Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

SQ B744F damaged SYD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Feb 2009, 09:24
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Sydney,NSW,Australia
Posts: 138
Received 14 Likes on 6 Posts
SQ B744F damaged SYD

SQ7298 Feb 19 09(?) SYD Intl Bay 3.
Just curious, but does anyone have any info on what caused the damage to the port wing.

Ramp damage pictures by rampdoggie - Photobucket

PS BTW Wasn't me
RampDog is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2009, 09:48
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sydney
Age: 54
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
being the wing tip it looks to high to of been ground equipment,most likely another wing tip collision.
employes perspective is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2009, 10:14
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like it was pushed back into a light mast? Seems pretty bad.
Blue Carpet is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2009, 10:43
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Standing at P37
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
being the wing tip it looks to high to of been ground equipment,most likely another wing tip collision.
mmmm...... the big clue is that it was a 744F.....F being the key.

After loading, the ground handlers towed the tail support strut into the wing tip. Just didn't give a wide enough berth around the wing. The poor
tail support ended up lying down on the tarmac.

Not the first time and certainly won't be the last.
Spanner Turner is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2009, 11:49
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Age: 64
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can anybody tell me the registration of that B744F please?
TechCons is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2009, 12:26
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Singapore
Age: 33
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Outch.... seems like an expensive damage..
9v-SKA is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2009, 20:00
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Tinseltown
Age: 37
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
she'll be right mate
MikeTangoEcho is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2009, 20:28
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The Snakepit Sydney
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rego

9V-SFG repaired by Qantas at an adhoc rate lots of $$$
Hardworker is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2009, 22:04
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NT
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it will buff out
LM82 is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2009, 22:23
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: west
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wingtip easy fix.
Green gorilla is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2009, 22:53
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Perth
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually the 744 can fly with the tip removed.

Even with the other one installed.

Apparently, it only adds a tiny bit to the fuel burn.

A couple of years ago British 744 was flying in with only one attached.
ZEEBEE is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2009, 00:55
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: australia
Age: 74
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nothing a bit of high speed tape and some staples couldn't fix!
blow.n.gasket is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2009, 06:50
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Sydney,NSW,Australia
Posts: 138
Received 14 Likes on 6 Posts
Thanks for the info Mr Turner. I thought that's what has happened, as it's the most likely bit of ground equipment to dragged around at that height.
I liked all the other humorous replies, as it's always better to laugh at misfortune (especially when it's someone else's)
Also,just curious, how far back can the "wingtip" be removed and the 74 still legally fly, as the winglet itself looked OK .
How many rolls of speed tape and what type of staples would one use if trying to contain costs?
RampDog is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2009, 10:58
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: AU
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yes winglet is mel-able.

nice damage thou

better get some of that really thick speed tape, and bend it over its self to make the TE profile......thats if team A380 hasnt taken it all!
BigGun is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2009, 11:05
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LM82, mate.... classic comment that one.
VH-XXX is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2009, 12:59
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The damage is on the wing and not the winglet, so NO CDL can be applied. (Not a MEL)
Engineer_aus is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.