BA Strike - Your Thoughts & Questions II
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: US
Age: 77
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
617Squadron ref post 2220
I am sorry to reply to your post many hours later but I do hope you read this.
I flew ATL - LHR - EDI three weeks ago and was surprised by the level of service in Club World. I have been watching this site for several months wondering if my holiday that was booked in December would actually happen. Talking to 2 of the crew that took care of me I was surprised to find they were strikers. Your comment about the smile was so true.
With all the garbage going on in their lives there was never a hint of it to their customers. Thanks to the 4 crews I flew with for a great trip. I will certainly book on BA when next I head your direction.
MCOflyer
I flew ATL - LHR - EDI three weeks ago and was surprised by the level of service in Club World. I have been watching this site for several months wondering if my holiday that was booked in December would actually happen. Talking to 2 of the crew that took care of me I was surprised to find they were strikers. Your comment about the smile was so true.
With all the garbage going on in their lives there was never a hint of it to their customers. Thanks to the 4 crews I flew with for a great trip. I will certainly book on BA when next I head your direction.
MCOflyer
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Thailand
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am interested why this thread is still open.
There is no strike, there is not even an impending ballot.
So why is it still here?
There is no strike, there is not even an impending ballot.
So why is it still here?
There is still a dispute and there are still legal proceedings.
Next question?
Added: Or go and look at the link in Post 2921 on the other thread. Because there's at least one person (probably called "Richard"!) who thinks it isn't over.
If it wasn't so pathetic, it would be funny.
Last edited by ChicoG; 30th Sep 2010 at 11:57.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: maidenhead
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fly380,
No I don't think we were ever offered bid line. It is an extremely costly method for BA to roster crew.
I am crew but while pregnant I worked in scheduling and there were nearly as many flight crew schedulers as there were WW cabin crew schedulers doing our rosters.
On E/F we do get to bid for our trips now but it is not seniority led like the pilot bid. It is done by a computer trying to match your preference with the available trips in the system.
notelangley,
Even on Eurofleet we fly with different crew each day and we all just get on and do the job. Sometimes I know some of my crew and that is good and as I only fly on the Airbus, I often know the pilots which I find great because in my personal experience, the Airbus pilots are the nicest I have flown with in my 25 years of flying.
I have worked in Cabin Crew Selection in the past and cabin crew are specifically selected on their ability to communicate with people and their ability to get on and work in a team.
MCOflyer,
I am so pleased that you enjoyed your flight with BA. It is also my experience that, whether a striker or a non striker, most crew are just as professional as they ever were. In fact, in general, we don't even talk about the strike to each other because no one wants to upset anyone else. I think this is why many of us post on here and other forums in order to get things off our chest.
No I don't think we were ever offered bid line. It is an extremely costly method for BA to roster crew.
I am crew but while pregnant I worked in scheduling and there were nearly as many flight crew schedulers as there were WW cabin crew schedulers doing our rosters.
On E/F we do get to bid for our trips now but it is not seniority led like the pilot bid. It is done by a computer trying to match your preference with the available trips in the system.
notelangley,
Even on Eurofleet we fly with different crew each day and we all just get on and do the job. Sometimes I know some of my crew and that is good and as I only fly on the Airbus, I often know the pilots which I find great because in my personal experience, the Airbus pilots are the nicest I have flown with in my 25 years of flying.
I have worked in Cabin Crew Selection in the past and cabin crew are specifically selected on their ability to communicate with people and their ability to get on and work in a team.
MCOflyer,
I am so pleased that you enjoyed your flight with BA. It is also my experience that, whether a striker or a non striker, most crew are just as professional as they ever were. In fact, in general, we don't even talk about the strike to each other because no one wants to upset anyone else. I think this is why many of us post on here and other forums in order to get things off our chest.
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: LHR
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CharliePop
You've got that the wrong way round I think. First there was BASSA. Then when people became disaffected by BASSAs militancy a breakway union, CC89 was formed.
