Lbs and Inches V. Kg and Meters?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lbs and Inches V. Kg and Meters?
I have recently started learning to fly helis and picked up a book I bought a few years ago (published 1997) and was taken aback to find calculations of moments measured in Foot/Pounds.
I was wondering if the units of measurements in the industry is still dominated by the imperial system? Do ATC still call heights in feet? Are the JAA exams in imperial or metric?
I hope I can learn/do the exams in Meters and Kilograms... none of my schooling was in the "old system"
- its almost like speaking a different language.
I was wondering if the units of measurements in the industry is still dominated by the imperial system? Do ATC still call heights in feet? Are the JAA exams in imperial or metric?
I hope I can learn/do the exams in Meters and Kilograms... none of my schooling was in the "old system"
- its almost like speaking a different language.
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Alderney or Lancashire UK
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
American manufacturer use their own peculiar brand of imperial measurements for pretty much everything. volumes pressures torques etc etc. When you've been flying for a bit the conversions become second nature and its not really a problem. If you want metric, fly european. Even then the aviation industry is littered with inconsistancies. ATC depends where in the world you are. When I did my JAR exams they were littered with inconsistancies. You gotta learn to live with it.
There are no limits
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shrewsbury, England.
Age: 67
Posts: 505
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On the Islander Aircraft I used to fly we had a mixture of cockpit indications including
Torque - foot/pounds
Fuel quantity - US Gallons
Fuel Flow - pounds per hour
TGT - degrees C
N1 - percent
pressure - bars and psi
As the man said - learn 'em all!
Torque - foot/pounds
Fuel quantity - US Gallons
Fuel Flow - pounds per hour
TGT - degrees C
N1 - percent
pressure - bars and psi
As the man said - learn 'em all!
Mine prefers pounds.....
To quote the great (but thankfully not yet late) Dr. Darrol Stinton...
You'll meet many and various unitary systems around flying machines (or engineering in general), nobody is going to have any sympathy for you if you don't know them. The only thing to do is roll your sleeves up and learn 'em - whatever you grew up with.
Like you I grew up in SI units, but regularly fly in Imperial. On the other hand I gave a lecture at Embry Riddle (an American aeronautical university) earlier this year and did the whole thing in SI - you should have seen the students panic, they'd never seen a Pascal before !
G
Who has been known to do aircraft weight and balance in kgf. inches
In the meantime I own one aircraft where everything on the engine is in metric, and on the airframe in imperial.
Be ambidextrous in your units.
Like you I grew up in SI units, but regularly fly in Imperial. On the other hand I gave a lecture at Embry Riddle (an American aeronautical university) earlier this year and did the whole thing in SI - you should have seen the students panic, they'd never seen a Pascal before !
G
Who has been known to do aircraft weight and balance in kgf. inches
In the meantime I own one aircraft where everything on the engine is in metric, and on the airframe in imperial.
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
An example only to add weight to the 'know both' theme:
I moved from flying Lynx to (UK) Apache. The Lynx was a Westlands frame designed in metric with Rolls-Royce engines in imperial. The Apache, on the other hand is an entirely imperial airframe design with newer Rolls Royce engines in... you guessed it -metric!
I too was entirely educated in SI units. You just get used to it; the ability to do mental arithmentic is a pretty fundamental pilot skill anyway!
PP
I moved from flying Lynx to (UK) Apache. The Lynx was a Westlands frame designed in metric with Rolls-Royce engines in imperial. The Apache, on the other hand is an entirely imperial airframe design with newer Rolls Royce engines in... you guessed it -metric!
I too was entirely educated in SI units. You just get used to it; the ability to do mental arithmentic is a pretty fundamental pilot skill anyway!
PP
Just think if we were being paid in the old currency....Shillings, and such? That would add yet another layer of confusion to this.
But more importantly....is my "dram" an Ounce, a Gill, or some awkward EU measure now? Actually...I prefer quarts when applied to that lovely Scottish nectar.
But more importantly....is my "dram" an Ounce, a Gill, or some awkward EU measure now? Actually...I prefer quarts when applied to that lovely Scottish nectar.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hello,
Q. Who else apart from the Americans still use imperial units?
A. Myanmar and Liberia Source
What if someone suggested (as I am now) that it is only out of stubborness and / or laziness that the Americans still use imperial units?
Afterall, the metric system is undoubtably more superior and efficient.
The amount of money it must cost various industries producing products with both systems...the amount of time it must take in schools teaching it...etc..etc.. Wasn't the Mars Rover demise a result of a Imperial / metric blunder?....I know of a story of a jet airliner that came a cropper to a similar lbs / kgs error.
While everyone who has replied in this thread so far has said,"Live with it!" I'm going to stick my neck out and say...
"When are the Americans (and world consumers) going to call for change? It makes no sense at all."
OK, so yes, as a pilot in today's day and age, I have to live with it. However, if people don't start putting pressure the folk who make the 'Imperial or Metric' decisions (i.e manufacturers, congress etc...) the farce (mixed systems) will continue.
At the end of the day, imperial units are all referenced from SI units anyway. Why bother with the extra step?
That's all.
cl12pv2s
Q. Who else apart from the Americans still use imperial units?
A. Myanmar and Liberia Source
What if someone suggested (as I am now) that it is only out of stubborness and / or laziness that the Americans still use imperial units?
