Flight Training Europe -v- OAT
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: wakefield
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Flight Training Europe -v- OAT
I'm considering undertaking the intergrated CPL/IR at Jerez, but just wondered if anyone had any positive/negative comments on the course structure, instructors, etc... Oxford is the alternative and, again, any feed back would be greatly appreciated.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: In the year 3000
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dude the best thing you can do is to search for the OAT & FTE threads and read them. Also visit the schools.
Trust me! this is a debate you don't want to start again
I am personally starting @ Jerez as part of the Tfly/FTE scheme soon
Trust me! this is a debate you don't want to start again
I am personally starting @ Jerez as part of the Tfly/FTE scheme soon
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Im not condoning this non-searching behaviour, but as I too am currently pondering this question I'll just give you my thoughts.
Some pro's and con's of both:
+ IR done in the UK at Oxford
+ MCC+JOC done in a 737classic sim at oxford
- Oxford costs about £10k more then FTE
-/+ OATs recently purchased by another company, this could cause some changes, not sure whether this is positive or negative tho
+ at FTE you get to spend a year in Spain! and it is cheap and easy to come bk to the UK for a weekend or so when you are feelin a bit pressured by everything, costs a bit more to pop bk from pheonix for the weekend!!
+ FTE is linked with GAPAN, the only flight school that is.
+ FTE is where BA used to conduct their sponsorship scheme and I believe still conduct MCC training.
- OATs grads come out with the "oxford complex".....
+ At FTE you will be flying the same fleet at the same airport for the whole time, no getting used to different aerodromes and different fleets
I have many more, and some may disagree with the points I've listed, but I'm cooking my lunch...and as others will tell you...do your own research!!
Some pro's and con's of both:
+ IR done in the UK at Oxford
+ MCC+JOC done in a 737classic sim at oxford
- Oxford costs about £10k more then FTE
-/+ OATs recently purchased by another company, this could cause some changes, not sure whether this is positive or negative tho
+ at FTE you get to spend a year in Spain! and it is cheap and easy to come bk to the UK for a weekend or so when you are feelin a bit pressured by everything, costs a bit more to pop bk from pheonix for the weekend!!
+ FTE is linked with GAPAN, the only flight school that is.
+ FTE is where BA used to conduct their sponsorship scheme and I believe still conduct MCC training.
- OATs grads come out with the "oxford complex".....
+ At FTE you will be flying the same fleet at the same airport for the whole time, no getting used to different aerodromes and different fleets
I have many more, and some may disagree with the points I've listed, but I'm cooking my lunch...and as others will tell you...do your own research!!
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I sooo hope that is true!
Personally I'd rather go to FTE, it just seems like it has a better vibe to it.
Actually I'd rather go to CTC, but failing that FTE is my first choice for flight schools. I'm still waiting on an assessment date, must be a very popular place!
Personally I'd rather go to FTE, it just seems like it has a better vibe to it.
Actually I'd rather go to CTC, but failing that FTE is my first choice for flight schools. I'm still waiting on an assessment date, must be a very popular place!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Surrey
Age: 43
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A lot of those negatives against OAT just aren't true in my opinion.
Visit each school and see what you think. I think the main bonus of OAT is that you get all of the groundschool finished before you start flight training. This is a big plus in my book. I wanted to actually enjoy my flying and not have to be worrying about exams.
I see spending a year in Spain as a negative for FTE, but that is just an opinion because I don't like the country. I would far rather spend 5 months in Arizona and enjoy the US (have some amazing memories of this, especially road-trips with all your mates to LA, Vegas and the Grand Canyon)
OAT was also used by BA for their sponsorship schemes when it was running so that isn't just a plus for FTE. I also don't think that everyone who comes out of Oxford has a complex about them. Nearly everyone on my course has a job and its 3 months after graduating!
The problem is that no one was been to both schools and so they can't comment! However, I have a number of friends who went to OAT and then went to Jerex for the BA JOC and they all agreed that OAT was the better establishment.
