Fixed Wing to Rotary
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Dublin
Age: 34
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fixed Wing to Rotary
Hey guys.
Just a little question that I hope some of you more learned people could answer for me.
At the minute i'm studying for PPL exams however i'd also like to go for my PPL H at some time in the future.
The exams from what i can see are the same Air Law, Met, Nav, HF.
Is the material the same? Does having done your PPL exams mean you dont need to do the PPL H ones?
I read a maximum 6 hours fixed wing can go towards your rotary. Has this been changed?
And finally have any of you done both? Would you advise it? And have you any advice on the topic to give me.
Im planning on posting this in rotary section too to see if i can get more hits.
Thanks for reading all.
Just a little question that I hope some of you more learned people could answer for me.
At the minute i'm studying for PPL exams however i'd also like to go for my PPL H at some time in the future.
The exams from what i can see are the same Air Law, Met, Nav, HF.
Is the material the same? Does having done your PPL exams mean you dont need to do the PPL H ones?
I read a maximum 6 hours fixed wing can go towards your rotary. Has this been changed?
And finally have any of you done both? Would you advise it? And have you any advice on the topic to give me.
Im planning on posting this in rotary section too to see if i can get more hits.
Thanks for reading all.
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Age: 50
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IIRC, you only need to sit 2 exams for the PPL(H) - Gen Tech is one of them, not sure what the other is. I think the hours are reduced too if you already hold a PPL(A)
Hope that helps a little.
Hope that helps a little.
Angry palm trees be the devil's work.
LASORS Section C2.3 says that you get credit for Aviation Law & Operational Procedures, Navigation and Radio Aids, Meteorology, Human Performance & Limitations and JAR-FCL Communications. So that leaves Flight Planning and Principles of Flight (which for helicopters is known as Theory of Flight as it is unproven - all I know is that if the wings are going faster than the fuselage, it can't be safe).
LASORS Section C2.3 says that you get credit for Aviation Law & Operational Procedures, Navigation and Radio Aids, Meteorology, Human Performance & Limitations and JAR-FCL Communications. So that leaves Flight Planning and Principles of Flight (which for helicopters is known as Theory of Flight as it is unproven - all I know is that if the wings are going faster than the fuselage, it can't be safe).
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Dublin
Age: 34
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
cheers for the input guys, really appreciate the comments.
have both you got experience flying both?
im a bit of an enthusiast and want to get involved in everything.
have both you got experience flying both?
im a bit of an enthusiast and want to get involved in everything.
Moderator
Wilco,
Yes, I did my PPL(H) a few years back, after 30 years with a PPL(A), then did my CPL(A). CPL(H) is a ways off yet$$.
I can't speak with any knowledge about the UK rules, but In Canada, I got many hours of flying credit toward PPL(H) from PP(A), and only had to sit one 30 question differences exam for Helicopters.
Do your PPL(A) first, so you're not paying the big bucks to be airborne, just to learn which way is up - do that initial flying on something with a low hourly cost.
The two types of flying are surprizingly different, but both very worth learning well. Each will give you respect for the other! I went on to do advanced role training in MD500D's, and was amazed not only at what the helicopter could do, but what I could make it do with my modest skill!
I highly recommend training in Schweizer 300. My choice was not the R22 (I had flown both). After you have 20 hours fixed wing, go threat yourself to an hour in the S300. Ask to have an autorotation demonstrated to you. Fixed wing forced approaches will seem very gentle, with lots of time, after that!
Good luck!
Yes, I did my PPL(H) a few years back, after 30 years with a PPL(A), then did my CPL(A). CPL(H) is a ways off yet$$.
I can't speak with any knowledge about the UK rules, but In Canada, I got many hours of flying credit toward PPL(H) from PP(A), and only had to sit one 30 question differences exam for Helicopters.
Do your PPL(A) first, so you're not paying the big bucks to be airborne, just to learn which way is up - do that initial flying on something with a low hourly cost.
The two types of flying are surprizingly different, but both very worth learning well. Each will give you respect for the other! I went on to do advanced role training in MD500D's, and was amazed not only at what the helicopter could do, but what I could make it do with my modest skill!
I highly recommend training in Schweizer 300. My choice was not the R22 (I had flown both). After you have 20 hours fixed wing, go threat yourself to an hour in the S300. Ask to have an autorotation demonstrated to you. Fixed wing forced approaches will seem very gentle, with lots of time, after that!
Good luck!
