Originally Posted by LowObservable
(Post 11484274)
This was the airplane that struck fear into the USAF Red Hats at Tonopah. Can't help wondering about the judgement behind making it a civilian air show performer.
|
Originally Posted by Chiefttp
(Post 11484900)
While the US pilots at Tonopah had respect for the straight acceleration of the MiG-23, I hardly think it “Struck Fear” Into them. After all our (USAF) record against the MiG-23 is one-sided….
|
Originally Posted by punkalouver
(Post 11484701)
4:05 of video in post #4. Sorry guys for the digress but he says that the Tomcat had a yaw string? On a Mach 2
Update: Apparently true: https://www.google.ca/search?q=f14+t...h=961&biw=1865 So had F4K&M Phantoms. It was attached to a small triangular plate at the base of the windscreen. |
Originally Posted by munnst
(Post 11484726)
I believe the rule for essential crew only doesn't apply to American shows.
|
Aircraft operating in US waivered airspace ( i.e. airshow airspace) can only carry essential crew. I am guessing they made the case to the FAA that they had to have a second crewman to operate the jet safely
|
Originally Posted by unmanned_droid
(Post 11484917)
I think the comment you're replying to was more related to the crew flying the thing, not the crews fighting against it.
|
In the book Red Eagles by Steve Davies, recording the secret testing of various Soviet fighters at Tonopah, he quotes a Major Thomas Drake, who apparently had the highest number of flights on the type, (294) "on every sortie that thing tried to kill me". I guess testing the corners of an aircraft's envelope is not the same as a well-rehearsed airshow routine, but it does indicate the aeroplane had its quirks.
Looking over a few Soviet jets in the past they do seem to have an agricultural look about them. Why do our Russian cousins paint their cockpits that ghastly dog vomit green? On a Boeing conversion course many years ago it was explained that Boeings then habit of painting their cockpits brown was to make it easy on the eye. I preferred the 727 battle-ship grey myself! Wonder what the Soviet reason is for greenish blue? |
Originally Posted by By George
(Post 11484989)
Why do our Russian cousins paint their cockpits that ghastly dog vomit green?
|
NTSB press briefing yesterday. Very limited information given and speculation etc avoided, as you would expect.
|
Originally Posted by munnst
(Post 11484642)
Wasn't the Starfighters nickname "The Lawn Dart" ?
|
Originally Posted by Chiefttp
(Post 11484900)
While the US pilots at Tonopah had respect for the straight acceleration of the MiG-23, I hardly think it “Struck Fear” Into them. After all our (USAF) record against the MiG-23 is one-sided….
|
Originally Posted by By George
(Post 11484989)
In the book Red Eagles by Steve Davies, recording the secret testing of various Soviet fighters at Tonopah, he quotes a Major Thomas Drake, who apparently had the highest number of flights on the type, (294) "on every sortie that thing tried to kill me". I guess testing the corners of an aircraft's envelope is not the same as a well-rehearsed airshow routine, but it does indicate the aeroplane had its quirks.
Looking over a few Soviet jets in the past they do seem to have an agricultural look about them. Why do our Russian cousins paint their cockpits that ghastly dog vomit green? On a Boeing conversion course many years ago it was explained that Boeings then habit of painting their cockpits brown was to make it easy on the eye. I preferred the 727 battle-ship grey myself! Wonder what the Soviet reason is for greenish blue? F-117A: The crash of General Robert M Bond It was implied he did not quite understand the limitations of said Mig 23 which led to the catastrophic event.. cheers |
Originally Posted by ehwatezedoing
(Post 11484998)
It's supposed to ease your vision transition from inside the cockpit to outside and vice-versa.
|
Originally Posted by By George
(Post 11484989)
In the book Red Eagles by Steve Davies, recording the secret testing of various Soviet fighters at Tonopah, he quotes a Major Thomas Drake, who apparently had the highest number of flights on the type, (294) "on every sortie that thing tried to kill me". I guess testing the corners of an aircraft's envelope is not the same as a well-rehearsed airshow routine, but it does indicate the aeroplane had its quirks.
Looking over a few Soviet jets in the past they do seem to have an agricultural look about them. Why do our Russian cousins paint their cockpits that ghastly dog vomit green? On a Boeing conversion course many years ago it was explained that Boeings then habit of painting their cockpits brown was to make it easy on the eye. I preferred the 727 battle-ship grey myself! Wonder what the Soviet reason is for greenish blue? |
Bird strike, flameout, too low to recover, SOP eject 23 will kill you even if you're not in it. https://www.rbth.com/history/330613-...um-catastrophe |
The Boeing brown was allegedly to hide nicotine stains. The 787 is grey
|
Originally Posted by Big Pistons Forever
(Post 11484971)
Aircraft operating in US waivered airspace ( i.e. airshow airspace) can only carry essential crew. I am guessing they made the case to the FAA that they had to have a second crewman to operate the jet safely
|
Originally Posted by sangiovese.
(Post 11485639)
The Boeing brown was allegedly to hide nicotine stains.
Is it called 'Baby-sh1t brown'? If not, it should be. |
The 23 and 27 have a lot of BS written about them. They are pretty straight forward if used as intended - low level strike, so straight line no turning and burning.
The main two issues with them are firstly the engine - which is not super reliable at the best of times, but when it experiences long or latitudinal stress has a nasty habit of distortion and self immolation. we are not talking serious g here. Secondly lateral stability, it snakes like a bitch hence the lower stabiliser which extends with gear up. This gets a fair bit of abuse so rarely stays straight for long, compounding snaking and trim requires continual attention. The indian air force had a pretty good serviceability rate around 70% most weeks. Not sure on the numbers for Bulgaria, GDR etc. If your flying at sub 100 feet and need to fly at warp factor 1 plus with a smooth ride that wouldn't trouble your haemorrhoids it was a great option. Just don't bank, yank and expect a good outcome. https://www.instagram.com/darkroomeagle/ anyway, some great shots of the ejection sequence here - looks like late life upgrade seats fitted too |
Originally Posted by Big Pistons Forever
(Post 11484971)
Aircraft operating in US waivered airspace ( i.e. airshow airspace) can only carry essential crew. I am guessing they made the case to the FAA that they had to have a second crewman to operate the jet safely
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 16:53. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.