Iran
Joined: Mar 2008
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 1,811
Likes: 214
From: London
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,081
Likes: 252
From: London/Oxford/New York
Thread Starter
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Joined: Jul 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 24,510
Likes: 7,255
From: Peripatetic
https://mei.edu/publication/irans-re...as-apocalypse/
Iran’s Revolutionary Guard and the Rising Cult of Mahdism: Missiles and Militias for the Apocalypse
Iran’s Revolutionary Guard and the Rising Cult of Mahdism: Missiles and Militias for the Apocalypse
Last edited by T28B; 21st February 2026 at 12:52. Reason: response to deleted material, which was removed
Joined: Dec 2020
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 1,568
Likes: 1,380
From: Over the rainbow
I would imagine America will enter the conflict with a little concern. It only takes one drone or missile to hit something vital and a mighty warship can be sent to the bottom. Not to mention air assets.
Add to that fog of war and it can all go tits up very quickly.
You also have to consider that Russia or China may have slipped them a few things. Gary Powers will testify to that.
Add to that fog of war and it can all go tits up very quickly.
You also have to consider that Russia or China may have slipped them a few things. Gary Powers will testify to that.
Tabs please!
Joined: Jun 2004
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 1,098
From: Biffins Bridge
Your error is that not everyone views the world from a western Judaeo-Christian mindset. Whether an individual decides to run amok with a machete which will end in their near certain death or an organisation chooses to commit an atrocity that will unleash revenge across a multi-faceted array of intelligence, resources and co-operation with 21st century technology, the same parameters apply. To a very different mindset, the act is always more important than the consequences.
In some parts of the world, it is still the middle ages and those guys have some rather nasty toys and a particular set of beliefs.
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 56
Likes: 30
From: Cambridge
There was an interesting article in the Guardian yesterday, covering the start of the war in Ukraine. The Brits and Americans could not convince the French, Germans, broader Europeans or the Ukrainians that war was coming. Even on the night of the invasion, the Germans didn't believe it! No one thought the Russians were that crazy. Plus, we had blotted our copybook with the 2003 Iraq invasion.
There is a track record of countries not believing another is going to do something insane. And you don't need to be a religious fundamentalist to do things few others in the world can understand.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng...e-plans-russia
There is a track record of countries not believing another is going to do something insane. And you don't need to be a religious fundamentalist to do things few others in the world can understand.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng...e-plans-russia
Joined: Feb 2002
Aviation Qualifications: AME
Posts: 4,166
Likes: 1,096
From: UK
I have no love for the regime in Iran but to suggest they want nuclear weapons to deliver a strike against an enemy risking total annihilation for their entire country is nonsense.
Last edited by TURIN; 21st February 2026 at 09:56.
Joined: Feb 2002
Aviation Qualifications: AME
Posts: 4,166
Likes: 1,096
From: UK
The same can be said for hijacking and slamming airliners into skyscrapers, the Pentagon etc. etc. The response is always going to be overwhelming and on an industrial scale that your society cannot even think about matching. And yet....... it happens.
Your error is that not everyone views the world from a western Judaeo-Christian mindset. Whether an individual decides to run amok with a machete which will end in their near certain death or an organisation chooses to commit an atrocity that will unleash revenge across a multi-faceted array of intelligence, resources and co-operation with 21st century technology, the same parameters apply. To a very different mindset, the act is always more important than the consequences.
In some parts of the world, it is still the middle ages and those guys have some rather nasty toys and a particular set of beliefs.
Your error is that not everyone views the world from a western Judaeo-Christian mindset. Whether an individual decides to run amok with a machete which will end in their near certain death or an organisation chooses to commit an atrocity that will unleash revenge across a multi-faceted array of intelligence, resources and co-operation with 21st century technology, the same parameters apply. To a very different mindset, the act is always more important than the consequences.
In some parts of the world, it is still the middle ages and those guys have some rather nasty toys and a particular set of beliefs.
The acts of individuals are very different to the acts of a nation state.
Pakistan has nuclear weapons. Are they on your list of people with different beliefs.
This warmongering idiocy has to stop.
Remember Iraq and the lies over WMDs.
Thread Starter
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Joined: Jul 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 24,510
Likes: 7,255
From: Peripatetic
at least 15 kc-46a pegasus seen on the ground at lajes field in the azores, located in the northern atlantic roughly 900 miles from the coast of portugal, a major stopping-off point for aircraft on the way to bases in europe and the middle east from the americas.
Aerial-refueling tankers positioned at lajes could also potentially support long-range bombers heading towards iran, with tankers stationed at lajes providing refueling for the b-2s that struck iran’s nuclear sites last june in operation midnight hammer.
