28 day check - logged as P1 or PUT?
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Down at the sharp pointy end, where all the weather is made.
Age: 74
Posts: 1,684
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
llanfairpg writes:
I've started a new thread on this subject in the Instructor's forum. I think it's worthy of separate debate.
Cheers,
TheOddOne
something for all you self employed instructors out there without liability insurance to think about!
Cheers,
TheOddOne
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The main reason for a pilots order book is not to make unenforcable law but to cover yourself, and your company/club in the event of a negligence claim.
There is not a legal requirement for a pilots order book, it is not a legal document and any rules in it are not legal requirements. This include the 28 day rule.
So when a club insists on a 28 day checkout out it is not for legal reasons it is for club reasons and if the pilot is already LEGALLY entitled to fly having met the FCL/ANO requirements then one could argue they are perfectly entitled to be P1.........
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Surrey, UK.
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I still believe that if hiring an aircraft you have to comply with the rules of the hirer else you are [effectively] taking it without consent.
I further believe that if you are acting unlawfully (TWOC) you cannot obtain a benefit from that action.
PiC/P1 hours must be a "benefit", else why would there be so many threads about claiming them?
I further believe that if you are acting unlawfully (TWOC) you cannot obtain a benefit from that action.
PiC/P1 hours must be a "benefit", else why would there be so many threads about claiming them?
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Middle England
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree with homegaurd, if you have a licence and are rated on the a/c and its just a matter of a currency check then P1/S is what my students use. P1 under supervision. It denotes that you were P1 but had and instructor with you. Shouldn't be hard to change in the logbook either.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Accept P1/S is not allowed to be used in that context as it is not a flight test.
What are you putting in your logbook? P1? So we have two people logging P1......
What are you putting in your logbook? P1? So we have two people logging P1......
Fly Conventional Gear
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Winchester
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Accept P1/S is not allowed to be used in that context as it is not a flight test.
SPIC= student pilot in command (which can be logged simultaneously with 'dual').
PIC U/S= pilot in command under supervision (only possible after a successful flight test).
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: heathrow
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PIC U/S= pilot in command under supervision (only possible after a successful flight test).
Think of the case were a training captain is converting say someone with a BAC 1-11 on his licence to the Airbus.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you want to talk about this in the context of airline logging then fine. I look forward to my club getting their first airbus....
The question is around logging club check rides in club aircraft and sprang from an original question about the time being allowable towards a CPL application.
Why don't we discuss the use of P2 next?
The question is around logging club check rides in club aircraft and sprang from an original question about the time being allowable towards a CPL application.
Why don't we discuss the use of P2 next?
Fly Conventional Gear
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Winchester
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Or at any time the handling pilot is operating under the supervision of the commander but carrying all the duties of the commander.
There is no such thing as SPIC in JAA Land.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Clearly Jeppesen don't know what they are talking about then?
Or maybe as an American company trying to make a one size fits all logbook they may have got it wrong and confused things? My FAA logbook has the SPIC entry, but then in FAA land you can have 2 P1's in a single pilot aircraft......
My AFE logbook claims to be JAR FCL compliant and contains only the headings listed above. I have both the PPL and CPL varieties.
So which is right?
Discuss......
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: heathrow
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Surely that is only valid in a multicrew aircraft?
Same as P2, you can log P2 in a Cessna 172 but unless it is part of a pre- agreement with the CAA it cannot be counted towards the grant or renewal of a licence or rating.
A lot of people posting on this thread are trying to make the answer what they would like it to be rather than actually reading LASORS.
My AFE logbook claims to be JAR FCL compliant and contains only the headings listed above. I have both the PPL and CPL varieties.
Fly Conventional Gear
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Winchester
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Or maybe as an American company trying to make a one size fits all logbook they may have got it wrong and confused things? My FAA logbook has the SPIC entry, but then in FAA land you can have 2 P1's in a single pilot aircraft......
It doesn't really matter because I've never used the SPIC entry and have just continued to log as I was told originally: P1, P U/T and P1 U/S (for completion of a flight test).
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SPIC features in JAA integrated training.
Although I would be interested to see where, please provide a reference.
Fly Conventional Gear
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Winchester
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Although I would be interested to see where, please provide a reference.
.I hope I'm not breaking the rules doing this but it just seemed easiest:
