Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Advice on buying a aircraft

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Advice on buying a aircraft

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Jun 2012, 14:29
  #21 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: stoke on trent england
Age: 49
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pilot dar
Wise words thanks!
aerofoil1 is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2012, 14:42
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Iraq and other places
Posts: 1,113
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
How about $50,000 purchase budget and $1000 a month for a C172 or C177 in the USA...?
Katamarino is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2012, 15:33
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Age: 52
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It always seems to me that people make up a budget beforehand that they then make the plane fit. And that's where the disappointments come.

Airplanes that are for most parts 30 years or older, don't really behave exactly predictable. Also, more often than not, if a plane is for sale it means the previous owner hasn't been flying it as much as he should and it's been sitting etc. Planes break down when they don't fly. They need to be flown regularly, which is why I've always advocated not to shy away from higher time airplanes.

When I bought my plane a wise man said "you're going to end up spending as much as you did buying her the first year just to work out all the gremlins". I laughed. Of course not. Impossible. What a madman!

A year later that was exactly, to the dollar, what it ended up being.

But since then, in over 70hrs, there basically hasn't been a single squawk. I've done at least three plus 1000nm cross countries in adverse conditions, one over 3000nm. Nothing - she's been behaving flawlessly. I know it won't last, but for every hour I fly that initial spending gets diluted.

My point is, don't do budgets. They won't work. Buy the plane, make sure you have as much as you bought it for on top to sort everything else out in the beginning and iron out kinks. Then pay and play it by ear as you go along.

For a big twin I pay $92/month in tie down. I pay $2000/year for insurance. Those are my only two fixed costs.

Last edited by AdamFrisch; 29th Jun 2012 at 15:37.
AdamFrisch is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2012, 15:50
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My point is, don't do budgets. They won't work. Buy the plane, make sure you have as much as you bought it for on top to sort everything else out in the beginning and iron out kinks. Then pay and play it by ear as you go along.
I would not agree in the general case of UK GA, where most pilots are severely budget-limited.

Especially this chap who is not going to get more than a high-end windsurfing kite for the £13k.

13k is way too low for outright ownership of anything other than absolutely rock bottom stuff e.g.



whose bird pulling power is going to be somewhere below zero - as evidenced by this
hilarious book hilarious book


At 13k I would look for shares, or knock some like minded heads together and form a syndicate around something that can go places. This chap talks of going abroad; you need something reasonable...
peterh337 is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2012, 16:14
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: The frozen north....
Age: 49
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Is it just me or does that look quite fun?
Unusual Attitude is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2012, 16:14
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Age: 52
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Peter, you bought a new plane and there a budget makes much more sense as you start, supposedly, from a squawk free, zero time platform. But a 30-50 year old plane with journeyman maintenance is very hard to budget.

I think the questions to be asked are: Can I afford to buy this plane? Can I set aside at least as much as I bought it for, for maintenance the first year? In that case, I think it's viable. So this gentleman should buy the aircraft for £13K, but make sure he has another £13K either saved up, or readily accessible over the next 6 months.
AdamFrisch is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2012, 16:17
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Iraq and other places
Posts: 1,113
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I think you're being a little simplistic, Adam. Every aircraft is different; not all are going to be in such poor shape that you need to pour your purchase price into it again. An old, thirsty twin is rather a special case compared to something like a run-of-the-mill C172 that has been well cared for. You just have to do your pre-buy checks carefully.
Katamarino is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2012, 16:22
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Age: 52
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My point was - if it's well cared for, you won't get it for £13K. If it's not, then you'll have to spend it as you go along. You either pay up front, or later, with airplanes. There are no real shortcuts or "good deals" to be had with them. You'll end up paying one way or the other.

Last edited by AdamFrisch; 29th Jun 2012 at 16:27.
AdamFrisch is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2012, 16:28
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Iraq and other places
Posts: 1,113
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
This we can certainly agree on!
Katamarino is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2012, 17:26
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 18nm NE grice 28ft up
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote "Unusual Attitude Is it just me or does that look quite fun? "

It's just you! I know your taste!

