👀👀 🙄🙄
BREAKING: German government spokesperson says that there was never a moment when the delivery of Leopard tanks was "linked with the delivery of abrams tanks" - Reuters |
Originally Posted by NutLoose
(Post 11370085)
|
They probably hadn't declared when he did it, I did point out it was a day or so old.
|
Originally Posted by ORAC
(Post 11370223)
Gvernment spokesperson says that there was never a moment when the delivery of Leopard tanks was "linked with the delivery of abrams tanks" - Reuters
"We originally invented a false dependency on the US doing something difficult that would prevent us from supplying tanks. Now that everyone else has ignored us, we look incredibly stupid. We will now supply Leopard tanks and the order with the factory shall be placed in 2024. In the meantime, would you like any more helmets......... or kettles .......or golf clubs ?" |
Originally Posted by NutLoose
(Post 11370205)
It's ok Russia mobilising troops, but when they attack like this, they are just fertilizer.
https://twitter.com/Tendar/status/16...Cy9aSR0u4sAAAA |
Originally Posted by ORAC
(Post 11370223)
👀👀 🙄🙄
BREAKING: German government spokesperson says that there was never a moment when the delivery of Leopard tanks was "linked with the delivery of abrams tanks" - Reuters EDIT: Nutty has given a comprehensive breakdown of new pledges for armaments, but I thought I could add a couple of interesting facts about Ramstein picked up in general reading. There are 53 000 American personnel stationed there ( that was a hell of a surprise. I would have guessed at 10 000 ) The public ( probably not Russians :O ) can visit the airfield ( unsure what that means exactly ) Monday to Friday at no charge. That must be your tax-dollars at work -tdracer and LoneWolf50 !! Pretty surprising to me though. I have never heard about permanent public access to a military establishment of any sort and Ramstein does have some very important functions. |
Originally Posted by Tartiflette Fan
(Post 11370295)
That "spokesman" was the new Defence Minister - Pistorius. It is just astonishing how these two-faced lying bastards have the nerve to spin 180 in 24 hours and somehow continue to believe that their voters continue to see them as honourable representatives of the nation . Unfortunately, however, the voters know that the other side are just as twisted.
Most Germans against sending Leopard tanks to UkraineOf the 2,025 respondents, 43% opposed the delivery and only 39% were in favour. Another 16% did not express a position, the survey, conducted for dpa by the polling institute YouGov, showed.One in three respondents (33%) think this is already too much. Another 24% say the volume of deliveries is just right, while 25% demand more German military support for Ukraine.Despite the reticence of the YouGov poll respondents towards having their country export the tanks, most are not opposed to other countries doing so. A total of 47% would be in favour, with 38% against and 16% undecided. Berlin must approve any transfer of the tanks, which 20 countries have in their arsenals. Poland and Finland have already said they would send Leopards to Ukraine. Unlike the Soviet-era tanks that comprise most of Ukraine's heavy armour, the tanks have advanced capabilities such as thermal optics. https://www.msn.com/en-xl/news/other...ur/ar-AA16vIo6 |
https://www.defense.gov/News/Release...e-for-ukraine/
So 109 Bradley in total. When you add it all up it is eye watering, see https://media.defense.gov/2023/Jan/1...EET-JAN-19.PDF |
This guy makes some sensible comments on hitting the transport infrastructure and backs it up with images of key points.
https://twitter.com/Tatarigami_UA From the Beeb Germany’s Leopard 2 main battle tank, produced by Rheinmetall, is Europe’s most popular tank. It’s been bought by more than a dozen nations, some of whom - namely Poland and Finland - are ready to send theirs to Ukraine right now. But there’s a problem. Under Germany’s export regulations, countries buying its tanks need a re-export licence from the German government before passing them on to anyone else. The US has similar restrictions. The Ukrainians can barely contain their frustration at this, as they say they need at least 300 modern, western tanks immediately if they are going to have any chance of repelling the coming spring offensive by Russia. But Olaf Scholz’s government is wary of antagonising Russia and does not want to be seen to be out of step with its allies. It has indicated that it first needs the US to give a green light to sending its own advanced M1 Abrams tanks and that is not something Washington is yet ready to do. .. |
Originally Posted by Tartiflette Fan
(Post 11370295)
There are 53 000 American personnel stationed there ( that was a hell of a surprise. I would have guessed at 10 000 )
It is the whole Kaiserlautern area with Kaiserslautern Army Depot,Daenner-casern, Kleber-casern, Tank casern Kaiserslautern, Sembach, Pirmasens and a few more installations where some 50.000 US troops are stationed. |
The German excuse appears to be fear of Russian escalation. Russia (without direct external escalation) has continued to escalate itself. (Long range missiles targeting critical infrastructure, mobilisation, energy war against Europe, mass murder of civilians..)
