Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

Uk Airport Chaos (hand wringing thread)

Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

Uk Airport Chaos (hand wringing thread)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Aug 2006, 07:21
  #21 (permalink)  
Final 3 Greens
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
How can banning hand baggage be as crippling as aircraft blowing up in mid air?

Because both occurences (note that these new aarrangements are causing severe delays) both stop the air transport system from functioning viably.

I am not comparing the severity of the events, just the severity of the consequences.

Got it now?
 
Old 10th Aug 2006, 07:24
  #22 (permalink)  
Buzz off with BAF!!
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Essex England
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NVpilot
Score one for the good guys.
Maybe. But it shows the level of disruption that a perceived threat
can cause to our 'advanced' society!
tilewood is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 07:25
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As far as is being reported, the threat was neutralised this morning. So as far as I can see this is all designed to remind the public how scared they should be, and that they mustn't question Tony's foreign policy/police state ID card scheme/immigration policy/insert contaversial scheme here


Talking of Tony, does anyone think it's a coincidence that he just managed to get to Barbados before all this happened?

And since he's away will the Deputy PM be handling things in his absence? God help us...
Dirty Mach is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 07:26
  #24 (permalink)  
THUNDERTAILED
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: L200
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The policy of no liquids appears to be especially relevant here, right down to 'no contact lens solution'. Sounds like the cretins hatched a plan involving liquid explosive, or liquid flammables.
AfricanSkies is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 07:26
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 23
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Final 3 Greens
Jimma

It may be an inconvenience for you, but for many business travellers, the inability to take a laptop in the cabin is somewhat more than that.

If this continues for long, it will have severe consequences for UK air travel, as the business community finds other ways to work around the blocker.

The impact on Ryanair and others will be interestng to observe, bye bye 20 minute turnarounds for the time being, methinks.
I totally agree, I am in the fortunate position whereby if I dont take my laptop on business travel, I can live with out it, but I know many people who cant.
jimma is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 07:26
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: here there and everywhere
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ray Darr
This was just issued - at 0615z today... LHR Short-haul flights of 3 hours or less are prohibited UFN. A review will be taking place within 2 hours. What a mess...
Pity to the innocent travellers, the economy, and all crew and staff involved, but safety first.
Cheers,
R.D.
Definitely.
I do feel for all my colleagues and all the passengers involved, but these measures are necessary, at least to discourage bad people from acting at this time.
flybywire is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 07:27
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good result,however I have lived with this type of theat most of my life and as our national security do a very good job they have to be lucky all the time and those Bas***ds only have to be lucky once.

Keep the good work up guys and its up to us to be very vigilant.

Rgds

K.I.L.
keepitlit is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 07:29
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Country
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AfricanSkies
The policy of no liquids appears to be especially relevant here, right down to 'no contact lens solution'. Sounds like the cretins hatched a plan involving liquid explosive, or liquid flammables.
so are the airlines going to remove all the bottles of Scotch, Vodka etc?
Jet II is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 07:31
  #29 (permalink)  
TightYorksherMan
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Peak District
Age: 41
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How can banning hand baggage be as crippling as aircraft blowing up in mid air? Yes, there will be significant disruption for a while, but, as always, the aviation industry will work through it, sort out what needs to be done, and make it happen.
I can understand it can be a problem however I cant see the business chappies among the world travelling by sea.....
Jinkster is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 07:34
  #30 (permalink)  
THUNDERTAILED
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: L200
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jet II
so are the airlines going to remove all the bottles of Scotch, Vodka etc?
Sounds like it. Perhaps they are concerned that the contents might not be what is indicated on the label.

Banning duty free spirits would be a good thing anyway - imagine what damage a few bottles of burning spirits could do in a toilet ceiling. Pax could buy their spirits on arrival at duty free instead.
AfricanSkies is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 07:36
  #31 (permalink)  
Final 3 Greens
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Jinkster

You need to get your little Britain blinkers off, UK business people may have no chouice, but those from other countries do.

The UK relies on a lot of premium transfer traffic, who can reroute via AMS, PAR, FRA.

Do you think that those travellers are going to be attracted by (a) loads of hassle and (b) the news that somone had a serious plot to blow them up?
 
Old 10th Aug 2006, 07:37
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: somewhere underneath 3rd rock
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jinkster
I can understand it can be a problem however I cant see the business chappies among the world travelling by sea.....
No, but those who can avoid travelling will, and those who transit through the UK - huge numbers do to get from the US to Europe, Asia and Africa will change to flights going through another hub - and these will be those paying the most.

I see BA hurting very quickly.
Wot No Engines is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 07:43
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Age: 60
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Final 3 Greens
How can banning hand baggage be as crippling as aircraft blowing up in mid air?

Because both occurences (note that these new aarrangements are causing severe delays) both stop the air transport system from functioning viably.

I am not comparing the severity of the events, just the severity of the consequences.

Got it now?
F3G - yes, got it now and before as well.

When the skies are cleared of all air traffic for 3-4 days (as it was post 911 and would be if aircraft started to fall out of the skies) due to the hand baggage restrictions, I will concede you have a point.
Llademos is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 07:44
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: London
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If in the USA all liquids are banned does that include water etc?? Surely this is a flight safety issue with crew not having access to that on flights?
747-436 is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 07:45
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Midlands
Age: 84
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dangerous contents of hand luggage

If "stuff" is dangerous in some way, how does it become safe by being put in the hold? Inability to carry car keys with remote controls will cause some grief too!
A2QFI is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 07:47
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by G-CPTN
They'll just have to WEAR it (or will worn jewellery be banned)?
The problem is with brooches that have pins - particularly today.
Gerontocrat is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 07:47
  #37 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,217
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
Banning duty free spirits would be a good thing anyway - imagine what damage a few bottles of burning spirits could do in a toilet ceiling. Pax could buy their spirits on arrival at duty free instead.
Yes, or a broken bottle is a much nastier weapon than a nailfile!



On the laptops issue, I have to say that my experience must be much better than everybody else's - I usually check everything in except for in-flight reading matter, my camera and my flying logbook and licences (if I'm travelling with them); I've yet to lose anything. But, for those who have had a problem, it's probably a very safe assumption that the level of police supervision of the checked-in baggage, during the current fun and games, will be really quite tight indeed!



In the meantime, I'm going to believe that this was genuine, necessary, the threat was real and that even if today wasn't the terrorists planned operational day, it had to be assumed that they might have a backup "go now" plan if part of the gang were rumbled. So, on that basis well done the good guys.



Now my own tiny note of discord. If these precautions have got to continue for long (which I hope isn't the case), please airlines could we have a decent supply of reading matter, pens and scribbling paper on board - or I'll go mad on a long trip!

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 07:49
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Cork, Ireland
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Politicians are making and controlling the news on this one and you can bet that Blair and the Labour Party are spinning this new threat in a fashion that suits their own agenda.
Tom the Tenor is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2006, 07:50
  #39 (permalink)  
Final 3 Greens
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
When the skies are cleared of all air traffic for 3-4 days (as it was post 911 and would be if aircraft started to fall out of the skies) due to the hand baggage restrictions, I will concede you have a point.

The 9/11 aircraft did not explode in middair, to refresh your memory, they were flown into buildings killing many thousands, a completely different situation, that's why the US locked down the airspace.

You are making an illogical point and I am not going to waste anymore bandwith arguing with you.

BTW, Heathrow is now closed to incoming flights for your info.
 
Old 10th Aug 2006, 07:51
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: London & Edinburgh
Age: 38
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tom the tenor - maybe those remarks should be put in Jet Blast, and not here?

Jordan
Jordan D is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.