Red White and Blue Voyager
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Country
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Big_D
BoJo did not like the grey colour and decided to change it by spending a lot of money during the economic meltdown era. Not sure if this counts as 'leftist propoganda".
But at least the Guardian would have been happy...
Thread Starter
Certainly does, TEEEJ. I wondered initially about a bit of wind-blown FOD, but that’s certainly come off the airframe.
Just seen the beast on the pan at Brize, looking a little incongruous alongside its counterparts. The livery is a bit too bright for my liking, much better to have gone for a lower key, more classic design IMO. Looks like a LoCo/BA knock-off.
Dead Pan
Not much more to say than that , I concur. Pretty poor for a country which promotes its creative skills companies "as being some of the best in the world".
Cheers
Mr Mac
Not much more to say than that , I concur. Pretty poor for a country which promotes its creative skills companies "as being some of the best in the world".
Cheers
Mr Mac
Originally Posted by Downwind.Maddl-Land
Was the airframe in for a scheduled maintaintence check ('C', 'D' or otherwise - would be nice to know!), that would have included a re-paint?
That the maintenance check would have been included in the Airtanker contract? ie, the cost of the check did not increase the cost to the taxpayer, other than, perhaps, the fee for the design.
Landed at a secret Oxfordshire base at about 1058A. Interesting to see that FlightRadar24 has an up-to-date picture of it in all its red-white-and-blue-ness
airsound
airsound
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: East Riding
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Or more likely a cynical publicity stunt to counter the adverse publicity-be interesting to see how often the aircraft is flown in the AAR role-not holding my breath!
SF
SF
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Just north of Chester, UK.
Posts: 277
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ScouseFlyer
Or more likely a cynical publicity stunt to counter the adverse publicity-be interesting to see how often the aircraft is flown in the AAR role-not holding my breath!
SF
SF
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: England
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ScouseFlyer
Or more likely a cynical publicity stunt to counter the adverse publicity-be interesting to see how often the aircraft is flown in the AAR role-not holding my breath!
SF
SF
Last edited by Door Slider; 4th Jul 2020 at 16:58.
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bishops Stortford, UK
Age: 81
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Indeed, and I recall seeing pictures of it on a North Sea towline the day after it arrived back at Brize from Marshalls. As it's an aircraft in the core fleet, ought we not to expect it to fly its share of daily tasking as the engineers manage the fleet as a whole? And as to publicity stunts, the main media fuss has passed on with the only sustained interest being shown here.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: ACT, Australia
Age: 61
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by ScouseFlyer
Or more likely a cynical publicity stunt to counter the adverse publicity-be interesting to see how often the aircraft is flown in the AAR role-not holding my breath!
SF
SF
The rest of the ill informed guff spouted on the rest of this thread is an example of why i rarely post now. What happened to the days when the Mods removed posts that clearly had nothing to do with Military Aviation? This thread for a start would be at best 5 pages long.
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Trumpville, on the edge
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What happened to the days when the Mods removed posts that clearly had nothing to do with Military Aviation?
What happened to the days when the Mods removed posts that clearly had nothing to do with Military Aviation?
Or am I wrong?
TT - keeping well, I trust?
