Landing Fees - Value for Money ?.
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 2 m South of Radstock VRP
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Posted elsewhere, I found this in the remote regions of my logbook the other day;
I bet it's a bit more now, even allowing for inflation. It was a short stop, sufficient to remove some "water ballast" and refuel the aeroplane.
I bet it's a bit more now, even allowing for inflation. It was a short stop, sufficient to remove some "water ballast" and refuel the aeroplane.
niknak
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dave W.
I haven't read the article, but the NWI landing fees have been significantly reduced, instead of the flat fee of ££££ its now around £8.80 per half tonne + VAT.
Which is why we probably didn't get a pay rise this year....
I haven't read the article, but the NWI landing fees have been significantly reduced, instead of the flat fee of ££££ its now around £8.80 per half tonne + VAT.
Which is why we probably didn't get a pay rise this year....
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Norwich's bill for "yellow jacket staff" is probably around £1M, most of them clearly superfluous.
It has very few 'large' movements and plenty of opportunity for GA. Only a total mug manager would try to exclude GA traffic. Everything is a fixed cost (ATC, the yellow jackets, etc) and the more you can get towards paying those the better.
Also the security is way overdone. The terrorists are not going to target Norwich. You could blow up most of that part of the UK and few people would notice. The obvious targets are .... more obvious!
It has very few 'large' movements and plenty of opportunity for GA. Only a total mug manager would try to exclude GA traffic. Everything is a fixed cost (ATC, the yellow jackets, etc) and the more you can get towards paying those the better.
Also the security is way overdone. The terrorists are not going to target Norwich. You could blow up most of that part of the UK and few people would notice. The obvious targets are .... more obvious!
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Midlands
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Norwich appears to be an example of an arrogant regional airport which whacked up its fees, got shut of most GA and then found it had nothing to replace it. It has now reduced the fee to what appears to be a sensible level and had made noises that it wants us back. I have not read the Pilot article yet.
Rod1
Rod1
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Right here
Age: 50
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you need 2000m, full ILS and ATC etc then it is obviously going to cost.
You could just as well say: "Since you don't need all that stuff, you obviously shouldn't pay for it. But since it is impractical to build two dozen airfields right next to each other, with different runway lengths, IFR navaid levels, ATC services and differing landing fees, you get to use the full facilities for the cost of what you'd actually need."
That approach works perfectly well in other European countries, to everyone's benefit. It would work just as well in the UK.
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Midlands
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
“But since it is impractical to build two dozen airfields right next to each other,”
Have you looked at the number of small airfields / strips in the area? OK, not 24, but it is a significant amount of choice. I agree that landing fees for VFR traffic at regional airfields should be about £10, but if it is not you do have a choice other than pay, pay, pay.
Rod1
Have you looked at the number of small airfields / strips in the area? OK, not 24, but it is a significant amount of choice. I agree that landing fees for VFR traffic at regional airfields should be about £10, but if it is not you do have a choice other than pay, pay, pay.
Rod1
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I say again: if I were to propose a large hike in council tax, or a large cut in other services, so as to be able to subsidise a municipal airport, then guess what ... I'd lose my seat, and not be in a position to implement such a policy.
It's called "democracy". It's the UK voters who don't want to subsidise what they see as a rich man's hobby. One can only assume that voters in other countries take a different view.
It's called "democracy". It's the UK voters who don't want to subsidise what they see as a rich man's hobby. One can only assume that voters in other countries take a different view.
niknak
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IO540
As you well know, security levels are dictated by the Government not the airports, if the airports failed to implement them they face closure and very heavy fines.
The representitives of G/A in the UK have miserably failed to get anything done, indeed if they did anything to get around this problem which affects all airport staff, not just you.
Additionally, you're clearly ignorant of what goes on at NWI and your post is based purely on gossip and conjecture.
Red 1.
Much the same goes for you, if you've got something to say, make it factual, not a rumour you heard in the pub, put up or shut up.
As you well know, security levels are dictated by the Government not the airports, if the airports failed to implement them they face closure and very heavy fines.
The representitives of G/A in the UK have miserably failed to get anything done, indeed if they did anything to get around this problem which affects all airport staff, not just you.
