Wikiposts
Search

Notices
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Myocarditis/Pericarditis

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th September 2025 | 10:19
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Brisbane
Myocarditis/Pericarditis

Does anyone have experience with myocarditis or pericarditis regarding CASA?
TheAviator95 is offline  
Reply
Old 15th September 2025 | 04:58
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,868
Likes: 191
From: australia
I got pericarditis as a result of the second Covid jab. At that time I had let my ppl lapse.
It was temporary, so I would have stayed mum if I had needed to keep the licence.
Earlier with Avmed on a renewal they piled on some stuff that was considered unnecessary, I contested that, and they dropped it. With an outfit that thinks it knows better than practising specialists, one needs to tread carefully.
As many others can attest.!
aroa is offline  
Reply
Old 15th September 2025 | 05:32
  #3 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 958
Likes: 46
From: Tent
Originally Posted by aroa
I got pericarditis as a result of the second Covid jab. At that time I had let my ppl lapse.
It was temporary, so I would have stayed mum if I had needed to keep the licence.
Earlier with Avmed on a renewal they piled on some stuff that was considered unnecessary, I contested that, and they dropped it. With an outfit that thinks it knows better than practising specialists, one needs to tread carefully.
As many others can attest.!
Arr Yes The New Normal - staying mum.
A similar is happening with cancer & CAsA of late.
Bend alot is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd September 2025 | 13:08
  #4 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 78
Likes: 14
From: Australia
I believe that the hearts of about 75% of pilots in the USA deteriorated due to the covid jabs. The deterioration was such that those pilots could no longer satisfy the heart health standards required by the FAA. To ground so many pilots would have shut down the aviation industry, however, so the FAA had no choice but to relax the medical standards required for the heart. Have heard this account from several, generally reliable sources, but have not yet seen strong confirmation.

If that happened in the USA, then it must have happened in Australia too. Is anybody aware of changes by CASA to our heart health standards?
APMR is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd September 2025 | 14:22
  #5 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,556
Likes: 779
From: The Coal Face
Without posting a link to a verifiable, authoritative source, your post is unable to be substantiated. Until such time as you do, it’s merit is questionable.

In the meantime, these links appears to wholly contradict your post.

https://apnews.com/article/fact-chec...d-373861551871
In October, the FAA widened the acceptable parameters it uses when screening pilots for a specific heart condition, the agency said in a statement to The Associated Press. However, the FAA explained that this change was made in response to new scientific evidence about the condition from its cardiology consultants, not adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines.
https://www.reuters.com/article/fact...idUSL1N34J2M0/
The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) broadened a standard for normal heart function in pilots because medical evidence showed no symptoms or additional health risk up to the raised threshold, the agency told Reuters, adding that the change had nothing to do with COVID-19 vaccine effects.
​​​​​​​
Chronic Snoozer is online now  
Reply
Old 23rd September 2025 | 02:20
  #6 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 78
Likes: 14
From: Australia
In the meantime, these links appears to wholly contradict your post.
LOL. Chronic Snoozer, I would take those statements as proof of the assertions in my post! If you know anything about the history and nature of "fact checking" you would know that such "fact checks" probably constitute the strongest proof available!

Of course they're going to claim the relaxations of the criteria were nothing to do with the vaccines!!! Do you think they would just come out and admit that their allowance of the jabs did such damage? You're not that naive, are you?
APMR is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd September 2025 | 03:34
  #7 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,556
Likes: 779
From: The Coal Face
I merely offered contradictory statements from the Administration. In your paradigm apparently, unsubstantiated assertion + questioning the veracity of assertion = proof of assertion. I guess that proves the Earth is flat.

It also proffers the axiom that no amount of evidence can disprove a conspiracy theory. It’s the new world we live in.
Chronic Snoozer is online now  
Reply
Old 23rd September 2025 | 05:02
  #8 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 78
Likes: 14
From: Australia
You really are that naive! You think that, if you want the truth on something, you can just go to the internet?
APMR is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd September 2025 | 06:08
  #9 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 958
Likes: 46
From: Tent
Originally Posted by Chronic Snoozer
Without posting a link to a verifiable, authoritative source, your post is unable to be substantiated. Until such time as you do, it’s merit is questionable.

