Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

BA Strike - Your Thoughts & Questions

Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

BA Strike - Your Thoughts & Questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd May 2010, 20:05
  #1741 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: LHR
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Euston Tower is a 36 storey building.

I doubt it was a purely spontaneous demonstration, someone must have told them exactly where to go.
LD12986 is offline  
Old 23rd May 2010, 05:10
  #1742 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NZ
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Clarification

Mr Woodley said BA was wrong to blame BASSA for the deadlock.
He said he had urged his members to reject BA’s latest offer on staffing and work practices because of the company’s ‘petty, vindictive attitude’.
The main sticking point between the two sides is BA’s decision to strip 2,000 cabin crew who went on strike last month of lucrative travel perks which allow them and their families to have free and cut-price flights. Unite wants the perk reinstated before it calls off the next wave of strikes.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1280583/BA-stockpiles-1-7bn-fighting-fund-WIllie-Walsh-vows-dysfunctional-cabin-crew.html#ixzz0oj4zpXTu
At least we are now clear as to the reason for the strike!

Beggars belief! They strike over..err the issue of the last strike!
Winch-control is offline  
Old 23rd May 2010, 06:39
  #1743 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Stockport
Age: 84
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Neptunus Rex

I think that "the man on the Clapham omnibus" would consider all the BA staff on the open topped omnibus to be bringing the company into disrepute.
Grounds for dismissal? It would be a start.
But they should be given the opportunity to strike first, and enjoy the fruits of that, just in case the disciplinary process results in something less than dismissal.
Dairyground is offline  
Old 23rd May 2010, 07:44
  #1744 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tweeting From Inside the ACAS Talks

It suprises me no one here has yet commented on Derek Simpson's alleged tweeting to the outside world during yesterday's talks.

Contributors to the cabin crew forum suggest his messages were aimed at BASSA membership and the text has been displayed on the BASSA forum. Given the sensitivity and gravity of these talks, does anybody consider it appropriate behaviour from someone who is supposed to be a senior Union official?

BA boss Willie Walsh surrounded as demonstrators storm union talks - Telegraph
ExecClubPax is offline  
Old 23rd May 2010, 08:04
  #1745 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: uk
Age: 54
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WW is on The Andrew Marr show today (some time in the next hour) BBC - BBC One Homepage . If you miss the show they usually have it on the iplayer
slf22 is offline  
Old 23rd May 2010, 08:32
  #1746 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It suprises me no one here has yet commented on Derek Simpson's alleged tweeting to the outside world during yesterday's talks.
There is nothing alleged about it, I saw the feed. The man is a fool.
Snas is offline  
Old 23rd May 2010, 08:35
  #1747 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BASSA promised "guerilla tactics" and having observed their coarse behavior in the past nothing surprises me.

The idea that someone was sending out messages from a private negotiating session is incredible.

What was Derek Simpson and Unite thinking???!!!

How does anyone take these individuals seriously?
Diplome is offline  
Old 23rd May 2010, 08:44
  #1748 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cardiff, UK
Age: 62
Posts: 1,214
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tweeting was obviously inapropriate and inadvisable in the circumstances, but it is not as if any major secrets were revealed. Indeed, I would say it shows that contrary to the BASSA line, WW was not being totally obtructive in the discussions.

Settlement of this dispute favourably is far more important than this minor issue, and I don't think WW should or will make too much of it.
Mariner9 is offline  
Old 23rd May 2010, 09:51
  #1749 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Jungles of SW London
Age: 77
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Baggersup

And why isn't tweeting from a confidential meeting like that a fireable offense?

It would be in most companies in similar circumstances.

The guy is a dope.

p.s. Does the appearance of the anarchists at the Euston building foreshadow more "spontaneous" guerilla protests, perhaps in places like T5 or the parking lots or other places BASSA cannot picket? Makes me wonder if the Euston event was not just a one-off.
If it isn't a fireable offence - and I rather think it is, no matter what the import of any information revealed - then it can only be considered unhelpful and irresponsible. At best. The man is, indeed, a dope - which, given the severity of the situation - ought to disqualify him from taking further part.

As for the 'Flying Picket' from Socialist Workers Party - I always thought 'socialist worker' was an oxymoron, like 'military intelligence' and 'political integrity' - you would have to consider Euston Tower to be a relatively 'soft target'. I guess if they tried that at T5, it would attract the undivided attention of an Armed Response Unit at least and risked the involvement of 'The Hereford Gun Club'.

BASSA are clearly under almost unendurable pressure at this point and now they are getting nasty and even more irrational - that makes them dangerous.

Roger.
Landroger is offline  
Old 23rd May 2010, 09:55
  #1750 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mariner9:

I must respectfully disagree.

That sort of conduct is simply never done during negotiations for very obvious reasons.

Simpson knows he went waaaayyy over the line with that stunt. Would not surprise me if BA refused to enter into further negotiations with him present. You can bet its already been suggested.

An absolutely stunning, juvenile and unprofessional stunt.
Diplome is offline  
Old 23rd May 2010, 10:07
  #1751 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: It used to be an island...
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Snas
There is nothing alleged about it, I saw the feed. The man is a fool.
While the twitt.r account "derekamicus" does not exist any more, the cached page at Google is still there. Is that the postings you are referring to?

