Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

RAF Rivet Joint

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd November 2013 | 19:51
  #341 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
From: UK East Anglia
D notice

Did Fly Fisher manage to get his D Notice placed?
Do we know what paperwork was used to this fly this jet into the secret airbase near Lincoln and when are we going to reap the benefit by flying the thing?
dragartist is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd November 2013 | 08:26
  #342 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,056
Likes: 2
From: London
Are we going to rename thm ?

"Rivet Join" is so......... non RAF -

surely we should call it "Campania" or similar

Or get the tabloids in a frenzy by calling it "Duchess"
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd November 2013 | 15:39
  #343 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 712
Likes: 0
From: United Kingdom

it makes you come across as a bit of a c0ck
That statement implies that he/she knows a bit about something... not a complete c0ck then!
TheChitterneFlyer is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd November 2013 | 15:51
  #344 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: UK/ USA
HH,

If the navy can have a ship called DUNCAN how about Nigel or Trevor!


I still think SENILE fits in with SENTINEL and SENTRY.
Jet In Vitro is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd November 2013 | 16:37
  #345 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,056
Likes: 2
From: London
"Steptoe" perhaps................
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Reply
Old 24th November 2013 | 11:07
  #346 (permalink)  
Gnd
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
From: Wiltshire
Unhappy

The only problem with BCE is they are so anti aviation that doesn't belong to them that being a lodger is totally useless and far to much trouble, ask those that have left ( and those that are trying to use it?)
Gnd is offline  
Reply
Old 24th November 2013 | 19:54
  #347 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
From: UK East Anglia
Crew training

X referring to the thread on the training pipeline being clogged got me wondering about crewing the back end in future years when all the Nimrod guys have retired. Is it necessary that the folks that sit down the back are actually in the RAF? I think I saw on here that there was some seedcorn activity going on with our US partners. Not to be confused with the MPA Seed corners.

If it's not classified can someone say if there is a "4th Aircraft" RCT for training as part of the AirSeeker "system"
dragartist is offline  
Reply
Old 24th November 2013 | 20:15
  #348 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Aviation Qualifications: Military
Posts: 398
Likes: 144
From: not scotland
DA, sent you a PM.
Toadstool is offline  
Reply
Old 25th November 2013 | 13:54
  #349 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Vienna, Virginia
Reply to dragartist

Backend crew on the RJs need to be military. Various international laws and military regs make it difficult to fly "other-than-military" on a military mission. If you have 'civilians' on a reconnaissance flight then you could be considered a "spy" vs. "reconnaissance" mission. Very BIG differences on how that is treated under international law. (One reason you never see "spy" used to officially describe any reconnaissance platform-U-2, SR-71, RC-135s, etc. Only the sensationalist press uses "spy plane" in this context). You can fly members of other services to fill the backend seats if you need the experience, but they need training on the system and equipment. I don't see how that ameliorates the training problem.
RJ crewmembers also undergo all the usual aircrew training: altitude chamber, egress training, etc.

Bottom line: Plan to train the crewmembers you need to accomplish the mission. Having enough linguists in the more esoteric languages, who can be aircrew, is always a problem. In that case you fly with a less than full-up crew.
NoVANav is offline  
Reply
Old 25th November 2013 | 14:14
  #350 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: Mos Eisley
Is it necessary that the folks that sit down the back are actually in the RAF?
Backend crew on the RJs need to be military
Surely that excludes the RAF from crewing the RJ at all?
OafOrfUxAche is offline  
Reply
Old 25th November 2013 | 14:25
  #351 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 55
From: Under a recently defunct flight path.
Some nice images of ZZ664 at following links.

Photos: Boeing RC-135W (717-158) Aircraft Pictures | !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Photos: Boeing RC-135W (717-158) Aircraft Pictures | !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Photos: Boeing RC-135W (717-158) Aircraft Pictures | !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That was a very quick respray after it landed! (Ref links in Post #360).
Lyneham Lad is offline  
Reply
Old 25th November 2013 | 14:43
  #352 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
From: Planet Claire
I heard it's already known as the 'Airsneaker'.

Sounds likely!
AtomKraft is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd December 2013 | 17:22
  #353 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: UK/ USA
Why would you stick labels on the aircraft? When will it fly again. Surely the longer it is left on the ground the more it will deteriorate?
Jet In Vitro is offline  
Reply
Old 24th December 2013 | 13:05
  #354 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: UK/ USA
Which is the most unhappy RAF Sqn at the moment. The Geese were not happy in the pub last week even though they have a new toy.

If I was top Goose I would be seriously worried.
Jet In Vitro is offline  
Reply
Old 24th December 2013 | 18:19
  #355 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 1,938
Likes: 2
From: Manchester, UK
Of course it's not a "spy plane". Only baddies have spy planes. We have reconnaissance aircraft.

Ps, novanav, how would a civilian involved in the air refuelling of a military attack be regarded under international law?
ShotOne is offline  
Reply
Old 24th December 2013 | 18:29
  #356 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Aviation Qualifications: Military
Posts: 2,992
Likes: 498
From: The Roman Empire
A valid target...?
Biggus is online now  
Reply
Old 25th December 2013 | 06:30
  #357 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 1,938
Likes: 2
From: Manchester, UK
Agreed, biggus...although in either case the issue of employment status hardly arises if they've been blown to smithereens
ShotOne is offline  
Reply
Old 25th December 2013 | 12:17
  #358 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 932
Likes: 0
From: UK
Ps, novanav, how would a civilian involved in the air refuelling of a military attack be regarded under international law?
They'd be considered combatants under Geneva law - (banter aside) they are clearly making a material contribution to combat operations.

Merry Christmas to all, including the Geese. Hope you get flying again soon.

S41
Squirrel 41 is offline  
Reply
Old 16th January 2014 | 14:27
  #359 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: UK/ USA
Are we there yet?

Is it the biggest paper weight in NATO?
Jet In Vitro is offline  
Reply
Old 16th January 2014 | 20:23
  #360 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: .
. Jet In Vitro Are we there yet?

Is it the biggest paper weight in NATO?

You should know mate, why don't you let us in on it instead of fishing around for someone to sound off.
FATTER GATOR is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.