Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

High Viz Jackets - Mandatory at GA Airfields?

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

High Viz Jackets - Mandatory at GA Airfields?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Mar 2007, 10:13
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Savannah GA & Portsmouth UK
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've got a good idea.

Why not make aeroplanes carry flashing lights so people on foot can see them? We could also make them big so they're easy to see, and equip them with an audible warning device that makes a loud noise. We could restrict the speed at which they move on the apron as well. That should enable people to be aware of them.

CAP 642 is rightly concerned more with the danger of being run down by airside vehicular traffic.
Mike Cross is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2007, 10:26
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It isn't a CAA mandatory thing at GA airfields, sounds like the powers to be at Tollerton are saying that so no one gives them a hard time and blames the CAA instead. Bit sneaky.

At Booker we have one of the busiest GA ramps in the country yet we can use our own common sense and don't have to wear hi-viz jackets. So far no one has been run over, strange that!
smarthawke is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2007, 11:07
  #23 (permalink)  
Blah Blah Blah
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Malmesbury VRP
Age: 48
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I really don't see an issue.

It is not hard to put on a hi-viz tabbard or jacket. It in no ways hinders your mobility.

If cost is you issue then don't but them from pilot supply stores. Go to an Army & navy type store where you wont pay the premium of "Pilot/Avaition Supplies".

Or if you are a total skin flint trawl the motorways and dual carriage ways, threre are always tabbards left on the hard shoulder by road workers. You never know you might even be able to collect enough odd shoes to make a few pairs for resale
gcolyer is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2007, 12:01
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Swindon, Wilts,UK
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Devil

What You need is a suitable Escort to your chariot!
Windy Militant is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2007, 12:07
  #25 (permalink)  
Blah Blah Blah
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Malmesbury VRP
Age: 48
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Problem solved
gcolyer is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2007, 12:07
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 2 m South of Radstock VRP
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
gcolyer

I think you are missing the salient point that it's a matter of principle. It'll be hard hats next, like Bob the bloody builder.

The next phase of this will be, "it's not just for your safety but the safety of others". The poor idiot type van driver who knocks you down and has post traumatic stress disorder for the rest of his/her life. Also, think of the poor emergency walahs who might have to pick up the bits after you've passed through a rotating airscrew. Being made to feel like an irresponsible and self centred individual (not a "team" player) works amazingly efficiently these days.
GOLF_BRAVO_ZULU is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2007, 12:19
  #27 (permalink)  
Blah Blah Blah
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Malmesbury VRP
Age: 48
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I get that point. I just don't think the enforcing of a tabbard is big enough to spit the dummy out over.
gcolyer is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2007, 13:43
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the north
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Steel toecap boots next maybe.

Once saw a chap in a microlight suit with flourescent top section told off for not wearing a hiviz vest !! (they then tried to sell him one at a vast price!)
bingoboy is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2007, 13:56
  #29 (permalink)  
niknak
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A lot of this legislation has been introduced because of the "cover your 6 o'clock mentality" which has migrated from the USA.

That said, I really can't see the difficulty with this particular requirement, it probably stems from your inability to adapt to the real world...

See and be seen, what's the problem?
niknak is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2007, 14:05
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the north
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I expect you are right and look forward to them becoming mandatory in all walks of life


ps do they do a hoody version
bingoboy is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2007, 14:08
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Beechy Bucks
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question - Why do airfields spend a lot of money on Health and Safety consultants creating missives about things like high-viz jackets.

Answer - Because its cheaper than being sued by an ambulance-chasing lawyer.........

(Now bracing myself for the inevitable backlash from all those lawyers using these activities to fund their flying habit!)
HAL-26 is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2007, 14:51
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fetish

Ihave a two-tone hi-viz with some fish-net pockets (no lie). It's 3 sizes too small and i love wearing it with a pair of speedo's (nothing else). Oh apart from the stiletto's.

Give me a few minutes I will go to the apron and get ATC to take a photo so that i can post it here.

Is that normal.
jamestkirk is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2007, 16:37
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: .
Age: 37
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Windy Militant
If you can get that girl when you buy one, I'll be ordering one up right away

JamesTKirk
Perhaps you should mention that to your AME at your next medical.
Captain Smithy is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2007, 16:39
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Farm strip on the Fens in South Lincs
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I luv 'em.
Just a few more weeks and I can put mine on and hide in the rape field next to my strip when the wife wants me to do something around the house.
rogcal is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2007, 16:54
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,581
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Two big dangers on GA airfields:

Propellors
Avgas

Propellors can't recognise Hi Viz jackets and are more likely to get caught up with a loose garment therefore High Viz Jacket is a Safety Hazard

Hi Viz jackets are nylon, flammable, and stick to the skin in a flash fire. They also generate static so should not be worn near Avgas. again, High Viz Jacket is a Safety Hazard

Why doesn't someone report this Safety Hazard to the HSE and get them banned from GA Airfields?
Whopity is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2007, 17:24
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: down-route
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
About 8 years ago during a turn-around at Gatwick a BA hostess lost a bet. Her forfeit was to run around the outside of the B737 in her bra and nickers.

To her relief the skipper objected, he said she wasn't allowed to run around outside wearing only her bra and nickers. He went into the cockpit retrieved a hi-viz tabard, returned to the cabin and told her to wear the tabard whilst she ran around the aircraft in her underwear.
False Capture is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2007, 17:34
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,817
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
A ba hostess in bra and knickers.....??

Presumably the captain's action in making her wear a yellow road-digger's coat was to stop some do-gooder coming up and saying "You poor old thing - did you forget something when you left the home today?"












Only kidding - I did once know a most delightful ba #1. And when I say 'know'.........
BEagle is online now  
Old 27th Mar 2007, 18:03
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: uk
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
niknak

perhaps if the vests improved safety rather than a tic box mentality to safety.

Adapt to real world .........that is fine ....but only if it is sensible.


Incidence at Blackpool a few years ago, a child was nearly hit by an a/c near the refuellers hut. Result everyone had to wear Hi Vis .It would have no difference to that incident , But hey H&S guru provided solution but not to the real problem.

vetflyer is online now  
Old 27th Mar 2007, 18:29
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My brother was telling me a good story about a pilot colleague of his. Got off a plane in a big U.K. airport, full uniform with four gold bards but no high-viz jacket. Was immediately accosted by a member of ground staff and asked 'sir, are you flight crew or passenger' (if he was flying he had to wear it, if he was positioning as passenger he didn't).

He paused, looked dumb, and whispered "what's the right answer".
Langball is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2007, 19:20
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: a galaxy far, far,away...
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't know of anyone getting run over by an aircraft, but have seen plenty of reports of folk walking into props or being sucked into jets.

Simple solution - paint all a/c dayglo yellow & let the crew wear whatever!
aluminium persuader is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.