Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Turkish F4 "Vanishes"

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Turkish F4 "Vanishes"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Jun 2012, 17:07
  #61 (permalink)  
Green Flash
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
OK, with NATO (ie the US) holding Turkeys coat (Int, Satelite and all manner of non-kinetic happenings) who would win between Turkey and Syria? For the sake of argument lets say the establishment of a no-fly zone a la northern Iraq including GBAD assets. Escalation play would be blockade of all Syrian ports. Could Turkey stick one on Assads boys?
 
Old 24th Jun 2012, 17:26
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Torquay, England
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ORAC
An airspace violation is just that, it is not an act of war. The deliberate shooting down of the aircraft when it was back in international airspace was and is specifically covered in the NATO Charter.
I think claiming this military aircraft was shot down over International waters might be speculation and so far both sides have only agreed that this aircraft had at the very least been in Syrian air space, the location where it was actually hit is still open to debate.

Japanese airliners, U2 aircraft, this is hardly the first incident if its type and if you want to go 'walkabouts' there is a price to pay.

Did Turkey cooperate when forces from NATO countries wanted to invade Northern Iraq from the Turkish borders?
glojo is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2012, 17:33
  #63 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,446
Received 1,603 Likes on 735 Posts
Depends if the Turks are looking for a casus belli, and who is willing to support them.
ORAC is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2012, 17:40
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Torquay, England
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good point but will there be any volunteers?

My own thoughts are there is very little chance of that happening and Russia needs that warm water port. Turkey has now learnt a very expensive lesson and how very sad that two people might have had to pay the ultimate price for this act of brinkmanship.
glojo is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2012, 17:47
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
very sad that two people might have had to pay the ultimate price for this act of brinkmanship.

Turn your speaker on and listen...

Last edited by hetfield; 24th Jun 2012 at 17:49.
hetfield is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2012, 18:01
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
To attack what? To achieve what? For what purpose?

Turkey's real agenda?

Turkey blames Syria for supporting Kurdish rebels, inches closer to military action - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2012, 19:36
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
pr00ne

To attack what? To achieve what? For what purpose?
No idea, but exactly the same was done in Libya a few month ago. Now everything is the same except small details - Syria don't have enough oil to support export. Maybe JDAMs are too expensive for this kind of country then...
CargoOne is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2012, 20:33
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: FR
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The incident as viewed by the turkish side (source of graphics = turkish air force radar) :
TÜRK UÇA

(edit: let the video play, I don't understand turk, but graphics are legended in english if you're a bit patient)

Last edited by AlphaZuluRomeo; 24th Jun 2012 at 20:34.
AlphaZuluRomeo is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2012, 21:36
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Swimmin' with bowlegged women
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sandozer
Looks like Pantsyr-1 was the culprit.
How reliable is that website anyway?
LS-4 is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2012, 22:24
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Exit stage right.
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Turkey allowing SFA to base itself there and be supplied by Saudi's so lots more to add into the mix.

At this point in time a calm down is more appropriate but whether that will happen is unknown.
racedo is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2012, 22:47
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Sunny Side
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
but whether that will happen is unknown
very insightful

S-D

Last edited by salad-dodger; 24th Jun 2012 at 22:47.
salad-dodger is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2012, 22:52
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Swimmin' with bowlegged women
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There hasn't been any word on the ELT, has it?

By the way, does anyone know if the type is equipped with an FDR of some sort, and if so, does it record RWR data?
LS-4 is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2012, 05:32
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: by the Great Salt Lake, USA
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Krakatoa
LS-4
"......we were not allowed within 5 miles of a Soviet warship......"
Not in my day. Must have been a different Cold War.
LS-4 has his location listed as Canada... they played by different rules than the Aussie/US forces.
GreenKnight121 is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2012, 07:22
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,822
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
There was one 35 Sqn Vulcan captain who declared war on the Russians. One day the Kiev was passing close to the UK in international waters; our secondary role was 'maritime radar reconnaissance' (aka 'boat spotting'), so off he went full of aggression, having entered in the auth sheets the words:

Locate and identify enemy shipping
He then proceded to bring back several shots of the Kiev taken at slow speed on the F95, with his overflight taking a number of frames.....and he flew rather more than a single pass. Surprised Russian sailors could be seen staring skyward, wondering WTF was going on.

After they'd recovered from the shock, the MRR cell showed our warry hero the JSP regulations for flight in the vicinity of Russian ships, all of which he had comprehensively broken. The auth sheet entry was removed and destroyed, the boss 'had a word' and the rest of us merely agreed that this particular captain was barking...
BEagle is online now  
Old 25th Jun 2012, 11:28
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Syrian Foreign Ministry spokesman has revealed that the aircraft was downed by anti-aircraft fire and not by a radar-guided missile.

