Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

PHI Crash in Louisiana Jan 2009 - 8 Dead, 1 Injured

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

PHI Crash in Louisiana Jan 2009 - 8 Dead, 1 Injured

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Feb 2009, 04:54
  #141 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ban Don Ling
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Devil "normalization of deviance"

Sounds like it should be on the What's New In West Africa thread ..... or more like included in the requisite psychometric testing!
tistisnot is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2009, 07:51
  #142 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Croydon
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Hazard Analysis 'and' Critical Control Points technique is the food industry's preventative risk assessment process. It was derived from NASA work on astronaut food (not o-rings).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HACCP

Nor does it have anything to do with Diane Vaughan.

Er now what was this thread about again? Oh yes...

topendtorque

It would be better to run a proactive FDR analysis programme after every safe landing to learn about near-missses than add the capability to transmit a few seconds of data prior to the occassional impact.

In this case assuming if the FDR survived as designed it either has data to answer 'why' or it doesn't, and If not, transmitting limited data before impact would not help.
squib66 is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2009, 10:07
  #143 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
requisite psychometric testing!
I reckon that definately would be something to do with rotary aviation, perhaps the H269?

Ramen
Unfortunately I am serious, however the poor old yanks still demonstrate massive divergance in their own beef export industry by three times failing to remove bone from shipments to Korea /Japan after they have been suspended for each of the previous four years. One day they'll work it out, meanwhile we're laughng to the bank.
One good thing about it is that crocodile abbattoirs now do three salmonella swabs instead a washdown with a hose.

They could do thirty three and I still wouldn't eat the stuff.

HACCP has got processors toidentify risky areas, we are supposed to use checklists. That to my mind should enough , but in the vein of the runaway politically warm alGore it's now suggested that we have ISO9002 cred or in the meat industry its now ISO 14002.

Its all a bit like the zim currency, as you point out and to draw an african parallel. bloody worthless when it comes to real safetly SKILL and ATTITUDE
topendtorque is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2009, 14:51
  #144 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Here and there...
Age: 58
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The companies offering sat-comms for aircraft these days posess the necessary technology to satisfy topendtorques needs.

Take the E-HUMS on the new 76C++'s that records literally dozens of channels and link it to the sat-comm and hey presto, you have realtime monitoring of all the selected parameters including FMS, GPS position and a telephone line if you want one too!
unstable load is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2009, 18:50
  #145 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NTSB press release out with investigation status

Press Advisory
skiddriver is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2009, 19:27
  #146 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 1,079
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Sad, after the report I can only speculate (yes I speculate) about a flock of birds taking out the engine levers and the pilots...

R.I.P.

Aser
Aser is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2009, 19:38
  #147 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: England
Posts: 1,459
Received 34 Likes on 20 Posts
It says no evidence of a birdstrike ASER, I think a flock of birds would have left one or two feathers!!!!!
ericferret is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2009, 19:57
  #148 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 1,079
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
ericferret you are very right, of course I just read it too fast ,but the absence of problems in servo/gearbox etc etc. it's amazing...

Regards
Aser is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2009, 21:13
  #149 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 1,659
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Just a question, has there ever been a recorded incident of maybe a front screen failing in the 76? Sounds like something broke a window if background noise increased. Wild speculation, shot at?

I bet no-one expected that report!
helimutt is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2009, 21:21
  #150 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: LOS
Age: 67
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could it be windshield blowing in and taking the engine levers back? Posting at the same time as Helimut......
Outwest is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2009, 22:48
  #151 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,287
Received 510 Likes on 212 Posts
What other flight parameters are recorded besides Airspeed and Altitude? Such as heading, turn rate, attitude......?
SASless is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2009, 02:11
  #152 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Philadelphia PA
Age: 73
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Flight control positions, engine parameters, G loading, a ton of stuff is recorded.
Shawn Coyle is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2009, 03:08
  #153 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,287
Received 510 Likes on 212 Posts
So they will know what the controls were doing....and whether the control positions coorelate to the flight path of the aircraft then?

I wonder what the tail rotor gear box and blades looked like and where they were found?
SASless is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2009, 06:45
  #154 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 1,659
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Portions of the windscreen and composite center post have been recovered and sent to the NTSB laboratory in Washington, DC for further examination and analysis of the composite structure and windscreen.
My highlight, Has this been modified in any way since A,A+, B, C etc?
It's one of the things in the report being looked at further from how I read it.??
helimutt is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2009, 06:51
  #155 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 898
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
Extremely interesting update mainly because it concentrates on aircraft systems and remains totally silent on the control positions.

My first impression is that this report has been provided to restore operator's/crew's confidence in the aircraft systems whilst not speculating about the actions/behaviour of the crew members.

In the AS355 'Harding' accident report in the UK several years ago, there was also reference to a noise 'heard on the CVR'; there was speculation about the source of the noise but it was never resolved.

Jim
JimL is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2009, 09:18
  #156 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Somewhere else now
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Following on from Helimutts line of thought....was it hunting season in that area at the time, at 700 ft and 138 Kts and if you were very unlucky could a bullet shatter the windscreen? Is 700ft the normal altitude for flights on that route?
drop lead is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2009, 11:02
  #157 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,287
Received 510 Likes on 212 Posts
What was the "Loud Noise"? What kind of noise was it....sudden sharp of short duration or was it sudden sharp and prolonged....one big "Bang" or a long duration noise?

Why would the Engine Levers be in any position other than forward in the normal setting?

Who....What....moved them aft? Human, failure of some kind, or impact?
SASless is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2009, 12:56
  #158 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Posts: 770
Received 29 Likes on 14 Posts
SASless:
Why would the Engine Levers be in any position other than forward in the normal setting?

Who....What....moved them aft? Human, failure of some kind, or impact?
I haven't seen any official word as to the position of the engine levers. (Has anyone?) But apparently, by admitting that they are focusing on the windshield and centerpost, the NTSB is looking down that avenue.

I'll say one thing. If they've examined the various data recorders as they say, then they are not telling us the full story, but only what they want us to know. Their report leaves out many important details and only gives us crumbs. The FDR certainly could have given us the position of the ECL's, and the collective. And the CVR certainly contained some messages from the pilots (or did they sit there for 10 seconds-plus and say and do nothing?).

Is the NTSB now hinting that the cause of this crash was external and not internal? If their intention was to "throw something out there" to assuage the nagging fears of S-76 community, they did more harm than good. There are more questions now than before. We must believe that this is merely a very carefully crafted "press release" and not meant as anything more.
FH1100 Pilot is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2009, 13:14
  #159 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: USA (PA)
Age: 47
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"carefully crafted" is probably a good description, much better than the initial report.

I agree, it sounds like they want to assure the rest of us, that it was something other than a inexplicable instantaneous combustion; rather - as you said - something external or structural, something unique that doesn't seem to endanger the rest of the fleet. They very much want to make sure to cover and exclude the engines, drivetrains, hydraulics and rotors.

It looks like they have a pretty good idea, but unlike us, can't speculate ( ) until they have prove.

(one would think PHI has tried (and found) every flaw on that airframe - how many of all S-76 AD's are the result of an incident at PHI? 85%?)

Last edited by Phil77; 6th Feb 2009 at 16:29. Reason: clarification
Phil77 is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2009, 14:53
  #160 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,287
Received 510 Likes on 212 Posts
FH-1100,


It was my assumption the engine levers might not have been fully forward....following up on the thought of a bird strike or structural failure as has been discussed such as a windscreen pushing backwards with a resulting movement of the engine levers. What their position really was is anyone's guess.

The center post remains is being examined and might surface some indication of if that was a cause or not perhaps.
SASless is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.