Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

MoD may destroy Mull of Kintyre Chinook crash records

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

MoD may destroy Mull of Kintyre Chinook crash records

Old 25th Jan 2019, 00:48
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Balmullo,Scotland
Posts: 888
Also waiting to sign, ex-tech Chinook and Puma flight(PCSF) Gutersloh
matkat is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2019, 05:03
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hotel Gypsy
Posts: 2,781
I'll just put a personal view on why this is so important.

I looked upon Rick Cook as a close friend. We were together at Gutersloh in the mid/late-80s and we flew together in the Falklands in April/May1988. On one trip, I remember Rick categorically refusing to scud-run up the side of a hill to collect two signallers who had been maintaining a rebro site; they had to walk down the hill to the CH47. In those three or four years we experienced the needless death of friends on a number of occasions (To recollect a few - Dave Sunderland/John Carver - Otterburn. Phil Brewer, Jim McMenemy & Glynn Jones - Hannover. Paul 'Ada' Adams & Pete Smith - Gutersloh. Colin Burns and the rest of the crew of Dylan - Harris).

Rick was a gentleman, intelligent, funny and highly professional. I'm sure there are at least 28 sets of similar personal thoughts dating back more than 25 years.

Brian Dixon, John Cook and many others spent well over a decade fighting to right the obvious 'wrong'; John never had the honour of seeing his son's name cleared. But that should be just half the story. There will be a time where all the information needs to be brought together to present a true and accurate consensus, warts & all; 2nd June 1994 was one of the RAF's darkest hours and 28 families deserve the right to retain all the facts.

"Justice has no Expiry Date" - John Cook
Cows getting bigger is online now  
Old 25th Jan 2019, 11:06
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Dundee
Posts: 3
Okay........

"We’re checking this petition

5 people have already supported Brian Dixon’s petition.

We need to check it meets the petition standards before we publish it.

Please try again in a few days."
weemonkey is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2019, 16:22
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Marginally on the positive side of QNH zero
Posts: 6
Waiting to sign.
Lokwyr is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2019, 16:08
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Elsewhere
Posts: 232
I've emailed my MP politely asking WTF?
k3k3 is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2019, 21:16
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pastures new
Posts: 280
It beggars belief that such valuable material would ever be destroyed. There is much to be learned from studying it.....indeed it should be required background reading for anyone involved in Military Flight Safety. Such a depressing litany of lies and failure must never be allowed to be forgotten overwise we run the risk of a repetition. May I again recommend David Hill's excellent book 'Their Greatest Disgrace'? Not the source documents we are petitioning to retain but an outstanding précis of the while sorry tale.
kintyred is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2019, 17:57
  #27 (permalink)  
A really irritating PPRuNer
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Just popping my head back up above the parapet
Posts: 904
Hi all.
Firstly, thanks for your patience in respect of the petition. I have no control over how long it will be off-line or, indeed, if it will be alowed to proceed, but as soon as I know for definite, I will let you know.

Just as an update, I can let you know that the concern for the documentation is gaining momentum. The story has also been picked up by the media in Northern Ireland:
https://www.newsletter.co.uk/news/ch...iles-1-8783038

Whilst we are waiting for the outcome of the petition, may I ask that you consider contacting your local MP and canvass their support.
As previously, we couldn't do this without your support.

Thank you, one and all.
My best,
Brian
Brian Dixon is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2019, 18:09
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wisbech, cambs
Posts: 54
Shirley -any thing in the past history of flight safety that can prevent a repeat of loss of life that's has associated documentation should be preserved and not just destroyed for any reason so mistakes ( or lack of openness by those in power ) can be freely and frankly discussed to prevent a similar accident in the future -or is that just a too simplistic viewpoint
Dave Sharpe is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2019, 01:05
  #29 (permalink)  
Just a numbered other
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Earth
Age: 67
Posts: 1,152
Hello Brian! Great to see you back here you irritating sod!
I’ll be signing as soon as I can and writing to my MP, who luckily is not the same one I had during the campaign. That obstructive so and so Andrew Robathan now resides in the Lords!

Ill see see what his successor Mr Costa makes of it.

I still remember well sitting behind Wratten in the HoL select committee enjoying him squirming under the questioning.

