Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

2010 Pilot's Award ... Duty Times

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

2010 Pilot's Award ... Duty Times

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Jun 2010, 07:55
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hiding between the Animal Bar and the Suave Bar
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2010 Pilot's Award ... Duty Times

Apologies if this has already been discussed, but I don't remember seeing it go past on Pprune, and a search didn't find anything ...

Having nothing better to do today, I was reading the 2010 Pilots Award for a giggle. I can't remember the last time anything changed except the pay rates, but ... Clause 24 is a gem ! It says that no matter whether your F&D times are determined by standard CASA rules, or exemptions, or you work under an FMS, your work hours must not average more than 38 hours per week unless you're in ag ops.

I'm sure this didn't used to be in there, and it doesn't sit easily with 90 hours/fortnight ! Anyone tried it on their employer ?

"24.2 Hours of work, days off and rest periods will be determined in accordance with the following provided that ordinary hours of work must not average more than 38 per week:
(a) the regulations approved by CASA from time to time;
(b) general or employer-specific exemptions to, or concessions under, the regulations approved by CASA from time to time; or
(c) a Fatigue Risk Management System (FRMS) that has been developed by the employer after consultation with the affected pilots and/or their representatives and approved by CASA to apply to particular employers and employees."
Unhinged is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2010, 08:05
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah it's a beauty isn't it. The feds cop a lot of stick at times but I think they had a great result with that award.
Sumdumguy is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2010, 08:19
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know of a few major flying schools that are now rostering 80 hour fortnights

Hornet
hornet0011 is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2010, 09:13
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Island
Age: 43
Posts: 553
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Pretty sure that was in the previous version also. If they want you to work the longer hours they need to negotiate and pay accordingly. That is the law!
glekichi is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2010, 09:14
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 5,810
Received 133 Likes on 65 Posts
I would assume that average 38 hours a week, means you have to average all of the weeks in a year that you are working (ie. not on leave). If you get six weeks leave, you have to average the work load over 46 weeks - not two weeks!
Checkboard is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2010, 09:26
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Island
Age: 43
Posts: 553
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I would have thought that that average would have to be for the working weeks, not leave. Leave is classed as working for 38 hours in that week as far as pay is concerned. They can't flog you 45hrs a week most of the year at the basic award salary and then make you take LWOP to bring the average down!
glekichi is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2010, 10:05
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very topical oh Unhinged one! 38 hours per week is to bring the award in line with the new Federal Government Laws (Jan 2010). You can only work, on average over a 12 month period, a 38 hour week. So a 45 hour 'duty' week now effectively needs to include 7 hours of lunch hours/breaks so that the employee only 'works' 38 hours per week.
DaisyDuck is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2010, 10:49
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hiding between the Animal Bar and the Suave Bar
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quite astonishing ! It overrules any CASA Regs, Legitimate exemptions granted to employers, and FRMSs ... No-one wins !

Two reasons that it isn't a win for pilots trying to get on with their careers:
(1) It'll cut across the plans of motivated young pilots building flying hours, because it further cuts back the time they can actually be in the air; and
(2) It makes hiring casual staff more attractive to an employer than hiring full-timers !

It ignores the reality of flying an aircraft in the GAFA, rather than a desk in Canberra. So now we're all meant to have an hour a day off for lunch, even if there's no lunch within 200 miles and there's good flying to be done. Bah humbug !!

Last edited by Unhinged; 10th Jun 2010 at 11:09. Reason: Clarity - Fingers typing faster than brain :-)
Unhinged is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2010, 11:28
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Island
Age: 43
Posts: 553
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I think you're totally missing the point. It does
not prevent one from working more hours, making hay while the sun shines, etc. It just means you need to be paid appropriately if that's going to be the case on a regular basis, or given appropriate down time to bring the average down if it's just an irregular spike that brings the average temporarily above 38hrs.
glekichi is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2010, 11:43
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hiding between the Animal Bar and the Suave Bar
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, it certainly reads to me like it does prevent you from working more (and "making hay" as you say)

The clause says "ordinary hours of work must not average more than 38 per week".

