Typhoon Pilots 'unfit for flying' Sent Home
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Banished (twice) to the pointless forest
Posts: 1,558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've had an Epiphany, and three tins of Strongbow, so here we go:
Let's make up some **** about some boys or girls, or boys and girls, in the RAF out there in Sandyland.
We can invent some supposed offence and colour in some circumstances, anything will do, no need for facts.
Then sit back and watch the "Holier than Thou brigade" fight those of the "There but for the grace of God" tribe and we can all chip in with nuggets of encouragement.
That will give the Typhoon drivers a break and allow loads of spleen venting without any real victims.
The absence of facts in my scenario is no different to the preceeding thirteen pages. If, and that's a big if, we accept the official line, the only "reliable" witnesses are the two cops who picked them up. There's more chance of finding all three tramps from the grassy knoll than getting to bottom of this.
I've been taken home, and other places, in a Police car after a night of drinking. Never been arrested for it, just conveyed home because the cops thought that was best. I am in a fortunate position of being able to get a Blue Light Taxi home from Police social functions where pubic transport is not a good idea, particularly for the wasted. If it was known by the great unwashed how much of that happens it would make news for a day or so, but who really cares?
Perhaps this story would not have been so "newsworthy" if it had centered around "blatant misuse of Italian Police resources" for Typhoon stars rather than the "Jet Jockey too pissed to stand up" kind of headline.
Maybe they were as pissed as rats, or maybe just cheery and they got a lift home and were done in by the Snowdrops. Either way, assuming they had infact had a few drinks, their own recollection of events will be suspect.
What I do know for sure, is that I wasn't there so I don't ****en know how drunk they were, or were not. Loads of room in here for people with the same amount of knowledge of the situation. I've not heard from a mate who was told by a bloke who bought a beer for a girl who knows a guy who said he saw them.
We should lock this thread and start a new one for those who need to discuss drinking (or not) on ops, so that we can leave the Typhoon guys alone.
Let's make up some **** about some boys or girls, or boys and girls, in the RAF out there in Sandyland.
We can invent some supposed offence and colour in some circumstances, anything will do, no need for facts.
Then sit back and watch the "Holier than Thou brigade" fight those of the "There but for the grace of God" tribe and we can all chip in with nuggets of encouragement.
That will give the Typhoon drivers a break and allow loads of spleen venting without any real victims.
The absence of facts in my scenario is no different to the preceeding thirteen pages. If, and that's a big if, we accept the official line, the only "reliable" witnesses are the two cops who picked them up. There's more chance of finding all three tramps from the grassy knoll than getting to bottom of this.
I've been taken home, and other places, in a Police car after a night of drinking. Never been arrested for it, just conveyed home because the cops thought that was best. I am in a fortunate position of being able to get a Blue Light Taxi home from Police social functions where pubic transport is not a good idea, particularly for the wasted. If it was known by the great unwashed how much of that happens it would make news for a day or so, but who really cares?
Perhaps this story would not have been so "newsworthy" if it had centered around "blatant misuse of Italian Police resources" for Typhoon stars rather than the "Jet Jockey too pissed to stand up" kind of headline.
Maybe they were as pissed as rats, or maybe just cheery and they got a lift home and were done in by the Snowdrops. Either way, assuming they had infact had a few drinks, their own recollection of events will be suspect.
What I do know for sure, is that I wasn't there so I don't ****en know how drunk they were, or were not. Loads of room in here for people with the same amount of knowledge of the situation. I've not heard from a mate who was told by a bloke who bought a beer for a girl who knows a guy who said he saw them.
We should lock this thread and start a new one for those who need to discuss drinking (or not) on ops, so that we can leave the Typhoon guys alone.
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Detroit MI
Age: 66
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Stupid thread about a couple of silly boys who got caught doing something that a bunch of old grannies don't approve of when they hear the whispered gossip of those with no clue of what the actual situation really was.
Bugger me... I must be on the Internet...
Bugger me... I must be on the Internet...