Total garbage that it had anything to do with BASSA militancy - you really should learn your facts before spouting such rubbish
Even if your version of the birth of CC89 is wholly correct No 15, it hardly makes CharliePop's version either "totally and wholly inaccurate" or "total garbage".
Seems to me you both agree that CC89 arose due to an internal dispute in BASSA.
Seems to me you both agree that CC89 arose due to an internal dispute in BASSA.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: maidenhead
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They are both right in a way.
I joined cc89 in 1989 when it started. It was formed by most of the long-haul Bassa reps ( who mostly had worked for BOAC) because they felt they could no longer work with the short-haul reps (who mostly had worked for BEA and British Airtours the charter part of BA and who were much more militant ). It was based at the Balpa offices and used the Balpa expertise to help them initially. Then it became part of AEEU union which itself merged with another union and then became Amicus. Then Amicus merged with the TGWU, the parent union of BASSA, to become Unite and that's where we are now. Amicus (cc89) has lost it's voice because it was the smaller of the two branches and the more moderate of the two too.
Hope that history lesson helps you understand the complicated politics of unions in BA.
I joined cc89 in 1989 when it started. It was formed by most of the long-haul Bassa reps ( who mostly had worked for BOAC) because they felt they could no longer work with the short-haul reps (who mostly had worked for BEA and British Airtours the charter part of BA and who were much more militant ). It was based at the Balpa offices and used the Balpa expertise to help them initially. Then it became part of AEEU union which itself merged with another union and then became Amicus. Then Amicus merged with the TGWU, the parent union of BASSA, to become Unite and that's where we are now. Amicus (cc89) has lost it's voice because it was the smaller of the two branches and the more moderate of the two too.
Hope that history lesson helps you understand the complicated politics of unions in BA.
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Europe
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Betty Girl
BEA and British Airtours the charter part of BA and who were much more militant
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tracey Island
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They are both right in a way.
I joined cc89 in 1989 when it started. It was formed by most of the long-haul Bassa reps ( who mostly had worked for BOAC) because they felt they could no longer work with the short-haul reps (who mostly had worked for BEA and British Airtours the charter part of BA and who were much more militant ). It was based at the Balpa offices and used the Balpa expertise to help them initially. Then it became part of AEEU union which itself merged with another union and then became Amicus. Then Amicus merged with the TGWU, the parent union of BASSA, to become Unite and that's where we are now. Amicus (cc89) has lost it's voice because it was the smaller of the two branches and the more moderate of the two too.
Hope that history lesson helps you understand the complicated politics of unions in BA.
I joined cc89 in 1989 when it started. It was formed by most of the long-haul Bassa reps ( who mostly had worked for BOAC) because they felt they could no longer work with the short-haul reps (who mostly had worked for BEA and British Airtours the charter part of BA and who were much more militant ). It was based at the Balpa offices and used the Balpa expertise to help them initially. Then it became part of AEEU union which itself merged with another union and then became Amicus. Then Amicus merged with the TGWU, the parent union of BASSA, to become Unite and that's where we are now. Amicus (cc89) has lost it's voice because it was the smaller of the two branches and the more moderate of the two too.
Hope that history lesson helps you understand the complicated politics of unions in BA.
They still have bargaining rights and rights to consultation.
Are you saying that no one in CC89 is doing anything regarding the present mess or are they silent because it doesn't affect them?
Join Date: May 2010
Location: maidenhead
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
77,
You have reprinted half a sentence. It was the short haul reps that were more militant than the long haul reps who broke away to form CC89.
At that time and before CC89 broke away, crew who were short haul and those that had previously been working for British Airtours were part of the short haul section of Bassa and those that were long haul crew were part of the long haul branch of Bassa.
I was not saying that any crew were more militant than any other crew, just the Bassa shorthaul reps were more militant than the longhaul reps who chose to break away and form CC89.
