Have you asked at a recruiting office?

Try calling RAF Cranwell and asking for "NCA Liaison Team".

They can answer both questions.

Cheers for the info camelspyyder,


ive not had a chance to speak to a careers office as I am currently on a course and didn't know if careers office or local commissioning club would be correct route. I didn't realise that the NCA liaison team is still going, ill dig out the details from the cranwell page when I can get on a DII machine.

Hi there guys,

another hopeful pilot candidate here. New to the forum, and after reading through the thread was wanting to ask a couple questions.

I have my P2 presentation in a couple of weeks and my interview the following week, i was just wondering if there were any hints or tips you guys knew of for the interview process other than the usual, keep up with current affairs and learn as much as possible about the RAF's current roles. I started trying to teach myself as much about avionics as possible too and just wondered if you guys - that actually know how it works - think that'll be of any assistance?

Sorry for the essay and cheers in advance,
Dave

Haven't posted here on a while;


But, for all those interested - Weapon Systems Operator role is now open for applications.


Best of luck to all.

You've pretty much nailed it, along with being able to explain why you stand out above other prospective candidates.

No and maybe yes. Assuming you pass the aptitude tests and medical, neither of which relies on your ability to understand the workings of a multifunction radar or a datalink, the crux of OASC is all about demonstrating leadership potential not technical ability. As with the commissioning boards at all 3 services, you can be a genius, but if you lack that certain something, you won't get in.

Unless you have a burning desire to understand everything there is to know about radars, I wouldn't go much beyond knowing the big picture stuff i.e. what sort of radars you might get on a particular aircraft type and what they do - air-air, air-ground, synthetic aperture radar etc.

Where that sort of knowledge will be handy is at interview as it's one of the ways in which you demonstrate your knowledge of the RAF and hence your enthusiasm for joining, and it might just be the crucial extra tick in the box to get you over the line if needed. But that will only be one small part of the interview, don't focus on it. Spend your time gathering your thoughts and putting your evidence together as to why you should get the job and then let the RAF pay you to learn about avionics down the line.

I know a few Brits who are currently in Oz who are keen.

Is pilot recruitment for all three services back to full steam ? In terms of prior to cutbacks ?

If so how many approximately would commence every year ?

Apologies if this info is posted elsewhere - 100 pages or so just a fair bit to read there.

Know the RAF was fairly brutal with cutting pilot trainees, on the upside though a lot of these were given a start by Cathay

Does anyone know when the age limit for serving NCA to apply for pilot changed to be the exact same as DE? As I understand the DE limit was always 26.5, but serving aircrew had up until 35? It's a step in the wrong direction IMO. There are a lot of switched on NCA who already have a high level of airmanship with a lot more to offer. The Army, however, will recruit pilots up to 30, who could potentially end up captaining an Apache, which I'm sure at very least would take as much training as an AT, SH or FJ mate. Is there a logic behind the RAF's decision? Thoughts?

Er, logic and RAF decision. Look up oxymoron in your Collin's dictionary.

I believe that there is no difference between Serving Airman or DE in terms of age limits at present. In training by age 26 if I'm not mistaken.

Completely agree. Just happened to a guy on our Sqn. Missed the age limit by a matter of months, no exceptions made. He's now PVR'd which is a total waste of talent in my opinion. I was rather lucky and made the jump from NCA at age 30 before the ridiculous rules were changed.

I almost jumped to the AAC some time back until it was pointed out that should I fail flying training, I would now be a SNCO in the army. I promptly thanked them for their time and replaced the receiver........

OFFICER and AIRCREW 'CANDIDATES' PLEASE READ THIS THREAD FIRST!
 

I was under the impression it was 32 years old for serving NCA and had been for a while. I guess admin, OASC or your local careers office would have up to date gen.

Avoiding lawsuits?

Someone aged 27 could have demonstrably better aptitude test results than an NCA bod aged 31, but the 27 yr old would be turned down on the spot for no reason other than he's late to the party.

Appreciate the Armed Forces don't work to the same employment laws as other sectors of work, but that won't last forever. They're just covering their own backs.

Hey guys,

I've lurked for ages and read this entire thread (amongs others) but thought it was about time I actually signed up and posted.

I'm applying for the RAF and have my OASC date confirmed mid-August. Currently have some minor issues with medical records, which will hopefully be sorted ASAP. Long story short, previous hayfever diagnosis (>>4 years ago).

Just wanted to say everyone on this thread has been hugely helpful - so much information is here and you are all doing a brilliant job.

Exmm...best of luck

I was you 30+ years ago, never thought I stood a chance.
Ended up USAF Exchange tour etc, had a blast.

Be a leader, but be humble, and you'll surprise yourself, and the Board.
Without a doubt, the GD(P) wings course that all others in the world aspire to.

