Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Flight Safety Australia magazine. A plea for plain English language

The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Flight Safety Australia magazine. A plea for plain English language

Old 16th Nov 2009, 00:59
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Qld troppo
Posts: 3,467
The proposition to change the current format of FSA back to the original Aviation Safety Digest that had always enjoyed universal success, was canvassed two years ago with the current editor. The proposition was knocked back based on the fact that FSA magazine had to pay it's own way and it could only do that by copius advertising which is what we see now.
So how does the need for advertising revenue fit with the crap quality of the content?

Dr
ForkTailedDrKiller is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2009, 01:33
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 4,247
I kept every issue I received of the crash comics and any others I that crossed my path that were otherwise unwanted - and then I read every word. Suffice to say I've never kept its replacement and at best have only ever skimmed the rag.

From the very first edition of FSD even Blind Freddy could see it was a poor substitute for the ASD.
Tinstaafl is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2009, 02:43
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Australia
Posts: 87
Sun-Tzu remarked over 2500 year ago:

If the instructions are not clear, if the orders are not obeyed, it is the fault of the general. But if the instructions are clear and the soldiers still do not obey, it is the fault of their officers.

Too bad no-one in power seams to have read Sun Tzu
twodogsflying is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2009, 11:36
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Oz
Posts: 468
Why CASA bothers to print and distribute FSA is a mystery.

According to the 'fine print' on the contents page

"The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors, and do not necessarily represent the views of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority"

So it would seem, one can't believe or take anything published in FSA seriously.

Sums up the value of it pretty well I think.

tipsy
tipsy2 is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2009, 12:05
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 14
Other work caused the project to be put to one side but I have the relevant contacts and it will be resurrected in the near to medium future. Centaurus and I have long had a desire to see the old crash comics be available for all the new chums .. who would benefit from learning the lessons of those who often hurt themselves ...
Thanks John, I've got 40 issues scattered between No. 42 and No. 138. Just give us a yell when the ball starts rolling.

I've also got a few duplicates so if anyone's keen on a copy or two shoot us a PM and I'll put it in the mail.
Pro777 is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2009, 00:39
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 449
Did anyone get today's CASA mail out and notice the wanky language in it? I consider myself highly literate and I have never heard the word subsumed used in my entire life.
Cynical Pilot is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2009, 02:53
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 76
Posts: 3,828
subsumed - To classify, include, or incorporate in a more comprehensive category or under a general principle.
Brian Abraham is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2009, 03:06
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Perth
Posts: 430
Harley

Put ads in if you have to, though i can see conflict of interest rearing it's ugly head, but go back to a more traditional and improved format , writing and editing style my friends and we will once again have a wothwhile and useful safety product that will stay with pilots through their flying careers and beyond.
Generally good points there Harley, but unfortunately the glitzy graphics are expected these days and any publication without them is now considered "amateurish" (not by me, I hasten to add).
Perhaps it's symptomatic of the modern tendency to favour form over function that is becoming more prevalent day by day.

I do believe that your point about "conflict of interest" re the advertising is worrisome and would welcome more discussion about that.
I don't believe that ANY publication can totally disassociate itself from the dictates of advertisers to whom the publication owes a part of its revenue.
ZEEBEE is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2009, 04:24
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: australia
Posts: 121
As a 40 year recipient of these Digests I have to agree they are, of late, pathetically weak in informative , interesting & technical content . Something has to be done about the excessive amount of advertisements in them too.
It's about time the government realised the lack of appropriately qualified technical personnel to produce these periodicals. Instead of relying on the public to submit stories , how about some decent technical articles.......
crocodile redundee is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2009, 16:42
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: THE BLUEBIRD CAFE
Posts: 60
Have got a stack of Air Safety Digests from the 60s to the 80s , going cheap.
Fantome is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2009, 20:55
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: 500 miles from Chaikhosi, Yogistan
Posts: 3,747
If you're in Hobart town, I'd be interested in those crash comics!
compressor stall is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2009, 00:54
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Adelaide
Age: 41
Posts: 18
Very (very) new to aviation in general and was a bit surprised to be receiving free reading material in the mail. I was pretty happy to be reading anything aviation-related but, to be brutally honest, the magazine was a bit meh. The close calls are alright (the writing a bit amateurish) but the stories re-enforcing regs are just bollocks. Dispassionate, bureacrat-speak which, honestly, I would start to skim but then lose interest within seconds.