Visit each school and see what you think. I think the main bonus of OAT is that you get all of the groundschool finished before you start flight training. This is a big plus in my book. I wanted to actually enjoy my flying and not have to be worrying about exams.
I see spending a year in Spain as a negative for FTE, but that is just an opinion because I don't like the country. I would far rather spend 5 months in Arizona and enjoy the US (have some amazing memories of this, especially road-trips with all your mates to LA, Vegas and the Grand Canyon)
OAT was also used by BA for their sponsorship schemes when it was running so that isn't just a plus for FTE. I also don't think that everyone who comes out of Oxford has a complex about them. Nearly everyone on my course has a job and its 3 months after graduating!
The problem is that no one was been to both schools and so they can't comment! However, I have a number of friends who went to OAT and then went to Jerex for the BA JOC and they all agreed that OAT was the better establishment.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: York
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi there
I agree with some of the stuff from Blinkz and EZYramper. Personally I would go to FTE, spend less money and have the same job prospects at the end - I also have some friends at Oxford and they stated that a lot of the job success stories are from people who made the effort in gaining employment for themselves (rather than benefitting from a job introduction). With regards to another comment - people getting into BA and doing the JOC at Jerez say Oxford is better, they would say that and is only fair to way this up against those from FTE getting into BA, who would probably say FTE is better (or maybe not so, but have 10 grand or so less debt).
Also if you go to Oxford it is more than likely the class sizes will approach 24, where as at FTE the equivalent is 12. This impacts the resources available, planes etc.
You can only make your mind up for yourself but it would also be useful to do some research on some old threads.
I agree with some of the stuff from Blinkz and EZYramper. Personally I would go to FTE, spend less money and have the same job prospects at the end - I also have some friends at Oxford and they stated that a lot of the job success stories are from people who made the effort in gaining employment for themselves (rather than benefitting from a job introduction). With regards to another comment - people getting into BA and doing the JOC at Jerez say Oxford is better, they would say that and is only fair to way this up against those from FTE getting into BA, who would probably say FTE is better (or maybe not so, but have 10 grand or so less debt).
Also if you go to Oxford it is more than likely the class sizes will approach 24, where as at FTE the equivalent is 12. This impacts the resources available, planes etc.
You can only make your mind up for yourself but it would also be useful to do some research on some old threads.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: wakefield
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the info!
I think I'm leaning towards Jerez, but I'll visit them both and see how I feel once I've had time to digest it all.
I just hope it's all worth it and I get a job at the end of it.
I think I'm leaning towards Jerez, but I'll visit them both and see how I feel once I've had time to digest it all.
I just hope it's all worth it and I get a job at the end of it.
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Surrey
Age: 43
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
bananaman, the point of my comment about the OAT BA people wasn't to do with the fact that they were happy that they had got BA. Like you said FTE also have an excellent reputation with BA. My point was that these are the few people that have experienced both the FTE and OAT schools. And having experienced both they said they preferred OAT.
It all comes down to preference. Yes you do save money at FTE, however also remember that you get another 20hrs in a 737 at OAT, which isn't cheap. I found the JOC extremely useful and has prepared me well for sim checks.
If you want to spend a year in spain, but mix exams and flying then FTE is your place. If you want to get all of the groundschool out of the way (and trust me thats a good thing!!) and then have an amazing time flying in the US then OAT is your school.
Either way its a gamble, don't go to either schools expecting to walk into a job as 9/10 that isn't going to happen. Good luck with your career
It all comes down to preference. Yes you do save money at FTE, however also remember that you get another 20hrs in a 737 at OAT, which isn't cheap. I found the JOC extremely useful and has prepared me well for sim checks.
If you want to spend a year in spain, but mix exams and flying then FTE is your place. If you want to get all of the groundschool out of the way (and trust me thats a good thing!!) and then have an amazing time flying in the US then OAT is your school.
Either way its a gamble, don't go to either schools expecting to walk into a job as 9/10 that isn't going to happen. Good luck with your career
Join Date: May 2007
Location: In the year 3000
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One thing the starter of this thread must take note off is that you are not going to get an unbiased opinion here.