Additionally, you're clearly ignorant of what goes on at NWI and your post is based purely on gossip and conjecture.
Red 1.
Much the same goes for you, if you've got something to say, make it factual, not a rumour you heard in the pub, put up or shut up.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Savannah GA & Portsmouth UK
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As you well know, security levels are dictated by the Government not the airports
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Yorkshire
Age: 50
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
it is fair enough
All these charges that we pay seem pretty good value for money. For £22 you can land your aircraft on a huge runway with fantastic fire cover. Much safer than if you land on a farm strip and pay nothing or a fiver.
I can see why your man at Norwich airport might say that he does not need our business. What they want is a 737 packed with passengers who will have a meal, buy drinks and spend money in the shops. Compare that with a 152 with instructor and student who want a cheap cup of tea, free biscuits and sit in a portacabin chatting to similar minded people.
I can see why your man at Norwich airport might say that he does not need our business. What they want is a 737 packed with passengers who will have a meal, buy drinks and spend money in the shops. Compare that with a 152 with instructor and student who want a cheap cup of tea, free biscuits and sit in a portacabin chatting to similar minded people.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Savannah GA & Portsmouth UK
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The original question was "Value for money?"
That's a subjective judgement on the part of the customer. A round of golf with a top professional for a hundred quid might be seen as excellent value by someone keen on golf, but not by me.
If you're selling goods you need to offer them at a price which your customers see as value for money or they won't buy.
Stelios knows the answer. He doesn't charge everyone the same price, he markets his product and sets his prices so he gets good load factors. Some people will have paid a lot and some a little for exactly the same product. If the airports were somehow able to take a leaf out of his book they could up their revenue. They know when the scheduled traffic is due in and out so why not fill in the gaps? Cardiff manage it, they got me in 15 minutes before Concorde! Can't remember how much it was, around 13 or 14 quid? In my book that was good value for money.
That's a subjective judgement on the part of the customer. A round of golf with a top professional for a hundred quid might be seen as excellent value by someone keen on golf, but not by me.
If you're selling goods you need to offer them at a price which your customers see as value for money or they won't buy.
Stelios knows the answer. He doesn't charge everyone the same price, he markets his product and sets his prices so he gets good load factors. Some people will have paid a lot and some a little for exactly the same product. If the airports were somehow able to take a leaf out of his book they could up their revenue. They know when the scheduled traffic is due in and out so why not fill in the gaps? Cardiff manage it, they got me in 15 minutes before Concorde! Can't remember how much it was, around 13 or 14 quid? In my book that was good value for money.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Right here
Age: 50
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I say again: if I were to propose a large hike in council tax, or a large cut in other services, so as to be able to subsidise a municipal airport, then guess what ... I'd lose my seat, and not be in a position to implement such a policy.
It's called "democracy". It's the UK voters who don't want to subsidise what they see as a rich man's hobby. One can only assume that voters in other countries take a different view.
It's called "democracy". It's the UK voters who don't want to subsidise what they see as a rich man's hobby. One can only assume that voters in other countries take a different view.
2. While there might be exceptions in a big country far out west, I think it is rare to see an instrument airport with 2,000+ m of asphalt being built solely to cater for rich men in PA28s... In countries where airports are subsidised, you'll see government money spent on airports with scheduled traffic that form part of the countries' national infrastructure; communities and regional administration spending money on smaller airports where they might want scheduled traffic or to cater for taxi and business travel, considered vital parts of the community's or region's infrastructure; and at most token sums to non-instrument (= non-commercial) airports with <1,000 m runways (i.e., the "rich men's toys" airfields...). The idea to build a mini-Heathrow using tax money for the sole purpose of handling light GA traffic would be equally bizarre to voters outside the UK! It's not done that way.