Aerial-refueling tankers positioned at lajes could also potentially support long-range bombers heading towards iran, with tankers stationed at lajes providing refueling for the b-2s that struck iran’s nuclear sites last june in operation midnight hammer.
Joined: Jun 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,153
Likes: 696
From: Brit living in Malaysia
Yes, that's called a deterrent. It's the reason we have nuclear weapons. The reason we don't have Russian military assets positioning throughout the North Sea threatening to bomb the hell out of London. FAFO.
I have no love for the regime in Iran but to suggest they want nuclear weapons to deliver a strike against an enemy risking total annihilation for their entire country is nonsense.
I have no love for the regime in Iran but to suggest they want nuclear weapons to deliver a strike against an enemy risking total annihilation for their entire country is nonsense.
As has already been correctly pointed out to you, your last sentence, to use your vernacular, is absolute tosh. That is precisely what Iran would be prepared to do. You are falling into the trap of judging Iran and trying to predict its actions and responses based on western values. Iran doesn’t run on western values!
Joined: Oct 2018
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,213
Likes: 1,648
From: Ferrara
"Put Iran in a situation where it knows it is about to lose a conventional war and ask yourself if you are 100% confident that Iran’s ideology would prevent it from going out with a big yellow flash!"
but people are saying on other threads that Russia might start firing off N weapons if they looked like losing in Ukraine. Thats the whole point of N weapons - they're something you can use when you're losing a conventional war - applies to everyone who has them.
" Iran doesn’t run on western values!" Neither does China, Pakistan, India, Russia, NOK or Israel
but people are saying on other threads that Russia might start firing off N weapons if they looked like losing in Ukraine. Thats the whole point of N weapons - they're something you can use when you're losing a conventional war - applies to everyone who has them.
" Iran doesn’t run on western values!" Neither does China, Pakistan, India, Russia, NOK or Israel
Joined: Apr 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 4,914
Likes: 608
From: surfing, watching for sharks
"Put Iran in a situation where it knows it is about to lose a conventional war and ask yourself if you are 100% confident that Iran’s ideology would prevent it from going out with a big yellow flash!"
but people are saying on other threads that Russia might start firing off N weapons if they looked like losing in Ukraine. Thats the whole point of N weapons - they're something you can use when you're losing a conventional war - applies to everyone who has them.
" Iran doesn’t run on western values!" Neither does China, Pakistan, India, Russia, NOK or Israel
but people are saying on other threads that Russia might start firing off N weapons if they looked like losing in Ukraine. Thats the whole point of N weapons - they're something you can use when you're losing a conventional war - applies to everyone who has them.
" Iran doesn’t run on western values!" Neither does China, Pakistan, India, Russia, NOK or Israel
Joined: Jun 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,153
Likes: 696
From: Brit living in Malaysia
Last edited by BANANASBANANAS; 22nd February 2026 at 09:42.
Thread Starter
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Joined: Jul 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 24,510
Likes: 7,255
From: Peripatetic
Video
The massive USAF airbridge to support future strikes on Iran continued overnight, with dozens of airlifters moving additional air defense assets and munitions into the Middle East.
"You don't fly 70 cargo planes into a single base for a 'limited strike.'
The airbridge we saw overnight confirms that the Pentagon is prepared for a weeks-long air campaign, not a one-off event.
By moving THAAD batteries and bunker-busters simultaneously, the U.S. is signaling it is ready to both take the punch and deliver a knockout blow.
The airbridge we saw overnight confirms that the Pentagon is prepared for a weeks-long air campaign, not a one-off event.
By moving THAAD batteries and bunker-busters simultaneously, the U.S. is signaling it is ready to both take the punch and deliver a knockout blow.
Thread Starter
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Joined: Jul 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 24,510
Likes: 7,255
From: Peripatetic
Video with interesting comments about the Joint Chiefs of Staff, which apply whether the attack is on Monday, Tuesday or a later date….
White House Inside Source tells
@JohnKiriakou
Trump has decided to ATTACK IRAN on Monday or Tuesday.
According to John’s source, Vice President JD Vance & DNI Tulsi Gabbard are ONLY 2 dissenting voices.
Rubio, Hegseth & Joint Chiefs of Staff all on board.
@JohnKiriakou
Trump has decided to ATTACK IRAN on Monday or Tuesday.
According to John’s source, Vice President JD Vance & DNI Tulsi Gabbard are ONLY 2 dissenting voices.
Rubio, Hegseth & Joint Chiefs of Staff all on board.
