assuming there must be a good reason why this isn't done?
I would have thought the pros would outnumber the cons and immediately the security problem is solved and being based in City centres is very close to where the majority of crime is committed.
Hi Beaufort 1,

As well as the (lack of) space available for a helipad mentioned by TC, there are lots of additional reasons why a city-centre police HQ rooftop might not make a suitable operating base:
1. There aren't many such buildings in the UK that are stressed for rooftop ops.
2. The supply of fuel and associated safety requirements would be tricky at best.
3. Spares delivery and storage, and storage space for maintenance equipment would be very awkward for a rooftop site.
4. Hangarage (essential) in addition to the helipad would result in a very large footprint.
5. The noise nuisance resulting from city centre rooftop ops at 3am wouldn't endear the police helo to the locals!
6. While it would certainly provide a rapid response to the town/city where the HQ is located, it might not be the best location to provide the best support to the 'bigger picture'.

Having said all that, a rooftop site at our main HQ would cut my journey to/from work, so the idea must have some merit!

As far as operating in a single for police ops is concerned, you've got to be kidding. There are simply too many occasions when, in order to do my job properly, the only autorotation landing area available would be a residential street cluttered with lights and cars (moving and stationary), never mind the residents. That's not my definition of a suitable landing area, so the unsuitability of a single-engined machine is beyond question (for me).

Explorer99
explorer99 is offline  
Old 19th May 2010, 21:10
  #307 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Teesside
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are less and less Police HQs being built in city centres. This is a deliberate act on two fronts.
1. The cost of land in city centres.
2. Lessons learned during the Toxteth Riots in the 1980s when Merseyside Police HQ was within throwing distance.
Not only do you get a broken helicopter but several million pounds worth of building and equipment surrounding it.
I can't see why people are surprised about attacks on helicopters. Police vehicles have always been damaged when parked and unattended. It is merely the cost of repairs which has changed.
paarmo is offline  
Old 21st May 2010, 02:43
  #308 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Warrington, UK
Posts: 3,838
Received 75 Likes on 30 Posts
Merseyside had already been identified as an early casualty
A somewhat out of date and inaccurate statement.

This cannot invariably be achieved coming off roof tops.
TC, you're obviously forgetting about helipad performance.
MightyGem is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2010, 07:58
  #309 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: london,uk
Posts: 735
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
And here's the best (or worst) part -- it can set people (or things) on fire. Apparently the laser is so high powered that shining it on fleshy parts will cause them to burst into flames. Of course it's equally capable of blinding people. The retailer warns:

Warning: Extremely dangerous is an understatement to the power of 1W of laser power. It will blind permanently and instantly and set fire quickly to skin and other body parts, use with extreme caution and only when using the included eye protection. Customers will be required to completely read and agree to our Class IV Laser Hazard Acknowledgment Form.
DailyTech - WickedLasers Unveils "Lightsaber" Powerful Enough to Set People on Fire
peter we is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.