Can only surmise they're incuded for legal requirements but to be part of a magazine, y'know, something people will actually read, reckon they need to be a little more human about it. These sorts of 'REMINDER: REGULATION 8008L3SS.OU812/WTFBBQ' smack of school marm scolding. What functioning adult is going to respect or adhere to that? Being reminded to do something you probably were doing anyway generally doesn't work on people with a vaguely functioning cerebral cortex.

That said, I did a bit of searching for these 'crash comics' and found a couple of excerpts;

http://www.airwaysmuseum.com/Downloa...son-VH-AGE.pdf
http://www.airwaysmuseum.com/Downloa...5%20VH-CAO.pdf

Informative, specific, interesting and still relevant lessons abound. But, these sorts of things (minus some editorialising) are already covered in ATSB incident/crash reports available online, yeah?

The usual purpose of a digest of any sort, pre-internet, was to disseminate info like incident reports to practitioners. With reports up for easy search/download these days, that elimiinates the need to put it in a digest I'd have thought. So you take away what is probably a large chunk of the publication (please, correct me if I'm wrong as I've not seen one).

So, with the above sorts of articles removed, this probably means you're not left with much to work with. In light of the above, what do people think should be in FSA? Is it even relevant to have it at all any more? It seems a pretty light-weight publication to me and, I'm sure, to a professional pilot, would seem even less relevant. Is the professional pilot the target demographic any more? I wonder because mates who grab a copy and read it when visiting like it a lot.

Thing is, amany industry digests seem to be stuck in a bit of a web-access void where bits of them are available online but the uproar from the lack of relevence would probably pale in comparison to the scenario where the publication was stopped entirely. FSA would be better served as a web publication in its current form, I think.
Top_Cat is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2009, 10:31
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 209
Just checked my collection - July 1968 for the old Safety Digest and about every one since. Every one a relevent read even today.

Bit like FTDK, the latest offering lasts about 5 minutes, unless of course severe constipation sets in.
CHAIRMAN is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2009, 11:27
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 58
Add me to the list of people who just bin it when it arrives, utter waste of paper.
Spikey21 is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2009, 12:41
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,011
But, these sorts of things (minus some editorialising) are already covered in ATSB incident/crash reports available online, yeah?
Fine if you are happy to spend your time glued all hunch back to a computer screen. Personally I prefer to sit in an armchair with my feet on the dog/cat and sit back and enjoy reading the magazine while occasionally pausing to make myself a cuppa.

The ATSB reports are sanitised to the nth degree and are carefully vetted by the legal eagles. Lots of reference to "Significant factors" leaving the reader to assess for himself the cause of the accident. In marked contrast, Mac Job's ASD magazines were completely different in style and there was no beating about the bush. In other words, you could picture the scene because of Mac Job's fine way with words. There is simply no contest between the two magazines - Air Safety Digest was light years ahead of the current CASA flight safety mag.

Regretfully I can't see any changes happening in the near future, especially as the current mag is driven by advertising revenue.
Centaurus is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2009, 13:02
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Haunted House
Posts: 294
Yeah, add me to the list too.

The rubbish graphics hurt my eyes!!

Kind of reminds me of a school kid's book report or something - "now class, you have to write an essay, and it's got to be [insert number] words long"...

So you do the minimum, and pad it out with bul**hi* (worked for me )

Do they write those letters themselves? And what's with the error count?
Counter-rotation is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2009, 20:23
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane Australia
Age: 78
Posts: 45
Talk about "here's a wheel let's reinvent it"

When I had sorted out the parts that I understood, from the 10 Commandments for LAMEs, I realised that it was exactly what I had been doing for over 45 years.

The rest looked like something from one of KRUDD's scriptwriters so in the bin it went.
ozleckie is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.