What further escalation is feared? Nuclear weapons ? Directly attacking a NATO country? Either would be suicide for Russia, the Russian armed forces know that. Would they obey Putin's order to commit suicide? |
Originally Posted by Fitter2
(Post 11370398)
The German excuse appears to be fear of Russian escalation.
What further escalation is feared?
Originally Posted by anxiao
(Post 11369308)
More than 50 years after Brandt launched his “Ostpolitik” initiative, it’s now being used as an excuse for what Germans call a “Putinversteher” – which literally translates as “Putin understander”. The term is a pejorative reference to politicians, who insist the Russian leader’s expansionist interests are justified, as well as anti-American pundits pushing back against Washington’s calls for Germany’s energy security.
“There are dense networks of money, influence and politics between the SPD and Russia. They hang out in the board rooms of energy companies, trying to build solidarity with Russia while just raking in the money,” explained Nick Spicer, FRANCE 24’s Berlin correspondent. “The question is whether Scholz is going to call out his former SPD colleague.” Perhaps Scholz needs the support of these networks to stay in power? |
👀👀👀👀
More than 170 Hungarian generals and senior military officers have been forced into early retirement in recent days by Hungary's MoD, led by Kristóf Szalay-Bobrovniczky. He is a former business partner of Transmashholding, a Russian state-owned company. A new government decree has allowed the Minister of Defense to unilaterally terminate the service of soldiers who have reached the age of 45 and have at least 25 years of actual service, with two months' notice. According to @Telexhu, the minister "dismissed members of the Defence Staff en masse. (...) One source said (...) that at least a hundred colonels, generals had been given unilateral dismissals, while another said that 157 (...) with immediate effect." According to opposition MP Ágnes Vadai, "this means there is a de-NATOisation going on in the Hungarian Defence Forces at the moment", as "the 45-year-old officers and generals are soldiers with international experience, who speak languages and have been socialised in NATO".…. https://telex.hu/belfold/2023/01/20/...galati-viszony |
Originally Posted by Declan275
(Post 11369702)
After the war is over, there’s going to be a fairly immense contract to be won when they decide to standardise their kit.
|
And just watch the Germans stampede to grab sales of the new kit ... |
Its the reconstruction contracts of the country where the big money will be made.
Those who gave a lot of help will expect a large slice of that pie. Last estimate I saw was in excess of $6 trillion to build new infrastructure etc. |
Originally Posted by ORAC
(Post 11370223)
BREAKING: German government spokesperson says that there was never a moment when the delivery of Leopard tanks was "linked with the delivery of abrams tanks" - Reuters
So, how does the tech of the Leopard compare to the Abrams? I'd think they'd be similar - does anyone know? |
Originally Posted by ORAC
(Post 11370417)
👀👀👀👀
More than 170 Hungarian generals and senior military officers have been forced into early retirement in recent days by Hungary's MoD, led by Kristóf Szalay-Bobrovniczky. He is a former business partner of Transmashholding, a Russian state-owned company. A new government decree has allowed the Minister of Defense to unilaterally terminate the service of soldiers who have reached the age of 45 and have at least 25 years of actual service, with two months' notice. According to @Telexhu, the minister "dismissed members of the Defence Staff en masse. (...) One source said (...) that at least a hundred colonels, generals had been given unilateral dismissals, while another said that 157 (...) with immediate effect." According to opposition MP Ágnes Vadai, "this means there is a de-NATOisation going on in the Hungarian Defence Forces at the moment", as "the 45-year-old officers and generals are soldiers with international experience, who speak languages and have been socialised in NATO".…. https://telex.hu/belfold/2023/01/20/...galati-viszony |
Originally Posted by tdracer
(Post 11370462)
My understanding is that much of the reluctance to send Abrams tanks is related to the high tech systems (targeting, communication, etc.) falling into the wrong hands. I know that in the Middle East, when an Abrams was disabled and couldn't be recovered, they made a point of destroying it so the 'bad guys' couldn't access anything valuable.