You won then, Brian. You’ll win this too!
Arkroyal is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2019, 17:26
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 59
Posts: 5,262
I have no standing to sign, being on the other side of the pond, but I would like to offer best wishes on a positive result from this in terms of the issue and its flight safety aspect seeing the light of day.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2019, 06:14
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 2,782
Question:To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what steps the Government is taking to preserve the records relating to the crash of the RAF Chinook helicopter on the Mull of Kintyre on 2 June 1994; and where those records are currently archived. (211684) Tabled on: 23 January 2019

Answer:Mr Tobias Ellwood:Ministry of Defence (MOD) records that were closed in 1995 and 1996 will be reviewed for release or alternative disposal this year. These reviews have not been completed, and a decision will be made in due course.The records relating to the crash of the RAF Chinook helicopter on the Mull of Kintyre on 2 June 1994 are currently archived with the MOD's Air Historical Branch (RAF) at RAF Northolt. The answer was submitted on 28 Jan 2019 at 17:37.





That is, crucial papers from 1993 and 1994 have already been reviewed and, judging from what was released a month ago, not much remains. It is well-known that MoD denies the stuff from Sept/Oct 1993 exists, yet (probably inadvertently) quoted it in a Ministerial briefing some years ago. The part of the airworthiness audit trail where Controller Aircraft (Spiers) told the Assistant Chief of the Air Staff (Bagnall) that he was not permitted to issue a Release to Service, but did. Thereby making a false declaration to aircrew (and passengers). See Philip Report, para 2.2.8. Hopefully the follow-up papers from Air Marshal Austin won't be destroyed this year. Ah, Austin, another name that emerged late in the day and has never been interviewed. Or perhaps he was, but those papers remain hidden....
tucumseh is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2019, 05:51
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The back of beyond
Posts: 1,541
Also may be of interest, from Hansards (scroll to near the bottom of the page) - https://www.theyworkforyou.com/debat...defence#g367.5
melmothtw is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2019, 18:14
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Bristol
Posts: 11
Retention of records

I seem to recall (having worked in an IPT) that airworthiness documents must be retained for at least 10 years after the out of service date of the equipment. I'd imagine that documentation relating to a crash would fall into that category.
Donkey9871 is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2019, 22:47
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Sussex
Age: 77
Posts: 4,011
Originally Posted by Donkey9871 View Post
I seem to recall (having worked in an IPT) that airworthiness documents must be retained for at least 10 years after the out of service date of the equipment. I'd imagine that documentation relating to a crash would fall into that category.
Given that this aircraft was unairworthy, and positively dangerous according to Boscombe Down who grounded their trials aircraft and suggested that the RAF do the same with their (already in service!) fleet, it would seem that different rules apply both then and ever since thanks to the cover up of the improper Release to Service of the Chinook Mk2.
Chugalug2 is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2019, 23:14
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 2,782
Donkey

Good first post! Unfortunately, MoD confirms it doesn't hold the 1992-3 (un)airworthiness documents I mention. Luckily, we have two letters signed a few weeks after the accident confirming the Air Staff knew beforehand it wasn't airworthy. MoD and Ministers (esp Adam Ingram) denied their existence, but Lord Philip chose to believe the physical evidence.

As you've worked in an aircraft IPT (as have I) can you ever recall the concept of a time-limited Release to Service? The Chinook HC Mk2 one ran out two weeks after the accident. It was for ground training and familiarisation only, and this was to be extended because Controller Aircraft had stated it was not airworthy. To me, the very notion is barking but someone else might say it was common practice.
tucumseh is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2019, 15:20
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 25,159
Now available for signature!
BEagle is online now  
Old 31st Jan 2019, 15:25
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Devon
Age: 65
Posts: 16
Petition

Just checked, the petition is open.
I have signed but we need more than 23.
XN593
XN593 is online now  
Old 31st Jan 2019, 15:49
  #38 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 55
Posts: 5,231
Signed....
treadigraph is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2019, 16:01
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Horsham, England, UK. ---o--O--o---
Posts: 999
Signed also...
Out Of Trim is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2019, 16:47
  #40 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bourton-on-the-Water
Posts: 848
Just signed - and it says there are now 31 signatures

airsound
airsound is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.