BEIRUT (Reuters) - Syrian air defenses had to react immediately to a Turkish jet flying at 100 meters altitude inside Syrian airspace in what was "a clear breach of Syrian sovereignty", Foreign Ministry spokesman Jihad Makdissi said on Monday.

"Syria reacted to the breach," he told a news conference about the incident on Friday. "We had to react immediately, even if the plane was Syrian we would have shot it down," he added.

Makdissi said the jet -- a Turkish airforce F4 Phantom -- was shot down by anti-aircraft fire, not by a radar-guided missile. Despite the incident Syria remains committed to a "neighborly relationship" with Turkey, Makdissi said.
News Headlines

Last edited by TEEEJ; 25th Jun 2012 at 11:31.
TEEEJ is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2012, 12:55
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Their Target for Tonight
Posts: 582
Received 28 Likes on 4 Posts
To be pedantic, a Syrian Ministry spokesman has claimed, rather than revealed. Truth is the first casualty and all that...

I do love the 'even if it were Syrian we would have shot it down' bit - clearly, a kill's a kill!

Last edited by Red Line Entry; 25th Jun 2012 at 12:57.
Red Line Entry is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2012, 14:17
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dunfermline
Posts: 128
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Not very judging by the latest "news" it was shot down by AA fire less than 1.5 miles from Syria.
sandozer is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2012, 15:34
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,228
Received 417 Likes on 260 Posts
ORAC
The point being that, in shooting it down in international airspace, Syria conducted an act of war to which Turkey is entitled to respond and to ask for help from the rest of NATO. The total destruction of all Syrian SAW and AD airfields might be an apposite response.
or, a valid defense of territorial waters/airspace. Granted, most nations operate under the protocol of warning before shooting, but maybe the Syrians are in the right here.

krakatoa
--
"......we were not allowed within 5 miles of a Soviet warship......"
Not in my day. Must have been a different Cold War.
Heh. I was well within 5 miles numerous times. Good fun. Got mooned a few times for my troubles.
BEIRUT (Reuters) - Syrian air defenses had to react immediately to a Turkish jet flying at 100 meters altitude inside Syrian airspace in what was "a clear breach of Syrian sovereignty", Foreign Ministry spokesman Jihad Makdissi said on Monday.
"Syria reacted to the breach," he told a news conference about the incident on Friday. "We had to react immediately, even if the plane was Syrian we would have shot it down," he added.
Makdissi said the jet -- a Turkish airforce F4 Phantom -- was shot down by anti-aircraft fire, not by a radar-guided missile. Despite the incident Syria remains committed to a "neighborly relationship" with Turkey, Makdissi said.
This looks like a variation on the rule "squawk or die." Back in the 80's, in the Med, off the coast of Lebanon, that was roughly the rule I had to adhere to when launching off of our ship's deck. If Mode IV was not responding, I put me arse back down on the deck until our crypto was up and sweet. This was as defense against our own people and their surface to air tools, both missiles and that fun little robot known as CIWS / R2D2. An ounce of prevention, and all that.

Red Line:
To be pedantic, a Syrian Ministry spokesman has claimed, rather than revealed. Truth is the first casualty and all that... I do love the 'even if it were Syrian we would have shot it down' bit - clearly, a kill's a kill!
So that's where those F-15 pilots ended up, the ones who shot down the Black Hawks. They are now consultants to the Syrian MoD.

As to Turkey's response to Syria, and Syria harboring Kurds ... the Turks have ventured into Northern Iraq more than once since the Americans showed up, and since the various Iraqi governments have been in place. All to hammer down on one Kurdish faction or another.

My point is: Turks are not at war with Iraq. Turkish troops running about in Syria chasing Kurds need not be a cause for war, but the Syrian government would have to be on board (which IIRC the Iraqi government was for a while). The odds of Assad and friends being supportive? Low to nil.

Last edited by Lonewolf_50; 25th Jun 2012 at 15:35.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2012, 16:24
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Swimmin' with bowlegged women
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GreenKnight121
LS-4 has his location listed as Canada...
You might be mistaking me for Fox3WheresMyBanana..

During the Cold War, the only wings I had were those of my diapers.

Last edited by LS-4; 25th Jun 2012 at 16:37.
LS-4 is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2012, 17:17
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: England
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Video claiming to be people on a beach watching the F4 being shot down..

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=5b8_1340635536
tonker is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.