Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

UK CAA Fees Consultation

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

UK CAA Fees Consultation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Dec 2008, 14:05
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 1,659
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Nigelh, again you propose that everyone does things your way. Just do lease flying?? You mean ILLEGAL CHARTER??? You never cease to amaze me with some of your foolish comments.

I agree the CAA should not be self-regulated. This should be changed but I would only imagine government can do this? Correct me if i'm wrong.
helimutt is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2008, 14:20
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: OS SX2063
Age: 54
Posts: 1,027
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nigel

I believe that the Private Pleasure flying use of AVTUR by AOC operators is exempt from the recent fuel tax hike by virtue of

For these purposes ‘private pleasure-flying’ means flying other than in the following circumstances:

Commercial operation or use of aircraft by companies for the carriage of passengers or goods as an aid to the conduct of their business and the availability of the aircraft for whole aircraft charter, flown by a pilot (or pilots) employed to fly the aircraft
And a whole host of others circumstance which I don't need to quote which come in a defintion document form HMRC, and yes I know I need to get out more.
VeeAny is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2008, 14:51
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: yorkshire uk
Posts: 1,523
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Helimut ...you always cheer me up being so predictable You are wrong ..lease flying is not illegal if done correctly and i have confirmation from the caa . You really need to be more proactive or you may lose your job/company as well . Where is that spirit that beat the germans ?? The CAA is just a bunch of suits trying to stop aviation ..they shouldnt be too hard to beat !!
I flew into Battersea the other night and had to fill a form in saying private or commercial for the fueling . What determines what it is ? How does the pilot , who signs , know what the flight is for sure ? What do you do when you fill the aircraft to do a charter or commercial flight and this is cancelled but the next flight is private ? Is ANYBODY paying this duty ??
nigelh is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2008, 16:06
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: UK
Age: 47
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well chaps thanks to Glenn and Gary, leading me by the hand, I have managed to fill in the CAA online form. I got a reference number back which is in the 80s which would mean not a lot of people have done the online form.

The BHAB should be fighting this with a bigger stick and what could GAPAN do?

Since we are not all members of one club/union etc. it is difficult to galvanise everyone.
Brilliant Stuff is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2008, 17:57
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 1,659
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
lease flying is not illegal if done correctly and i have confirmation from the caa
I'm not saying lease flying is illegal, but doing commercial work under the guise of lease flying, is.
My understanding is that if a pilot is about to fly an aircraft, fully expecting it to be a commercial flight, then that's what he signs for, fuelling wise. Private, the same. What happens if that changes is there should be a notification of change. We all know that that would be like one of us speeding and telling the police about it afterwards. Not really going to happen. Not if you were in the car with me the other night you wouldn't tell anyway.(thats another story)

If lease flying accomplishes the same job as commercial flying, why have an aoc in the first place then?
the CAA will increase the charges anyway, no matter what you do. They are self regulating. Thats what people should be fighting against.
helimutt is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2008, 18:22
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: yorkshire uk
Posts: 1,523
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Helimut you sound like you have already lost the will to fight . So , if the caa are self governing ...lets change it ...lets all refuse to pay them until they become accountable and take due care of the people whose lives they preside over . If they are not paid they will be out of a job . If you pay them you will be out of a job . Make a choice . I will make a bet that over half of all aoc,s will be broke by end of next year and will close . ( apart from those owned by enthusiastic rich pilots who will bail them out)
The bull**** of paperwork and stupid laws that say that x landing area is unsuitable due to a fence 50 yrds away has to go . People have got to get a grip and take responsibility for their industry and take it out of the hands of these clowns . Lease work is commercial ...what do you mean that it would be illegal ? Someone leases a helicopter and uses it for their business ,that is commercial . All they cannot do is recharge the passengers which would make it technically public transport . If you know your business customers well that should not be a problem . Stop paying the caa and just look after your main clients and leave the dross of weddings etc which make no money anyway to someone else .
ps dont tell me you are one of those irresponsible people i see speeding below me on the motorway are you ?? shame on you.
nigelh is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2008, 19:40
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 1,659
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I don't speed, normally. and it was dark, and the road was very quiet! Can't say more than that.
Anyway, as it's the company I work for who pay the CAA fees to allow them to operate, oh, and my medical fees, and my licence rating/issue fees etc, I think the companies should be making more noise. They're the ones being screwed over.

