Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

UK unveils new next generation fighter jet, the 'Tempest'

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

UK unveils new next generation fighter jet, the 'Tempest'

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th July 2018 | 11:16
  #61 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 129
From: Here
Originally Posted by Cows getting bigger
Have BAe dusted-off FOAS?
Does explain why "Replica" re-emerged in 2014
Davef68 is offline  
Reply
Old 17th July 2018 | 11:49
  #62 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,340
Likes: 112
From: UK
Originally Posted by Bob Viking
I know I’m not surprised but threads like this take on a familiar pattern.

It’ll never be as good as a TSR2/Phantom/Hunter. It’s ugly. We won’t get enough. It’ll be rubbish. I wouldn’t have done it like that. Etc, etc ad infinitum.

Clearly I am wired differently to lots of people on this forum. When I read the article I think ‘brilliant, a new fighter’. It shows forethought and ambition with a fair amount of commitment to it so far.

As for the piloted/unpiloted mix I think it makes perfect sense. The mothership and drone concept is not new. It should actually excite us not scare us.

Anyway, I expect I’ll be a lonely voice amongst the masses but why not try to see the positives. If nothing else it shows that my kids may get to be fighter pilots after all.

BV
Hey Bob, I’m with you buddy - although I will have retired 10 years prior to ISD!
Lima Juliet is offline  
Reply
Old 17th July 2018 | 12:53
  #63 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: Not far from EGPH.
Originally Posted by Davef68
Does explain why "Replica" re-emerged in 2014
Nose profile is a bit different (reverted to a conventional nose-mounted radar configuration, rather than conformal antennae?), but yes, looks like it owes a lot to Replica.
XR219 is offline  
Reply
Old 17th July 2018 | 13:00
  #64 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,534
Likes: 293
From: The Alps


JN second piece of fiction centred around doomed RAF combat aircraft is called the Tempest lol
chopper2004 is offline  
Reply
Old 17th July 2018 | 13:01
  #65 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: Not far from EGPH.
Originally Posted by melmothtw
Not Leonardo, but Leonardo UK which is a British-registered company that will supply the EW systems and the like. Italy a good prospect for partnership, but not on board yet.
To be pedantic, the UK subsidiary of Leonardo Società per azioni is actually called "Leonardo MW Ltd." (MW for "Marconi-Westland", apparently).
XR219 is offline  
Reply
Old 17th July 2018 | 14:40
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 1
From: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Here are excerpts of a somewhat skeptical analysis (with some interesting pictures) from thedrive.com:

The U.K.'s New 'Tempest' Stealth Fighter Project Already Faces Serious Challenges

The country is eager to remain competitive militarily and economically, but it's not clear if they can afford their own advanced fighter jet.

BY JOSEPH TREVITHICK
JULY 16, 2018

The U.K. Ministry of Defense has unveiled new plans for a new stealth fighter jet called Tempest at the biennial Farnborough Airshow. The announcement coincides with the release of a new Combat Air Strategy, which focuses heavily on sustaining and expanding the United Kingdom’s domestic defense industrial base and international cooperation in that sector, but there are already questions about the project’s viability given the country’s increasingly uncertain political and economic future.

Underscoring the emphasis on engagement with the private sector, U.K. Defense Secretary Gavin Williamson offered details about Tempest and the country’s new aerial warfare strategy in front of a full-size notional mockup of the jet at BAE’s booth at Farnborough on July 16, 2018. The U.K.-headquartered firm will lead “Team Tempest,” which also includes engine-maker Rolls-Royce, Italian defense contractor Leonardo, and the European missile consortium MBDA.

“We have been a world leader in the combat air sector for a century, with an enviable array of skills and technology, and this Strategy makes clear that we are determined to make sure it stays that way,” Williamson said. “British defense industry is a huge contributor to U.K. prosperity, creating thousands of jobs in a thriving advanced manufacturing sector, and generating a U.K. sovereign capability that is the best in the world.”

Though Tempest’s design isn’t anywhere close to firm, slides Team Tempest showed at the event described a number of increasingly common basic requirements for an advanced fighter jet design. Though described as a sixth-generation design, what BAE Systems and its partners have shown so far looks very much like what many countries are looking at for new fifth-generation types. The mockup and concept art show a stealthy, modified delta-wing planform with a pair of vertical small, outwardly-canted vertical stabilizers.

It’s not the first time the United Kingdom has attempted to develop its own advanced fighter jet, either. In the 1990s, the Royal Air Force launched the Future Offensive Air System (FOAS) program, which eventually led to the BAE Replica fighter jet concept.