In the meantime, these links appears to wholly contradict your post.

https://apnews.com/article/fact-chec...d-373861551871
https://www.reuters.com/article/fact...idUSL1N34J2M0/
It seems both the "Fact Checked" links using the same source come to different but similar points.

Neither say they investigated the possibility or not - Just the reason/s for change was based on other than Covid Vaccines.

Also noted was they did not even state an increase in Heart Conditions over any period.

To just guess, I would say we, over recent times for 1 or more reasons. Have an increase in the world population in heart issues, cancer, kids with issues and excess deaths - but that is just my observation.
Bend alot is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd September 2025 | 16:21
  #10 (permalink)  
Community Builder
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 358
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
I received the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine x 2. Twice I was hospitalized with myocarditis within 48 hours subsequent to the administration of the vaccine. My internist told me to forego further mRNA vaccines. Draw you own conclusions.

- Ed
cavuman1 is online now  
Reply
Old 23rd September 2025 | 20:29
  #11 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
40 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Aviation Qualifications: SLF
Posts: 1,582
Likes: 312
From: UK and Italy
Originally Posted by cavuman1
I received the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine x 2. Twice I was hospitalized with myocarditis within 48 hours subsequent to the administration of the vaccine. My internist told me to forego further mRNA vaccines. Draw you own conclusions.

- Ed
No vaccine is without risk, and especially mRNA vaccines, they really have a massive effect on your body. The Pfizer vaccine has a 0.02% risk. You were one of the 0.02%.

Covid has, for a man of your or my age, a 30% risk of dying. The only reason why people aren't getting Covid, is that most have had the jab. You won't get it, even though you don't have any mRNA jabs, is that there are very few around you who aren't immunised.

In the UK we have an epidemic of measles, because people believed 'oh the MMR vaccine causes autism'. The MD who said this has now been struck off.

I have malaria, and there is now a jab against malaria. My kids haven't had malaria, and I would advise them to have the jab, if they are going to malarial countries even though it is only 45% effective and has severe side effects. Most malarial drugs are now ineffective. The alternative is never to go to malarial countries. What's the fun in that?

Science isn't perfect. Medical science isn't perfect. Chemotherapy is supposed to wipe out the remains of cancer once you've had the cancer out, but it doesn't always, as I found out the hard way, the cancer returned.

People used to be amazed and pleased if a doctor or surgeon cured them - less than 50 years ago. Now they're indignant if they don't. We just take for granted that medical science is perfect.

It isn't.
justapax is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd September 2025 | 20:45
  #12 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 182
From: cowtown
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/article...012%20Subjects

Regular Use of Ivermectin as Prophylaxis for COVID-19 Led Up to a 92% Reduction in COVID-19 Mortality Rate in a Dose-Response Manner: Results of a Prospective Observational Study of a Strictly Controlled Population of 88,012 Subjects



The Doctors that used Ivermectin didn’t lose patients at anywhere near the death rates in public hospitals. Those facts were banned by the “ social media “ . Might be more appropriate to call them the social mafia . They controlled the data , the message and employed tyranny enforcement against anyone with facts about treatments that worked .

https://www.scribd.com/document/5633...ID-19-Syndrome
fitliker is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2025 | 05:07
  #13 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 78
Likes: 14
From: Australia
The only reason why people aren't getting Covid, is that most have had the jab. You won't get it, even though you don't have any mRNA jabs, is that there are very few around you who aren't immunised.
Nowhere near the truth on those claims there, justapax. Almost all of continental Africa didn't get "the jab" (they couldn't afford it and had more important things to worry about than a disease with a fatality rate that is similar to flu). By your logic, however, the fact they never got jabbed means there must have been widespread and high rates of Covid (and lots of deaths). There wasn't.

