Originally Posted by munnst
(Post 11484424)
I was at a talk regarding ejection from the early Starfighter. Procedure for ejecting was to roll inverted as the seat came out downwards. To quote the pilot giving the talk
"If I had enough control to roll inverted I didn't need to eject". (I never flew the 104, but suspect there may have been other potential reasons to eject than a lack of roll control… ;) ) |
Originally Posted by Capt Fathom
(Post 11484286)
I guess it’s natural to want to save yourself, but it’s a big call to abandon your jet in a residential area.
Mig: Manufactured In Garage :p |
A large crate of expensive drinks to whoever maintained the ejection seats, though.
|
|
No need to speculate - both crew ejected so they’ll be able to tell us.
|
Originally Posted by pba_target
(Post 11484388)
That video isn't from an F-18. It's a Hawk crew (two QFIs) who jumped out after the engine threw a compressor blade at medium level and they were outside of glide range to a runway.
Aviation safety summary |
An East German saying: "If you want a MiG-23, buy a field near an aerodrome and then wait for one to fall in it".
|
Originally Posted by Dora-9
(Post 11484583)
An East German saying: "If you want a MiG-23, buy a field near an aerodrome and then wait for one to fall in it".
|
Originally Posted by Skeleton
(Post 11484590)
Given the number and frequency of German Starfighter losses during it's service, that saying was in use on the other side of the wall as well. Trust me.
|
The air show narrator in fact referred earlier in the day to the F-104 as "Widowmaker".
I can't provide any eye-witness account of the MiG crash.... Thunder Over Michigan is presented twice on two consecutive days, and the morning and afternoon shows are mostly the same. I really enjoyed the morning show . . . |
Well very lucky outcome for all involved. I muss say as ejections wold go I'd rather not attempt it out of a 50y soviet jet...
|
4:05 of video in post #4. Sorry guys for the digress but he says that the Tomcat had a yaw string? On a Mach 2 aircraft?
Update: Apparently true: https://www.google.ca/search?q=f14+t...h=961&biw=1865 |
Originally Posted by punkalouver
(Post 11484701)
4:05 of video in post #4. Sorry guys for the digress but he says that the Tomcat had a yaw string? On a Mach 2 aircraft?
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
|
Originally Posted by India Four Two
(Post 11484396)
What surprises me is that there were two crew in an aircraft performing at an air display.
|
Two crew ended up landing in the lake, from what I've seen, which could have ended up badly for them as well.
|
Originally Posted by atakacs
(Post 11484697)
Well very lucky outcome for all involved. I muss say as ejections wold go I'd rather not attempt it out of a 50y soviet jet...
|
The European F104s had upward ejection seats by Martin Baker.
A guy I flew with ejected on short finals with an engine fire warning, the aircraft landed on its own and was stopped by the barrier. No damage, no fire. |
Originally Posted by GeeRam
(Post 11484733)
Two crew ended up landing in the lake, from what I've seen, which could have ended up badly for them as well.
|
I presume one of the three interlinked lakes south of the I-94 as the jet hit the ground around the apartment blocks between the water and the I-94, and crew banged out over the lake.....possibly Ford Lake, the western one of the three?
|
Just seen this, which confirms crew landed in Belleville Lake and pilot sustained serious, but not life threatening injuries, back seater minor injuries. NTSB investigator already saying crash caused by engine problems (as mentioned in post above cited by witnesses) and crew had declared emergency before banging out.
https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/...t-was-injured/ |
All times are GMT. The time now is 17:33. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.