Call 100,
I was told that they had lost proportionately more members than Bassa due to the fact that CC89 members tend to be more moderate.
I was also told that the Unite leadership was fed up of the two unions arguing and told the CC89 reps to take a back seat for the sake of showing a unified front.
I have been a CC89 member since it started and I can assure you that the union that I have known all these years would not have wanted to call the 12 days of Christmas mess and that is why it has lost so many members.
You have reprinted half a sentence. It was the short haul reps that were more militant than the long haul reps who broke away to form CC89.
At that time and before CC89 broke away, crew who were short haul and those that had previously been working for British Airtours were part of the short haul section of Bassa and those that were long haul crew were part of the long haul branch of Bassa.
I was not saying that any crew were more militant than any other crew, just the Bassa shorthaul reps were more militant than the longhaul reps who chose to break away and form CC89.
Call 100,
I was told that they had lost proportionately more members than Bassa due to the fact that CC89 members tend to be more moderate.
I was also told that the Unite leadership was fed up of the two unions arguing and told the CC89 reps to take a back seat for the sake of showing a unified front.
I have been a CC89 member since it started and I can assure you that the union that I have known all these years would not have wanted to call the 12 days of Christmas mess and that is why it has lost so many members.
Last edited by Betty girl; 30th Sep 2010 at 20:42.
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Unite's latest message:
http://www.unitetheunion.org/PDF/027...sh-Airways.pdf
Does anyone else notice a pattern here? Nothing new in this message. All the same old dogma heard time and time again...
..and no new ballot, no firm call to action.
How long does the BASSA membership tolerate the placating missives and no action? Perhaps its possible that Unite and BASSA understand that they have lost, that neither party wishes to take affirmative action, and this has now become a case of simply letting things stay as they are with a "We feel your pain" message to come from time to time.
For BASSA members the vision isn't exactly empowering.
http://www.unitetheunion.org/PDF/027...sh-Airways.pdf
Does anyone else notice a pattern here? Nothing new in this message. All the same old dogma heard time and time again...
..and no new ballot, no firm call to action.
How long does the BASSA membership tolerate the placating missives and no action? Perhaps its possible that Unite and BASSA understand that they have lost, that neither party wishes to take affirmative action, and this has now become a case of simply letting things stay as they are with a "We feel your pain" message to come from time to time.
For BASSA members the vision isn't exactly empowering.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 45 yards from a tropical beach
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
...which is why they are prevaricating over ending the strife, which would then require fresh elections, in which several of them would be not be eligible to stand.
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Europe
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Betty Girl
I know that I only quoted half a sentence. I did not intend to mis-represent what you said. However it did seem to me that your original post linked BEA/British Airtours with the militant faction in short haul. Airtours operated both long and short haul and the sheduling agreements were different to mainline.
Originally no one in Airtours was employed by BA apart from the pilots who were on secondment from mainline. The employment contracts were totally different until they were absorbed into mainline.
As such it was a very happy operation.
Originally no one in Airtours was employed by BA apart from the pilots who were on secondment from mainline. The employment contracts were totally different until they were absorbed into mainline.
As such it was a very happy operation.
Totally and wholly inaccurate - CC89 was formed as the WW section of BA was in disagreement with the SH section - hence why most of CC89 members were from WW, plus they tried to entice a lot of Midfleet crew into their ranks.
Total garbage that it had anything to do with BASSA militancy - you really should learn your facts before spouting such rubbish
Total garbage that it had anything to do with BASSA militancy - you really should learn your facts before spouting such rubbish
The Longhaul BASSA committee, branch 1261 of TGWU, were being told by the SH BASSA reps that BCal should be part of the SH membership and this daft idea was backed by a certain 'Militant' TGWU official.
After representations to the highest authority, the TGWU Gen Sec - Ron Todd who just ignored them they went to a very well attended members meeting and were told from the floor to form a new union for cabin crew. This happened in February 1989 and the rest is history.
Midfleet had nothing to do with it and came many years later but did have many CC89 members.
