UKMFTS Failing to Deliver...again
I left the CAF they way I joined it. My Commissioning Scroll arrived in a tube which was casually tossed to me by a Clerk as I walked by the unit Amin Office. My last official correspondence was a one paragraph PFO letter directing me to retire.
I am however not in the slightest bit bitter. At times I suffered under some truly toxic senior management, but they will never be able to take away my fond memories of the great people I worked with.
I am however not in the slightest bit bitter. At times I suffered under some truly toxic senior management, but they will never be able to take away my fond memories of the great people I worked with.
https://www.rmc-cmr.ca/en
Talking about Canada and flying training bar the Texan and Hawk ...I take it their system is finely tuned and delivers to wings standard and not have same problems as us here in old blighty.
https://www.kfaero.ca/defence-progra...training-fact/
Also I understand that it sup for grabs with FACT.
cheers
I think I am right in saying that makes them unique in the entire RAF/RN/AAC Flying Training world.
And the instructors are UK military.
Thread Starter
Oh thats professional - from here ?
https://www.rmc-cmr.ca/en
Talking about Canada and flying training bar the Texan and Hawk ...I take it their system is finely tuned and delivers to wings standard and not have same problems as us here in old blighty.
https://www.kfaero.ca/defence-progra...training-fact/
Also I understand that it sup for grabs with FACT.
cheers
https://www.rmc-cmr.ca/en
Talking about Canada and flying training bar the Texan and Hawk ...I take it their system is finely tuned and delivers to wings standard and not have same problems as us here in old blighty.
https://www.kfaero.ca/defence-progra...training-fact/
Also I understand that it sup for grabs with FACT.
cheers
Contract value is $8 Billion+. CAE currently provides the training at Moosejaw through NFTC and KF provides the rotary training at Southport.
It will be an interesting watch!
I believe that they are also unique in the fact that the number of airframes (24?) exceeds the number of engines to go with the same (22?) - how on earth did that happen, and what was the logic (!) behind that decision?
If true then it will indeed be a baffling decision that flies in the face of the norm, which is usually airframes complete with engines, plus spare engines and components.
It was 28 Hawk T2 - https://www.defenseindustrydaily.com...rainers-02734/
However, it was also true that only 26 engines were bought as the expectation was that the aircraft in deep servicing wouldn’t need their engines - a massively flawed decision. However, the extra 2 engines were eventually purchased.
However, it was also true that only 26 engines were bought as the expectation was that the aircraft in deep servicing wouldn’t need their engines - a massively flawed decision. However, the extra 2 engines were eventually purchased.
Too few engines was never going to work, but in this case I am not sure it would have made much of a difference as the issue is a fault with the engines, not the number of engines. Even if the MoD had bough 100 spare engines, they too would suffer from the same fault and be unusable under the current circumstances.
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Hot Sandpit
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Too few engines was never going to work, but in this case I am not sure it would have made much of a difference as the issue is a fault with the engines, not the number of engines. Even if the MoD had bough 100 spare engines, they too would suffer from the same fault and be unusable under the current circumstances.
From the DT just now...
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business...gine-failures/
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business...gine-failures/
A British government minister has blamed the French for problems with RAF jet engines that could delay military pilot training for up to three years.Engines in the Air Force’s Hawk T. Mk.2 training aircraft have been pulled from service amid fears of in-flight failures. Defence procurement minister Alec Shelbrooke, appointed by Liz Truss last week, revealed that a shortage of engines caused by problems with French-made components will last for up to three years. In a parliamentary statement last week Mr Shelbrooke said: “A fault has been identified with the Rolls-Royce/Safran Adour 951 engine, which powers the Hawk T. Mk.2. “As a precaution, a number of engines have been temporarily removed from service whilst the Ministry of Defence supports a Rolls-Royce/Safran investigation into the root cause and rectification.”Problems with the Hawks’ Adour engines, built by a joint venture between Britain and France, were traced by engineers to a component made by the French aero-engine manufacturer.
Safran makes the low pressure compressor fan for the Adour 951, a component specifically referred to in Mr Shelbrooke’s parliamentary statement.
