IMC - letting down
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IMC - letting down to none IAP airfield
Hi all
I've recently passed my IMC skills test but have not yet used it.
This question relates to flying VMC on top or flying in IMC near your aerodrome, where sufficient cloud base is available for a visual approach but where flying higher gets you into smoother air (let's say, you are flying at FL55 with few clouds at 1500ft, broken at 2000ft).
One thing I remember reading in my book about travelling to an aerodrome without an approach was you can either descend over the sea (if possible) til clear of cloud, track to a beacon if one is nearby and checked the MSA there or use an approach at a nearby airport (ie ILS or NDB) til visual then breakaway.
My instructor wouldn't commit to answer as to which was right or wrong, but mentioned that an approach only has 2 realistic outcomes: that being a landing or a go-around, by which you have a missed approach procedure and would usually climb back into IMC or on top again.
So - would an option be to request an instrument let down, or request an IFR approach with a touch and go and then proceed VFR to your enroute aerodrome?
What do you do?
Many thanks
Lee
I've recently passed my IMC skills test but have not yet used it.
This question relates to flying VMC on top or flying in IMC near your aerodrome, where sufficient cloud base is available for a visual approach but where flying higher gets you into smoother air (let's say, you are flying at FL55 with few clouds at 1500ft, broken at 2000ft).
One thing I remember reading in my book about travelling to an aerodrome without an approach was you can either descend over the sea (if possible) til clear of cloud, track to a beacon if one is nearby and checked the MSA there or use an approach at a nearby airport (ie ILS or NDB) til visual then breakaway.
My instructor wouldn't commit to answer as to which was right or wrong, but mentioned that an approach only has 2 realistic outcomes: that being a landing or a go-around, by which you have a missed approach procedure and would usually climb back into IMC or on top again.
So - would an option be to request an instrument let down, or request an IFR approach with a touch and go and then proceed VFR to your enroute aerodrome?
What do you do?
Many thanks
Lee
Last edited by LeeP-PA28; 5th Aug 2011 at 16:18.
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: E Anglia
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why do you need a touch and go with your IFR approach?
What's wrong with descending to DA/DH or above if higher cloudbase then going around and proceeding VFR to your airfield?
I've asked a local base (RAF Lakenheath) for a RAS (as it was called then) to cloudbreak a couple of times over a particularly flat part of East Anglia but each time they were initially pretty unkeen and needed some persuading.
On one occasion I was all ready to go to Cambridge for an ILS letdown before LKH agreed.
What's wrong with descending to DA/DH or above if higher cloudbase then going around and proceeding VFR to your airfield?
I've asked a local base (RAF Lakenheath) for a RAS (as it was called then) to cloudbreak a couple of times over a particularly flat part of East Anglia but each time they were initially pretty unkeen and needed some persuading.
On one occasion I was all ready to go to Cambridge for an ILS letdown before LKH agreed.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks Cusco- that was my query.
Why do you need a T&G on an approach - surely an ILS or other IAP to DH and visual is sufficient - but how would one request that?
Why do you need a T&G on an approach - surely an ILS or other IAP to DH and visual is sufficient - but how would one request that?
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the boot of my car!
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Normally the military will give you a descent but not below the MSA or the base of their radar cover. They will normally add that you are responsible for your own terrain clearance.
With any cloud break OCAS the most important thing is to know where you are and about other aircraft that may be just below the cloud you aredescending through.
Military radar are good at confirming both.
With any approach don't trust one indication but cross check what you believe is correct.
Even on an ILS I know of some pilots who have flown dead needles so again check the ident and various distance points against glideslope altitudes and the app chart.
It depends if it's a high cloudbase way above the SSA then let down.
If it's tricky ask for an approach for a cloud break with a breakoff to fly visual to your destination.
That has the benefit that if you break out lower than you hoped you can ask to Land.
As with anything new to you don't take on more than you can handle
Pace
With any cloud break OCAS the most important thing is to know where you are and about other aircraft that may be just below the cloud you aredescending through.
Military radar are good at confirming both.
With any approach don't trust one indication but cross check what you believe is correct.
Even on an ILS I know of some pilots who have flown dead needles so again check the ident and various distance points against glideslope altitudes and the app chart.
It depends if it's a high cloudbase way above the SSA then let down.
If it's tricky ask for an approach for a cloud break with a breakoff to fly visual to your destination.
That has the benefit that if you break out lower than you hoped you can ask to Land.
As with anything new to you don't take on more than you can handle
Pace
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Northwest UK
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not sure if this is off topic but say if you enterd class D airspace VFR not above 1500ft and halfway to the aerodrome you become IMC due to cloud that you didnt forcast, Then you have Radar asking you to report field in sight.. What is the best thing to do?