Do your own research, find out the good the bad, hype, spin, marketing etc and form your own opinion. Prune is a good place to start and the search function is good!
Originally integrated was meant to be like this (mixing flying with gs) but then OAT changed things so really OAT is modular 
Thread Closed right mod?
Do your own research, find out the good the bad, hype, spin, marketing etc and form your own opinion. Prune is a good place to start and the search function is good!
If you want to spend a year in spain, but mix exams and flying then FTE is your place.
Thread Closed right mod?
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I believe that a flying school can actually do bugger all to land you a job, its all down to you. So any FTO that says that they can get you a job, or "enhance" your employment prospects by choosing them; Is clearly bullshi*ing.
I graduated from an integrated school and within 2 weeks had an interview, passed and have now just signed a contract to fly A320's. 3 others on my course have done the same. Of the remaining 8, 4 have interviews lined up shortly thanks to the recommendation system in place at the school. At "the other" integrated school, I believe that the course who graduated at the same time as me has seen almost a 100% employment record.
Now, before you jump on me... the jobs come as a result of your success in the airline selection process the entry to which was secured by the school together with your performance. The school never promised me a job when I started my training. I do however have little doubt that I would not be in the position I am in now without their help. In fact I know I wouldn't. They opened the proverbial door and I managed to crawl through it.
At the same time I would caution all those starting their training now to guard against relying on the recommendations system - and part of me thinks that I was foolish to risk so much (a second mortgage on my parents house), and extremely lucky to have got away with it. It seems to me that a lot of the recommendations are down to how you got on with certain staff members... the general consensus being that if you keep your head down, don't cause any trouble and perform reasonably well you will probably get an interview or two. If you mess that up, then you are on your own.
V2
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have to agree with V2 on two counts. The school you go to plays a vital role first because you can't get a job without the training and all wannabes consider this when choosing the school best for them. I think even the most cynical ones on this thread would agree or else, they wouldn't put so much effort into finding the school that is right for them. They could just choose the cheapest or the one closest to their home or whatever. Don't tell me none of you ever ask what the graduate job success looks like when you visit FTOs! When wannabes quit asking this question, FTOs will quit publishing the results.
FTOs are are an easy place for an airline to find high quality low hour pilots. The fact that most airlines chose integrated schools when they did sponsorship programmes still carries weight today without airline scholarships as they still hire in large numbers from their previous training partners. BA sponsorship was provided by FTE and OAT and guess where BA get most of their low hour hires from today? BMI used OAT and have taken some 25 grads from them this year. Who did Aer Lingus go to when they started hiring again, their old sponsored training provider. The fact applies mostly to integrated schools as that is where most sponsorship was, but CTC has done well by adopting certain characteristics of integrated courses for their heretofore modular offering. Now even they appear to be going integrated. You can ignore this and still do well if you are a decent chap and get good results, but don't slag off others who notice this trend and decide to hedge their bets, as they have to make the int vs mod decision befor ethey ahve any results. It's horses for courses and this thread is about two integrated schools, not mod vs. int.
I also agree with his last paragraph, but would add that getting on in an organization by not rocking the boat too much is a skill needed as an employee, not just a student. I believe in using silver bullets sparingly and generally only when there is a werewolf around. In other words, don't whine over petty stuff, save your chits for safety related matters or serious ethical breaches and don't spend them complaining about the food in the canteen because no canteen ever has good food,
FTOs are are an easy place for an airline to find high quality low hour pilots. The fact that most airlines chose integrated schools when they did sponsorship programmes still carries weight today without airline scholarships as they still hire in large numbers from their previous training partners. BA sponsorship was provided by FTE and OAT and guess where BA get most of their low hour hires from today? BMI used OAT and have taken some 25 grads from them this year. Who did Aer Lingus go to when they started hiring again, their old sponsored training provider. The fact applies mostly to integrated schools as that is where most sponsorship was, but CTC has done well by adopting certain characteristics of integrated courses for their heretofore modular offering. Now even they appear to be going integrated. You can ignore this and still do well if you are a decent chap and get good results, but don't slag off others who notice this trend and decide to hedge their bets, as they have to make the int vs mod decision befor ethey ahve any results. It's horses for courses and this thread is about two integrated schools, not mod vs. int.
