Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

F-35 Cancelled, then what ?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

F-35 Cancelled, then what ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Jul 2015, 16:39
  #6841 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,580
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
"Eyeball tracking... The F-35 helmet does both."

PIFFLE! And I have had the thing on my head. Mods, how long do we have to correct the myriad falsehoods propagated by this person?
LowObservable is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2015, 16:47
  #6842 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I said 3 pages back that he's either a Walt or under the employ of LM.

Since he denies the latter...
Hempy is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2015, 16:48
  #6843 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Where exactly did I say that the AIM 120 could ONLY be used WVR in a boresight mode?
You stated: AIM 120s WVR (the old boresight) mode was called "Mad dog in a meat shop" for a very good reason!

The implication to me is that the AIM-120's WVR mode is the old boresight mode. An implication agreed with by CM in the very next post. My apologies if I misunderstood both of you.

But if I misunderstood, what was the point of the statement? Was it a non sequitur unrelated to the discussion at hand?
KenV is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2015, 16:50
  #6844 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sort of like F-35 IOC in 2014??
Yes indeed!
KenV is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2015, 17:11
  #6845 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: aus
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
" PIFFLE! And I have had the thing on my head. Mods, how long do we have to correct the myriad falsehoods propagated by this person? "
LowObservable, I wouldn't worry too much, I saw you say that LOAL need to acquire their target within the 9 to 3 o'clock, when it can be a rear hemisphere acquisition
a1bill is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2015, 17:24
  #6846 (permalink)  
O-P
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ken,


We were discussing LOAL modes. So, totally related to the discussion at hand.


Have you flown an AiM120 equipped aircraft?
O-P is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2015, 17:35
  #6847 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Eyeball tracking... The F-35 helmet does both."

PIFFLE! And I have had the thing on my head. Mods, how long do we have to correct the myriad falsehoods propagated by this person?
I've had Gen III and Gen IV of the HMDS on my head. Gen IV had eye tracking using a non contact optical tracking system. Prior to Gen III it looked like HMDS would not make it into the F-35 at all and Lockheed/DoD contracted with BAE to use a modified version of the Typhoon's HEA system in the F-35. But Rockwell/Elbit solved the latency and other problems with Gen III and Gen III is now in production and the current standard issue helmet system for the F-35. Gen IV should be in production in time for block 3F. Personally, I have my doubts, but we'll have to wait and see.


Link below for Gen III history/specifics:
?Magic Helmet? for F-35 ready for delivery | Ars Technica
KenV is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2015, 17:53
  #6848 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have you flown an AiM120 equipped aircraft?
Already answered. Multiple times. F/A-18C. But all experience was ashore, I never went to sea with AIM-120. My last at sea deployment was before Raytheon/Hughes had gotten enough TIVS (Thermally Initiated Venting Systems) available for the whole fleet. USN only allows AIM-120 aboard its carriers when equipped with TIVS and the boat I was on got none.

Last edited by KenV; 15th Jul 2015 at 18:22.
KenV is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2015, 18:21
  #6849 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We were discussing LOAL modes. So, totally related to the discussion at hand.
Well, that explains it. I was discussing WVR air combat and rebutting/debunking the contention that radar guided missiles are useless in WVR combat. Your phraseology (including using the term WVR) made it appear that WVR was the topic you were discussing, and not LOAL modes, a term you did not include in your post. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
KenV is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2015, 18:28
  #6850 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mods, how long do we have to correct the myriad falsehoods propagated by this person?
Good question!! The fanboys have posted all sorts of nonsense in this thread. How long must we endure that?
KenV is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2015, 19:05
  #6851 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,580
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
The HMDS has a head tracker. I am quite unaware of any use of eye tracking in this or any other fighter HMD. It is not mentioned in the ArsTechnica story you cite.
LowObservable is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2015, 19:19
  #6852 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The HMDS has a head tracker. I am quite unaware of any use of eye tracking in this or any other fighter HMD. It is not mentioned in the ArsTechnica story you cite.
Try to read what I actually wrote.

I wrote:
1. HMDS Gen III has a head tracker.
2. HMDS Gen IV includes an eye tracker.
3. Gen IV is in development and is not yet in production.
4. Gen III is the current production version, which barely got approved for F-35 and for production.
5. BAE's system in the Typhoon almost got used in the F-35.
6. The article I cited is for the history of the Gen III HMDS.