I know they wouldnt vector you normally at the low altitude that you was cleared the VFR clearence.. 'at Liverpool below 1900ft'
I know they wouldnt vector you normally at the low altitude that you was cleared the VFR clearence.. 'at Liverpool below 1900ft'
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: UK
Age: 35
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not sure if this is off topic but say if you enterd class D airspace VFR not above 1500ft and halfway to the aerodrome you become IMC due to cloud that you didnt forcast, Then you have Radar asking you to report field in sight.. What is the best thing to do?
I know they wouldnt vector you normally at the low altitude that you was cleared the VFR clearence.. 'at Liverpool below 1900ft'
I know they wouldnt vector you normally at the low altitude that you was cleared the VFR clearence.. 'at Liverpool below 1900ft'
Alternatively you just request an IFR clearance to start with, if your licence allows of course.
My instructor wouldn't commit to answer as to which was right or wrong, but mentioned that an approach only has 2 realistic outcomes: that being a landing or a go-around, by which you have a missed approach procedure and would usually climb back into IMC or on top again.
Nothing wrong with coming down an ILS then once in visual conditions break off the procedure and continue VFR, just ensure ATC are aware of your requirements. I wonder what your instructor would do if he had to do a visual circle to land after an ILS when the airfield did not have an ILS on each end?
Be aware though that using an ILS generally incurs a fee payable to the provider.
Fly safe
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks bingofuel.
I'm sure he has, being ex commercial airliner, however I think that the breaking away once visual and either getting a VFR or SVFR clearance after the approach is at the discretion of ATC.
I've just telephoned by local airport and they cannot see a reason why they wouldn't allow it - just as much notice as possible is required.
My airfield has an NDB to which I can practise approaches on in the overhead on a clear day, which unofficially one could build an approach on to a safe height maintaining rule 5 and rule 29 of course based on VFR/IFR. I just wondered what other people did in reality if their destination has suitable weather for a VFR approach with no IAP present, but where the enroute sector was totally overcast and no holes to descend through
I'm sure he has, being ex commercial airliner, however I think that the breaking away once visual and either getting a VFR or SVFR clearance after the approach is at the discretion of ATC.
I've just telephoned by local airport and they cannot see a reason why they wouldn't allow it - just as much notice as possible is required.
My airfield has an NDB to which I can practise approaches on in the overhead on a clear day, which unofficially one could build an approach on to a safe height maintaining rule 5 and rule 29 of course based on VFR/IFR. I just wondered what other people did in reality if their destination has suitable weather for a VFR approach with no IAP present, but where the enroute sector was totally overcast and no holes to descend through
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: E Anglia
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why do you need a T&G on an approach - surely an ILS or other IAP to DH and visual is sufficient - but how would one request that?
'XXXX Approach, request low approach and go-around ILS RWY xx'
Then, when you land back at base phone up the ILS provider with your credit card details.
Last edited by Cusco; 5th Aug 2011 at 18:31.
Avoid imitations
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 415 Likes
on
218 Posts
IFR means you must maintain 1,000 feet above the nearest obstacle within 5nm of your track. There is absolutely nothing to prevent you from descending to the altitude you mentioned to clear cloud whilst still complying with IFR. Best to get a radar service although bear in mind that the controller will usually inform you that you remain responsible for your own terrain clearance at all times.
Obviously, you need to know your position at all times and plan in advance.
Obviously, you need to know your position at all times and plan in advance.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FWIW it is not illegal (therefore it is 100% legal) to descend below the MSA, in a G-reg, in UK airspace, for the purposes of a landing, on a DIY "instrument approach".
You are always open to the "reckless" clause in the ANO but AFAIK this has never been used in these cases.
For an N-reg it is illegal worldwide; FAR 91.175 refers.
In practice, people routinely descend over the sea, to get intoa coastal airport. Just be extra careful watching the altimeter And be really extra careful watching it at night If you have an autopilot with VS/ALT modes, use it to the full while monitoring things.
You are always open to the "reckless" clause in the ANO but AFAIK this has never been used in these cases.
For an N-reg it is illegal worldwide; FAR 91.175 refers.
In practice, people routinely descend over the sea, to get intoa coastal airport. Just be extra careful watching the altimeter
And be really extra careful watching it at night If you have an autopilot with VS/ALT modes, use it to the full while monitoring things.
I've only done my IMCR this year and my instructor was absolutely clear that the way to use it to get back to our VFR airfield if required (i.e. cloud base below MSA, otherwise, just get a traffic or deconfliction service for the descent through cloud) was to do an instrument approach into one of the local major airfields then break-off once clear of cloud and come home VFR. If you are worried about the 20 quid or whatever for the approach then I would suggest that you should probably not be airborne in such conditions!