So, how does the tech of the Leopard compare to the Abrams? I'd think they'd be similar - does anyone know? Window was subject to agonising appraisal before being used to save Bomber Command lives. Historically best to "use it when you need it, and be one step ahead for when countermeasures are invented". |
Originally Posted by tdracer
(Post 11370462)
My understanding is that much of the reluctance to send Abrams tanks is related to the high tech systems (targeting, communication, etc.) falling into the wrong hands. I know that in the Middle East, when an Abrams was disabled and couldn't be recovered, they made a point of destroying it so the 'bad guys' couldn't access anything valuable.
So, how does the tech of the Leopard compare to the Abrams? I'd think they'd be similar - does anyone know? |
Originally Posted by _Agrajag_
(Post 11370474)
I can't say that this comes as a surprise. Hungary has been moving away from the ideals of NATO (and the EU for that matter) for a while. What puzzles me is that the views of many Hungarians (perhaps a majority) are at odds with those of Viktor Orbán, yet he remains in power and has been emulating Putin in turning Hungary into an autocracy. Seems strange for a country that suffered when under the thumb of the Soviet Union to put up with this.
Just like Erdogan in Turkey. And both funded by the Kremlin. |
Originally Posted by _Agrajag_
(Post 11370480)
Used to be standard to have detonators rigged in anything sensitive.
https://c8.alamy.com/comp/WX8279/vie...ane-WX8279.jpg https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/zGQAA...-L/s-l1600.jpg (...and sorry for the aviation content! :ouch: ) sort of reminds me of this: https://i.pinimg.com/originals/ff/1e...a41c67257e.jpg |
Originally Posted by Sue Vêtements
(Post 11370502)
I did a walkaround once in a B17 and the guide said that's what the two red buttons on the glareshield are for. I think he said it destroyed the radios
Originally Posted by Sue Vêtements
(Post 11370502)
(...and sorry for the aviation content! :ouch: )
|
Originally Posted by _Agrajag_
(Post 11370480)
Used to be standard to have detonators rigged in anything sensitive. Goes right back to the earliest airborne radars I think. Certainly kit I worked on in the 70's and 80's had the capability to fit detonators for this purpose. No idea if modern kit has the same capability. Be surprised if it didn't, though.
|
Originally Posted by henra
(Post 11370394)
In Ramstein Air Base itself ~9000 US staff are working/stationed.
It is the whole Kaiserlautern area with Kaiserslautern Army Depot,Daenner-casern, Kleber-casern, Tank casern Kaiserslautern, Sembach, Pirmasens and a few more installations where some 50.000 US troops are stationed. Ramstein Air Base - Allgemeine Daten"Als größte Einrichtung der US Air Force außerhalb der Vereinigten Staaten umfasst das Gebiet 1400 Hektar und wird von rund 53.000 amerikanischen Soldaten und Angehörigen bewohnt. Die Fläche gehört allerdings der Bundesrepublik Deutschland."https://praxistipps.focus.de/ramstei...-gelten_145238 |
The countries that are armed with the Leopard-2 have agreed that they can start training courses for Ukrainian tank crews to master the Leopard-2. Ukrainian Defense Minister Reznikov said this in an exclusive comment to LIGA.net
https://news.liga.net/ua/politics/ne...ryv-po-leopard |
Originally Posted by Tartiflette Fan
(Post 11370539)
Quoting from this article.