Rolls-Royce and Safran said in a joint statement: “We cannot comment on operational availability, however, we continue to work closely with our military customer to ensure we maximise the Royal Air Force’s training capability.” Neither company would say how many engines were affected, or explain why the French-made component had failed.
“Initial assessments suggest the reduction in aircraft availability will have an impact on UK fast jet training output over the next three years.”The Hawk Mk.2 is used by the RAF for advanced fighter pilot training at RAF Valley, Anglesey. The Mark 2 is a newer version of the original Hawk T. Mk.1 jet, which is still flown by the Red Arrows. The compressor fan problem does not affect the Red Arrows’ aircraft, which use a different version of the Adour engine.
BAE Systems, which builds the Hawk, said: “Through a collaborative approach with the Royal Air Force and our industry partners, we continue to deliver long-term support and maintenance to the RAF Hawk fleet, to ensure their readiness and availability.”
About 3,000 Adour engines have been delivered over the past 30 years, with the type powering various Hawk models including T-45 Goshawks sold to the US Navy, the Anglo-French Jaguar fighter jet and various military and civil helicopters.
RAF pilot training has been beset by delays for many years. A 2019 National Audit Office report found that fighter jet pilots were languishing in training for a total of seven years thanks to delays under a privatised pilot training contract.
This month Rolls-Royce said it was pulling out of a contract with US company Boom, which is making a “son of Concorde” supersonic airliner, saying “the commercial aviation supersonic market is not currently a priority for us”.
The London-listed engine maker was trading at 76.4p on Friday afternoon, a significant discount on its five-year high of £3.75 from October 2018.
Safran makes the low pressure compressor fan for the Adour 951, a component specifically referred to in Mr Shelbrooke’s parliamentary statement.
Rolls-Royce and Safran said in a joint statement: “We cannot comment on operational availability, however, we continue to work closely with our military customer to ensure we maximise the Royal Air Force’s training capability.” Neither company would say how many engines were affected, or explain why the French-made component had failed.
“Initial assessments suggest the reduction in aircraft availability will have an impact on UK fast jet training output over the next three years.”The Hawk Mk.2 is used by the RAF for advanced fighter pilot training at RAF Valley, Anglesey. The Mark 2 is a newer version of the original Hawk T. Mk.1 jet, which is still flown by the Red Arrows. The compressor fan problem does not affect the Red Arrows’ aircraft, which use a different version of the Adour engine.
BAE Systems, which builds the Hawk, said: “Through a collaborative approach with the Royal Air Force and our industry partners, we continue to deliver long-term support and maintenance to the RAF Hawk fleet, to ensure their readiness and availability.”
About 3,000 Adour engines have been delivered over the past 30 years, with the type powering various Hawk models including T-45 Goshawks sold to the US Navy, the Anglo-French Jaguar fighter jet and various military and civil helicopters.
RAF pilot training has been beset by delays for many years. A 2019 National Audit Office report found that fighter jet pilots were languishing in training for a total of seven years thanks to delays under a privatised pilot training contract.
This month Rolls-Royce said it was pulling out of a contract with US company Boom, which is making a “son of Concorde” supersonic airliner, saying “the commercial aviation supersonic market is not currently a priority for us”.
The London-listed engine maker was trading at 76.4p on Friday afternoon, a significant discount on its five-year high of £3.75 from October 2018.
Last edited by cynicalint; 16th Sep 2022 at 17:25. Reason: Adding extra paras.
Bet they wish they hadn't scrapped the T1's
Engines -
Sorry for the intrusion here - I'm having real trouble understanding the logic to buy less engines than airframes. OK a small flying school wouldn't have complete spare engines knocking around, and an airline will have alternative arrangements for a large podded engine or 3.
But surely the slight expense of having say 35 complete engines (not withstanding the fact a specific weakness as mentioned across all of those engines) stored ready to swap would be a nice hedge. Especially for Military flying training where the usage profile is much more aggressive.
My mental hourglass icon is on overdrive. It just doesn't compute.
Sorry for the intrusion here - I'm having real trouble understanding the logic to buy less engines than airframes. OK a small flying school wouldn't have complete spare engines knocking around, and an airline will have alternative arrangements for a large podded engine or 3.