3. Subsidising is only one way to keep landing fees down for light GA, and not the most important or desirable one. The way to go, and how it is done elsewhere, is to better differentiate landing fees in such a way that small planes don't get to pay huge fees for services they don't need. With the current British system, light GA daring to set foot on a large regional airport subsidise the facilities that only larger aircraft need. And then I'm not talking about hard runways and fire support; I'm talking about 2,000 meters of runway and CAT 7 fire support for a PA28.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In my own little world
Posts: 776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PilotDom
What is the actual status with landing fee's for SEP's at Norwich ?. I was tempted to go the other day but saw on the airport website that the minimum invoice fee is £40 so ended up going to another field in East Anglia instead.
A and C
Also with club rules we can only visit licensed airfields which narrows it down a bit.
Coventry was very reasonable when we visited in the 152, although the price does seem to jump up a fair bit if one goes in a 172 and that has all the kit that Cambridge has yet is a lot cheaper. The guy who we paid the fee to said that a 172 and the new generation of VLJ's are in the same price band which seems a bit bonkers to me.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I find it somewhat unlikely that an election would be decided on that particular issue only.
better differentiate landing fees ...
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Right here
Age: 50
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well Gertrude, what you say mightsound convincing, if it wasn't for the fact that the rest of the world manages just fine without UK level landing fees... But if you're happy with paying tens of euros for a landing, good for you!
However, if you think it is necessary, a look outside your own country will rapidly prove you wrong.
However, if you think it is necessary, a look outside your own country will rapidly prove you wrong.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
But if you're happy with paying tens of euros for a landing, good for you!
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bjornhall is quite right. How depressing to see people as ever defending the indefensible in rip-off Britain. Taxpayers don't subsidise GA in America. On the contrary, GA stimulates economic growth and creates jobs which benefit everyone. American airports and ATC are funded by taxation on fuel, whereas the (much higher) tax revenues on our fuel are wasted by our tax and spend government on God knows what.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Have you looked at the number of small airfields / strips in the area? OK, not 24, but it is a significant amount of choice. I agree that landing fees for VFR traffic at regional airfields should be about £10, but if it is not you do have a choice other than pay, pay, pay.
If planning was suitably modified to enable ~ 800m full-planning strips to be set up, that would be something else. Then you would need a mogas STC for the engine...
Additionally, you're clearly ignorant of what goes on at NWI and your post is based purely on gossip and conjecture.
From a mile away, you can see somebody has built up a nice empire there.
They forget the whole point of the place is to process planes and passengers. Instead they have emulated Gatwick/Heathrow, but they have maybe 1% of the traffic and 1% of the terrorist risk.
Whoever set up the ops at Norwich should be sent to some place like Cannes, to see how everything can be streamlined yet everything still gets x-rayed properly on the way out.
Do notice I am not moaning about pricing. However, at the price charged, the process should be very well organised.
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Scotland
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just got back from lunch with a flying friend and we were discussing the same topic as this thread.
His comments were short and not very sweet but generaly I have to agree with him. We have the oportunity to gather the information prior to our visit and if we are not happy with the cost then go somewhere else.
If you had your own Runway or Strip that required maintainance, manning, licencing etc then how much would you charge?
I really dont know how much would be fare but I`d be looking at covering costs and then some.....
If only I had that luxury..................
In addition to I0540`s last comments I remember not that long ago having arrived at Wick and sat having a toastie in full view of the security guards (both of them), my wife and I dusted the crumbs from our shirts and wandered back over to access the apron again but not before we had emptied our pockets, removed our shoes and answered several questions about our visit.
I didn`t mind the whole process but it did seem a bit much just for a wee toastie up North.
His comments were short and not very sweet but generaly I have to agree with him. We have the oportunity to gather the information prior to our visit and if we are not happy with the cost then go somewhere else.
If you had your own Runway or Strip that required maintainance, manning, licencing etc then how much would you charge?
I really dont know how much would be fare but I`d be looking at covering costs and then some.....
If only I had that luxury..................
In addition to I0540`s last comments I remember not that long ago having arrived at Wick and sat having a toastie in full view of the security guards (both of them), my wife and I dusted the crumbs from our shirts and wandered back over to access the apron again but not before we had emptied our pockets, removed our shoes and answered several questions about our visit.
I didn`t mind the whole process but it did seem a bit much just for a wee toastie up North.
Last edited by stocker; 16th Apr 2008 at 15:10.