Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Fire Bombers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Mar 2014, 11:37
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Brisbane,Australia
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is bit strange that Australia is trying to beat bushfire without Canadairs.How many homes must be lost or lives before they find out way to buy them.They can scoop water from shallow waters even inside busy ports or rivers.Seems it is easier and cheaper to loose homes,lives,forest etc.. than spend some money for CL-415s.Every year the same story and new damage.They just watch in the sky and wait for rain like recently when fire burnt on North Stradbroke island for days.What do you think that CL415 could not scoop water somewhere around island or from Brisbane river? Look on Youtube or some other sites what pilots do in Greece,Italy,Croatia,France etc and where about they scoop water.
We cant beat huge fire with those tiny Pipers or helicopters.
Igrane is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2014, 21:48
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: All at sea
Posts: 2,197
Received 168 Likes on 106 Posts
Yesterday I was sitting on the deck of my boat in a bay in Southern Tassie watching two helicopters at work on a couple of very small fires nearby.
They had unlimited access to water, light wind conditions and seemingly everything in their favour, but still worked solidly for two days to finish the job. One seemed to be having problems with its bucket occasionally dropping its load before it got to the fire, but regardless it seemed like a lot of costly hours and effort flown for a minor fire.
Struck me that a larger fixed wing aircraft like a Bae146 working out of Cambridge or Hobart would have probably done the job in two runs taking maybe half an hour each. Or a CL215 scooping from the same bay as the choppers in not much more time.
But I am no expert, so correct me if that would not have been the case.
Mach E Avelli is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2014, 22:58
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: cloud9
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ever tried to put a Bon Fire out with a bucket of water? Takes a fair bit of doing.
They can't put the fire out totally, all the bombers can do is try to contain it and not let it get any bigger.
solowflyer is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2014, 03:08
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: YMML
Posts: 2,561
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Depends how big the bucket is to start with
OZBUSDRIVER is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2014, 02:39
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: australia
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ive said this before and ill say it again. The RFS don't wont aircraft they only have them because the public now expect it. They wont Flash red trucks with flashing lights and staff they don't have to pay for. They wont fires they don't put fires out as soon as they start, they let them go wow we have this great big fire now, now I get my head on the TV and can ask for more funds get the picture.
It is empire building
Im not talking about the many great people that volunteer there time and lives but they let down by what's above them
yr right is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2014, 04:35
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: australia
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well smash you ever done any work with them from an aviation view. I have and I can tell you things that would you would never believe, trust me I don't lie and have no need to. There is a bigger picture than you will ever know. Like I said aircraft are not Red fire trucks.
yr right is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2014, 05:23
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: australia
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smash there are so much I cant tell, how ever its on the pubic record. I suggest you look at the court case over the Canberra fires. The state lost the case and where found guilty . The state change the law so the state cannot be sued. Would you like me to continue.
Sorry to tell the truth and I have had others on this site who are also in the know agree with me and what I have said.
yr right is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2014, 08:40
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Oz
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just spotted this thread.

Worth noting that the bushfire risk would be mitigated if people actually did more back burning. Its better for the environment here in Aus, and it reduces the risk of major fires. Problem is there is to many city slickers who move to the bush areas and refuse to back burn. Not sure whether it's because they are scared or because they have some stupid green concepts in their head. I have a mate who refuses to backburn, and I just cant figure out why. HE is in a prime spot to get killed if a bushfire comes through, and no matter what I tell him he wont listen. If you have ever been caught in a bushfire, you will understand why its so important.

