Great! Please then tell us what the answer is if they can: a) No longer initiate new programmes b) no longer negotiate any programmes Then someone invented PRINCE (PRojects IN Controlled Environments) or how to get so far behind programme, your end project will be obsolete/redundant before it is finished. Oh how I laughed :ugh:. Then they came up with PRINCE 2 and the laughter did not stop. The Government saw this as the answer to all there problems of time and budget and made their contractors use it. On time, on budget, :} :} :} :} never ever, except once AFAI. The only project I ever did that had PRICE in the contract was a district general hospital reconfiguration, £30m and 18 months to do it :eek: . I was the Planning Manger on it and the Project Manager was one of the best I ever worked with. We realised very early on that if we followed the PRICE rules, it was going to take five years to get it done, so we ignored ALL the rules of PRINCE, taking the ££££ risks of doing so ourselves. We delivered the project on time and under budget, it was unheard of to do this on a project of this size and complexity for the NHS. The answer is employ competent project mangers, let them get on with delivering what they were tasked to deliver and do not tie their hands behind their backs. PRINCE 2, please, don't make me laugh any more, I can't take it. |
Originally Posted by meleagertoo
(Post 11285820)
You two evidently have far more active and febrile imaginations than I.
I have watched and rewatched that video three times now to see if I was mistaken, or to see if I can identify what you describe. No, I wasn't, an no I cannot. I'm nor saying what is depicted isn't as you describe, just that on watchng it three times at normal speed there is no way it could be identified as that. What really bothers me is how you managed to do so...frame by frame examination? Yukk. Don't call me weird! You of all people! |
Originally Posted by meleagertoo
(Post 11285820)
Y
Don't call me weird! You of all people! |
Originally Posted by Tartiflette Fan
(Post 11285829)
I equally saw nothing but debris strewn across the bridge. Absolutely nothing that looked human.
|
Originally Posted by WB627
(Post 11285811)
Yikes :eek: you are not joking. BTW, your Twitter links are not showing up, up like mine :ooh:
If that preview panel does not load (ISP restrictions, VPNs or not VPNs), a perfectly blank space is what you get. |
Originally Posted by WB627
(Post 11285842)
You should have gone to Specsavers
|
Originally Posted by WB627
(Post 11285811)
Yikes :eek: you are not joking. BTW, your Twitter links are not showing up, up like mine :ooh:
If that preview panel does not load (ISP restrictions, VPNs or not VPNs), a perfectly blank space is what you get. |
Originally Posted by Thrust Augmentation
(Post 11285868)
I'll agree with that, it was all perfectly clear on my 1st watch. Everything is of a similar colour, but still it's quite obvious.
|
6 seconds in, part of body against wall, possibly arm, 22 seconds legless corpse. 34 seconds another burnt body. Total film length 40 seconds, happy now seeing corpses?
Geez, I do not believe I actually posted the above information. Hence why I never posted the link direct, those that want to see it will find it, I watched it just expecting to see the bridge damage, but having watched it realised what it contained hence not posting a direct link, reporting the bridge damage but warning others about the remains. … |
More satellite views of the main Kherson bridge and the damage so far.
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....696e173aa.jpeg https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....237a6a582.jpeg |
|
Originally Posted by NutLoose
(Post 11285816)
Well, it starts by swinging to an arm and part of a torso on the right, then moves on to the top half of a body on the right, then scans across to another torso along with bits everywhere on the left.
You have to remember, while most of us are adults on here, that does not necessarily mean everyone is, hence my reservation at posting it. I told you where the link was and I posted a link in 8499, it was up to you to look for it. . |
Originally Posted by GlobalNav
(Post 11285923)
You can’t make this bum happy. Thank you for showing intelligence and sensitivity. It reminds us that this is not a mere athletic competition.
|
Originally Posted by FlightDetent
(Post 11285872)
The links are suppressed by the site fronted because a fullsize preview graphics panel is shown. Embedded in the post like the YouTube videos.
