Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Waddington airshow

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Waddington airshow

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Jul 2003, 16:19
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wait, it gets worse!!! I believe the grass on the airfield was not the regulation 1 inch (or 25.4mm for our European friends) and nobody had polished the runway! It was the most awful shade of dull grey.

Disgraceful display of standards. How on earth are we going to impress Joe public by having such sloppy standards? I really think the Station Commander ought to be taken out and shot at dawn.

And don't get me started on the aircraft! I'm sure I saw some with smokey marks all over them, fingerprints on the canopy, dull paintwork, blah blah blah!!! Does nobody possses TurtleWax these days? And what's with all these smoke trails from vortex generators and the like, leaving random assymetric patterns all over the sky? It's just not on old chap.

I didn't join the Air Force to allow all this sloppiness to spoil my image. The public deserves better what. Die with dignity I say. Ride into battle with all buttons gleaming and a lovely pair of shiny shoes - that'll show those cretinous foreign johnnies!!!

Toodle pip what what!!
witchdoctor is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2003, 16:58
  #22 (permalink)  

Champagne anyone...?
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: EGDL
Age: 54
Posts: 1,420
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Flying Suits at air shows eh?
Last one I can remember I left wearing a dayglo orange dutch SAR flying suit.... fairly confident that wasn't what I was wearing at the start of the party...
Come to think of it, that hadn't been ironed either. I must've looked a state......what with that and the several pints of beer I'd thrown over myself. I shall pen a letter of complaint to the Dutch MoD forthwith.

Anyway, I'm still mourning the loss of the turn-ups on the No1 trousers and the bottom brass button on the No1 Jacket.....

Standards etc etc! Bahhhhhhhh.


Livid of Lyneham.
StopStart is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2003, 16:58
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some of you might need to remember that until you get far enough up the totem pole to change the dress regulations and the kit itself, you're stuck with it all.
Zoom is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2003, 17:01
  #24 (permalink)  

Champagne anyone...?
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: EGDL
Age: 54
Posts: 1,420
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Exactly.

So let's have a little less mumbling in the ranks.

You there! Stop sniggering or it'll be the glasshouse for you!

StopStart is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2003, 22:42
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Liverpool based Geordie, so calm down, calm down kidda!!
Age: 60
Posts: 2,051
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
The original post has pros and cons, but what hacks me off is the reaction of some of you lot. I make people wear issue kit to fly. On the ground at air shows, we MUST set an example of sorts. The public expect you to look professional. Please...... do not say that people are trying to appear 'normal' to the public. Let's be honest guys, you wear Oakleys and roll the sleeves up to meet an image, an elite one at that. YOU LOVE THE ATTENTION! That is ok, but hands in pockets and scruffy suits is not on.
jayteeto is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2003, 01:53
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.

...actually, I wear my Ray Bans because they work. I only presume that Oakleys do too.

.
L J R is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2003, 02:09
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Oxfordshire / Wiltshire
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.

and service issue glasses don't work????

.
JohnB is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2003, 02:20
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Snoop

Aircrew in flying suits ehh!!!!!

Who'd have believed it!!!?

Next you will be wanting to revive the QR for underpant inspections of the troops!!!

I'd like to see Her Majesty's finest C-17 "Mr Whippies" walking round with their hands in their pockets...... that would be a fete!

Ya boo, sucks to you - Fritzy!
T_Handle is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2003, 04:23
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Usually Somewhere Else
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"" Please...... do not say that people are trying to appear 'normal' to the public. Let's be honest guys, you wear Oakleys and roll the sleeves up to meet an image...""