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Age: 52
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Helicopters have a habit of biting you with the bug, real hard. After I'd done my PPL A, I got hooked so badly on helicopters I didn't ever want to fly fixed wing again. In fact, I let my PPL A lapse for that very reason - FW just didn't have the allure. Eventually an engine failure (and money) ended my training in H's and I never did do the skills test, even though I was close. And I've since rediscovered the joys of FW and the travel possibilities that it offers, something you can't do in helicopters.
I flew the H300 and like DAR said, they're really nice flying machines. Slow, a little bit dated, but very benign and built sturdy. They have a very forgiving skid that will absorb most abuse. And a gentle autorotation with plenty of rotor inertia compared to the R22. They also have the stick where it belongs - between your legs
Today my finances are better and I'm older and I will probably finish my PPL H after I've done my instrument at some point. I did go up for 2 hrs a couple of months ago and had a great time. Challenging hard work after nearly 16 years, but I could still hover!
I flew the H300 and like DAR said, they're really nice flying machines. Slow, a little bit dated, but very benign and built sturdy. They have a very forgiving skid that will absorb most abuse. And a gentle autorotation with plenty of rotor inertia compared to the R22. They also have the stick where it belongs - between your legs
Today my finances are better and I'm older and I will probably finish my PPL H after I've done my instrument at some point. I did go up for 2 hrs a couple of months ago and had a great time. Challenging hard work after nearly 16 years, but I could still hover!
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London UK
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
all I know is that if the wings are going faster than the fuselage, it can't be safe
Helicopters are fun! I learned on the R22 because it was the cheapest option, or so I was told. It was still about twice as expensive as fixed wing.
I also found that all those hours practicing hovers, etc improved my fixed wing landings a lot.
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: England & Scotland
Age: 63
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Funny how we see our machines as the "safe" option. Losing an engine, (not yet happened to me but I practice) I need something the size of a football penalty area with an approach angle of about 45 degrees to put her down safely. I have les than 20 knots fwd speed when I touch down.
I can also land on water, if no grass available.
I think that compares favourably in the survival stakes with greater gliding range but a shallow approach angle at higher touchdown speed, still needing a kilometre of flat grass.
Guess we each love what we do.
Wilcox - get your ticket then book into a heli-friendly hotel or restaurant for lunch with wife or girlfriend (don't take both, they usually don't get on). Lots of brownie points for that one!
John
I can also land on water, if no grass available.
I think that compares favourably in the survival stakes with greater gliding range but a shallow approach angle at higher touchdown speed, still needing a kilometre of flat grass.
Guess we each love what we do.
Wilcox - get your ticket then book into a heli-friendly hotel or restaurant for lunch with wife or girlfriend (don't take both, they usually don't get on). Lots of brownie points for that one!
John
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
JAFO your comments regarding those absurd whirly things made me laugh coffee through my nose.
I am going to use the 'Angry Palm Trees' line on my heli mad mate.
Hi-larious!
I am going to use the 'Angry Palm Trees' line on my heli mad mate.
Hi-larious!
Moderator
so ugly the earth repels it.
"A helicopter is a collection of vibrating parts all fatiguing at a different rate, over an oil spot".
I think all fixed wing pilots should have at least one lesson in a helicopter just to get an appreciation for just how different to fixed wing flying rotary flight actually is.
John R81: I don't know where you get the notion that a fixed wing needs 1000m of grass to land on. A lot of the strips I fly from and to are significantly shorter than that.
John R81: I don't know where you get the notion that a fixed wing needs 1000m of grass to land on. A lot of the strips I fly from and to are significantly shorter than that.
Hovering AND talking
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Propping up bars in the Lands of D H Lawrence and Bishop Bonner
Age: 59
Posts: 5,705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think all fixed wing pilots should have at least one lesson in a helicopter just to get an appreciation for just how different to fixed wing flying rotary flight actually is.
On a serious note, one aspect of which a fixed-wing pilot should be aware, is the responses required in an rotary emergency are the converse to those in a fixed-wing emergency. There has sadly been a few rotary accidents/fatalities involving a high-houred fixed-wing pilot but who only had recently passed a helicopter PPL. To that end, I would certainly advise having an instructor who flies both.
Cheers
Whirls
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Southern UK
Age: 63
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If trying to maximise benefit of the fixed wing experience prior to rotary get a tailwheel rating and some hours using it.
It nurtures the instinct of using your feet to nail heading and manage yaw rates which is quite a large part of helicopter slow speed handling.
2 cents
W
It nurtures the instinct of using your feet to nail heading and manage yaw rates which is quite a large part of helicopter slow speed handling.
2 cents
W