That aircraft, which Tempest appears to borrow from in many ways, never flew and FOAS came to halt in 2005. The country decided instead to purchase the F-35.

In 2012, the United Kingdom and France embarked on what they called the Future Air Combat System (FCAS) project, which focused on developing stealthy unmanned combat air vehicles. Airbus has since used FCAS to describe a Franco-German stealth fighter program that also includes a number of similar requirements to the Tempest program, including supporting loyal wingman-style manned-unmanned teams.

That aircraft, which Tempest appears to borrow from in many ways, never flew and FOAS came to halt in 2005. The country decided instead to purchase the F-35.

In 2012, the United Kingdom and France embarked on what they called the Future Air Combat System (FCAS) project, which focused on developing stealthy unmanned combat air vehicles. Airbus has since used FCAS to describe a Franco-German stealth fighter program that also includes a number of similar requirements to the Tempest program, including supporting loyal wingman-style manned-unmanned teams.

Regardless, the U.K. government is clearly hoping to leverage these efforts for its own use to both speed up development and find ways to share burdens and otherwise lower costs. By their very nature, stealth fighter programs have proven to be very time-consuming and costly endeavors.

On top of that, despite the prominent Union Jack in the Team Tempest logo, it’s hard to deny that the program already has a distinctly pan-European flavor given the involvement of Leonardo and MDBA. Also, prior to the announcement, the Ministry of Defense had reportedly been in talks with Swedish officials about a shared stealth fighter effort. BAE Systems is already working together with Turkey’s TAI on its TFX program and could join Japan's future stealth fighter project, as well.

The immediate problem, of course, is whether the United Kingdom will be able to position itself as a viable partner, let alone leader in such a program given its present political and economic turmoil. This is almost entirely a result of plans to leave the European Union, also known as the British Exit or Brexit. The U.K. government is struggling to firm up its own negotiating position ahead of attempting to begin talks with E.U. officials on a deal to disentangle themselves from the organization.

If and when the United Kingdom succeeds in extricating itself from the regional bloc, it will immediately throw up barriers to direct industrial cooperation with European defense contractors. It will almost certainly make existing multi-national partnerships, such as MBDA and the Eurofighter consortium that produces the Typhoon fourth generation fighter jet, more complicated.

With a demonstrator aircraft not even scheduled to take to the sky for more than six years, there is a distinct chance that the political and economic environment in the United Kingdom will have changed substantially before the Tempest project even gets going. Prime Minister Teresa May’s government has suffered a number of important resignations just in July 2018, including that of now former Foreign Minister Boris Johnson, and it is unclear how long she may last in that post.

With all this in mind, the Ministry of Defense will have to work hard if it wants to move Tempest ahead at all, let alone keep to its stated timetable. Otherwise, it’s very possible that the program could end up being a repeat of FOAS and the Replica.
The U.K.'s New 'Tempest' Stealth Fighter Project Already Faces Serious Challenges - The Drive

Last edited by Airbubba; 17th July 2018 at 17:23.
Airbubba is offline  
Reply
Old 17th July 2018 | 17:07
  #67 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 4,236
Likes: 80
From: Just behind the back of beyond....
Originally Posted by Rockie_Rapier
A purely UK product?

Not with Leonardo on board. I wonder how that's going to work out, post Brexit?
The bit of Leonardo involved is what we used to call Selex, and before that GEC-Marconi. They're based in Scotland…..

While the relevant bit of MBDA is based in Stevenage…..
Jackonicko is offline  
Reply
Old 17th July 2018 | 18:40
  #68 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Aviation Qualifications: Military (Retired)
Posts: 16,699
Likes: 54
From: Lincolnshire
I know there is a certain appeal using sequential names with repeating previous names. I was pondering a weather event that did not repeat an earlier one. How about Tsunami? Appropriate for a certain sqn in the future and signifying swamping an enemy
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Reply
Old 17th July 2018 | 19:24
  #69 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Aviation Qualifications: ATCO
Posts: 8,023
Likes: 314
From: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Originally Posted by Pontius Navigator
I know there is a certain appeal using sequential names with repeating previous names. I was pondering a weather event that did not repeat an earlier one. How about Tsunami? Appropriate for a certain sqn in the future and signifying swamping an enemy
You are picking the Squadron numberplate already

Oh, what about:
Fury
Gladiator
Meteor
Camel ? Designed by a Committee? (Hat/Coat/Tasi)

MPN11 is offline  
Reply
Old 17th July 2018 | 19:58
  #70 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Aviation Qualifications: Military (Retired)
Posts: 16,699
Likes: 54
From: Lincolnshire
But they lack the T and weather connection.