But surely the slight expense of having say 35 complete engines (not withstanding the fact a specific weakness as mentioned across all of those engines) stored ready to swap would be a nice hedge. Especially for Military flying training where the usage profile is much more aggressive.
My mental hourglass icon is on overdrive. It just doesn't compute.
Bean Counters, dear boy, bean counters
Engines -
Sorry for the intrusion here - I'm having real trouble understanding the logic to buy less engines than airframes. OK a small flying school wouldn't have complete spare engines knocking around, and an airline will have alternative arrangements for a large podded engine or 3.
But surely the slight expense of having say 35 complete engines (not withstanding the fact a specific weakness as mentioned across all of those engines) stored ready to swap would be a nice hedge. Especially for Military flying training where the usage profile is much more aggressive.
My mental hourglass icon is on overdrive. It just doesn't compute.
Sorry for the intrusion here - I'm having real trouble understanding the logic to buy less engines than airframes. OK a small flying school wouldn't have complete spare engines knocking around, and an airline will have alternative arrangements for a large podded engine or 3.
But surely the slight expense of having say 35 complete engines (not withstanding the fact a specific weakness as mentioned across all of those engines) stored ready to swap would be a nice hedge. Especially for Military flying training where the usage profile is much more aggressive.
My mental hourglass icon is on overdrive. It just doesn't compute.
It uses Number of Aircraft, Fit Policy, Flying Hours, Repair Pipeline Times, Recovery Rate at 1st Line, Recovery Rate at 2nd Line, and Mean Time Between Removals (not Failure, as it is the act of removal that places the demand on the spares) to determine the Depot Stock level. This, in addition to laid down spares levels at each unit, which is a far simpler calculation based on aircraft numbers, role, and MTBR.
Numbers/ Fit Policy/Flying Hours/Times are dictated by the Centre for each year. Last time I looked, Recovery Rates were required to be at least 8% and 68% respectively; the latter determining the scale and scope of 3/4 Line contracts. It can be seen that maintaining the integrity of STOCKCAL (the primary role of any Support Authority), for any given inventory item, is utterly crucial, as it is inextricably linked to, for example, manning and funding in almost every area of aircraft operations. Almost any In-Service Support problem can be resolved by applying it.
It would be interesting to know if this mandated policy is reflected in the outsourced support contracts that now dominate military support. I somehow doubt it. Lacking knowledgeable Service input, the figures are too easy to manipulate. That is why scrutiny of all requirements must be carried out from the User's point of view; another widely ignored mandate.
As I said, a deliberately simplistic overview.
Edit: Sorry, I really should have said that if the Fit Policy is not Full Fleet Fit, and there is only one item per aircraft, and a single unit/squadron at one location, then it will not be unusual for the total number of items to be less than the number of aircraft.
Last edited by tucumseh; 18th Sep 2022 at 15:44.
Sounds like they are now allowed to tailor the buy to meet the budget constraints and accept shortfalls rather than procure properly with a plan that works.
John Healey, Shadow Secretary of State for Defence, asked the Secretary of State for Defence:
“What steps his Department is taking to ensure that the disruption to the UK Fast Jet training is minimised over the next three years.”
James Heappey, Minister of State for the Ministry of Defence, responded:
“Measures being considered include sending further trainees to the NATO Joint Jet Pilot Training programme in the USA; accelerating planning for No 11 Squadron (Joint Qatar/UK Squadron) at RAF Leeming to train RAF pilots from late 2022 until 2027; and working with allies and partners to examine whether UK pilots could be trained overseas, or where we might pool our resources, to mutual benefit.”
“What steps his Department is taking to ensure that the disruption to the UK Fast Jet training is minimised over the next three years.”
James Heappey, Minister of State for the Ministry of Defence, responded:
“Measures being considered include sending further trainees to the NATO Joint Jet Pilot Training programme in the USA; accelerating planning for No 11 Squadron (Joint Qatar/UK Squadron) at RAF Leeming to train RAF pilots from late 2022 until 2027; and working with allies and partners to examine whether UK pilots could be trained overseas, or where we might pool our resources, to mutual benefit.”