Thanks for the words of encouragement :)


I've been accepted onto the October IOT into Aircrew, which is brilliant news - if not a bit rapid!


I'll be happy to help anyone who is coming up to OASC in the next few weeks, but really there is nothing I can say that hasn't been covered in this thread already.

Well done, good to know you got your medical records sorted.

Congratulations!!!

OASC Interview
 

Evening all!

I'm on my way to OASC Part 2 on the 9th November. Keeping the positive thoughts flowing :)

If asked in the interview what the role and vision is of the Royal Air Force, it's not going to look great if I quote what's on their website! So is it just a case of breaking it down into my own words? Put a personal spin on it even!

Thanks in advance.

Brady

A bit of both really. I would quote exactly what is on the website; it shows you're using suitable sources in your research. You will, however, be expected to voice an opinion on what you have read.

Best of luck!

Evening all,

It has been mentioned that you have to get into the top 0.5 percentile, in the aptitude tests, to become a pilot. Does anyone know the percentile for WSOP?

Regards,
Ste.

It's impossible to quantify in that way for WSOp or Pilot. Is that 0.5% of applicants? of those tested? I would say that in reality less than 1 in 200 of those who want to be a pilot can do it. It's also quite negative for an applicant to worry "am I in the top 0.5%". Just do your best. You either have sufficient aptitude or you don't.

Speaking of Navs, and I am talking of those that already jumped the AFCO, OASC, and IOT hurdles, 30% or more still wash out.

Many who washed out we're chopped pilots but that was when pilot intakes were much higher. Now I would expect competition would be stiffer so standards higher.

However there is one interesting change. This thread on Pprune used to be very active with potential applicants; now interest is close to nil.

PN - For the benefit of youths reading this thread, we stopped recruiting Navs over 10 years ago! Non pilot aircrew were then accepted as either Weapon System Officers (WSO) or Weapon System Operators (WSOp). As a follow on from SDSR 10, WSO training has ceased to exist and WSOp training, after a long period of being relatively quiet is about to ramp up again. Albeit, with nothing like the intake once seen during the days of having an MPA Force.

I bet if there was a thread dealing with PVRs, redundancy and pensions it would be far busier than this one is now. What would you call it though? 'How green is your grass?' Or maybe 'Come on in, the water's lovely' ;)

PA, thank you for the amplification, my point though was that there are a lot of hurdles with wings following training, OCU, Sqn check and acceptance up to 6 months after OCU.

Hi all, I am after a bit of advice from anybody who has direct experience with OASC.

I got in contact with RAF Recruiting about eyesight requirements for Aircrew and the possibility of laser corrective surgery. I got back this:

"Any candidates having l@ser eye surgery must wait at least 12 months before applying,
you must be at least 22 years of age at your application,
the total pre operative refractive error was not outside the limits for selection i.e. +6 or -6 dioptre in either eye and the best spectacle corrected visual acuity was within selection standards.
Further specialist assessment will also be required following the pre employment medical assessment to confirm ophthalmic fitness for recruit entry."

They didn't answer my question as to whether I would be allowed in to the Service BEFORE having laser corrective surgery. I was told by one of the FJ pilots that laser surgery BEFORE applying may stop me getting in.

What are my options?

Do you really need to have the options spelt out?

I think you set them out quite well. Just consider your value to the RAF. Right now it is near to zero. As you jump through each hoop your value increases. You should be able to see where that leads.

So the reality is then that the only chance I'd have of even getting past OASC is to have surgery.

Thanks PN.

That was not a conclusion o would draw from what you wrote.


otal pre operative refractive error was not outside the limits for selection i.e. +6 or -6 dioptre in either eye and the best spectacle corrected visual acuity was within selection standards

Unfortunately I have astigmatism, which requires me to have glasses. I highly doubt I will pass a Service/pilot eye test prior to basic flying training (if it works like that?) without corrective surgery. Even for simple tasks like reading a letter, or even reading PPRuNe, I struggle without glasses. My aided vision is pretty good I think, but then I've had nothing to compare it to.

I was just wondering if the RAF will allow me to have the surgery after Selection. I'd be willing to have it, and at my own expense.

Ah, you never said that in the first place. To answer the final question, almost certainly not. Imagine a box of 24 Apples, all the same price but the biggest, shiniest one has a worm hole. It'll probably be ok if you cut it out. . .

Your best bet is to apply and let the medics assess you and tell you what you really need to know.

Eye Surgery
 

Hey Typhoon,


My History:


Gap Year program in 2010---I had PRK in 2011.


I have just recently been accepted to flight screening.


My Tips: they only accept PRK surgery at the moment... if you have lasik your out. I believe you need to have the surgery before being accepted...I had the same thought as you but was told no. (it was the best money I spent anyway regardless). The rules keep changing so yeh..its a long process...