If that preview panel does not load (ISP restrictions, VPNs or not VPNs), a perfectly blank space is what you get. |
Originally Posted by NutLoose
(Post 11285892)
More satellite views of the main Kherson bridge and the damage so far.
https://twitter.com/ArtisanalAPT/sta...67758061948930 This image is from today, the lower one the 21st https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....696e173aa.jpeg https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....237a6a582.jpeg |
So the next war will be drone, 3D printed, space and nuclear power station focused?
|
Originally Posted by beardy
(Post 11285950)
The links used to show up for me, now they don't and I haven't changed any settings. They do show up if I copy and paste the whole post text.
|
So the next war will be drone, 3D printed, space and nuclear power station focused? If we are unlucky, the one after that will be fought with clubs and spears. |
Ukraine helicopter low level, looks like under wires too
|
Is this a build up or just reporting what is known?
|
Is Putrid about to throw his last dice?
|
|
“China calls on Putin to end Russian roulette at Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant in Ukraine after disaster near-miss. When China is speaking up, you know it’s serious.”…
https://apple.news/AOXQg4sceQgWu4jnmiiv-EQ |
Quote: Originally Posted by Fitter2 View Post The MOD is utterly incompetent at (a) negotiating a contract and (b) managing a project development. From the other side of the fence, they are an almost bottomless money pit, but it makes at least some ex-RAF people in industry have guilty feelings for those serving, and for taxpayers. Posted by Tartiflette Fan Great! Please then tell us what the answer is if they can: a) No longer initiate new programmes b) no longer negotiate any programmes Expatriate the whole she-bang to ..............................whom ? 2 Use the end users advice better when writing the specification, rather than having it hacked down to save money by the Treasury civil servant accountants. 3. Buy the best match to the spec, rather than politicise the buying decision. 4. Ruthless holding the manufacturer to fulfilling the contract and meeting the spec The cost would be far lower than the billions wasted later. That might be a start. Sorry for thread drift, but seeing the trickery and disregard for responsibility to the taxpayer on the one hand, and when looking back at doing the job with the tools at our disposal makes me a bit cross. |
Originally Posted by ORAC
(Post 11286106)
“China calls on Putin to end Russian roulette at Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant in Ukraine after disaster near-miss. When China is speaking up, you know it’s serious.”…
https://apple.news/AOXQg4sceQgWu4jnmiiv-EQ |
Ukraine MOD came out with a wish list of FJ's.
To play around with the idea the Gripen would be an interesting option for Ukraine: did well in latest tenders being the runner up (Finland, Canada), easy to maintain (advertised to require just two conscripts to turn around on a highway base) and already NATO compatible. Just a small hickup is the very low number made, who'd send their AC's on a short notice? Czech needs their to cover Slovakia due to Slovakia sending their mig29's to Ukraine. Hungary has only 12+2. South Africa has 17. So unless Czech gets their F35's very fast and Sweden sends their fleet it's a no go. |
Originally Posted by Beamr
(Post 11286190)
Ukraine MOD came out with a wish list of FJ's.
. |
Originally Posted by MPN11
(Post 11286196)
The end product of peacetime, pared down, forces. Will we all ever learn that Defence is not an option, but essential, and has to be properly and fully resourced against all possible adverse scenarios? Meanwhile, in the Treasury ...
|
Originally Posted by uxb99
(Post 11285972)
Does show the accuracy of modern weapons. I fear the next war will be focused on space. Knock out the GPS satellite systems.
https://www.popularmechanics.com/mil...al-navigation/ https://www.gps.gov/governance/advis...8-12/laine.pdf Knocking out GPS satellites however would effect both sides. |
Originally Posted by MPN11
(Post 11286196)
The end product of peacetime, pared down, forces. Will we all ever learn that Defence is not an option, but essential, and has to be properly and fully resourced against all possible adverse scenarios?
|
Originally Posted by NutLoose
(Post 11286222)
It’s why the US is looking at celestial navigation as stars can’t be hacked or destroyed.
https://www.popularmechanics.com/mil...al-navigation/ https://www.gps.gov/governance/advis...8-12/laine.pdf Knocking out GPS satellites however would effect both sides. I note in the Draper slides that only lines of position from two different celestial bodies are required to determine position. But unless the relative azimuths are ideal (90 degrees) and error sources are zero or ignored, it’s been a better practice to have at least three LOPs from bodies roughly 120 degrees azimuth apart, in order to triangulate and minimize contributions of systematic error. I don’t know the technology, but I suppose they have a way of observing stars even in daytime. |
Originally Posted by Beamr
(Post 11286190)
Ukraine MOD came out with a wish list of FJ's.