But otherwise, the above quote got it completely right.
KenV is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2015, 19:40
  #6853 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,580
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Gosh, now I see the problem. I did not realize there was an eye tracker on the Gen IV HMDS.

You know, that Gen IV HMDS. The one that is mentioned nowhere in the 2014 DOT&E report, which talks about ongoing tests of the Gen III. The one that can't be found on a targeted Google search. The one that has never been mentioned in any testimony.
LowObservable is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2015, 19:56
  #6854 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: aus
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
KenV, if you have clearance to f-35 data. It is easy to misspeak, it would be best to google that any data has been publicly released.
a1bill is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2015, 20:57
  #6855 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by KenV
I've had Gen III and Gen IV of the HMDS on my head.
No you haven't, it doesn't exist. You may have had a go with an early development prototype, but at this stage it is little more than a technology demonstrator belonging to Visual Systems International. If it wasn't theirs then you were playing with a research model, not necessarily representative of any future DASH HMDS Gen IV.

Phishing?

Last edited by Courtney Mil; 15th Jul 2015 at 21:15.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2015, 21:59
  #6856 (permalink)  
O-P
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CM,


I believe that part of the AIM132s, MLU will give it a highly enhanced mode that would allow you to just chuck it into the fight and let it sort it out. For obvious reasons, the details are not for discussion on an open forum, but I'm sure you saw the details before you left.


For those that consider the 132 as a purely WVR weapon, it's not! It is best thought as as a BWR weapon that is outstanding WVR. I once asked if I would swop a 132 for a 9x... "not a chance" (OK, it was actually F#*k Off), was my reply
O-P is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2015, 22:04
  #6857 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: in the magical land of beer and chocolates
Age: 52
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some seem to think that good manoeuvrability is still something to strive for in a fighter.
Eurofighter: Typhoon To Be More Agile, Deadly
LONDON — Flight tests of a Eurofighter Typhoon fighter sporting several aerodynamic modifications have greatly improved the aircraft's agility and weapons-carrying capabilities, Airbus Defence and Space said Wednesday.

The addition of fuselage strakes and leading-edge root extensions and other more minor changes to an Airbus test aircraft resulted in improved lift, angle of attack and roll rate capabilities compared with the standard aircraft, the Eurofighter consortium member said in a statement.
...
the modifications increased the maximum lift created by the wing by 25 percent, resulting in an increased turn rate, tighter turning radius and improved nose-pointing ability at low speed.

Test pilot Raffaele Beltrame said the program had exceeded expectations in some areas.

"We saw angle of attack values around 45 percent greater than on the standard aircraft, and roll rates up to 100 percent higher, all leading to increased agility. The handling qualities appeared to be markedly improved, providing more maneuverability, agility and precision," he said.

The test pilot said the modification work also offered potential benefits in the air-to-surface configuration, "thanks to the increased variety and flexibility of stores that can be carried."

...

The aerodynamics improvements are the latest of several capability upgrades announced in the last 18 months or so, including development of an e-scan radar, the integration of several news weapons and the development of a new multiweapon launcher.

Last edited by kbrockman; 15th Jul 2015 at 22:05. Reason: extra quoting
kbrockman is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2015, 22:10
  #6858 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
O-P, I see where you're going. It was part of the concept right from the start. However, I think the people that write the RoE and CONOPS will take a lot of persuading, no matter how good the technology is. I'll see if I can dig out the slides I made for an unclassified presentation very many years ago.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2015, 00:00
  #6859 (permalink)  
O-P
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

CM,


I believe that the early problem wasn't with the capability of the seeker, but the processor needed to be twice the size of the said firework. What used to take three London buses now goes into a watch. Hence the MLU.


Which brings up the F35s (or any aircraft for that matter) IR stealth claim again, sometimes it's not what you can see that counts, it's what's not there.
O-P is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2015, 00:49
  #6860 (permalink)  
O-P
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CM,


The "new" mode for the 132 is surely better than the "Mad Dog", F4 with a 9L, Hawk with anything, or even a targeted IR rocket that has been decoyed.


I'm not saying that it should be the primary employment mode, just an option if your buddy is going to die unless you do something. I can't see RoE being a problem as long as it's not used as the primary option. ie "Get to RNE and chuck 'em all off and run".


I remember the QF4 piccy! Yikkes.
O-P is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.