Just the job to take the family abroad for the weekend.

D.O.

Last edited by dont overfil; 29th Jun 2012 at 17:28.
dont overfil is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2012, 18:38
  #31 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,217
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
A question to ask yourself - how often do you expect, really, to fly with the family?

An enjoyable 2-seater on a permit, such as the Luscombe above - or many other possibilities - will for most of us give many hours of inexpensive and enjoyable solo or 2-up flying, then hire something like a C172 for the half dozen hours per year you'll find you actually want a 4-seater.

I would also however agree with those saying "go for a share". Owning around a sixth or eighth share will massively cut your risk and fixed outgoings, and if anything increase the availability compared to spending a lot of your free time looking after a sole-owned asset.

G

(Owned shares from half to twentieth in 7 aeroplanes, over about 20 years.)
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2012, 19:19
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Age: 52
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Am I the only one incapable of distinguishing between Luscombe's and Cessna 120/140's?
AdamFrisch is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2012, 09:45
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scotland
Age: 84
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Crash one
I think your attitude to those who maintain C of A aircraft requires a little adjustment, it is not a case of simply throwing your cheque book after the aircraft and being ripped off as your post suggests.

The fact is that no one in the GA maintenance world is making much money (except the CAA) by the time the overheads are covered and the cost of having someone maintain your aircraft be it permit or C of A will be the same for the labour if you are getting a skilled service.
A&C
I am not suggesting that they are all a rip off. Nor did I suggest that it is the org that gets the money. I am well aware that a piece of paper can cost ££££, & CofA approval etc.
What I am suggesting is that the CofA system is far more expensive than the permit system for the same result. I am an engineer (toolmaker) not an aeromech, but I "understand" & will not believe that aeroengineering is any more difficult than "my" kind. The CAA charging vast sums of money to "certify" everything & everybody does not make the actual work carried out any better.
Crash one is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2012, 10:56
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: lancs.UK
Age: 77
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
like what Ghengis said........ there's a nice-looking Avid on fleabay, right now.

folding wings, trailer, water-cooled Rotax, ground-adjustable prop.....etc.

Take it home, bung it in the garage. realistically, 1 hour to reassemble and pre-flight once you get to your aerodrome.

all sounds good to me and would leave a healthy margin for 4-seater rental.

(and who's to say the rest of the family would want to accompany you?- been there with the boating job, good thing it was small/light enough for solo use! )
cockney steve is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2012, 11:03
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One may not fly with "the family" often but flying with others massively enhances the enjoyment of flying.
peterh337 is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2012, 13:28
  #36 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,615
Received 60 Likes on 43 Posts
What I am suggesting is that the CofA system is far more expensive than the permit system for the same result.
Crash One,

Though I see the point you are trying to make, the "result" is not the same...

Remind yourself that your C of A'd aircraft with the G on the side, is entitled by ICAO agreement to fly just about anywhere on earth. Now I understand that this international recognition is of greatly reduced interest to many "permit" type aircraft owners, and that IS the distinction that everyone needs to be aware of.

I'm sure that from the UK, reaching many other nations in a GA aircraft is a practical possibility. Here in Canada, for 99% of GA aircraft its Canada, USA, and for a few, some Carribean islands, or Central America. Thus, in Canada, many aircraft owners (with eligible types) will surrender their C of A for a flight permit, and a more simple "system". In Canada, it's called "Owner Maintenance". I have one of my two aircraft entering this category now. But doing so strips it's international acceptance, and I have no expectation this aircraft will ever be welcomed into another nation.