How about Turbulent then or Thunder, Thunderer, Torrent, Twister

PS

SASless. Ty, didn't think of that one - Thunderflash

TWhirlwind - if made in Yorkshire

Last edited by Pontius Navigator; 18th July 2018 at 06:29.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Reply
Old 17th July 2018 | 23:45
  #71 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
Veteran: National Guard
 
Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
Thunder Bolt.....errrrr....sorry taken already......so how's about Thunder Mug!
SASless is offline  
Reply
Old 17th July 2018 | 23:57
  #72 (permalink)  
20 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,515
Likes: 151
From: A better place.
Looks like an under-nourished Austin Allegro rip off of an F-35.
Vertical tails - even though they're canted?
I thought that future penetrating counter air flying wing thing that the USAF has been touting was more sixth generation.
tartare is offline  
Reply
Old 18th July 2018 | 10:45
  #73 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 94
From: Welwyn Garden City
Originally Posted by BEagle
Well I hope that this gets the go-ahead and won't be canned like so many previous generation UK designs.

Perhaps it might even fly on the 70th anniversary of Duncan Sandys sticking his knife into British fighter design?
While researching Duncan Sandys rationale behind the umanned fighter future, or rather all missiles only future, on another different note, National Service, he clearly nailed his colours to the Royal Navy mast. Sandys was appalled at the idea of the Senior Service having to take a share of NS conscripts, he could understand pushing them all in the Army and RAF direction but the Navy! Heaven forefend the dark blue service needed highly skilled and qualified tradesmen etc who would need to be selected. It provided some insight into the the supposedly dispassionate thinking behind the ill-advised notion of an all missile future. Although it wasn't a routine occurrence in 1957, it would be interesting to know if the CAS of the day put it to him that missiles can't shadow and identify and so on?

FB
Finningley Boy is offline  
Reply
Old 18th July 2018 | 11:42
  #74 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 501
Likes: 91
From: UK
Originally Posted by MPN11

You are picking the Squadron numberplate already

Oh, what about:
Fury
Gladiator
Meteor
Camel ? Designed by a Committee? (Hat/Coat/Tasi)


Given all the scepticism, I'd suggest Defiant. And besides, what could possibly go wrong with a name like that.

Last edited by Frostchamber; 18th July 2018 at 11:42. Reason: Typo
Frostchamber is offline  
Reply
Old 18th July 2018 | 13:56
  #75 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 24,509
Likes: 7,254
From: Peripatetic
If you want to sell it to Japan or get them as a partner - call it Tsunami.

though from some of the comments Zero would seem more appropriate to their views....
ORAC is offline  
Reply
Old 18th July 2018 | 14:07
  #76 (permalink)  
Tabs please!
Community Builder
Community Influencer
40 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 1,098
From: Biffins Bridge
If the name has to be weather related then there's only one suitable answer. Given the amount of cash it will consume and the number of politicians who will stick there noses in, it has to be...…

wait for it...….

wait for it...…………

"Trough".
B Fraser is online now  
Reply
Old 18th July 2018 | 14:25
  #77 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Aviation Qualifications: ATCO
Posts: 8,023
Likes: 314
From: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
<giggle>
MPN11 is offline  
Reply
Old 18th July 2018 | 14:26
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 556
Likes: 1
From: 4 Civvy Street. Nowhere-near-a-base. The Shires.
Originally Posted by PDR1
That's OK - the significant features of the F35 were all plagiarised from Hawker's P1216 anyway...



PDR
...and that was copied from the Luftwaffe '46 fantasy art site in the first place
camelspyyder is offline  
Reply
Old 18th July 2018 | 17:10
  #79 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 4,236
Likes: 80
From: Just behind the back of beyond....
Tornado, Typhoon, Tempest seems pretty good to me.

I suppose Hurricane works too.

But if you want fart humour and a letter T…..
​​​​​​​
"Trump"
Jackonicko is offline  
Reply
Old 18th July 2018 | 18:14
  #80 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 11
From: South East of Penge
I guess the most Famous "super" Typhoon names were those "Divine Winds" associated with wrecking the Mongol fleets trying to invade Japan in the late 13th Century.
Can't see that name catching on though.
Haraka is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.