Ramstein Air Base - Allgemeine DatenPage 200: Active Duty 8225 in 2014. |
Originally Posted by ORAC
(Post 11370550)
The countries that are armed with the Leopard-2 have agreed that they can start training courses for Ukrainian tank crews to master the Leopard-2. Ukrainian Defense Minister Reznikov said this in an exclusive comment to LIGA.net
https://news.liga.net/ua/politics/ne...ryv-po-leopard EDIT: Just how pathetic does the German government want to portray itself as being ?Today Pistorius said that they would have to do an accounting of the tanks whilst considering their position. Seriously now, after nearly a year, going to an international conference with pre-warning what will be discussed, and the Defence Minister says he doesn't have the figures on tank availability ? |
Originally Posted by henra
(Post 11370557)
https://www.acq.osd.mil/eie/Download...ort%20FY15.pdf
Page 200: Active Duty 8225 in 2014. |
|
Probably realistic advice, but why the h*ll can't we give UKR the means to erase that threat?
Interesting that the original desire by many of us for more material support to the UKR is finally getting belated traction. Timing is such an important factor. |
Are the Russians (Wagner) aiming for a Bakhmut bellybutton to tie off the final knot, a Bakhmut
And are the US negotiators aware of this and working towards it? Will the new influx of weapons prove to be a seal along the new 'wall', providing equal and opposite military pressure rather than actual battlefield use? |
Originally Posted by Tartiflette Fan
(Post 11370563)
Just how pathetic does the German government want to portray itself as being ?Today Pistorius said that they would have to do an accounting of the tanks whilst considering their position. Seriously now, after nearly a year, going to an international conference with pre-warning what will be discussed, and the Defence Minister says he doesn't have the figures on tank availability ?
What's next, "we won't count our tanks until the Americans count theirs" ? I heard an excuse on Radio 4 that this is in part due to 39-45. That's almost beyond living memory FFS. |
Case for Abrams vs Leopard for Ukraine.
|
Originally Posted by ORAC
(Post 11370677)
Case for Abrams vs Leopard for Ukraine.
Appreciate the drive and resolve, dead serious and verbatim no joke, yet the amount of 'our side' bias has thickened recently a lot. That's from someone who's been now repeatedly moderated and rightly so for being too loud about the victim/aggressor stance (my take). |
Originally Posted by ORAC
(Post 11370677)
Case for Abrams vs Leopard for Ukraine.
|
Originally Posted by ORAC
(Post 11370550)
The countries that are armed with the Leopard-2 have agreed that they can start training courses for Ukrainian tank crews to master the Leopard-2. Ukrainian Defense Minister Reznikov said this in an exclusive comment to LIGA.net
https://news.liga.net/ua/politics/ne...ryv-po-leopard I realise I’ll be shouted down , but the implication in training them to use the Leopard is that they’ll be getting the tanks quite soon & I don’t see that happening. I concur that they SHOULD get them but there’s no sign of a change in German attitude. As I’m posting , another question : sorry if it’s already been covered & I missed it... Are they getting all this kit for nothing or will there a massive bill for fighting tyranny along the lines of the one Blighty faced for ‘Lend lease’? I assume we’re all giving the kit away , is that the case? |
Originally Posted by Flugzeug A
(Post 11370714)
Sorry , but why ?
After a decision to send Leopards you will then have to send the future users to at least 2 months of training. Why waste these two months? To help Vlad and his cronies? It's the right thing to do. And in parallel use the two months to put some pressure on Olaf the Slow. HE is the problem. The vast majority of the rest of the German Government would like to push ahead. Maybe NSA can find some Wirecard or Cum Ex documents in the meantime to accelerate things?! |
Do all NATO countries have tanks?
If Germany is dragging it's heals couldn't a coalition tank force (including German tanks) be sent to Ukraine so that one country cannot be singled out? My understanding is that most countries use Leopard or Russian armour anyway? |
Originally Posted by uxb99
(Post 11370779)
Do all NATO countries have tanks?
If Germany is dragging it's heals couldn't a coalition tank force (including German tanks) be sent to Ukraine so that one country cannot be singled out? My understanding is that most countries use Leopard or Russian armour anyway? Same goes for almost everything else. If the UK had, for example, Abrams M1s then we couldn't send them to Ukraine without agreement from the US. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 16:50. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.