Blo0dy oath I wear oakley's cause they look better; lets face it, a gimp mask would look better than the RAF Issue specs. Any self respecting young man/women wouldn't be caught dead in them, let alone alive!!! As for sleeves up, it's called COMFORTABLE. I fully concur that hands in pockets look scruffy, but lets face it, as long as the RAF flying suits have hip pockets, people will play pocket billiards. Wanna look better in flying wear?? Buy American flying suits, which are probably half the price, not designed by comittee, even (God forbid) fireproof. They don't have useless velcro which leaves the pocket flaps sticking out all over the place, and there aren't 24 different shades of green. It's fine to slate another mil, but not until ours better!Perhaps we should concentrate on being the best, and a little less time on trying to look the best.At the mo, it's neither!
flyboy007 is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2003, 05:37
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northants, UK
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And yes, you must be psychic - SU26 did the first ribbon cut at the Old Buckenham display on Sunday
Says it all really. Dobbo helped the bloke out when he wanted to learn display flying, and now he just copies everything Dobbo does. Guess he can't have taught himself badly if he gets people just aping what he does, eh?
DamienB is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2003, 06:40
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Not at home as usual
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flyboy 007,

I whole-heartedly agree with you on the subject of flying suits. I went into stores to pick up my new flying suit and guess what? It's more uncomfortable and they have manged to position the pen holder so they dig into your arm whilst you are flying. Once again a magnificant performance from our "smart" procurement teams. You would have thought they would have tried the kit out first! I say buy American, wear raybans/oakleys and hopefully when the heirachy finally gets annoyed with us "gash" aircrew they will finally buy something worthy of wearing. Until then, let's continue to look how the kit actually performs: Pathetically.
Sqnpest is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2003, 06:43
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Gone.........for good this time.
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ah yes, but who won the prize for best display at Waddo? SU26 I think......

and now back to the subject of this thread.............................
Zlin526 is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2003, 07:16
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northants, UK
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What, the prize that everybody I've spoken to has said "You must be kidding" to? Not met anybody who agreed with that decision - the F-18 driver deserved it by a mile.
DamienB is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2003, 15:40
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe you might ask to be on the voting panel next year then? But as someone else said on this thread until you're senior enough to make decisions you'll just have to live with those made by others.

Last edited by rivetjoint; 2nd Jul 2003 at 16:59.
rivetjoint is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2003, 16:58
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I love this thread. I'm sure the public would be delighted to be reassured to know that the military isn't full of petty, stuffy old farts obsessed with minutia that nobody else gives two hoots about which absolutely refutes the stereotype joe public has of the great british military, especially officers.
witchdoctor is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2003, 17:16
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Down the field!
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
F-18 was pretty awesome, but I have to say, I’m not sure if it was the best… I personally think the best display of the show was the two navy Lynx. What they did with those helicopters is very impressive…. Anyone agree?

Cheers

Grob Driver
Grob Driver is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2003, 18:30
  #37 (permalink)  
smartman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
In my day (and I used to hate that starter as much as you) we flew as hard, drank as hard, womanised as well, had similar inferior kit, moaned about the same issues, and sometimes got in the s**t. We also made the most of what we had - and (at great Meldrew risk again) took a general pride in things. And yes, we also envied the US and their flying kit. Sure, there was a small minority that looked like a tub of turds and revelled in whinging, whining, and describing the boring majority as old farts.

I guess then, from most of the foregoing threads, that not a lot has changed -----------
 
Old 3rd Jul 2003, 01:48
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Europe
Age: 56
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well you lot certainly don’t come across as professional aircrew. You come across as whinging pretentious children.

The impression of the RAF sinks to new lows with this crap. You joined an armed force representing this country not a civvy company. There are rules to follow. If it doesn’t suit you leave.

Whinging like this does nothing for your public image. You just lost the support of (at least) one voter here.

Nothing but little boys with big toys.
Vortex what...ouch! is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2003, 02:10
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What, the prize that everybody I've spoken to has said "You must be kidding" to? Not met anybody who agreed with that decision - the F-18 driver deserved it by a mile.
How much of the F 18 pilots performance is based on the software programming teams efforts when the little box of tricks was put together at the factory? Fly by Wire technology means a lot easier demo to fly...doesnt it?
mutleyfour is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2003, 02:11
  #40 (permalink)  

Champagne anyone...?
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: EGDL
Age: 54
Posts: 1,420
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

My, my, aren't there some jolly angry people out there in Internetland?

Now then, what was the question?



Prententious? Moi? etc etc.
StopStart is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.