We should be starting a group to have them regulated by external means. Nigelh, I agree with you totally about the stupidity of the regulations that some have to endure. It's definitely as if they want to phase out flying completely and yes, killing golden geese is definitely apt.
helimutt is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2008, 19:48
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: OS SX2063
Age: 54
Posts: 1,027
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To try and illustrate the point I've spent most of tofay working on an Excel spreadsheet to calculate AOC costs.

It can be found here.

I have tested it as well as can be expected in about 10 hours and it does bear out the figures sent to me by some AOC holders.

The future predictions after next year are made on an assumption that nothing changes and the current proposed scheme of charges is implemented.

The important bits are to enter your current charges and your current fleet size of multi and single engine aircraft.

The current charges matter as I read the implication in the document that you may be charged according to what you were charged last year and two seemingly equal AOCs may end up paying different charges.

If anyone finds anything wrong with it let me know ASAP and I'l fix it.

Ignore the income and expenditure bits to do with operating aircraft, just the AOC bit has been tested.
VeeAny is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2008, 22:47
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: yorkshire uk
Posts: 1,523
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You have the cost per hr coming in @£60 per hr on aoc charges alone by 2011 ? And that is on R44 ? What are the other costs imposed on you ? I know of some co,s whose fees are going up to £40k AND they have to pay to have extra staff do all the paperwork that is imposed ..thereby coming to probably £60k plus !!!! I guess you then have to add on all the extra courses that are so necessary ...dangerous goods , dunker, survival, first aid etc etc Dont get me wrong some of it is good and sensible but some is not . Where is the logic in a flight being deemed safe and acceptable for you and your wife and kids ...but not for the next door neighbour who chucks you £100 ?? You can all go into Battersea without floats ...but not him ..you can fly at night but he has to get a twin !!!! Daft Most non self fly flying in the UK in singles is either lease or dodgy charter i would guess . The dodgy charters are just breaking the law and probably skimp on maintenance and are flown by a ppl or faa cpl but the lease flights are probably identical to the aoc ones ...ie same aircraft and same pilot . Where i am going is , why not get all these operators back into the fold with an aoc " lite" ...make them more accountable but without crippling them with costs and unwanted paper filling . I would be very happy to have an aoc on those terms and could then go out and market my services to the public and increase the hours flown . Bringing down the cost per aircraft but doubling the number paying would make total sense ...which is of course why it will never happen . Sadly ( no offence ) a lot of you commercial pilots are not actually very commercial at all . You sit there and wait for a job . Go flying and come back and file papers and drink tea . ( especially if you are on a salary....) By the time you get off your arses to fight for your jobs they will be long gone and ,a bit like crop spraying ,...it will never be the same again .
nigelh is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2008, 10:19
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: TQ496634
Age: 52
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To continue the theme....
In my previous life I got very used to people saying.."I pay your wages!!" usually as we were rolling around on the floor of the local ale house trying to avoid vomit and glass, but that's another story... The point is that we DO pay the wages of the CAA, perhaps its time to act in a way that will make them listen? As nigelh says if we don't give them our money how can the regulate and impose these industry destroying ideas on us?
IH
Sgtfrog is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2008, 12:01
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: yorkshire uk
Posts: 1,523
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think i can honestly put my hands up and admit there are a LOT of rules i dont understand !! Why there is no such thing as night vfr is one . If you understand then tell me ...if a lease flight is for a business purpose it is then a commercial flight ( with regard to fuel levy ) but is a private flight with regard to regs ?
I accept that a lot of what you say is correct in legal terms ...but do you think that all the paperwork pushed onto aoc,s helps safety ? As i said before it will very often be the same machine and same pilot doing private work . What you do appear to be advocating is the whole industry getting together with one voice ...but is thhat possible in such a fragmented industry as this ?? Or do we just bury our heads in the sand as we have always done in the past .
nigelh is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2008, 20:56
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: WSussex
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

1,115 views on this thread, and my ref number was in the very low 90's. Shame on you!!
leftskidlow is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2008, 21:11
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: OS SX2063
Age: 54
Posts: 1,027
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Leftskidlow

Valid point, mine was 73 on Friday. Lets hope everyone else who this affects does something next week.