Goodluck

Just to clear things up:

Whats this 0.5% figure for pilot applicants? Meaning that (less than) 1 in 200 applicants are selected?

Not to sound like a complete plonker but I am not terribly confident that this is particularly accurate, based on all previous information that I've heard. I'm basing this all on info that I've got from the Royal Navy - not the RAF so I can't comment on those guys.

Upon meeting individuals successful at FATs, I've been informed by multiple people that flying aptitude is a score out of 180, where 112 is a pass for pilot. However, I met a chap who got 140 and that was considered a very competitive score.

I have also heard that candidates that scraped the 112 mark got into BRNC as potential aircrew (granted that this is based on AIB score) but have an equal chance to get flying.

I have also heard that if you fail for pilot (or any aircrew role that you were applying for) you can write to the AIB and ask to re-take the FATs at least once more.

All of this stuff is from some RN Personnel, a couple of ACLOs and candidates from around the country. Can anyone tell me if it is valid?

I'll be fair, the 0.5% figure sounds plausible because of the demand for quality over quantity, and I have met a vast number of plonker candidates (I for which may be one, but I can only hope that I'm not).

Just thought I'd share my side of the story, I figured I might learn something.

Hi again everyone,

As an ex army reserve engineer, I am waiting for my discharge QR code to be transferred from the Army to the RAF so that they have an understanding of how I was discharged. (Which was voluntary discharge). I have been waiting for over a month and have chased up my my recruitment office, they haven't given me much information, and simply suggest that it is being processed up in Scotland. Has anyone else had this issue? Would anyone else be able to shed light on how long it could take? :ugh:

Thanks,
Ste.

Geff, only just seen this.

Thank you so much. PRK would be the option I'd go for regardless since it is the most practised, and subsequently there is a lot more experience. I am not saying LASIK is bad, or those who perform it are bad, it's just that I am more comfortable that way.

My biggest hurdle at present is asthma. I understand the risks with asthma and flying, however those risks only apply to those who currently suffer with asthma (the unpredictable asthma attacks). I haven't been prescribed medication for a long time, and I hardly used the medication when I had it as I didn't need it. Unless the RAF suddenly changes its policies on childhood asthma or it gets wiped from my medical records as a mistake (in which case I wouldn't volunteer the information to OASC!), then the only way I will ever get near a fast jet is by going to a museum.

Another question for PN: Why is childhood asthma (however the asthma symptoms are no longer present and have not been for some time, if at all) so frowned upon for Aircrew duties?

Asthma and short-sightedness? I wish you well Typhoon, but I'd suggest you have a back-up plan in case RAF aircrew doesn't work out for you.

Don't mean to put a downer on your ambitions, but at 21 you're old enough not to have it sugar coated. The harsh fact is that either of those conditions on their own will likely preclude you from fast jet aircrew (and by extension, any other from of RAF/RN/AAC aircrew), and both together..., well.

I know this from experience.

When I had my eyes done, Lasik with wavefront was the best treatment available. The qualified Doctor who did my eyes has been doing laser eye surgery since 1991 and has done 13,000 patients.

Maybe PRK has been done more if it is an older technology and cheaper. It doesn't mean it is better.

But don't take my word for it, you really should speak to the qualified experts who are in the know.

Because OASC can pick and choose who they want. If they always have more applicants than vacancies they can afford to turn down anyone. If they have 2 candidates for 1 position, one has asthma and the other doesn't, they will take the less risk candidate.

GR4Techie,

Being picky and discriminating against a former condition that is of no problem (if it even existed in the first place) any more are quite different.

If a person fails the flying aptitude tests, or they have a very serious, current medical problem, then I understand. However it is possible to "grow out" of asthma, where the symptoms are no longer present.

I am willing to bet that nobody has ever had the balls to officially challenge the Services on their policy regarding 'childhood asthma'. I have read on here, that apparently Forces medics, and other personnel from not only the UK, but the world over can't understand it either. But those higher up the Chain of Command won't budge....

You don't have to understand why the RAF won't accept asthma in its aircrew candidates, you just have to accept it and find something else to do with your life.

It's not a question of 'balls' Typhoon, it's having the sense to realise the inevitable and to move on with your life.

You said it, so accept it and move on with your life.

It has been said many times, the requirement for aircrew is low, dozens instead of the hundreds of Hester year. The numbers applying May be lower too but the majority will be fully fit with no medical history.

A candidate with any medical history, resolved or not, is an unnecessary risk when compared with others. Frustrating maybe but that is life.h

True, PN.... and it won't stop me from trying to get it taken off my records.

I didn't have bloody asthma, I barely took my inhalers. The GP's were wrong IMHO. Although I'm a 90's child..... anybody with the sniffles in Spring time had Asthma back then.