Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

SARH to go

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd March 2009 | 13:30
  #881 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
Veteran: National Guard
 
Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
strategic access point to the Antarctic
Perhaps there is still hope for an Empire yet....huh Crab?
SASless is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd March 2009 | 14:42
  #882 (permalink)  
Tightgit
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 806
Likes: 7
From: The artist formerly known as john du'pruyting
Sort of war we might win sas, a barren desolate !!!!!hole with very few people living there!!
handysnaks is offline  
Reply
Old 5th March 2009 | 20:25
  #883 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 10,959
Likes: 1,814
From: EGDC
We can still build empires Sasless - take a look at the new SARFHQ at Valley
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Reply
Old 6th March 2009 | 01:40
  #884 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
Veteran: National Guard
 
Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
Complete with a new golf course perhaps?
SASless is offline  
Reply
Old 6th March 2009 | 07:19
  #885 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 10,959
Likes: 1,814
From: EGDC
Sasless - I thought you were a Telegraph reader not the Daily Mirror!!
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Reply
Old 6th March 2009 | 09:11
  #886 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: No longer a cockpit near you
Has CHC given up on the SARH contract as it seems to be alienating its specialist workforce?

Amazed!!
JIGSPY is offline  
Reply
Old 6th March 2009 | 09:26
  #887 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Here and there!
Shame the guys and girls work hard for the company on the islands and the management have really done themselves no favours.
bleepup is offline  
Reply
Old 6th March 2009 | 09:28
  #888 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 313
Likes: 2
From: PLANET ZOG
Jig
CHC would not give up on SARH! There are too many managers and hangers on creaming off large salaries for that.
They are more intent on screwing the whole existing SAR team.
Then they can claim that they are not in a position to go any further because their Crews have all done a runner!!!
3D
3D CAM is offline  
Reply
Old 6th March 2009 | 09:46
  #889 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 10,959
Likes: 1,814
From: EGDC
Where's Arthur Scargill when you need him?
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Reply
Old 6th March 2009 | 10:12
  #890 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Here and there!
Then they can claim that they are not in a position to go any further because their Crews have all done a runner!!!
But haven't the 3 that left up North been replaced! But i believe 2 new recruits have had a phone call to say sorry no job now!
bleepup is offline  
Reply
Old 6th March 2009 | 19:52
  #891 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,174
Likes: 7
From: UK
Perhaps there is still hope for an Empire yet....
Much in the same way as the Marianas, Samoa and Guam.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Reply
Old 6th March 2009 | 21:49
  #892 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
Veteran: National Guard
 
Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
Crab,

Actually I have never been able to keep it straight.....Sun or Mirror and keep getting it all confused. Why they waste two full pages defeats me!
SASless is offline  
Reply
Old 7th March 2009 | 06:14
  #893 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 10,959
Likes: 1,814
From: EGDC
So is this really going to be the future of UK SAR? A contractor with dodgy funding who first puts aircraft not fit for the job into service and pretends everything is OK - then when the money gets tight starts to screw the professionals at the coal face by changing terms and conditions without negotiation, asking for more work for the same money and pushing the boys and girls towards industrial action.

In the Military this would be considered a Flight Safety hazard and certainly not conducive to providing a top quality, well motivated SAR force of the future.

I have no idea if Air Knight would be any better but so far CHC seem to be demonstrating all the reasons why I have had such deep misgivings about the whole SARH process

I understand the desire to civilianise SAR but if it has to be so, it should be a 'not for profit' organisation so that the bottom line doesn't keep compromising the front-line.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Reply
Old 7th March 2009 | 10:27
  #894 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Upside down
Crab,

I wouldn't worry much about CHC. As they eagerly pi$$ off and alienete the entire work force, it will undoubtedly come to a grinding halt soon.

Wether it be Oil & Gas or SAR, the management seem keen to mismanage their way to destroying the business.

Sad........
Hoppit is offline  
Reply
Old 7th March 2009 | 10:33
  #895 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: England
There is an article in the latest Flight International about the delays and cost overruns of the US Presidential VH71 programme. An alternative that has been proposed is an upgrade to the USP's current fleet along the lines of the Carson blades/glass cockpit project.

I won't spoil the surprise about the savings that can be made, see for yourself, but they are enormous. To be honest, I don't have the technical ability to know how to post a link, sorry.

Now, if it's good enough for the President of the USA ...........

CD
Clever Richard is offline  
Reply
Old 7th March 2009 | 11:48
  #896 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: ENGLAND
Crab, great idea, 'not for profit', maybe a small one but more the priviledge of holding the contract and doing the job than any profit motivation. Any for lord sake, someone at the MCA who can stand up to contractors and say, don't crap and don't perform like crap!
Tonka Toy is offline  
Reply
Old 7th March 2009 | 12:46
  #897 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
Veteran: National Guard
 
Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
Perhaps the CAA would like to take this over as they are in the forefront of safety and innovation. Add the small profit that could be made as suggested and they could add that to their requirement to be self supporting.

The flying opportunities for their Inspectors would be a real boon. They could be put on rotating rosters much as military pilots are moved to desks between flying tours.

There you go Crab....problem sorted!
SASless is offline  
Reply
Old 8th March 2009 | 08:38
  #898 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 10,959
Likes: 1,814
From: EGDC
No Sasless - that is an empire that really doesn't need to be built
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Reply
Old 8th March 2009 | 08:56
  #899 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
From: UK
Where's Arthur Scargill when you need him?
Surely you wouldn't want him to get involved. He failed last time!
flyer43 is offline  
Reply
Old 10th March 2009 | 16:39
  #900 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: South Coast
Regretably Chivenor drops to 12 hour SAR cover, 0800-2000, for the following days 11,12,13,22,23 March.
Sorry it's come to this but understandable.

Spr
sapper is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.