Phraseology Q
Sometimes I hear people saying:
FOR example: ALL STATIONS MUDGEE, ABC, IFR DUCHESS one zero miles south west, (altitude or on descent), inbound for VOR Approach, ETA overhead __. My Question is are we mean't to say All Stations when or Mudgee Traffic at the start of the call and Mudgee Traffic at the end of the call, which is what I had previously been doing in VFR flights, and is the above call structured properly, I think it is. Is all stations the old way? |
Yes. It used to be all stations.
|
yes its traffic these days, and its a good habit off finishing you call with mudgee traffic, or wereever you might be.
In NZ they dont or didnt when i did my training anyway I think it is a good thing to repeat again after your transmission to wich traffic you were talking too. sometimes you mis the initial place someone talks to. and if he/she finish with hooker creek traffic and you happen to decent in to VRD than you no you don't have to worry about him/her. rather than go, "station calling were did you day you are?" |
Start with "Mudgee Traffic". End with "Mudgee".
Substitute place name as appropriate. |
sweet as, thought so :ok: ending with the location name sounds smart incase others missed it at the start.
|
No Body is right. Only say "Traffic" at the start, but say the place name at the start and the end.
XXX Traffic, blah blah blah, XXX:ok: |
tks captain, is that in the AIP somewhere? only needing to say the location name at the end?
|
sure is
AIP ENR1.1 - 21.1.12 The standard broadcast format is; a. {Location} Traffic b. {Aircraft type} c. {Callsign} d. {Position/intentions} e. {Location} |
21.1.13
If calls are not made clearly and concisely using the standard phraseology, confusion can arise at aerodromes that are close together where the CTAF is the same. And over the page... SUMMARY OF BROADCASTS − ALL AIRCRAFT AT NON−TOWERED AERODROMES Before Taxiing CTAF Broadcast Entering the runway (with intentions) CTAF Broadcast Turning downwind CTAF Broadcast Turning base CTAF Broadcast Turning final (with intentions) CTAF Broadcast Clear of the runway CTAF Broadcast By 10NM inbound or overflying CTAF Broadcast Entering the circuit CTAF Broadcast Straight in approach at: a. 3NM final, and b. 1NM final (with intentions) CTAF Broadcast Instrument approach when, a. departing FAF or established on final approach segment inbound b. terminating the approach, commencing the missed approach CTAF Broadcast |
Great to see a bit of discussion on this topic. Old habits die hard so we can expect the odd stuff up by those that have been around awhile, but still really no excuse. My real beaf and what i get really peeved at is so many students are not getting taught correctly. There is no excuse for this. I blame the problem on many of the instuctors out there, both GA and RAA.......Come on guys and gals, get it right,it's so easy. FB
|
Make it happen capt, i dont want to be pickey since i am not famous for making the most radio calls, but in your list would there be room for, after you enter the runway, a line up call and a departure call??
I am not sure wether that is a law or not, but i always make a line up call, and more often than not a departure call, but that depens to what hight i climb. cheers:ok: |
fullboost - I agree entirely! Instructors (especially those that have been around for a while) should take a lot more responsibility for ensuring that they are teaching the correct procedures.
I think many pilots also fail to transmit their intentions as required, especially when entering the runway - it would often be helpful to know in which direction you are going to go tootling off once airborne. There is no requirement to make a rolling call, a departure call, or a backtracking call. Thus, these are not radio calls that I would tend to make, unless they are going to be useful to someone. For example: a rolling call when some time has passed since entering the runway for any reason. |
Old habits die hard so we can expect the odd stuff up by those that have been around awhile |
I like hearing departure calls as it updates my mental picture of where people are, I realise they're not standard though. I also give a rolling call at some aerodromes where I can't see the other end of the runway (have seen a DC3 and a Herc, I think, taking off towards each other, not a pretty sight.)
|
It is not "Traffic Mudgee" for the radio cripples out there either.:}
|
Originally Posted by AerocatS2A
I also give a rolling call at some aerodromes where I can't see the other end of the runway...
|
GADUDE
Those weren't "my" calls, they are the AIP list of required calls. Personally, I usually give a rolling or a lining up with x seconds delay call if there is a short delay before moving. I'm sure no-one is going to jump down your throat if you are unable to make one of these calls due to radio being occupied, but I do suggest accuracy, eg if you have completed the turn onto D/W, base, final, call them as ON D/W, base, final so people know where to look for you. Sure there will be many cases for and against to come..... |
Turning downwind CTAF Broadcast Turning base CTAF Broadcast Turning final (with intentions) CTAF Broadcast |
The reality is that only four calls will be mandatory from next year and it comes down to commonsense about making other calls.
|
Ultra
good luck getting all thses calls in with 4 aircraft in the circuit, and at least 2 or 3 inbound or outbound at any one time. Like I said if the radio's busy, no-one's going to bite you for omitting a call. You don't get to pick and choose the rules. Moorabbin is a good example of being aware of where other aicraft are around you. Come try flying at Caloundra one day. Caboolture and Redcliffe all on the same CTAF. Not really much drama. If radio's busy for one of the turns, you've still got two other chances and I can guarantee you have a better awareness of where the other aircraft are in your circuit as a result. Before someone chimes in with "but what if congestion.... but what about overtransmitting???"....... Being a hell of a lot closer to you, and aircraft in your circuit will come across stronger and more audible than an aircraft at the other end of the CTAF area |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:10. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.