The thread Qualityman started on Friday was merged into an older one so that may skew the viewing figures somewhat.

GS

Last edited by VeeAny; 8th Dec 2008 at 06:18.
VeeAny is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2008, 22:36
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Close to the hangar, UK.
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Add one more, 92 now.
firebird_uk is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2008, 10:17
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Used to be God's own County
Posts: 1,719
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Feeling of .............

I feel powerless.
Not because of apathy - I'm no. 093 on the CAA online gambit.
but because the CAA document contradicts itself at every turn.
If they must achieve a 6% ROCE then surely they should remind their Master that they too should receive a 'capital injection' or atleast a suspension during these difficult times.
We have loads of money to throw about - or did have when Gordon suddenly decided so cannot see the problem or why there is such a delay for such action?

There is a finite pool from where money can be milked from Aviation-related companies. At what point will the culling of these companies and CAA's 6%ROCE strategy conflict?

I feel powerless because it would appear that all the knowledgeable heads within higher echelons of our once industry-leading CAA are powerless.

RIP AOC and GA operations
EESDL is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2008, 10:35
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: In the air with luck
Posts: 1,018
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Been through the consultation before in another industry, the questions were so skewed as to be a joke and to produce their required result, so they went ahead with the original plan, .
Filled out the form not much hope though (eighty something) not a lot for a whole industry.
What do you expect from a government that rates your tree house
500e is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2008, 12:59
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Mega city One.
Age: 53
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Number 99!

Had rant at most of the things that affect me but I got lost in most of the forms towards the end!

Maybe they could SAVE 6% by getting rid of that subsidised canteen they have at CAA towers?
Maybe they could cut down on the amount or tea breaks they seem to always be taking when-ever I phone up for a question.


I am hoping that when EASA comes in we will have a means of complaing about our CAA and something will be done. They are a law to them selves at the moment and competion free.

HB999
heliboy999 is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2008, 13:51
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: OS SX2063
Age: 54
Posts: 1,027
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For those who are interested I've stuck a page on the Griffin Site in which I've tried to be clinical about the issues and put some illustrations based upon data sent to me by a couple of AOC holders over the weekend.

It can be seen here

I thought it best to seperate it from this thread to keep the issues away from the opinions.

The AOC Charges tool does seem to work and has got all the ones correct we've tested it on up to now. I have however modified it this morning having been fed the scale of target charge percentage increases in the next few years ,this morning.

GS
VeeAny is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2008, 14:59
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Goathland
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Up to 106 now.
Kevin.
kevin_mayes is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2008, 15:59
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: In the air with luck
Posts: 1,018
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
VeeAny.
Your post is aimed at AOC ,training schools, (commercial users), BUT this will affect all aviation, do not put off the private\business flyer from increasing the count.
Less airfields, less training schools, less chances to fly, BUT certainly a much higher cost to both commercial & private flying \ training .
The other way to look at things if you are strapped for cash you look for ways to stay in business, by cutting costs, people, buildings, put off new acquisitions, (a real help to stimulate the economy), or Maintenance, (I am not saying people will stop maintaining, but the pressure will be to do it faster so less AOG time, will it go till the next check rather than replace in know)
The CAA\ government does not seem to understand that industry has to find money from some where, the ever increasing overheads cannot be absorbed for ever.
We have exported whole industries due to cost, the world is changing we were told the city was our biggest earner!! this now appears to be somewhat off base, we need small to medium sized Company's to flourish not be pushed into the hands of the receivers
Rant over.
500e is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.