So rather than paying exorbitant amounts of money transporting fire bombing aircraft from EU to AUS , perhaps we would be better of spending the money getting rural fire brigades educating people about back burning, and out there doing effective back burns. A proactive approach to the situation would be far more appropriate.
Andy_P is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2014, 01:04
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: YMML
Posts: 2,561
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
A grass fire here in ML took out a mates house up the back of Wallan. He loved the idea of trees around his house and all over his acreage. Granted, the fire got hot enough thru the scrub around his area that it crowned and really let rip...lost his shed, his race car and tools and almost lost his house...story behind that!. The moral of the story? He has bought a chainsaw and now there is a ten meter kill zone around his house and property boundary...F@%% the greens AND the CFnA! He says.
OZBUSDRIVER is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2014, 08:42
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: australia
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Prevention is better than the cure. Once the fire takes hold there not much you can do if there nothing that has been done to prevent it in the first place. Its not well known but the political view of the RFS and the state govs get extra $$$$$$ if the fire get lagre enough from the federal gov. Hence why if you have not notice how long it take to get aircraft into the fire before it takes hold.
yr right is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2014, 22:21
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Getting back to my earlier post on page 2 of this thread, I notice that Buffalo Airways have obtained one of the ex Aero Union Orions.

Looks like they are viable after all.

Wunwing
Wunwing is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2014, 21:16
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fire bombers

Where can you train to fly one of those? Im getting bored of long haul.
onehotflyer is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2014, 21:20
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
and now there is a ten meter kill zone around his house and property boundary...F@%% the greens AND the CFnA! He says.
He'll need more than 10 metres on a really bad day.
500N is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2014, 23:12
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Darkness
Posts: 45
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
We need a holistic approach to fire fighting, with aviation forming a part of that. The NAFC is a good start, but not every state has signed up yet. Also,we can't just always have what we've always had. Aviation firefighting needs to be a performance-evaluated, evolving capability. This means achieving the best capability for best use of funds.

The main advantages of aviation in fire fighting are rapid detection/provision of fire intelligence, rapid attack/containment, and increased situational awareness for fire commanders. At the moment, we are not achieving the best of these capabilities in the most efficient way.
Subversive1 is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2014, 09:29
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tasmania and High Wollemi
Posts: 439
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
aviation quick reaction.

Subversive, have a look at the RFS Canobolas zone plan for bad days. Drommy or 802 can often beat the red truck to the fire as they are dispatched at the same time. Lets the ground crew do quick mop up and go home.

Parkies similar for RAFT chasing lighting strikes.

Very effective combination in initial attack.
catseye is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2014, 10:05
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had an interesting night last night with a local community leader in one of last seasons badly burnt areas.I had the temerity to ask when the enquiry into last years fire was being held. The answer was we dont need one. When I asked about the poor ground response that I observed during the beginning of that fire, I was told that this was because all the fire fighters were at work so the time delay was understandable.I just give up.

These people dont deserve anything better.They actually believe that red trucks with lots of flashing lights will save the world.

Wunwing
Wunwing is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2015, 07:55
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Topical zombie thread.

The bigger equipment is here, right now.

So are the fires. Right now.

How do they stack up?

Seems to be a lot of properties lost if the media is to be believed.

Interested to hear the angles.
currawong is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2015, 08:18
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: goulburn
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
New aviation resources give help from above - NSW Rural Fire Service

Here is the link to the press release in NSW referring to DC10, C130 and aircranes. Were they used in Victoria or left sitting on the ground up here?
ohallen is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2015, 09:12
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: what should be capital of Oz
Age: 68
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Two C-130's, a Skycrane and a Chinook used at Lorne plus a significant number of other aircraft. The "chook" sent down from NSW, I believe.
zanzibar is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2015, 09:42
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Australia
Age: 46
Posts: 133
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by yr right
Ive said this before and ill say it again. The RFS don't wont aircraft they only have them because the public now expect it. They wont Flash red trucks with flashing lights and staff they don't have to pay for. They wont fires they don't put fires out as soon as they start, they let them go wow we have this great big fire now, now I get my head on the TV and can ask for more funds get the picture.
It is empire building
Im not talking about the many great people that volunteer there time and lives but they let down by what's above them
The award for the dumbest comment of 2015 goes tooooooo????

Yr right!!!!!

look maybe you're actually right in the fact that the district officers want to front up to a coronial or a parliamentary committee explaining why the world burnt to the ground all because they were too pig headed to have air support All so they could use the flash red trucks.

I'm sure that a 80k per year public servant reaching the end of his career really wants the risk of him losing it all. What I hear is that the vollos on the ground don't like them because they don't go and get to play.
red_dirt is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.