Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Phraseology Q

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Oct 2008, 09:05
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: VXXX
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Phraseology Q

Sometimes I hear people saying:

FOR example:

ALL STATIONS MUDGEE, ABC, IFR DUCHESS one zero miles south west, (altitude or on descent), inbound for VOR Approach, ETA overhead __.




My Question is are we mean't to say All Stations when or Mudgee Traffic at the start of the call and Mudgee Traffic at the end of the call, which is what I had previously been doing in VFR flights, and is the above call structured properly, I think it is.




Is all stations the old way?
ksa5223 is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2008, 09:17
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes. It used to be all stations.
Mr. Hat is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2008, 09:42
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: nz/oz
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yes its traffic these days, and its a good habit off finishing you call with mudgee traffic, or wereever you might be.

In NZ they dont or didnt when i did my training anyway

I think it is a good thing to repeat again after your transmission to wich traffic you were talking too.

sometimes you mis the initial place someone talks to. and if he/she finish with hooker creek traffic and you happen to decent in to VRD than you no you don't have to worry about him/her.
rather than go, "station calling were did you day you are?"
gadude is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2008, 09:52
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Aus
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Start with "Mudgee Traffic". End with "Mudgee".

Substitute place name as appropriate.
No Body is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2008, 10:40
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: VXXX
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sweet as, thought so ending with the location name sounds smart incase others missed it at the start.
ksa5223 is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2008, 10:57
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: I'm right behind you!!!
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
No Body is right. Only say "Traffic" at the start, but say the place name at the start and the end.

XXX Traffic, blah blah blah, XXX
Cap'n Arrr is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2008, 11:04
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: VXXX
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
tks captain, is that in the AIP somewhere? only needing to say the location name at the end?
ksa5223 is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2008, 11:33
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 565
Received 20 Likes on 7 Posts
sure is

AIP ENR1.1 - 21.1.12

The standard broadcast format is;
a. {Location} Traffic
b. {Aircraft type}
c. {Callsign}
d. {Position/intentions}
e. {Location}
kingRB is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2008, 07:42
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollister, Hilo, Pago Pago, Norfolk Is., Brisbane, depending which day of the week it is...
Age: 51
Posts: 1,352
Received 31 Likes on 9 Posts
21.1.13
If calls are not made clearly and concisely using the standard
phraseology, confusion can arise at aerodromes that are close together
where the CTAF is the same.

And over the page...

SUMMARY OF BROADCASTS − ALL AIRCRAFT AT NON−TOWERED
AERODROMES

Before Taxiing
CTAF Broadcast

Entering the runway (with
intentions)
CTAF Broadcast

Turning downwind
CTAF Broadcast

Turning base
CTAF Broadcast

Turning final (with intentions)
CTAF Broadcast

Clear of the runway
CTAF Broadcast

By 10NM inbound or overflying
CTAF Broadcast

Entering the circuit
CTAF Broadcast

Straight in approach at:
a. 3NM final, and
b. 1NM final (with intentions)
CTAF Broadcast

Instrument approach when,
a. departing FAF or established
on final approach
segment inbound
b. terminating the approach,
commencing the missed
approach
CTAF Broadcast
MakeItHappenCaptain is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2008, 08:26
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: australia
Posts: 17
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great to see a bit of discussion on this topic. Old habits die hard so we can expect the odd stuff up by those that have been around awhile, but still really no excuse. My real beaf and what i get really peeved at is so many students are not getting taught correctly. There is no excuse for this. I blame the problem on many of the instuctors out there, both GA and RAA.......Come on guys and gals, get it right,it's so easy. FB
fullboost is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2008, 03:06
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: nz/oz
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Make it happen capt, i dont want to be pickey since i am not famous for making the most radio calls, but in your list would there be room for, after you enter the runway, a line up call and a departure call??

I am not sure wether that is a law or not, but i always make a line up call, and more often than not a departure call, but that depens to what hight i climb.
cheers
gadude is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2008, 03:31
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Aus
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fullboost - I agree entirely! Instructors (especially those that have been around for a while) should take a lot more responsibility for ensuring that they are teaching the correct procedures.

