Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

New London Heliport

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

New London Heliport

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Nov 2007, 16:10
  #81 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Meon Valley
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is there a genuine debate about the prospects of a new heliport for London, or is this now just a pi$$ing contest about mil helos creating <1 % of the noise cars do every hour of the day in the great capital.
poor southerner is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2007, 17:35
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Apa, apo ndi kulikonse!
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thought we had agreed that it can't work..... for all the reasons given!!!

AlanM is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2007, 19:11
  #83 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 431 Likes on 227 Posts
It is in everyone`s best interests to ensure compliance with current procedures in order to safeguard the status quo. Quite clearly this is beyond the understanding of ShyTorque judging by his gung-ho rant but perhaps someone could lead him to a quiet corner and spell it out in words of one syllable.
Snarlie, I'm not ranting by any means and certainly not gung ho either so there really is no need to resort to personal insults. I do understand the sensitivity to helicopter noise, being a very regular user of the lanes /routes and the present heliport. I just strongly disagree with the action you propose, for a number of reasons, some posted already.

You used the term "current procedures". Procedures for whom, civilian helicopters or military? Aren't you confusing the published maximum altitiudes on the routes for "minimum allowed altitude" and forgetting the differences between civilian and military flight rules?
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2007, 10:14
  #84 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Errr - well today I saw an R22 today fly between Vauxhall Bridge and the Isle of Dogs (on the river) at 700ft, when cleared "standard operating altitudes" (and it is up to 2000ft there) I can agree.
Do you mean you saw it, or you saw what the mode C was reporting it as? If it's the latter then are you quoting the pressure altitude and did you confirm with the pilot whether the reading was correct? I suppose if it's reading 0 at kew you know something's amiss

Last time i asked farnborough to check my mode C reading it was either 400 or 600ft (i forget which) out so i went back to mode A.

Do you see altitude information from mode S data?
FairWeatherFlyer is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2007, 10:42
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Apa, apo ndi kulikonse!
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seen on RADAR - wearing a squawk issued by LHR SVFR and in the zone so
Mode C is then verified to be within 200ft of reported altitude. And no I didn't say anything as I was not plugged in controlling at the time.

The point I make is that as an ATCO, I really don't care what level you take. (as long as you stay out of the Restricted areas when off the river)

The CAA have stipulated "Not above 2000ft" on H4. My question is why fly at 700ft when cleared up to 2000ft.... in a single! (No this is not Robbo or Single bashing!!!) Surely this is a noise issue as well as a safety issue?

As for Mode S, we get downlinked parameters from certain aircraft displayed on our screens at West Drayton. We are the only unit in the U Kwith Mode S capable radars at the moment. We see Selected Flight Level, IAS, ROC/ROD etc - but NOT your Hexidecimal unique code.... yet! (I believe it is "read" by radar but not put on our screens)
AlanM is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2007, 22:50
  #86 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FYI, in this weekend's financial times' magazine, the Mrs Moneypenny column covers travel by helicopter charter. Some stuff on perception of safety and also a comparison of the poor state of London heliport availability compared to other cities (New York). And, almost forgot, dogs as passengers!
FairWeatherFlyer is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.