Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Fears for Pentagon air power as Iran claims drone capture

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Fears for Pentagon air power as Iran claims drone capture

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Dec 2011, 17:47
  #101 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by chopper2004
Anyhow it be nice if the Iranians put a couple of personnel beside said vehicle to determine scale and size.
I think they heard you.

BossEyed is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 17:52
  #102 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Torquay, England
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fox News has done its best to play down this claim but even they have now had to recognise what has happened.

One official told Fox News on Thursday that the incident is a huge loss and makes the top-secret helicopter tail lost during the Usama bin Laden raid in Pakistan "look like a pittance." The official said there are real fears the Iranians will share this technology with the Russians and the Chinese, in addition to using it themselves.
glojo is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 18:15
  #103 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Alps
Posts: 3,151
Received 101 Likes on 54 Posts
Cheers Boss now they can telepathically read my mind what next?

Anything else we can deduce from the pics?
chopper2004 is online now  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 20:17
  #104 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That one of the blokes was in Octopussy?

Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 20:40
  #105 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Oh, God. We've got two parallel universes going in here. This and the thread about the huge bomb thing.

Anyway, Chopper2004, did you think that the opening pictures looked like a tiny scale model? And then the other pictures looked like a different scale? I did. Just doesn't look right somehow.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 20:55
  #106 (permalink)  
TWT
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: troposphere
Posts: 831
Received 34 Likes on 19 Posts
Video

Video: Iran Shows Off Captured U.S. Drone, Swears It's No Fake | Danger Room | Wired.com
TWT is online now  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 21:09
  #107 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Alps
Posts: 3,151
Received 101 Likes on 54 Posts
Courtney

Tbh I wasn't sure until Bosseye put me in the right direction that the pic with personnel around, that it looked too presentable too tidy and the flags and curtain behind it appeared as a diorama.

And the sceptIsm / disbelief behind their claim to have shot down a UAV a Sentinel of all things at the beginning could have been seen as propaganda?

Last edited by chopper2004; 8th Dec 2011 at 22:11.
chopper2004 is online now  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 22:10
  #108 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: California
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
After watching that a couple times, some observations.

Looks like it's been painted in primer. The color and gloss of the paint just doesn't look like something of US origin.

Looks like the wings have fallen off and been stuck back on - looking at the lumps/lines just outboard of the overwing pod structures.

Appears to be a dent/hole in the leading edge of the left wing.

Interesting that the underside is shrouded in banners.

My guess - it crashed and broke up. The Iranians stuck it all back together and had to prop it up on something to make it appear to be in one piece as the undercarriage was damaged beyond use. The banners conceal this structure. They then repainted it to conceal scorch marks/scratches/scrapes etc.

Last edited by TheWestCoast; 8th Dec 2011 at 22:21. Reason: Changing right wing to left wing.
TheWestCoast is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 22:14
  #109 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Torquay, England
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If America is now finally admitting they have lost this UAV and the Iranians have claimed they have recovered it then what are we suggesting?

I have never seen one of these so called stealth drones but I was disappointed to see how flimsy the thing looks but the bottom line is the US admits it is their vehicle......

It is surprising that a foreign Power can over-ride the signal of the operator and then amazingly, this foreign power can then allegedly take control of the aircraft and land the thing. First North Korea capture a US Intelligence Gathering ship click here Then of course we recently had the Chinese capture an EP-3E click here

Fox News is what I call a US propaganda channel as opposed from a News channel. At first they were adamant that the US military had lost their UAV over Afghanistan but now even this broadcaster is confirming this act. Surely it has to be accepted Iran really does have this UAV especially as the US are not denying any of the reports. Click this

Does the thing look 'wonky' because it has been gutted and is now held together by Gaffa tape? I have looked on Ebay but so far 'No trace' of any bits and pieces of ex US high tech hardware.
glojo is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 22:25
  #110 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Malkin Tower
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
looks to me like some kind of attempt at misdirection. Send in a cheapo plastic model and let the Iranians think they've captured something useful, while at the same time keep the real ones flying safely
If the enemy is looking for the wrong aircraft it won't find the right one
jamesdevice is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 22:31
  #111 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Exit stage right.
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
looks to me like some kind of attempt at misdirection. Send in a cheapo plastic model and let the Iranians think they've captured something useful, while at the same time keep the real ones flying safely
If the enemy is looking for the wrong aircraft it won't find the right one
Alternatively the SNAFU theory is more like it where assumming that nobody can stop it sounds more plausible..............and then it all goes TU.
racedo is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 22:37
  #112 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Malkin Tower
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought the same until I saw those photos - the aircraft simply looks like a cheap model, and I don't believe that paint job. Its almost as if they wanted it shot down.

Of course history would favour the SNAFU model. After all, the CIA have past history at this - Gary Powers and the other Taiwanese U-2 losses
jamesdevice is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 22:37
  #113 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
jamesdevice
Not too shabby an idea.
What will let it down will be some blabber mouth in the US Gov't crowing about duping the Iranian's.
500N is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 22:39
  #114 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Alps
Posts: 3,151
Received 101 Likes on 54 Posts
On the militaryphotos.net website, on the recent pages, theres close up photos of the vehicle on display and someone's superimposed what the dimensions could be as the air force chief of staff is standing beside it.

http://img546.imageshack.us/img546/2927/rq1705.jpg
chopper2004 is online now  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 22:42
  #115 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Malkin Tower
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
doesn't look much like the supposed 28 metre wingspan does it?
jamesdevice is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 22:47
  #116 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It does look "plasticy"

What are the 2 lumps on either side of the air intake / engine ?

I haven't seen them on any other photos of the various UAV's
so if someone can point me in the direction, it would be appreciated.


I am still very skeptical that this is the real deal. at this stage I'll hold back my judgement as jamesdevice's suggestion has some merit.
500N is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 22:47
  #117 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Brum
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That intake grill looks just, well... wrong...
Nige321 is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 22:51
  #118 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Brum
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
What are the 2 lumps on either side of the air intake / engine ?
SatCom aerials??
Nige321 is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 22:51
  #119 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Excuse the thread drift and along the lines of conspiracy theories but what are the chances of TWO Nige's, both from Brum, one currently located on the other side of the world, posting one after the other on the same thread.

I'm sure SAM will have an answer.
500N is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 22:57
  #120 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Malkin Tower
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Morphic resonanace field
jamesdevice is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.