I also agree with his last paragraph, but would add that getting on in an organization by not rocking the boat too much is a skill needed as an employee, not just a student. I believe in using silver bullets sparingly and generally only when there is a werewolf around. In other words, don't whine over petty stuff, save your chits for safety related matters or serious ethical breaches and don't spend them complaining about the food in the canteen because no canteen ever has good food,
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: scotland
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just wanted to add to the pros of Oxford:
You remain in the UK for most of the course, so it is of course very easy to drive, get public transport home.
Phoenix is supposed to be fun. By that you should have made enough friends to enjoy yourself out there in the US. You probably wont have time to feel home sick! Plus the distance may force you to concentrate without the distractions of returning home at the weekend. My friends say they would love to visit Phoenix if I go with OAT.
Every aerodrome you go to, the locals will be speaking English Plus if you become a commercial pilot, be prepared to visit lots of different airports, you wont take off at LHR, circle and then land!
Its preety unfair to use the example of BA's sponsorship students training at FTE as a pro, as I believe they were also sent to Oxford and others. Furthermore in 2005/06 OAT's BA self sponsored students made up 56% of the F/Os ssps at BA. Also bear in mind that Willie Walsh (BA CEO visited Oxfords ball and trained there when he went to become a pilot with Willie Walsh). OAT also produced the youngest captain for GB, however FTE are used by GB for SSP.
OATs employment stats are open and very impressive. BA peaked in 2005, recruiting 35 grads. 27 in 06, and 20 so far this year.
There is skills protection with OAT and you dont start paying until 6 moths after.
You have to pay for OATs skill selection but not with Jerez, possibly because they wouldnt have anyone visiting them if you had to pay with free flights+taxes and charges, food costs and overnight accomodation??
There seems more self sponsorship schemes associated with FTE.
GAPAN have also sent students to a flying school in Europe!
Im not trying to put either flying school down. This is just my honest opinion of what i have researched, and have not started and flying school yet. I felt the Oxford environment to be a place I could really study. I have had dealings with FTE and I must say there courses too seemed very competitive, impressive and the campus seems really nice.
You remain in the UK for most of the course, so it is of course very easy to drive, get public transport home.
Phoenix is supposed to be fun. By that you should have made enough friends to enjoy yourself out there in the US. You probably wont have time to feel home sick! Plus the distance may force you to concentrate without the distractions of returning home at the weekend. My friends say they would love to visit Phoenix if I go with OAT.
Every aerodrome you go to, the locals will be speaking English Plus if you become a commercial pilot, be prepared to visit lots of different airports, you wont take off at LHR, circle and then land!
Its preety unfair to use the example of BA's sponsorship students training at FTE as a pro, as I believe they were also sent to Oxford and others. Furthermore in 2005/06 OAT's BA self sponsored students made up 56% of the F/Os ssps at BA. Also bear in mind that Willie Walsh (BA CEO visited Oxfords ball and trained there when he went to become a pilot with Willie Walsh). OAT also produced the youngest captain for GB, however FTE are used by GB for SSP.
OATs employment stats are open and very impressive. BA peaked in 2005, recruiting 35 grads. 27 in 06, and 20 so far this year.
There is skills protection with OAT and you dont start paying until 6 moths after.
You have to pay for OATs skill selection but not with Jerez, possibly because they wouldnt have anyone visiting them if you had to pay with free flights+taxes and charges, food costs and overnight accomodation??
There seems more self sponsorship schemes associated with FTE.
GAPAN have also sent students to a flying school in Europe!
Im not trying to put either flying school down. This is just my honest opinion of what i have researched, and have not started and flying school yet. I felt the Oxford environment to be a place I could really study. I have had dealings with FTE and I must say there courses too seemed very competitive, impressive and the campus seems really nice.