CC89 in BA is known as Amicus Cabin Crew - but BASSA continued to call them '89. CC89 (Unite) has members in all British airlines being the only recognised union for British Midland and Virgin for example.
The dispute would have been resolved a long time ago if BASSA had sat down and thrashed out a deal with BA along side Amicus.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: maidenhead
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
77,
I was not saying Airtours were at all militant just that they were part of the short haul branch back then.
They did do both long haul work and short haul work but they were all part of the short haul branch of Bassa at that time.
As Vctenderness mentioned everything kicked off after the BA and Bcal merger in 1988. At Gatwick we all merged together to become BA LGW mainline crew. Some Bcal crew went to long haul and some went to short haul and at the same time all the Airtours crew also either went to long haul or short haul at LGW but they were at that time members of the short haul section.
So the reason for the breakup was the different two branches arguing about who should have which members in their branch and a total dislike between the two branches who had originally come from two separate airlines BEA and BOAC and as history has confirmed the short haul reps were more militant than the reps who went to start up CC89, which later became Amicus.
I was not saying Airtours were at all militant just that they were part of the short haul branch back then.
They did do both long haul work and short haul work but they were all part of the short haul branch of Bassa at that time.
As Vctenderness mentioned everything kicked off after the BA and Bcal merger in 1988. At Gatwick we all merged together to become BA LGW mainline crew. Some Bcal crew went to long haul and some went to short haul and at the same time all the Airtours crew also either went to long haul or short haul at LGW but they were at that time members of the short haul section.
So the reason for the breakup was the different two branches arguing about who should have which members in their branch and a total dislike between the two branches who had originally come from two separate airlines BEA and BOAC and as history has confirmed the short haul reps were more militant than the reps who went to start up CC89, which later became Amicus.
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Europe
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok Betty,
Interesting synopsis of the history of unions in BA. Some militant, some not. However we still need some clear thinking to resolve the present impasse. Unfortunatey there doesn't seem to be any prospect of a quick solution. BA are, I would imagine, quite happy as the now have a much larger MF than they could ever have hoped for and don't need to do anything at all. Meanwhile BASSA look for a way forward but any legal action will take a long time and while it goes on those that have been on strike will continue to find life difficult.
In the end if BASSA succeed in legal action it won't really matter as BA now have this large MF and as routes are transferred, well I don't need to go on, do I??
Coming soon on a University Industrial Relation course..."How not to progress a dispute".
Interesting synopsis of the history of unions in BA. Some militant, some not. However we still need some clear thinking to resolve the present impasse. Unfortunatey there doesn't seem to be any prospect of a quick solution. BA are, I would imagine, quite happy as the now have a much larger MF than they could ever have hoped for and don't need to do anything at all. Meanwhile BASSA look for a way forward but any legal action will take a long time and while it goes on those that have been on strike will continue to find life difficult.
In the end if BASSA succeed in legal action it won't really matter as BA now have this large MF and as routes are transferred, well I don't need to go on, do I??
Coming soon on a University Industrial Relation course..."How not to progress a dispute".
Join Date: May 2010
Location: maidenhead
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
77,
I agree with you completely. I think that Bassa have totally let down BA cabin crew. They have made MF arrive bigger and faster. The very sad thing is that they could have had some input into the terms and conditions of the new crew and they chose not to. Now these new crew have a very inferior agreement even by the standards of a lot of other airlines.
Clauses like crew being stood down on no pay if the airlines feels it is over crewed, one weeks notice to terminate the job but the new crew have to give 4 weeks notice!!, working on ground duties whenever the company require it and working to scheme, which is not unusual, but there are no safeguards at all to how they can be rostered unlike other airlines and our own flight crew colleagues.
So yes we have all been let down, strikers, non-striker and future new crew.
