In the meantime, these links appears to wholly contradict your post.
LOL. Chronic Snoozer, I would take those statements as proof of the assertions in my post! If you know anything about the history and nature of "fact checking" you would know that such "fact checks" probably constitute the strongest proof available!
Of course they're going to claim the relaxations of the criteria were nothing to do with the vaccines!!! Do you think they would just come out and admit that their allowance of the jabs did such damage? You're not that naive, are you?