I don't see anything about being able to exceed that if you get paid more.

Anyway, I've never had a job anywhere which met that particular criteria, and definitely not in aviation !
Unhinged is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2010, 14:55
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Island
Age: 43
Posts: 553
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Well, it certainly reads to me like it does prevent you from working more (and "making hay" as you say)

The clause says "ordinary hours of work must not average more than 38 per week".
Nothing there stopping you from doing a 50 or even 60hr week when the conditions are good and things get busy, followed by a week with a few days off to bring the average back down to 38.

I don't see anything about being able to exceed that if you get paid more.
Think EBA! The EBA doesn't need to be too different to the Award, as long as the employee is not put at a disadvantage. I.e. the longer work hours would need to be properly compensated for. I'd say we will see a lot more smaller companies with EBAs now that the Award is law and applies to everyone without an EBA.
glekichi is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2010, 17:06
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Brisbane, Qld
Posts: 1,371
Received 29 Likes on 15 Posts
isn't that the point? Employers are going to find it harder and harder to hide behind the Award?

Now if they put you on for longer than 38hours a week Duty Hours, they are no longer sticking to the Award Wage and as such need to have some kind of agreement in place with you and that gives us pilots a chance to negotiate and get paid more than we did before.

Is that how its meant to read and work?
Ixixly is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2010, 19:24
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, you can receive an 'over award' pay and then work more hours if the employee agrees to this and its fair. This will be how potentially employers will have to deal with it if they want their employees to work more than a 38 hour week. It was hard enough to 'do the job' at a 45 hour week, so the cost of keeping a full time pilot now has just gone up, quite a bit. So the cost of GA, has just gone up, again. However, it is an AVERAGE over a 1 year period so during busy/slow seasons it can be made to be flexible.
DaisyDuck is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2010, 23:30
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Further away
Posts: 947
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Lawrie Cox, time for you to step in and enlighten everyone as to what it actually means.
13 posters and no agreement yet!
megle2 is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2010, 23:53
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,815
Received 433 Likes on 236 Posts
(2) It makes hiring casual staff more attractive to an employer than hiring full-timers !
You have to pay a casual or part-time pilot a much greater figure per hour than a full-time pilot, this argument makes no sense.

Ie; based on the maximum 900 hours flying a year (average 75 per month or under 20 hours flying per week, leave included)

Single Engine below 1360kg.

Full time salary: $38-$42 per flying hour (including leave loading loss of licence etc...)
Casual Rate: $51+ per flying hour, Penalty rates for weekends, public holidays, after normal working hours etc... apply on top of this.

For the casual rates to match you would have to fly less than 700 hours a year, which is an average weekly total of less than 15 hours including six week leave.

It makes more sense to an operator to employ less pilots full time and make sure they fly the required hours a year.

If the boss just wants you to answer telephones get them to pay you the award for administration work, ASO pay is around $35-$40k a year.
43Inches is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2010, 13:35
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NSW Australia
Posts: 2,455
Received 33 Likes on 15 Posts
The replies in this thread tell the reader a lot about how much "real world" (ie: outside of aviation) experience you guys have.

"Ordinary time" and "Ordinary hours of work" mean the hours that are included in your salary or wages. In the mining industry, that's 35 hours per week.

I worked 50-60 hours every week when I was mining and I knew that I would get paid 35 hours at "normal time", then he rest at double time. In addition, I would get 25% loading (x 35 hours) as a casual, and 25% loading (x 35 hours) for working night shift.

Aviation seems to be a little different to that

If you are working a 90 hour duty fortnight you are entitled to 38 hours pay at your normal rate, then 14 hours at the penalty rate (normally 1.5 times or 2.0 times the ordinary rate). That's what "ordinary" means. It's not about averaging it over a year - where does it say that in the award?

Are you going to wait until 30 June each year to go back and claim your overtime? Of course not.

Sumdumguy said:
The feds cop a lot of stick at times but I think they had a great result with that award.
What did the Frds have to do with it?
Horatio Leafblower is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.