Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

WSOp's/WSO's at Kinloss, what does the future hold?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

WSOp's/WSO's at Kinloss, what does the future hold?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Oct 2010, 20:35
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Odiham
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@ Rumpunch:

'We never had afterburners and looked good at airshows thats why we were canned.'

Utter utter hoop mate. Get a grip

The MR2 did an amazing job, flown by awesome crews and engineered and administered by excellent ground support staff - but it was not binned for its lack of airshow 'impact'.

Comments like yours don't help those who are now very scared at RAF Kinloss.
wokkamate is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2010, 21:36
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: lincs
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's around this time on a Sunday night after a couple of stiff malt whiskies and whilst the Mrs watches David Tennant getting his end away on the BBC that I think, wouldn't it be cool to log onto prune and give the masses the benefit of a pithy one liner. One that would summarise the dismay of the AEOp world both at Kinloss, Waddo and the various outposts we find ourselves in. I could even attempt to endear ourselves us to our Loadie bretheren both fixed wing and rotary.

Unfortuneately I just feel quite sad that we as a trade will probably never be the same again, that the RAF is pretty much bobbing around with the last floaters in the toilet of defence and that Moray (a county most of my family know as home) is unlikely to recover from being raped by the aftermath of the bankers and sharletons who peddle lies and deceit in the City.

PFMG is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2010, 22:22
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wokkamate

My gripe is not with helo world, Its blatant obvious the MRA4 was canned to save the fast jet world. The correct personnel at the top managed to wangle David Cameron into his mindset. Even Liam Fox tried to sway the PM but he took advice from the wrong people hell bent on making Afghan a longer war that will save the Army.
RumPunch is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2010, 01:22
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: london
Age: 52
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I feel strongly against the wishes of our Government to scrap the MRA4 and leave us short in many areas a coastal nation should be only looking to invest in.
As for those fine people who are now wondering what the future holds, whether in 5 or 10 years time, the requirement for a frame such as the MRA4 will be noticed, acted upon then they will need experience to man it.
We may not see this airframe in air force blue but possibly in navy blue.
The RN were our main benefactors of our primary role and sense dictates that they may gain from our loss.
We will lose many experienced personnel, some nearing their time, others not deserving. It isn't fair, and wailing, complaining etc will not matter.
Move on. the Nimrod is dead.
LRMPA I feel sure is not.
WSOp's may have a very different career path now that the Kinloss bubble has been burst. I hope those that survive SDSR and redundancy embrace what the future holds; and sincerely wish those with no option but to look elsewhere; solace in a job well done.
For all of our variances, those involved with the Nimrod MR2 for the last 10 or so years, aircrew and ground crew alike, can hold our heads high and say that a difference was made, not public knowledge and therefore no high profile announcements.
Well done, and good luck to all.
stingray1971 is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2010, 13:18
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: planet earth
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rumpunch has indirectly brought up a very salient point.

Just about the whole of the RAF's senior leadership has / is made up from the FJ community ( with a few exceptions ). Therefore there will always be a bias in that direction and why is it always have to be aircrew to reach the very top of the Service ?

Compared to SH / AT, the FJ contribution in AFG has been limited, therefore why is nothing but FJ leadeship when AFG is meant to be the only game in town right now ? And please don't give me any bollacks about a non FJ type not getting the bigger picture: Biographies : GENERAL NORTON A. SCHWARTZ
c130jbloke is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2010, 13:29
  #66 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
C130, when did the RN last have an Engineer or a Paymaster as CNS? Or the Army have an Engineer or Logistics man as CGS?

All Services select from a teeth branch.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2010, 13:48
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North West
Age: 73
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Brian Burridge?
He was a Maritime man until 11Gp and 18gp merged to become 11/18th Hussars!!
A fine example to all officers on how to survive when allegedly kicked out of house by the then wife!!

Last edited by AQAfive; 1st Nov 2010 at 13:50. Reason: Addition of word allegedly
AQAfive is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2010, 16:06
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Back North
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C130, when did the RN last have an Engineer or a Paymaster as CNS? Or the Army have an Engineer or Logistics man as CGS?

All Services select from a teeth branch.
PN - not sure if I have fallen for your bait, but isn't the current CGS an engineer?
Strato Q is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2010, 16:25
  #69 (permalink)  
FFP
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'll throw this one out there.....

Those in the aircrew business usually fell into 2 groups going through training. Those that wanted to go far north and those that didn't.

Those that wanted to go were loved by all when the role disposal came around. Those same people could be the ones dishing out the "dry your eye's" lines (not saying they are, but you get my point)

Some compasssion in this whole episode is called for in my opinion. Here's hoping for a soft landing to the redundancies and not a bubble burst for the majority...
FFP is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2010, 16:46
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Durkadurkastan
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Correct. General Sir Peter Wall was appointed to CGS in Sep of this year and is a Royal Engineer. And wasn't AM French (the old CinC) a Chinook mate?
4Foxtrot is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2010, 17:37
  #71 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Strato, thanks, however a Sapper would have told me they are usually in front of the infantry and the tanks so technically are as teeth as the Paras.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2010, 17:47
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe the MRA4s won't get broken up after all:

Government considers sale of aircraft axed in review - Reuters
LFFC is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2010, 18:29
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: The real world
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It seems the article is talking entirely about Harrier and nothing to do with Nimrod! the picture of the Nimrod isn't a Mk 4 either.
Given the overruns, the spiralling costs and the history of the project I would be very surprised,no shocked if anyone would buy the MRA 4
Jayand is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2010, 18:47
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 4,334
Received 80 Likes on 32 Posts
The Assistant Chief of the Air Staff is a Chinook mate.

The Assistant Chief of Defence Staff is a Chinook mate.

There are at least 4 Air Cdre non-FJ mates from Herc, VC10 and RW backgrounds.

So I do not believe it is a FJ old boys club!
Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2010, 18:51
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 256
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pontius Navigator
Strato, thanks, however a Sapper would have told me they are usually in front of the infantry and the tanks so technically are as teeth as the Paras.
Fair enough, but you did ask when was the last time the Army had an engineer or loggie as CGS, clearly not expecting the answer which you got.
baffman is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2010, 19:00
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: planet earth
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LJ,

Noted, but the CAS is a ? The last CAS was a ? The one before him was a ?
c130jbloke is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2010, 19:01
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midlands
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mmmmm - there are some senior officers who did not start out as FJ aircrew though, the current Commandant of Cranwell was a JT before getting his commission.... so what does that make him? Ambitious?
Justanopinion is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2010, 19:11
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 4,334
Received 80 Likes on 32 Posts
Don't forget that the CINC is a Navigator - not that it should make that big a difference.

I think that the glass ceiling for non-FJ aircrew is well and truly broken though.
Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2010, 19:53
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Uranus
Posts: 958
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Sir, your memory fails you as Baggers is a Tornado GR4 mate.

The B Word
The B Word is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2010, 19:56
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Uranus
Posts: 958
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
BTW Sir John Day was a 4-star CINC and was a Wessex mate prior to Sir Brian Burridge who was a Nimrod mate.

So there are plenty of RAF 4-stars in recent years that are non-FJ.

The B Word
The B Word is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.