I think many pilots also fail to transmit their intentions as required, especially when entering the runway - it would often be helpful to know in which direction you are going to go tootling off once airborne.

There is no requirement to make a rolling call, a departure call, or a backtracking call. Thus, these are not radio calls that I would tend to make, unless they are going to be useful to someone. For example: a rolling call when some time has passed since entering the runway for any reason.
No Body is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2008, 05:18
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 4,273
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Old habits die hard so we can expect the odd stuff up by those that have been around awhile
And for those of us who have been around a while longer it will be a return to how it was when we learnt. None of that newfangled "All stations" stuff.
Tinstaafl is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2008, 06:33
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Here and there
Posts: 3,101
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
I like hearing departure calls as it updates my mental picture of where people are, I realise they're not standard though. I also give a rolling call at some aerodromes where I can't see the other end of the runway (have seen a DC3 and a Herc, I think, taking off towards each other, not a pretty sight.)
AerocatS2A is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2008, 09:05
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: BackofBourke
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is not "Traffic Mudgee" for the radio cripples out there either.
tio540 is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2008, 03:10
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Fantasy Isthmus
Age: 51
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AerocatS2A
I also give a rolling call at some aerodromes where I can't see the other end of the runway...
Bathurst is a good example, I think.
TLAW is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2008, 07:38
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollister, Hilo, Pago Pago, Norfolk Is., Brisbane, depending which day of the week it is...
Age: 51
Posts: 1,352
Received 31 Likes on 9 Posts
GADUDE

Those weren't "my" calls, they are the AIP list of required calls.
Personally, I usually give a rolling or a lining up with x seconds delay call if there is a short delay before moving.
I'm sure no-one is going to jump down your throat if you are unable to make one of these calls due to radio being occupied, but I do suggest accuracy, eg if you have completed the turn onto D/W, base, final, call them as ON D/W, base, final so people know where to look for you.
Sure there will be many cases for and against to come.....
MakeItHappenCaptain is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2008, 10:09
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Sydney NSW Australia
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Turning downwind
CTAF Broadcast

Turning base
CTAF Broadcast

Turning final (with intentions)
CTAF Broadcast
good luck getting all thses calls in with 4 aircraft in the circuit, and at least 2 or 3 inbound or outbound at any one time.
Ultralights is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2008, 10:19
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oz
Age: 77
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The reality is that only four calls will be mandatory from next year and it comes down to commonsense about making other calls.
  • When the aircraft enters the "vicinity of an aerodrome"
  • Immediately before joining the circuit pattern or, in the case of a straight-in approach, at least 5 nm from the threshold of the runway
  • Immediately before, or during, taxiing
  • Immediately before entering a runway.
For myself, the turning base call with intentions while the wings are turned to make me visible - remains a desirable transmission - subject to circuit traffic.
james michael is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2008, 11:47
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollister, Hilo, Pago Pago, Norfolk Is., Brisbane, depending which day of the week it is...
Age: 51
Posts: 1,352
Received 31 Likes on 9 Posts
Ultra

good luck getting all thses calls in with 4 aircraft in the circuit, and at least 2 or 3 inbound or outbound at any one time.
So what....don't even bother??
Like I said if the radio's busy, no-one's going to bite you for omitting a call.
You don't get to pick and choose the rules.
Moorabbin is a good example of being aware of where other aicraft are around you.

Come try flying at Caloundra one day. Caboolture and Redcliffe all on the same CTAF. Not really much drama. If radio's busy for one of the turns, you've still got two other chances and I can guarantee you have a better awareness of where the other aircraft are in your circuit as a result.

Before someone chimes in with "but what if congestion.... but what about overtransmitting???".......
Being a hell of a lot closer to you, and aircraft in your circuit will come across stronger and more audible than an aircraft at the other end of the CTAF area
MakeItHappenCaptain is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.