Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Red Arrows

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd September 2007 | 21:38
  #101 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: Pfffft
What's the hole in the top of the fuselage for, in line with the trailing edge of the wings?

Cheers,
ASI
Another St Ivian is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd September 2007 | 22:28
  #102 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,324
Likes: 14
From: Lincs
Thanks Teeej, you've answered some questions I've always wanted to ask.. I might just go there.. I have recently bought a Canon 400D and am looking to make the change from shooting cars to aircraft. Are there any good b&b/digs?
I've sent you a PM.
TEEEJ is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd September 2007 | 22:33
  #103 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,324
Likes: 14
From: Lincs
What's the hole in the top of the fuselage for, in line with the trailing edge of the wings?
I think it might have something to do with the auxiliary power unit. Is it the vent/exhaust?
TEEEJ is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd September 2007 | 04:27
  #104 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: Umm, where did I put the Garmin?
Yep, starter exhaust.
Rakshasa is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd September 2007 | 06:26
  #105 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 27,399
Likes: 857
From: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
When I did the Flying Supervisors' Course, they made a big issue of the number of accidents/incidents when pilots were 'showing off' to the camera.

So perhaps it's best not to advertise your presence by wearing a road-digger's yellow coat or whatever - just in case some fun detector should say "Hmm, don't like the idea of the chaps posing for snappers - someone might go a little too low or do something silly. Best we stop this sort of thing....."

I would suggest you just lurk in the weeds with your cameras - and don't tell people when you're there.

Excellent photos, by the way!
BEagle is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd September 2007 | 11:31
  #106 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,324
Likes: 14
From: Lincs
Thanks! Points noted BEagle. I personally don't wear any high viz, but some of the guys also do it for safety reasons. Sometimes you can be the only person on that whole mountainside and some of the locations are pretty remote. The last thing they want is to go rolling off a crag, hit their head go unconscious, and not get found quickly after they go overdue. I would certainly advocate that if there is a group of people on the hillside then they shouldn't use them.
TEEEJ is offline  
Reply
Old 11th October 2007 | 20:38
  #107 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Nottingham
Ex Reds

Was browsing websites about Red Arrows aircrew and am aware of the 3 year tour. Looked at 1990 and saw a Flt/Lt Paul Rogers who completed 1 year (according to the stats). What happened to him and why did he only do 1 year, just curious....

Thanks
slotter68 is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2007 | 16:00
  #108 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
From: North Yorkshire
Reds' New Paint Scheme

What do people think of the new paint scheme, which can be seen on the RAF website? To quote Jas Hawker:

“We needed to keep a careful balance between making our famous aircraft unrecognisable and reminding people that we are proud to represent the Royal Air Force. This is especially important when many Royal Air Force personnel are away from home, serving overseas in front line operations such as Afghanistan and Iraq. We are a visible way of reminding people of our colleagues’ hard work and professionalism in the line of duty. The change to our aircraft paint scheme will help us to do this more effectively.”

I think it looks too busy. Preferred the old one.
Clockwork Mouse is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2007 | 16:13
  #109 (permalink)  

Yes, Him
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 2,696
Likes: 0
From: West Sussex, UK
That mirror writing on top of the wing is pretty clever though...
Gainesy is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2007 | 16:16
  #110 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 146
Likes: 3
From: Hants
What's the difference?
talk_shy_tall_knight is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2007 | 16:28
  #111 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 1,932
Likes: 13
From: England
What's the difference?
The big ROYAL AIR FORCE written along the side of the fuselage?!?!

Is it just me or does anyone else hate the stupid slope on the As and Y? So corporate, so naff!
Roland Pulfrew is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2007 | 16:55
  #112 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
From: United Kingdom
They did this on the Gnat, albeit under the forward fuselage. IMHO it looks naff:

If any change was needed at all, I would have prefered the royal blue to extend below the white go-faster stripe full length.
The Gnat version:

What goes around etc etc obviously somebody was due promotion!!
Tiger_mate is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2007 | 17:04
  #113 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 146
Likes: 3
From: Hants
I thought the Gnat went out years ago.
talk_shy_tall_knight is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2007 | 17:14
  #114 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: England
Fantastic bit of politicking by Red One there.
To make a connection between "Red Arrows" and "Operational Theatres" via paint schemes and the corporate logo deserves an AFC all by itself.

Last edited by Brain Potter; 31st October 2007 at 22:46.
Brain Potter is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2007 | 17:20
  #115 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 4,236
Likes: 80
From: Just behind the back of beyond....
It looked good on the Gnat, whereas this abomination looks horrible, and the silly font on the As and Ys looks silly.
Jackonicko is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2007 | 18:37
  #116 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: Some-r-set
Bloody corporate logo.

I do find the 'Y' and 'A' slope rather annoying.
High_lander is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2007 | 18:41
  #117 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Scotland
True... very politically correct!
Op_Twenty is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2007 | 18:51
  #118 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
From: United Kingdom
I will so laugh if somebody at an airshow changes the 'O' of Force to an 'A'

Priceless

Anybody a 'Photoshop' geek?
Tiger_mate is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2007 | 18:58
  #119 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: North of Hadrians Wall
the new version probably cost a mint in 'consultancy' fees....

the old Gnat version was done on a fag packet by station painters.
OilCan is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2007 | 19:10
  #120 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 902
Likes: 0
From: Wiltshire


Sure other will make a better job but...

and not a geek will have you know!!
November4 is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.