That is simply because that other nation has no idea to what standard that aircraft is maintained, and has no international obligation to accept it. When you maintain an aircraft within the ICAO system, you're paying for it (in layers of paperwork, and mandatory inspections), but you're retaining a privilage of international acceptance. It's up to the owner to understand the difference in systems....
Pilot DAR is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2012, 09:00
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scotland
Age: 84
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pilot Dar
I take your point ref same result. All I was saying is that you have an a/c that is acceptably serviceable under both systems depending on what you want to do with it. If the OP wants to fly as cheaply as possible then, as I stated in my first post, VFR daytime may be ok. I am sorry I did not mention UK airspace only. But if the OP wishes to investigate the LAA, it's aims, functions, restrictions etc then it may be enough for him. LAA Permit a/c are being accepted in parts of europe & the LAA are trying to improve on that. But I agree there are restrictions ref the rest of the world, public transport, aerial work etc.
I am also well aware that the paper pile has to weigh about the same as the a/c. Which is where most of the cost comes from.

Last edited by Crash one; 1st Jul 2012 at 09:05.
Crash one is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2012, 19:00
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Age: 85
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have owned three aircraft and owned them totally myself 'cos that's my way.
BUT...even if you can afford it I would recommend sharing the damn thing with another for moral support, there is nothing so lonely as trying to sort out aircraft things on your own. Someone to talk to, to discuss things with and to share decisions is worth a thousand words from others.
funfly is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2012, 22:40
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scotland
Age: 84
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have owned three aircraft and owned them totally myself 'cos that's my way.
BUT...even if you can afford it I would recommend sharing the damn thing with another for moral support, there is nothing so lonely as trying to sort out aircraft things on your own. Someone to talk to, to discuss things with and to share decisions is worth a thousand words from others.
I would certainly go along with that sentiment. When the thing backfired once & created a fire on the ground I was lucky enough at the time to be surrounded by people who let me know! Usually I am alone & at this time mine is the only aircraft on the strip. Start with the brakes off & move at least twice it's length immediately & turn to have a look, door locked open, not strapped in. I wouldn't like to share cos I like to go when it suits me, or leave it up on bricks US as long as I need to.
Crash one is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2012, 13:49
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Ecuador
Age: 45
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
*
Hi guys,
*
interesting thread, this!
Thought I´d give you guys my perspective, albeit from an entirely different country / situation!
*
I am member of a club, of which the mechanic is very knowleagable and helpful when it comes to repairs & advice with regards to spare parts etc. He must know all the US spare-part sites on the internet because he always finds the weirdest links to check valves, brake cilinders, adjustable prop parts, noise filters etc etc, you name it; and for decent prizes!
*
Being club members we do help each other sometimes when it comes to bringing stuff in from the U.S for instance; or even borrowing parts from each other when the one plane isn´t going anywhere, anyways! For instance, recently I lent my radiator to a fellow member, just for a 2 day trip.
We are all Rotax-powered, you see.........
*
I agree that it would be lonely to do it all “on my Todd” so to speak; I for one, greatly appreciate all the advice I can get!

Originally Posted by Silvaire1
Assuming no regulatory road blocks it is wonderful for everybody to have their very own aircraft and to work together to keep all of them flying and beautiful.

Good fences make good neighbors.
I agree with this wholeheartedly! At our club, we all have and run our own planes; why? Because it´s still SO affordable where we are!
I guess some people share larger Cessna´s etc here, but as far as the LSA go; they are all privately owned.
For US$ 2,- a US gallon of fuel you can still go places, and you can actually pick up an airframe and maintain it up to the authorities´ standards for not that much at all; relatively speaking.
And then the hundreds of little airfields we can choose from, but that is for another thread.
*
If your budget is an issue, (and I know mine would be, in the UK!!) by all means share!
Share the burden, share the headaches............and plan your trips well, considering* your fellow comrades` needs!
*
I personally love the fact that I own an aircraft! She´s my baby, the mechanic finished it all in my taste, I´m still taking plenty of pictures each trip, and I´m not done kitting her out completely just yet! (Slipper clutch is next on the list, for instance).
Are their better aircraft out there? Sure! But this one happens to be mine, it fulfills all my flying-needs and that gives me a satisfaction that I don´t think I would get renting or sharing.
*
If you can afford it........having your own plane is really a pretty cool thing!
*
Cheers from down South somewhere,
*
###Ultra Long Hauler###
Ultra long hauler is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.