Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Avalon Class E Airspace To Go?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Jul 2020, 02:38
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 90 Likes on 33 Posts
Avalon Class E Airspace To Go?

The Avalon Airspace review recommended the removal of E over YMAV. Looks like Bloggs gets his wish. So much for GA scenics. If we are lucky, we might get a coastal corridor, although that will probably be forbidden to RAA aircraft. More importantly, in marginal VFR weather, the You Yangs were a great landmark for arrivals from the west. and you could pass them on your left as you prepared to join the coastal track for YMMB. That sounds like it’s gone too.

‘’It appears that the airlines and airport operators always howl for controlled airspace and they always get it.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2020, 05:46
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The RMIT won't be happy about that.
LexAir is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2020, 02:27
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
The E was always inapprpriate and probably instituted by DIRD/CASA and Airservices to bring disrepute on the class of airspace.
Class D under tower control would have enabled use by smaller aircraft but positioned by the controllers where they did not impede the departure and arrival of IFR aircraft.
Unfortunately Airservices operates it as though it was a high volume airport such as Tulla, when in fact it is quieter than Moorabbin on the other side of the bay. This means that radar control will continue even though it is very inefficient for such aerodromes.
This is probably because the Melbourne Centre ATC chiefs have very little experience with Class D airports, unlike Brisbane Centre where they operate with four Class Ds and 2 Class Cs.
Mr Approach is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2020, 07:51
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Up The 116E, Stbd Turn at 32S...:-)
Age: 82
Posts: 3,097
Received 46 Likes on 21 Posts
Now tell me......isn't the name 'Airservices Australia' ?

Sounds more like 'AsA Qld' and 'AsA Vic'.......Sorta like 'ALDI'.....Good (?) but different.......

No cheers....
Ex FSO GRIFFO is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2020, 09:27
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Karratha,Western Australia
Age: 43
Posts: 481
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr Approach
This is probably because the Melbourne Centre ATC chiefs have very little experience with Class D airports, unlike Brisbane Centre where they operate with four Class Ds and 2 Class Cs.
I don't know much about this bit of airspace but pretty sure ML CEN looks after Karratha, Alice Springs, Albury, Launceston, Hobart and Avalon which are all Class D? (excluding the old GAAP/Metro D towers as well).
Awol57 is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2020, 12:41
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,565
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
The E was always inapprpriate and probably instituted by DIRD/CASA and Airservices to bring disrepute on the class of airspace.
and then
Class D under tower control would have enabled use by smaller aircraft but positioned by the controllers where they did not impede the departure and arrival of IFR aircraft.
Completely non-sensical...
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2020, 13:53
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The Peninsula
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Class E over the top of AV is sweet as a nut. It does exactly as it's meant to. Gives VFR the flexibility to transit whilst separating IFR. Granted, the workload is high a lot of the time for the ATC but they do a cracking job of it. It actually works very well.
Bodie1 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.