Just to add a plug for the IMCR, I would encourage any UK pilot with a JAR PPL to get one in the last few months before it might disapear. I have had it only six months and have used some aspect of the skills or privileges nearly every time I have flown since getting it.
Just to add a plug for the IMCR, I would encourage any UK pilot with a JAR PPL to get one in the last few months before it might disapear. I have had it only six months and have used some aspect of the skills or privileges nearly every time I have flown since getting it.
IFR means you must maintain 1,000 feet above the nearest obstacle within 5nm of your track.
Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), an aircraft shall not fly at a height of less than 1,000
feet above the highest obstacle within a distance of 5 nautical miles of the aircraft
unless:
feet above the highest obstacle within a distance of 5 nautical miles of the aircraft
unless:
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: A long way from home
Age: 44
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Can't be arsed reading the whole thread, I'll just add an experience I had...
On a trip from London to York, it looked like it would be a much easier job to go on top of the clouds. However the destination airfield was just that - a field. A quick phone call to the nearby RAF base (Church Fenten IIRC) and they said something like "Normally we'd offer you an ILS and then you could divert once VMC, but it's U/S. How about SRA?" Since my knowledge of SRA is purely academic, I had to decline the offer, but it was good that the flexibility was there.
I think that most places are happy to help, it's just a question of communication.
On a trip from London to York, it looked like it would be a much easier job to go on top of the clouds. However the destination airfield was just that - a field. A quick phone call to the nearby RAF base (Church Fenten IIRC) and they said something like "Normally we'd offer you an ILS and then you could divert once VMC, but it's U/S. How about SRA?" Since my knowledge of SRA is purely academic, I had to decline the offer, but it was good that the flexibility was there.
I think that most places are happy to help, it's just a question of communication.
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: IRS NAV ONLY
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just to add to Whopity's post, the 5NM (or 8km) is the distance from aircraft's estimated position (at least according ICAO Annex 2), so actual navigation performance is taken into account.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Since my knowledge of SRA is purely academic
I'll second Gertrude's post. In my IMCR course, as well as NDB and ILS, I did one each SRA and PAR, (being based near a friendly RAF station helps get the PAR) and they were fine. It's a bit like in your early stage training when the instructor talks you around the circuit and down the approach, except that the person talking is looking at radar screen(s) instead of sitting next to you.
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oxford
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Indeed. If you think of an SRA as a talking non-precision approach (so once inside the FAF you descend not below the MDA, if you like you can do it all in one go and then fly level at the MDA), and the PAR as a talking ILS, it's a piece of cake.
For the PAR you will need to be able to maintain a 3deg descent, just like an ILS, monitoring airspeed - rate of descent - airspeed -rate of descent all the way down, and adjusting following what you hear instead of what you see on the ILS receiver.
Not only that, but your friendly local RAF station will monitor your decision height (usually by saying 'Procedure minimum for this approach is 200ft' and waiting for you to say 'Decision height for this approach will be 500ft, this approach will be to low approach and go-around' or whatever) and then tell you when you are 'Approaching decision height' and 'Passing decision height'. They'll do that for an ILS, too, as they will use the PAR equipment to monitor your approach. It's like a virtual co-pilot, and very handy.
The only downside is they will expect you to conduct approaches on QFE - which is a whole separate argument I don't want to kick off again! (Hence references to Height in the foregoing.)
Tim
For the PAR you will need to be able to maintain a 3deg descent, just like an ILS, monitoring airspeed - rate of descent - airspeed -rate of descent all the way down, and adjusting following what you hear instead of what you see on the ILS receiver.
Not only that, but your friendly local RAF station will monitor your decision height (usually by saying 'Procedure minimum for this approach is 200ft' and waiting for you to say 'Decision height for this approach will be 500ft, this approach will be to low approach and go-around' or whatever) and then tell you when you are 'Approaching decision height' and 'Passing decision height'. They'll do that for an ILS, too, as they will use the PAR equipment to monitor your approach. It's like a virtual co-pilot, and very handy.
The only downside is they will expect you to conduct approaches on QFE - which is a whole separate argument I don't want to kick off again! (Hence references to Height in the foregoing.)
Tim
...and those nice RAF ATCOs will ask you whether you have done your downwind checks and to confirm, every time around, that you have fixed gear. Very helpful but distracting when you're trying to learn to fly instrument approaches on a turbulent day with Chinooks and Pumas hurtling around underneath you.
Seriously, I am very grateful to RAF Benson's ATCOs.
Seriously, I am very grateful to RAF Benson's ATCOs.
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: England
Posts: 858
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why are so many people talking about ILS and PAR minima? Your MDA is the transit altitude to the base aerodrome or the circling minima for the cloud break approach (if your transit starts in the same direction as the circling approach). Why even do an approach?- a cloud break can be from any known position that either you or ATC can define accurately?