Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Fate of RAF Scampton

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Fate of RAF Scampton

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Dec 2023, 19:51
  #201 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Trumpville, on the edge
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Substandard accommodation?

Notwithstanding the rights/wrongs of housing asylum seekers, and the influx of Portacabin type units to Scampton (despite the Council imposing a 'stop work' notice [which was simply ignored by the Home Office,]) it appears that some of the permanent accommodation blocks have been subject to refurbishment-type works since the RAF vacated the site. This work appears to have been lost in the media noise surrounding Scampton, and thus my question is: How can the RAF vacate the site one day, and very soon after, refurbishment of accommodation blocks takes place? That suggests to me that the service personnel who occupied those buildings were living (and working) in substandard accommodation - surely if it's good enough for service personnel to live in, then it should be good enough for asylum seekers too?

BTW Bob, it's Sir Edward Leigh, not Richard

Last edited by Trumpet trousers; 6th Dec 2023 at 19:54. Reason: correcting Bob
Trumpet trousers is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2023, 21:24
  #202 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Age: 59
Posts: 2,712
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Trumpet trousers
Notwithstanding the rights/wrongs of housing asylum seekers, and the influx of Portacabin type units to Scampton (despite the Council imposing a 'stop work' notice [which was simply ignored by the Home Office,]) it appears that some of the permanent accommodation blocks have been subject to refurbishment-type works since the RAF vacated the site. This work appears to have been lost in the media noise surrounding Scampton, and thus my question is: How can the RAF vacate the site one day, and very soon after, refurbishment of accommodation blocks takes place? That suggests to me that the service personnel who occupied those buildings were living (and working) in substandard accommodation - surely if it's good enough for service personnel to live in, then it should be good enough for asylum seekers too?

BTW Bob, it's Sir Edward Leigh, not Richard
I suspect that much of the accomodation you refer to had been out of use for a good few years. I last went to Scampton 9 years ago and much of it looked semi-derelict then!
Wycombe is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2023, 01:09
  #203 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Up Narf
Posts: 432
Received 133 Likes on 66 Posts
Originally Posted by Trumpet trousers
Notwithstanding the rights/wrongs of housing asylum seekers, and the influx of Portacabin type units to Scampton (despite the Council imposing a 'stop work' notice [which was simply ignored by the Home Office,]) it appears that some of the permanent accommodation blocks have been subject to refurbishment-type works since the RAF vacated the site. This work appears to have been lost in the media noise surrounding Scampton, and thus my question is: How can the RAF vacate the site one day, and very soon after, refurbishment of accommodation blocks takes place? That suggests to me that the service personnel who occupied those buildings were living (and working) in substandard accommodation - surely if it's good enough for service personnel to live in, then it should be good enough for asylum seekers too?

BTW Bob, it's Sir Edward Leigh, not Richard
The accommodation at Scampton in 1989 was rubbish. When it had multiple units based there! I was on TMT1. Accommodation was rubbish and falling apart. 2 weeks later with RSS, I was in a room in married quarters used as overspill for detached personal to unit...
Diff Tail Shim is online now  
Old 7th Dec 2023, 11:51
  #204 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: near an airplane
Posts: 2,794
Received 52 Likes on 42 Posts
Just curious, but driving past RAF Scampton this last summer I noticed what appeared to be a couple of 'shrink-wrapped' airframes on the airfield. Does anybody know if any airframes are stored there?
Jhieminga is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2023, 13:21
  #205 (permalink)  
pug
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: A post-punk postcard fair
Posts: 1,375
Received 86 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by Jhieminga
Just curious, but driving past RAF Scampton this last summer I noticed what appeared to be a couple of 'shrink-wrapped' airframes on the airfield. Does anybody know if any airframes are stored there?
Hawker Hunter Aviation non-airworthy airframes which I think included Buccaneer, SU22 and perhaps F4. I’m pretty sure they were gone last time I passed a couple of weeks ago but I could be wrong.
pug is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2023, 07:23
  #206 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Starring at an Airfield Near you
Posts: 371
Received 15 Likes on 7 Posts
Still there as of 10 days ago - and one is definitely a F-4
Edit: Still there Sun 10 Dec 23.....

Last edited by Downwind.Maddl-Land; 10th Dec 2023 at 08:52.
Downwind.Maddl-Land is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2023, 07:30
  #207 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: near an airplane
Posts: 2,794
Received 52 Likes on 42 Posts
Originally Posted by pug
Hawker Hunter Aviation non-airworthy airframes which I think included Buccaneer, SU22 and perhaps F4. I’m pretty sure they were gone last time I passed a couple of weeks ago but I could be wrong.
Many thanks! It was too brief a glimpse to identify anything other than 'multiple shrink-wrapped military types'. Needed to keep my eyes on the road as well of course.
Jhieminga is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.