Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Was it really fright(e)ning?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Was it really fright(e)ning?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Jul 2012, 06:39
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: A better place.
Posts: 2,319
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Was it really fright(e)ning?

Have always admired the F3.
Looks like something out of Thunderbirds - all that polished aluminium (the earlier ones anyway) and a planform like a steel dart.
But did it really deserve it's nickname from a pilot's point of view?
I remember reading somewhere that some of the Saudi pilots were literally too scared to fly the thing.
Any former drivers with stories to tell?
tartare is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2012, 09:02
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: The real world
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is this a wah?
The nickname frightening was given to the Lightening not the F3.
Jayand is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2012, 09:06
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
I think he meant the Lightning F3, not the later, far superior fighter.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2012, 09:07
  #4 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,405
Received 1,591 Likes on 728 Posts
Marks of Lightning last in service in the UK were the F3, F6 and T5.
ORAC is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2012, 09:28
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,808
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
I think he meant the Lightning F3, not the later, far superior fighter.
Fighter? Interceptor, surely?
BEagle is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2012, 09:37
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the problem was that the spec was written by people who had been bounced too often from altitude in WW2 - they were never going to be caught like that again

the fact it carried far too little fuel was never thought important

personally I was amazed at how they managed to scab on so much extra capacity over the years to fix a basic design flaw
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2012, 09:47
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
I always thought that the Lightning started off as a P1, a research vehicle. Because the cock-ups of the British aircraft industry and the Whithall that controlled it the RAF found itself without a supersonic fighter project. The Fairey FD2 would have been the best, the Bristol 188 the worst but Canberra production was going to tail off so the P1/Lightning was botched up to fill the slot.

Despite all this it still managed to have an illustrious career. The last of the sports cars.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2012, 10:09
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Of course. Interceptor. Sorry.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2012, 10:35
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: earth
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think few posters here realise that the Lightning led the world in performance at the time of first production. Yes, it was a prototype and only little developed but it out-performed just about every other fighter in its day.

In its later development models the shortage of fuel was not such a critical issue for point defence but it never got either a state of the art radar or a good missile nor did it carry enough of them.

Just to put its qualities into perspective, the RAF did not get a fighter that could match either its rate of climb or its' service ceiling until Typhoon appeared some 40-odd years later. Nor did they get anything else so shiny!
soddim is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2012, 12:02
  #10 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,405
Received 1,591 Likes on 728 Posts
Don't knock the Firestreak and Redtop, for their era they were good missiles.

p.s. I have a large scale (about 18" x 12", I think) photo of the last ever Redtop firing if there are any WIWOLs out there interested. It's been sitting inside it's envelope since I got it over 20 years ago, so it might as well go to a good home.

p.p.s. I've a got a smaller framed copy on my wall, so I'm not losing all my memories.....

Last edited by ORAC; 25th Jul 2012 at 12:35.
ORAC is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2012, 12:26
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Location: Location!
Posts: 2,302
Received 35 Likes on 27 Posts
Where's BEag ..... Sorry, Lightning Mate, when you need him?

Jack
Union Jack is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2012, 12:36
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: 51.50N 1W (ish)
Posts: 1,141
Received 30 Likes on 13 Posts
Having watched self-styled steely eyed 226 OCU sudents fresh from Valley & Brawdy stagger white and trembling into the line hut after their first ride in a T4 (instructor jolly trip), and blagged 1 trip in a T5 ('sorry sir, can't reproduce the symptoms and need to diagnose in flight') I can confirm it was impressive.
Fitter2 is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2012, 13:03
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
The Lightning was designed and built for purpose – point defence in a nuclear war.
Quick reaction, rapid climb, fast, all weather, autonomous operation if required, ECM tollerant radar ~ era, missiles with a high kill rate.
Its long service life indicated some success in adaptation, limited more by politics than the willingness to develop it.

A photo which I took earlier:- Firestreak vs Jindivik FL480



Not Frightening – Fantastic !
safetypee is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2012, 13:36
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,808
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
What an excellent photo!

I did hear that there was once a proposal to fit rocket packs into the F1's ventral to give it an ability to reach around FL 900 in a point defence climb against aircraft such as the Myasishchev M-50 Bounder!

"Just what we need - less fuel and a greater rate of climb!", quoth one wag.
BEagle is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2012, 14:50
  #15 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was it really fright(e)ning?
it had its moments
I remember reading somewhere that some of the Saudi pilots were literally too scared to fly the thing.
- to add to the list of Marques, the Saudis were F53 and F56.
Any former drivers with stories to tell?
- yes, and err, no!
BOAC is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2012, 16:00
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: 51.50N 1W (ish)
Posts: 1,141
Received 30 Likes on 13 Posts
I remember reading somewhere that some of the Saudi pilots were literally too scared to fly the thing.
I think it more accurate (although Lightning Mate may have a different perspective) that the instructors had more difficulty convincing themselves that the Saudi students were capable of soloing.

And every Saudi 1st T55 solo was followed by a humungous party. They don't, of course, indulge in alcohol themselves; as one explained 'we are so religious that should alcohol touch our lips it immediately turns into water'.
Fitter2 is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2012, 16:26
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Baston
Posts: 3,274
Received 671 Likes on 241 Posts
An earth-bound met-muppet, I found the two Lightning Squadrons [19 and 92] at Guetersloh absolutely awe-inspiring.

As a visiting USAF senior officer said, watching a two-ship vertical climb-out

"J E ..........S U S !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
langleybaston is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2012, 20:00
  #18 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
I believe the Lightning even had a data link where the ground controller could control the intercept via the link rather than R/T. We were target on one occasion where the link was down but the controller gave the computer directions by voice.

It was quite instructive: heading such, flight level such, accelerate to Mach 1.6 now, turn to deg now, climb now etc. As we were non-manoeuvring it went like clockwork but I don't if it ever became fully operational.

I also remember one exercise where our OC Admin, a Navigator, got a ride in a T-bird (T4) and spent some hours on the ORP at Binbrook listening to the Telebrief - "Raids Imminent" - all the while watching bombers stream through the overhead. No doubt they had been splashed by fighter or SAM.

Finally they were scrambled against a target and went to Fl400 where they identified a civair in the Blue Way. Just 40 miles from base they were Bingo and RTB.

Last edited by Pontius Navigator; 25th Jul 2012 at 20:02.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2012, 20:36
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: front seat, facing forwards
Posts: 1,156
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Was due to get a T-bird ride with a mate I went through training with, but on the day it went u/s so I had a trip in the simulator instead. Managed FL930 before it flamed out and was doing Mach 2 in the descent with no engines. I thought that quite impressive!
just another jocky is online now  
Old 25th Jul 2012, 20:43
  #20 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,405
Received 1,591 Likes on 728 Posts
I believe the Lightning even had a data link where the ground controller could control the intercept via the link rather than R/T. We were target on one occasion where the link was down but the controller gave the computer directions by voice.
Yes, SLEWC and the Lightning had a data link mode, but it was never operationally used.

The software was still in use in 1975 when I was at Neatishead, but very rarely used. It need 2 controllers to do 4 simultaneous intercepts, whilst a single controller could easily do two; the software was so bad that that for a high speed target the software told you to go to M2 in the the opposite direction to get a 90nm separation before turning back towards the target - which you ignored and flew the "blip" to end up under the commanded position at the final turn.
ORAC is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.