Guest
Posts: n/a
I'll disengage if you will, just as long as the final post on this thread reads:
So we're agreed. Pilots who are on operations and who are discovered drunk in a public place for whatever reason - be it stress related, cultural indoctrination, institutionalised stupidity or simply an inability to control themselves - are not to be lauded as 'professional' or 'excellent' pilots, or even tolerated as 'unlucky' pilots. They are poor pilots, and we shouldn't have to share the skies with them.
So we're agreed. Pilots who are on operations and who are discovered drunk in a public place for whatever reason - be it stress related, cultural indoctrination, institutionalised stupidity or simply an inability to control themselves - are not to be lauded as 'professional' or 'excellent' pilots, or even tolerated as 'unlucky' pilots. They are poor pilots, and we shouldn't have to share the skies with them.
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: somewhere special
Age: 46
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry, couldn't let that be the last post.
Poor pilots - No! how does some circumstantial, tabloid generated rumour mill, about a non-flying incident question a pilot's technical ability?
Poor personal judgment - Absolutely!
But the truth is none of us on this forum were there, we'll never know what really happened, never understand the full chain of events and yet some on this kangaroo court are more than happy to pass judgment from sanctimonious armchair positions.
Mods FFS please close this!
H-u-L
Poor pilots - No! how does some circumstantial, tabloid generated rumour mill, about a non-flying incident question a pilot's technical ability?
Poor personal judgment - Absolutely!
But the truth is none of us on this forum were there, we'll never know what really happened, never understand the full chain of events and yet some on this kangaroo court are more than happy to pass judgment from sanctimonious armchair positions.
Mods FFS please close this!
H-u-L
Guest
Posts: n/a
Sorry, couldn't let that be the last post.
That's ok. It's an Internet forum. You're free to disagree.
Poor pilots - No! how does some circumstantial, tabloid generated rumour mill, about a non-flying incident question a pilot's technical ability?
I apologise. Of course you're correct. They could be outstanding pilots. And I'll happily concede that at their very worst - even intoxicated - they'll likely be better pilots than I.
But as so many have pointed out, being outstanding behind the stick is not the complete job. Being able to lead by example is important too. As is exemplary judgement in difficult situations. And for me, it's the latter that is unforgivable.
Poor personal judgment - Absolutely!
So where do we start to suspect that poor personal judgement in one area of an individuals life may be indicative of poor professional judgement in other areas? Can a man be an amazingly competent strike leader and a lush? I dunno, but I suspect not. And I certainly wouldn't care to be on his wing to discover whether or not I'm correct.
Mods FFS please close this!
Threads die naturally where there's nothing left to say or no-one interested enough to say it. No need to force the issue. Besides, this thread is p*****g Really Annoyed off mightily, which may be the sole reason for letting it run and run...
That's ok. It's an Internet forum. You're free to disagree.
Poor pilots - No! how does some circumstantial, tabloid generated rumour mill, about a non-flying incident question a pilot's technical ability?
I apologise. Of course you're correct. They could be outstanding pilots. And I'll happily concede that at their very worst - even intoxicated - they'll likely be better pilots than I.
But as so many have pointed out, being outstanding behind the stick is not the complete job. Being able to lead by example is important too. As is exemplary judgement in difficult situations. And for me, it's the latter that is unforgivable.
Poor personal judgment - Absolutely!
So where do we start to suspect that poor personal judgement in one area of an individuals life may be indicative of poor professional judgement in other areas? Can a man be an amazingly competent strike leader and a lush? I dunno, but I suspect not. And I certainly wouldn't care to be on his wing to discover whether or not I'm correct.
Mods FFS please close this!
Threads die naturally where there's nothing left to say or no-one interested enough to say it. No need to force the issue. Besides, this thread is p*****g Really Annoyed off mightily, which may be the sole reason for letting it run and run...
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oxon
Age: 66
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Priceless, we effectively have it from the horses mouth that these guys were not scheduled to fly for the next 2 days yet we still have the same old sanctimonious horse sh1t still being posted 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Below Ground Level
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Having skipped through the 200+ posts it appears that the string of comments/views on this incident has missed one salient point ....
Symptoms .....
Gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) and gamma-butyrolactone (GBL),
Tranquilizers, most often benzodiazepines, including valium and rohypnol, and
Ketamine
No-one appears to have considered Gaddafi's 5th columnists...., frequenting bars and restaurants in and around the off-duty areas with attempts to disrupt operations against their country. Are there any safeguards in place locally? Both accused should have had blood tests before departing for UK.
Press' says...., light blue touch paper and retire immediately.....,
Symptoms .....
- drowsiness or light headedness
- difficulty concentrating
- feeling confused or disorientated
- difficulty speaking, or slurring your words
- loss of balance and finding it hard to move
- lowered inhibitions
- paranoia (a feeling of fear or distrust of others)
- amnesia (memory loss) or a ‘black-out’ of events (when you cannot remember large sections of your evening)
- temporary loss of body sensation (feeling like you are floating above your body, or having an ‘out of body’ experience)
- visual problems, particularly blurred vision
- hallucinations (seeing, hearing or touching things that are not really there)
- nausea and vomiting
- unconsciousness
Gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) and gamma-butyrolactone (GBL),
Tranquilizers, most often benzodiazepines, including valium and rohypnol, and
Ketamine
No-one appears to have considered Gaddafi's 5th columnists...., frequenting bars and restaurants in and around the off-duty areas with attempts to disrupt operations against their country. Are there any safeguards in place locally? Both accused should have had blood tests before departing for UK.
Press' says...., light blue touch paper and retire immediately.....,
Last edited by Pressonitis; 1st Jun 2011 at 09:30. Reason: spelling
I still maintain that this situation came to light because of the erroneous order banning alcohol.
Hammer to crack a walnut it appears, and it led to exactly the kind of PR disaster that the "New Age" armed forces were trying to avoid.
Maybe the old method of dealing with it, quietly and in house, has been the preferred option in the past for a reason?
Hammer to crack a walnut it appears, and it led to exactly the kind of PR disaster that the "New Age" armed forces were trying to avoid.
Maybe the old method of dealing with it, quietly and in house, has been the preferred option in the past for a reason?
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pressonitis. See post 45.
There's something not quite kosher about this whole thing. Too late now I suppose to test their blood for anything additional to alcohol?
Originally Posted by Seldomfitforpurpose
Priceless, we effectively have it from the horses mouth that these guys were not scheduled to fly for the next 2 days yet we still have the same old sanctimonious horse sh1t still being posted
Love the user name by the way.
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I heard before this event (in early April), that there was a 24/7 2-can rule in force at Stn or Gp level, for all off-duty personnel in support of ops in Libya (deployed or not). I suspect this would be an unpopular order.
Putting 2 and 2 and 2 together, it seems as if this order was breached (as is inevitable) and that two officers were caught (unlucky for them, but they must face and accept the consequences) and that the subsequent 'dry' order (which smacks of collective punishment) has prompted the leaking of this dog-bites-man story.
Most of us who have served have drunk enthusiastically to excess, usually knowing when to rein it in, occasionally failing in this regard, but always accepting the consequences for our social actions. Very unlikely that this alleged incident would have any implications for flight safety or operational effectiveness, other than flouting a 2-can rule or risking being caught out if the sh!t really hit the fan in some unlikely way, but orders are orders and all that.
Putting 2 and 2 and 2 together, it seems as if this order was breached (as is inevitable) and that two officers were caught (unlucky for them, but they must face and accept the consequences) and that the subsequent 'dry' order (which smacks of collective punishment) has prompted the leaking of this dog-bites-man story.
Most of us who have served have drunk enthusiastically to excess, usually knowing when to rein it in, occasionally failing in this regard, but always accepting the consequences for our social actions. Very unlikely that this alleged incident would have any implications for flight safety or operational effectiveness, other than flouting a 2-can rule or risking being caught out if the sh!t really hit the fan in some unlikely way, but orders are orders and all that.
Guest
Posts: n/a
No problems. You'd be firmly under his pipper.
I doubt it. Whilst rarely being able to claim a simulated gun kill myself, I spent my entire flying career without anyone being able to claim a simulated gun kill on me.
Some of us are naturally good at running away.
I doubt it. Whilst rarely being able to claim a simulated gun kill myself, I spent my entire flying career without anyone being able to claim a simulated gun kill on me.
Some of us are naturally good at running away.