Afterall, the metric system is undoubtably more superior and efficient.
The amount of money it must cost various industries producing products with both systems...the amount of time it must take in schools teaching it...etc..etc.. Wasn't the Mars Rover demise a result of a Imperial / metric blunder?....I know of a story of a jet airliner that came a cropper to a similar lbs / kgs error.
While everyone who has replied in this thread so far has said,"Live with it!" I'm going to stick my neck out and say...
"When are the Americans (and world consumers) going to call for change? It makes no sense at all."
OK, so yes, as a pilot in today's day and age, I have to live with it. However, if people don't start putting pressure the folk who make the 'Imperial or Metric' decisions (i.e manufacturers, congress etc...) the farce (mixed systems) will continue.
At the end of the day, imperial units are all referenced from SI units anyway. Why bother with the extra step?
That's all.
cl12pv2s
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, the Americans are stubbon and 'never listen to anything that is not American' so don't expect them to change to a system which is obviously better. The metric system is a far more useable and produces less errors that the American system.
I deal alot with the USA and their system is awfull but they won't change so get use to it. They are arogant and have a huge industy so why should thet change?
I deal alot with the USA and their system is awfull but they won't change so get use to it. They are arogant and have a huge industy so why should thet change?
Afterall, the metric system is undoubtably more superior and efficient.
The fact is that foot-pound-second is a perfectly rational system of units that works just as well and consistently as kg-m-s.
The world is effectively divided into two - those using the old Imperial system, and those using SI, whilst in reality both use lots of bastardised units like kgf or cm that confuse the issue. Personally I think that everybody should learn both.
The arrogance of Americans thinking they don't need to learn SI, and Europeans who think that Imperial is obsolete and can be ignored does nobody any good. Just be thankful that for the first time in human history there are only two major systems to learn - 200 years ago every country had it's own, often every town or every factory.
G
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Arrogance...! We gave them imperial measurments, their whole industry (which is pretty big) runs in imperial. Why on earth would they want to give that up because the europeans adopted some re-jigged french/german system? Even us brits don't enter into the spirit wholeheartedly - who for example works out their car petrol consumption in Ltrs/100 km ?
Avoid imitations
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,583
Received 441 Likes
on
233 Posts
Apart from refuelling conversions from pounds / litres / gallons / US gallons (obviously vital to get correct), from a piloting point of view just call all units "bananas", as they may as well be.
Having said that, in UK I ride a motorcycle that has kph rather than mph on the speedometer but I know the conversion figures to avoid the dreaded camera flash.
Having said that, in UK I ride a motorcycle that has kph rather than mph on the speedometer but I know the conversion figures to avoid the dreaded camera flash.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Australia
Age: 47
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Billywizz wrote
"Bellytank
surely you mean inches per second, its what you do with it that counts!"
your correct BILLY!!..i can't figure out what to do between 8-10 inches!!...there is some real torque effect happening between that range!!!...and the fuel consumption really goes through the roof!!........
getting back to the subject.....yes i do use all units...( of my brain) to work calculations..as you all do as well....LB...KG...LITRES...GALLONS...INCHES...%...I should have been a mathematician...then again i would have made too much money doing that job!!!.....
"Bellytank
surely you mean inches per second, its what you do with it that counts!"
your correct BILLY!!..i can't figure out what to do between 8-10 inches!!...there is some real torque effect happening between that range!!!...and the fuel consumption really goes through the roof!!........
getting back to the subject.....yes i do use all units...( of my brain) to work calculations..as you all do as well....LB...KG...LITRES...GALLONS...INCHES...%...I should have been a mathematician...then again i would have made too much money doing that job!!!.....
head turner....Arrogant ? The Americans....I would suggest you give us too much credit....after all one cannot expect much out of a race of people that tried to make salt-water tea.
But then I drive my American made pickup truck...do mechanical things with my American made tools on American made products...and thus I have no problem dealing in American units....until I work on my Kubota farm tractor...then I buy American made metric tools and buy American made parts (filters...etc...) being Japanese made....it has not needed any parts yet.
Thus, I fail to see the big deal....all my torque wrenches are marked in American units...as are my tech manuals thus no conversions needed.
But then.....being the big boy on the block when it comes to building things....I guess we can get away with it. That is not being arrogant....just realistic.
But then I drive my American made pickup truck...do mechanical things with my American made tools on American made products...and thus I have no problem dealing in American units....until I work on my Kubota farm tractor...then I buy American made metric tools and buy American made parts (filters...etc...) being Japanese made....it has not needed any parts yet.
Thus, I fail to see the big deal....all my torque wrenches are marked in American units...as are my tech manuals thus no conversions needed.
But then.....being the big boy on the block when it comes to building things....I guess we can get away with it. That is not being arrogant....just realistic.
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Here there and everywhere !
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
... engineers ?
... this could all explain why, ( in a non-aviation industry ) as an apprenctice many years ago, I was asked to go the the stores for a 12 inch metric ruler, a left handed screwdriver, and a sack of 2 ounce sparks for the grinding machine.....
The storekeeper was obviously ex RAF 'cos he knew exactly what I wanted and sent me back with them all
The storekeeper was obviously ex RAF 'cos he knew exactly what I wanted and sent me back with them all