To play around with the idea the Gripen would be an interesting option for Ukraine: did well in latest tenders being the runner up (Finland, Canada), easy to maintain (advertised to require just two conscripts to turn around on a highway base) and already NATO compatible. Just a small hickup is the very low number made, who'd send their AC's on a short notice? Czech needs their to cover Slovakia due to Slovakia sending their mig29's to Ukraine. Hungary has only 12+2. South Africa has 17. So unless Czech gets their F35's very fast and Sweden sends their fleet it's a no go. |
Satellite imagery confirms three MiG-31K/I (Kinzhal missile-equipped) have been deployed to the Kaliningrad Chkalovsk Air Base.
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....ce9fe10ed.jpeg |
Originally Posted by GlobalNav
(Post 11286247)
Is this idea applicable only to aircraft or would the technology be integrated with warheads?
I note in the Draper slides that only lines of position from two different celestial bodies are required to determine position. But unless the relative azimuths are ideal (90 degrees) and error sources are zero or ignored, it’s been a better practice to have at least three LOPs from bodies roughly 120 degrees azimuth apart, in order to triangulate and minimize contributions of systematic error. I don’t know the technology, but I suppose they have a way of observing stars even in daytime. |
Originally Posted by GlobalNav
(Post 11286247)
Is this idea applicable only to aircraft or would the technology be integrated with warheads?
I note in the Draper slides that only lines of position from two different celestial bodies are required to determine position. But unless the relative azimuths are ideal (90 degrees) and error sources are zero or ignored, it’s been a better practice to have at least three LOPs from bodies roughly 120 degrees azimuth apart, in order to triangulate and minimize contributions of systematic error. I don’t know the technology, but I suppose they have a way of observing stars even in daytime. |
Originally Posted by GlobalNav
(Post 11286247)
Is this idea applicable only to aircraft or would the technology be integrated with warheads?
I note in the Draper slides that only lines of position from two different celestial bodies are required to determine position. But unless the relative azimuths are ideal (90 degrees) and error sources are zero or ignored, it’s been a better practice to have at least three LOPs from bodies roughly 120 degrees azimuth apart, in order to triangulate and minimize contributions of systematic error. I don’t know the technology, but I suppose they have a way of observing stars even in daytime. |
Sweet
|
Originally Posted by NutLoose
(Post 11286274)
I read somewhere they could see through clouds and in daylight… IR? With everything I imagine it will work down to weapons.
Separately, the Russian's seem to be only interested in their domestic consumers of propaganda now, or they are heading towards a national bi-polar personality disorder... the dissonance with reality is painful to watch. I would recommend an extended course of Haldol or similar for the occupants of the Kremlin to assist their return to reality. Side effects may include
|
In the past few months, we and other analyst have watched the formation and training of Russia's 3rd Army Corps, first publicly reported by Ukrainian intelligence back in June. Now it is being deployed to the Ukrainian border.
Photo and video evidence shows trains with a Buk air defense system and T-80BV and T-90M tanks. Per Russian Railways database, they are heading deployed from Mulino, 3rd AC's training base, to the Ukrainian border close to Taganrog, Rostov region….. It is currently unknown where the 3rd AC will deploy, but the frontlines closest to the destination of the trains (Neklinovka station in southern Rostov region) are Donetsk and Zaporizhia region.…. |
A significant reduction took place with elements of the Northern Fleet leaving the Mediterranean following a deployment that started on Feb-11.
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....ebe64fa7f.jpeg |
All times are GMT. The time now is 23:29. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.