And you don't seem to be aware that the Covid jabs don't actually work. This is funny because it seems almost the entire medical industry realises that the jabs didn't stop you catching Covid, didn't stop you passing it on, didn't stop you getting sick and didn't stop you dying from it. There are now mountains of scientific and medical literature documenting how poorly those jabs work. There are still some that cling to the idea that they worked for a month or two, but then you needed another booster. Personally, as a close observer of the Covid insanity of the last few years, I don't believe they worked *at all*.
APMR is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2025 | 06:19
  #14 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 273
Likes: 53
From: Australia
This is so 2022. Can you all just calm TF down and move on with your lives? I feel like my brain is bleeding reading this constant BS. Or maybe it's my heart expanding?
umop apisdn is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2025 | 07:36
  #15 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 958
Likes: 46
From: Tent
Originally Posted by umop apisdn
This is so 2022. Can you all just calm TF down and move on with your lives? I feel like my brain is bleeding reading this constant BS. Or maybe it's my heart expanding?
Very selfish - many lost a lot during that time.

Seems now for nothing as the threat was not there - Dan's lockdowns due to Medical & Science are now publicly available (The Medic was not consulted & sent a email after the fact to ask if he should put out a statement to suport the "evidence" of the descission).

Dont read move on - no need for you to comment or feel ill. Others are freely allowed to discuss thier recent issues without you and your booster #23 by now.
Bend alot is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2025 | 07:42
  #16 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 958
Likes: 46
From: Tent
Originally Posted by justapax

Covid has, for a man of your or my age, a 30% risk of dying.
.
I really need some links/evidence for this (or did I miss something?)

No wind up a serious question.
Bend alot is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2025 | 09:19
  #17 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 273
Likes: 53
From: Australia
Originally Posted by Bend alot
"Very selfish - many lost a lot during that time."

"you and your booster #23 by now."
I'll just leave that there as a mirror for you to look into.
umop apisdn is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2025 | 15:22
  #18 (permalink)  
Community Builder
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 358
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
justapax: The luck o' th"Irish, doncha know!

- Ed
cavuman1 is online now  
Reply
Old 25th September 2025 | 08:22
  #19 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 958
Likes: 46
From: Tent
Originally Posted by umop apisdn
I'll just leave that there as a mirror for you to look into.
Happy to be selfish as - I was (like most others) a exteame low risk of getting any sicker than the flu.

Only persons with preexisting issues gained any real benifit.

Topic still current for very many as this is from yesterday.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-09-...ries/105808630

Australia brought way more vaccines than needed 126.5 million doses- that was a bit selfish.
Bend alot is offline  
Reply
Old 27th September 2025 | 21:09
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 42
Likes: 26
From: Melbourne
Originally Posted by APMR
I believe that the hearts of about 75% of pilots in the USA deteriorated due to the covid jabs. The deterioration was such that those pilots could no longer satisfy the heart health standards required by the FAA. ..........so the FAA had no choice but to relax the medical standards required for the heart. Have heard this account from several, generally reliable sources, but have not yet seen strong confirmation.
That was quite well-covered unless you get your news from CH9, ABC, SMH, etc. Predictably, the story was spun and so you see it being denied by the same people who don't understand the sheer volume of money big pharma puts into the media, the health system, etc. "Peer-review" is BS today; so much of it is bought that the standard is now worthless except for convincing the non-critical thinkers who believe anything. Same with the "fact-checkers" - a joke - so it's hardly surprising people like Chronic Snoozer are unconvinced although it'd be great if, after so many lies foisted upon us, they'd eventually catch on.

Interesting that someone mentioned IVERMECTIN. I seem to recall heated discussion in here with the pitchfork-waving masses decrying it as a "horse-dewormer" for use by nutters. The charge was led by the wizofoz as I recall. What say he now?

Third world countries used ivermectin to great results. It was an anti-viral, and for humans, long before it was an anti-parasitic for horses. The horse dose did not remotely resemble the item manufactured for human use but that didn't stop the fearful, panicky, selfish hordes from the witch-hunt. So much ignorance. It was astounding.
Rataxes is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.