PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions (https://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions-91/)
-   -   RFDS Pilatus PC24 (https://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions/615489-rfds-pilatus-pc24.html)

Stationair8 16th Nov 2018 20:46

RFDS Pilatus PC24
 
The first RFDS PC24 is due in Perth this weekend.




Alice Kiwican 16th Nov 2018 23:48

Be good to see it for real!👍

faction 17th Nov 2018 01:51

The first one will arrive in Perth on December 3rd after touching down in Broome the day before.

machtuk 17th Nov 2018 08:52

Was just speaking to a PC 24 driver today actually, it's rather slow, thought it might have been faster. Wil be interesting how it operates with the distances Australia has between major cities:-)

Capt Fathom 17th Nov 2018 08:58


Was just speaking to a PC 24 driver today actually, it's rather slow, thought it might have been faster. Wil be interesting how it operates with the distances Australia has between major cities:-)
Are you comparing it with a PC12 or a Learjet?

DIBO 17th Nov 2018 09:32

Compared to other a/c able to operate out of 2,930 feet (893 m) unpaved surfaces, (max) cruising at 440 ktas is pretty fast :)

machtuk 17th Nov 2018 09:42

400kts typical, anything above that uses too much gas he says. The short RWY ability comes at a cost. High DA Alt's, terrain, surface type, gross weight etc extend considerably the T/Off dist. Short range when considering the size of Oz. Will be keen to find out real world figures not just the propaganda we read about, salesmen stuff:-)

harrryw 17th Nov 2018 13:36


Originally Posted by machtuk (Post 10313492)
400kts typical, anything above that uses too much gas he says. The short RWY ability comes at a cost. High DA Alt's, terrain, surface type, gross weight etc extend considerably the T/Off dist. Short range when considering the size of Oz. Will be keen to find out real world figures not just the propaganda we read about, salesmen stuff:-)

They give the range at 2000nm at FL450 so more like 700nm each way maximum unless refueling is available.In WA it could be fairly limiting...They really do not want to have to stop on the way. Also it is often better to restrict altitude to keep the cabin altitude low so that could be a major problem though they do say Cabin AZlt of sea level at FL230. It is a beautiful looking plane though.

AbsoluteFokker 17th Nov 2018 14:23

So which other jet do you see doing dirt/gravel in Australia? Seems pretty good to me.

VH-MLE 17th Nov 2018 14:51

Personally, and while it might be approved for it, I cannot see it doing unsealed airstrips at all. It'd be more typically used for your "long haul" type flights i.e. Broome, Kununurra to Perth (as well as Cocos, Christmas Island - weather permitting). I think there'll still be plenty of demand for the PC12's for the foreseeable future...

machtuk 18th Nov 2018 07:47


Originally Posted by VH-MLE (Post 10313683)
Personally, and while it might be approved for it, I cannot see it doing unsealed airstrips at all. It'd be more typically used for your "long haul" type flights i.e. Broome, Kununurra to Perth (as well as Cocos, Christmas Island - weather permitting). I think there'll still be plenty of demand for the PC12's for the foreseeable future...

Not too many remote dirt strips kept good enuf for this type of jet operation, a few but the list would be short. As mentioned SL cabin needed at times, a strong H/W component all means at times it's a very limited machine. Advantages would be the cargo door & it's ability under limiting certain conditions are it's main advantages.
Looked at applying for the gig when they where looking for drivers but there would be a few toes trodden on to get there, I don't do that.
The PC12 (B200 better) is the backbone of the Air Ambo Ops, the jet being added was a political thing to some degree, a must have at all costs !

601 18th Nov 2018 08:14


I cannot see it doing unsealed airstrips at all.
Back in the 80s I operated C550s for 10 years into gravel, grass, dirt all over Qld and NSW and at an AFM reduced weight of 5700kg, We watched our fuel and pax loads and did a lot of re-calculating in flight.
Had a lot of problems with "operational control" and getting a signature on the Flight Plan at some briefing offices was difficult.
"what? you want to take a jet outside controlled airspace and into a grass strip, you can't do that" was a not an uncommon comment when flight planning.
Even landing at Archerfield for inspections was a problem initially.

I can see it being used
But having operated the C550, B200 and B350, I would have thought that the King Airs would still be more suitable.

Capt Fathom 18th Nov 2018 08:32

Seems to be some negativity here by some posters!
The RFDS has been operating aircraft for a long time. Have they been seduced by the Pilatus marketing or are people just bagging the new type.
Only time will tell how successful it is.

lucille 18th Nov 2018 08:41

That cargo door is a winner! Trumps every other negative - your back will thank you. Try squeezing a 200kg patient on a Lifeport stretcher through a L35/36, DA200 or C550 door - that will be your Eureka moment.

Its all too easy to find fault with range, speed, gravel strip capability and SL cabin limitations. There are heaps of aircraft which can do somethings better but none have that door.

VH-MLE 18th Nov 2018 10:05

Personally, I'm not bagging it at all, I just don't see it being required for unsealed runway ops, but definitely see a (long overdue) need for it from larger regional locations which have more suitable aerodromes. Also, I'm pleased to see the organisation moving on from the current RFDS "jet operator" who some might say has milked the RFDS very well...

machtuk 18th Nov 2018 21:47


Originally Posted by Capt Fathom (Post 10314070)
Seems to be some negativity here by some posters!
The RFDS has been operating aircraft for a long time. Have they been seduced by the Pilatus marketing or are people just bagging the new type.
Only time will tell how successful it is.

They are called opinions!!

pithblot 18th Nov 2018 22:36

ATPL required?
 