(Aside to the powers that be at PPRuNe, replacing "t w i t t e r" by "PPRuNe" automatically is MOST UNHELPFUL. If you don't want it mentioned at least just make it t****** or similar)
nicolai is offline  
Old 23rd May 2010, 10:11
  #1752 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Thailand
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One of the basic tenets of ACAS is confidentiality of discussions:

Although largely funded by the Department for Business Innovation & Skills (BIS), Acas is a non-departmental body, governed by an independent Council. This allows us to be independent, impartial and confidential.
By his actions, Simpson has demonstrated a breach of trust. ACAS would be well within their rights to bar him from future proceedings.

The fact that both BA and ACAS have chosen to turn a blind eye to this shameful act shows that they are trying hard to overcome the constant obstacles that this witless bunch of 70s union cretins keep trying to put in the path to settlement.

Personally, I'd have dynamited the shallow end of the gene pool a long time ago.
ChicoG is offline  
Old 23rd May 2010, 10:13
  #1753 (permalink)  
RTR
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its a bit rich when Derek Simpson calls the cabin "deluded clowns" and he now finds himself wearing a clowns hat! That was a crass thing to do.

The following quote gives room for your own conclusions but it doesn't include Willie being responsible for the farce yesterday................but:

RTR is offline  
Old 23rd May 2010, 10:29
  #1754 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: LHR
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An article on the situation Tony Woodley finds himself in from today's Observer:

Can Unite's Tony Woodley forge a last-minute deal to avert the BA strike? | Business | The Observer
LD12986 is offline  
Old 23rd May 2010, 10:32
  #1755 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cardiff, UK
Age: 62
Posts: 1,214
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dilome - happy to disagree re importance of T.w.i.t.t.e.r. My view is that as WW has to negotiate with a dishonourable union, one more example of poor conduct doesn't really change things.

On another point, I note in that Socialist Worker article a BA CC claims he/she is on a £12k basic. If so, what the heck has he/she to fear from New Fleet and the much feared "£12K basic" then? Ergo, he/she is either lying over salary (sorry to put it so bluntly) or striking over something else. Cant be ST; why strike last time over no loss of pay regardless of New Fleet. Perhaps he/she is one of those facing disciplinaries?
Mariner9 is offline  
Old 23rd May 2010, 10:35
  #1756 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: delhi
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
T5 report

Saw various reports about T5 being like a ghost town last week, having travelled out of it on the morning of the 21st I can confirm it was anything but.

Sadly however the full effect of this IA was evident on the morning LHR - DEL which carried no more than 50 Pax. On the day that BA announced a £530m loss this seems a very hollow victory for the strikers.

The CC were very pleasant but statistically probably included a number of those responsible. There was a sense of smugness eminating from some at the sight of the near empty a/c and the easy money for the duty.

From my own perspective if ever I boarded a BA a/c in future and encountered any of the sun tanned muppets appearing behind Woodley on the steps outside the high court I would refuse to have them serve me. If this meant going without for the duration then so be it. In fact for me it is the prospect of encountering such a species in future which is more likely to lead to booking with alternates than any other factor.

WW needs to bring this to a head and clear the rubbish out right now, only then can we start to restore the badly damaged image of the airline and for that matter UK Inc both home and abroad.

I am reminded that the Dinosaurs did gather in groups before becoming extinct.
Jipperty is offline  
Old 23rd May 2010, 10:47
  #1757 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mariner9:

I'm always a bit amused when they state their "basic" pay and neglect to enlighten their audience regarding all the other pay schemes they benefit from.

..and a good point about New Fleet.
Diplome is offline  
Old 23rd May 2010, 10:53
  #1758 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: BHX LXR ASW
Posts: 2,271
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Jipperty

I am reminded that the Dinosaurs did gather in groups before becoming extinct.
With that remark are you referring to older Cabin Crew who have been flying for a good number of years and have a lot of essential experience under their belts?
crewmeal is offline  
Old 23rd May 2010, 11:08
  #1759 (permalink)  
pb3
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: West London
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree, Landroger, it can get dangerous.

It seems a corner was turned this weekend during the SW's protests. Mr. Walsh's safety was actually threatened by an invasive mob some of whom allegedly were chanting "k*ll willie" (according to some news reports.).
Not sure I agree with this. The brief news clips I saw this morning showed WW in the midst of the protesters chatting calmly away on his mobile phone. He did not appear at all concerned about his personal safety. The protesters were holding their signs up (towards the cameras of course) and not even looking at him .

The only one looking as if he wanted to kill someone was Tony Woodley. He appeared absolutely furious - the protesters at the front of the invading party appeared somewhat taken aback.
pb3 is offline  
Old 23rd May 2010, 11:09
  #1760 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: England
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No, I should think they mean those that are gathered together under the Bassa banner....it beggars belief that they fail to see the economic climate around them. I feel so sorry for the moderate CC , who have the intelligence to realise that change had to happen and then the courage to work through this mess.....Good Luck to them!
button44 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.