Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

"Supervised" solo flight

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

"Supervised" solo flight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th October 2008 | 20:31
  #21 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
Community Builder
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 15,110
Likes: 1,083
From: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
#15
the beater
Might I suggest that we ask about how important members of the Royal family obtained their licences?
Which licences do you mean?
ShyTorque is offline  
Reply
Old 17th October 2008 | 21:44
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: saigon
I know for a fact they were doing it at one of the large flight schools in queensland, Australia until CASA found out!
nathan_m is offline  
Reply
Old 18th October 2008 | 01:23
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: An Irish dude in Houston, TX. I miss home!!!
The only time I've heard the term supervised solo before is on the first 2 solo flights. But the CFI isn't in the chopper. They will be outside watching,

The first solo, as i'm sure you all know is the hover solo with the CFI watching on and giving hand gestures such as, pick up, set down, hover left, etc.....

The second is the pattern solo with the CFI watching on and possibly in radio contact.

Some places refer to this as "Supervised Solo". Maybe this is what the guy was talking about.
darrenphughes is offline  
Reply
Old 18th October 2008 | 08:52
  #24 (permalink)  

Hovering AND talking
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,711
Likes: 1
From: Propping up bars in the Lands of D H Lawrence and Bishop Bonner
The first solo, as i'm sure you all know is the hover solo
Mine wasn't! I was straight into the circuit. If I had done a hover solo first, I might have had more appreciation about the difference my instructor's couple of cwt made!! Perhaps there was a weight and balance issue and that school had run out of sandbags!

I have heard of this "supervised" solo thing before from an FAA PPL(H) but didn't believe it.

Cheers

Whirls
Whirlygig is offline  
Reply
Old 18th October 2008 | 09:48
  #25 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 898
Likes: 73
From: UK
Slight thread drift, but are the 10 hours solo towards the PPL(H) usually charged at dual instruction rate or self hire rate?
GS-Alpha is offline  
Reply
Old 18th October 2008 | 11:00
  #26 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,103
Likes: 5
From: Chabanais, France
the beater

Charles, the Prince of Wales did a wings course, Prince Andrew did a complete flying course and by the time William checks out as a qualified SAR pilot so will he have done a wings qualifying course. Just what is your problem? Or are you another annoying little republican?
parabellum is offline  
Reply
Old 18th October 2008 | 11:27
  #27 (permalink)  

Hovering AND talking
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,711
Likes: 1
From: Propping up bars in the Lands of D H Lawrence and Bishop Bonner
are the 10 hours solo towards the PPL(H) usually charged at dual instruction rate
Dual instruction rate as the instructor is still "on duty" and at hand in case.

Cheers

Whirls
Whirlygig is offline  
Reply
Old 18th October 2008 | 11:39
  #28 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 898
Likes: 73
From: UK
I thought that would be the case. Thanks. I think I will be going solo any time now.
GS-Alpha is offline  
Reply
Old 18th October 2008 | 16:25
  #29 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL(H)
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 56
From: UK
Originally Posted by TorqueStripe
The solo x-country flight and a 'regular, unsupervised' flight were charged as SFH.
In which case, TS, you were pretty lucky. The QXC flight is still a 'supervised solo' flight and you were effectively flying on your instructor's licence. If anything had gone wrong, it was his/her licence which was on the line.



(Edited to add: My initial comment was on the presumption that your initial training was under the JAA system. However, after having had a quick look at your profile, I'm guessing that you might have first trained under FAA. My comment applies to JAA.)
Bravo73 is online now  
Reply
Old 18th October 2008 | 16:45
  #30 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: airport
Originally Posted by Bravo73
Originally Posted by TorqueStripe
The solo x-country flight and a 'regular, unsupervised' flight were charged as SFH.
In which case, TS, you were pretty lucky. The QXC flight is still a 'supervised solo' flight and you were effectively flying on your instructor's licence. If anything had gone wrong, it was his/her licence which was on the line.
Common practice (in the USA) is to charge for self hire, unless your instructor sits down at the pattern watching you.
Runway101 is offline  
Reply
Old 18th October 2008 | 16:51
  #31 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL(H)
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 56
From: UK
Thanks, Runway. I figured that it might be like that in FAAland. (Hence my quick, 're-edit' disclaimer! )
Bravo73 is online now  
Reply
Old 20th October 2008 | 23:57
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Nigeria
The Canadian military has 'supervised solo' system in place for very spcific conditions. I would expect other militaries to have similar systems in place. There were no 'hours requirements', merely a syllabus to complete.

I have never seen a civil school operate this way (they do not operate under conditions that should require it). Clearly, as others have mentiond, it is not legal in a civil environment.
Swamp76 is offline  
Reply
Old 21st October 2008 | 00:54
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 563
Likes: 1
From: queensland australia
there has been many instances of pilots in australia having done no solo time prior to issue of their licence, i have met a few.

although there is no requirement for supervised solo, (instructor watching from the ground), in australia, i make a point of doing a couple of hours on the ground to look for accuracy in the circuit, and make videos of the student flying, they get a kick out of it.
imabell is offline  
Reply
Old 21st October 2008 | 03:28
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
From: USA (PA)
Out of the FAA regs:
Although I couldn't find the definition of "solo flight" under § 61.1 Definitions and Abbreviations (as if it isn't clear enough ), but we do all agree that one need to do 10 hours of solo flight under § 61.109 right? The examiner will check if the applicant logged those ours in his logbook and at least here is where it's getting interesting...

How can somebody have a different interpretation of "sole occupant of the aircraft"?:

§ 61.51 Pilot logbooks.
[...]

(c) Logging of pilot time. The pilot time described in this section may be used to:

(1) Apply for a certificate or rating issued under this part or a privilege authorized under this part; or

(2) Satisfy the recent flight experience requirements of this part.

(d) Logging of solo flight time. Except for a student pilot performing the duties of pilot in command of an airship requiring more than one pilot flight crewmember, a pilot may log as solo flight time only that flight time when the pilot is the sole occupant of the aircraft.

Last edited by Phil77; 21st October 2008 at 03:34. Reason: clarification
Phil77 is offline  
Reply
Old 28th October 2008 | 19:51
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: USA
I have never heard of supervised solo in the USA. I own a flight school in the USA and you are either solo or you are not. If someone says they obtained a certificate without actually flying solo that should be reported to the FAA for investigation. In my school if you are solo you pay the solo rate.

Regards,
Chopperpilot47
chopperpilot47 is offline  
Reply
Old 28th October 2008 | 20:52
  #36 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: Ireland
Supervised solo is another JAA invention to make more money.
wesp is offline  
Reply
Old 30th October 2008 | 02:05
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: the one less travelled
where I'm based (US), supervised solo is purely and simply, observing from the ground with a handheld, anything more is doing the student a disservice in the long term, and is also ILLEGAL!!

We charge dual time for it, as correctly stated earlier, you're flying on the instructors licence and they're spending time on the ground observing.

What an arrogant post from Head Turner that I can only attribute to dangling the bait, as I hope no-one holds that view in reality.
bluestack is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.