I agree with you completely. I think that Bassa have totally let down BA cabin crew. They have made MF arrive bigger and faster. The very sad thing is that they could have had some input into the terms and conditions of the new crew and they chose not to. Now these new crew have a very inferior agreement even by the standards of a lot of other airlines.
Clauses like crew being stood down on no pay if the airlines feels it is over crewed, one weeks notice to terminate the job but the new crew have to give 4 weeks notice!!, working on ground duties whenever the company require it and working to scheme, which is not unusual, but there are no safeguards at all to how they can be rostered unlike other airlines and our own flight crew colleagues.
So yes we have all been let down, strikers, non-striker and future new crew.
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tracey Island
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bg...If what you say is true, about Unite asking CC89 (or whatever they are called in the mess that is BA) to remain in the background, then what has happened to them?
The scenario would have been fine in the beginning but, as the relationship go worse and BASSA were acting against what CC89 thought was their best interests, then it would not wash, whatever Unite said from on high...CC89 has a duty to represent it's members best interests.
By remaining silent they are agreeing with BASSA and if they are also losing members then it's clear to see why. BA have not asked them to remain in the background! From BA's perspective they can see it as destroying the TU base of both groups.
Why are CC89(?) not negotiating MF terms and conditions?
None of it makes any sense.
The scenario would have been fine in the beginning but, as the relationship go worse and BASSA were acting against what CC89 thought was their best interests, then it would not wash, whatever Unite said from on high...CC89 has a duty to represent it's members best interests.
By remaining silent they are agreeing with BASSA and if they are also losing members then it's clear to see why. BA have not asked them to remain in the background! From BA's perspective they can see it as destroying the TU base of both groups.
Why are CC89(?) not negotiating MF terms and conditions?
None of it makes any sense.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: maidenhead
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Your right, it's as if they have become impotent. On their website the only information that is put up is official messages from Unite the parent union. Nothing else is posted at all.
I think some of them were suspended over a fight with Bassa reps but I don't know what has happened to the rest of them, they say nothing, literally.
I think some of them were suspended over a fight with Bassa reps but I don't know what has happened to the rest of them, they say nothing, literally.
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: -)
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have worked in Cabin Crew Selection in the past and cabin crew are specifically selected on their ability to communicate with people and their ability to get on and work in a team.
I have just flown back from Melbourne on a Qantas 747._ On the leg to Hong Kong I asked a stewardess whether her colleagues on this plane were strangers or people she knew._ She said that this route was looked after by a reasonable number of cabin crew and so she did know one or two - but she said that some of the other routes had a great many cc and that with those it was a case of strangers at the start of each roster._ On the HK-Heathrow leg I asked a steward who said that the number of cc on this route was about 500 and so the same faces did crop up._ I also asked a stewardess and she said that she always knew one or two and that from the beginning of October to just past mid November she was doing elements that were "three up, three down and four days off"._ The jargon was beyond me, also (because I am an outsider) much of what was said to me garbled-up in my mind even as I listened.
The 500 figure was most interesting._ In my opinion 500 is a good figure for a working unit, because when shop stewards are elected, they will be known by those who elect them._ By coincidence 500 is the capacity of the largest room where BASSA called a general meeting, although the reports that I read say that the electorate abrogated their democratic responsibilities and agreed to BASSA filling the shop steward gaps by co-option (this is what I read and therefore it is unreliable hearsay)._ I briefly mulled over the idea that the 10,000 heritage cabin crew could be subdivided into twenty rosters and that each roster could elect two shop stewards which would give a grand total of 40 shop stewards._ But of course such an idea is naive and unrealistic - the rosters would obviously be devised by BA - and I hate to use the word gerrymandering, but the integrity of the union would be compromised by BA being able to alter the electoral sub-units of heritage cabin crew.
To my mind 10,000 cc in a working unit is too large for democracy to be sustained and there will be many committee members whose heads are permanently in the stratosphere, pus also it is a perfect environment to produce a cult.
Last edited by notlangley; 2nd Oct 2010 at 12:19. Reason: minor correction