Does the pilot need an ATPL?

mattyj 19th Nov 2018 06:42

The pilot does have an ATPL

triadic 19th Nov 2018 07:59

The media pictures to date don't seem to show a cargo door, which is mentioned above... has a cargo door being fitted?

mattyj 19th Nov 2018 09:25


YendorB 22nd Nov 2018 13:30

Anyone know the pay and conditions for this gig? Curious

Kulwin Park 22nd Nov 2018 20:48


Originally Posted by YendorB (Post 10317351)
Anyone know the pay and conditions for this gig? Curious

It would be standard RFDS twin engine endorsed pay conditions, but the PC24 pilots will get an endorsement paid for them, plus an extra $20-30k on their pay packet for the specialist type I'm guessing.

aaandrogerthat 22nd Nov 2018 20:59

Haha! Silly RFDS, they obviously didn't do their research thoroughly before committing to this aircraft. 10 minutes on pprune would have been time well spent and alerted them to all the flaws and limitiations of this plane. What were they thinking.... :-)

Squawk7700 23rd Nov 2018 00:57


Originally Posted by aaandrogerthat (Post 10317793)
Haha! Silly RFDS, they obviously didn't do their research thoroughly before committing to this aircraft. 10 minutes on pprune would have been time well spent and alerted them to all the flaws and limitiations of this plane. What were they thinking.... :-)

You may laugh, however plenty of pilots on here either work for them or formerly did, so are fairly well informed in their operations.

Outtahere 23rd Nov 2018 07:38


Originally Posted by YendorB (Post 10317351)
Anyone know the pay and conditions for this gig? Curious

Around $160K was what I was told for SA/NT. Standard PC12 salary plus T & C allowance.

VH-MLE 23rd Nov 2018 10:14

Aaandrogerthat - you're a bit of a dick - sorry to say that, but what experience do you have to make that call?

Smalahove 23rd Nov 2018 13:24


Originally Posted by VH-MLE (Post 10318218)
Aaandrogerthat - you're a bit of a dick - sorry to say that, but what experience do you have to make that call?

Zooooooooommmmm........

LeadSled 23rd Nov 2018 22:11


Originally Posted by aaandrogerthat (Post 10317793)
Haha! Silly RFDS, they obviously didn't do their research thoroughly before committing to this aircraft. 10 minutes on pprune would have been time well spent and alerted them to all the flaws and limitiations of this plane. What were they thinking.... :-)

aaaaaaand---
Must be a lot of stupid people with money about, the original PC-24 order book for the first batch opened and closed in days, the same will happen when the order book is re-opened some time soon. With preferential customers fixed up, earliest delivery dates for a new customer of the company look like somewhere between 2021 and end 2022.
And, comparatively, this aircraft is expensive in it's class.
What other bizjet manufacturer has their capacity sold out, they are even closing Porter production to make a bit more room.
Tootle pip!!

josephfeatherweight 23rd Nov 2018 22:17

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again - nobody appears to understand sarcasm here when it jumps up and smacks them in the face.
MLE (and others) - I’ll spell it out for you - aaandrogerthat was being sarcastic/facetious...

LeadSled 24th Nov 2018 07:02


Originally Posted by josephfeatherweight (Post 10318799)
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again - nobody appears to understand sarcasm here when it jumps up and smacks them in the face.
MLE (and others) - I’ll spell it out for you - aaandrogerthat was being sarcastic/facetious...

josephetc,
He/she/it was?? Maybe he/she/it should be a little less subtle ---- as is very obvious, his extreme subtlety completely obscured hi/her/its sarcasm/facetiousness.
Tootle pip!!

Capt Fathom 24th Nov 2018 08:56

I actually thought it was quite funny. VH-MLE missed it totally! Zooooooooommmmm......... indeed!
Beam me up Scotty!

VH-MLE 24th Nov 2018 11:30

OK, I know I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed, but I didn't (and still don't) see sarcasm/facetiousness in that post... Maybe I'm just getting old and grumpy...

topdrop 24th Nov 2018 22:18

Little smiley at the end is a bit of a clue.

aaandrogerthat 27th Nov 2018 18:26

Haha! Lighten up guys! The clue is right here.. "10 minutes on PPRuNe would have been time well spent and alerted them to all the flaws and limitiations of this plane"

The PC-12 was a game changer, and so is the PC-24. Incredible machine

I'll retreat into my burrow now, having been suitably chastised for my feeble attempt at SARCASM... :-)

Plazbot 27th Nov 2018 18:42

Saw it today in Dubai. VHVWO.

DIBO 27th Nov 2018 19:11

Found this nice photo @JetPhotos: VH-VWO just before its departure from Switzerland this morning, on its way to warmer climates...https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....2126265518.jpg

pilotchute 28th Nov 2018 05:35

https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....f03d48801.jpeg
Seems getting a cargo door in a biz jet isn't that hard.

harrryw 28th Nov 2018 07:22


Originally Posted by pilotchute (Post 10322342)
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....f03d48801.jpeg
Seems getting a cargo door in a biz jet isn't that hard.

Seems to be a lot of work.....they say that takes 12 weeks to do for a Citation.,

Captain Nomad 28th Nov 2018 07:42

Not practical to have aeromedical stretcher loading equipment permanently mounted in that single-use front doorway either...

pilotchute 28th Nov 2018 08:32

I bet the sticker price on a citation with similar performance would be considerably lower than a PC24. The Cargo door installation time isnt really a factor if you plan ahead.

I only say this as I'm sure RFDS aren't made of money and the savings on modified Citation could be spent elsewhere.

Just my opinion and I'm sure RFDS did the maths.


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.