The reaction of the British captives to the Iranians
"In the eyes of the world nothing short of brilliant"
I just don't see that. Far from it, I see Iran as the loser in this whole episode.
If simply capturing innocents, parading them around till you reach some point of diminishing return and then outfitting them in off the rack suits (where's the tie btw) is brilliant, then we need to review definitions.
It can only get worse from here if the detained arrive back home with some nasty stories of their time as guests of the state.....
I would be interested in why you think it was brilliant as I truly don't understand why you view it that way.
ORAC
I believe some degree of the population (here and in the UK)truly believe it was a victory for Iran because the UK didn't assume a more muscular posture. Not simply trolling, not even in favor of Iran.
I just don't see that. Far from it, I see Iran as the loser in this whole episode.
If simply capturing innocents, parading them around till you reach some point of diminishing return and then outfitting them in off the rack suits (where's the tie btw) is brilliant, then we need to review definitions.
It can only get worse from here if the detained arrive back home with some nasty stories of their time as guests of the state.....
I would be interested in why you think it was brilliant as I truly don't understand why you view it that way.
ORAC
I believe some degree of the population (here and in the UK)truly believe it was a victory for Iran because the UK didn't assume a more muscular posture. Not simply trolling, not even in favor of Iran.
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Set 18,
I can understand your childlike (Boys Own) inquisitive nature and without being rude we all too have asked many of the questions that you ask and from a quiet personal perspective review and critique all of the news media footage.
But if a Serving person having attended some of the excellent courses on offer to us Service individuals you will also be aware that ANY discussion on this subject may place those that heaven forbid maybe in this situation in the future at risk.
If your thirst for knowledge is a military one, then best book yourself on a refresher course as I am sure that those involved with the debrief will do a thorough task and extract all of the information that will inform both policy and procedures for future captives.
Be careful of the 'Beadwindow' my friend and suggest 'Zip Lip'!
I can understand your childlike (Boys Own) inquisitive nature and without being rude we all too have asked many of the questions that you ask and from a quiet personal perspective review and critique all of the news media footage.
But if a Serving person having attended some of the excellent courses on offer to us Service individuals you will also be aware that ANY discussion on this subject may place those that heaven forbid maybe in this situation in the future at risk.
If your thirst for knowledge is a military one, then best book yourself on a refresher course as I am sure that those involved with the debrief will do a thorough task and extract all of the information that will inform both policy and procedures for future captives.
Be careful of the 'Beadwindow' my friend and suggest 'Zip Lip'!
Red On, Green On
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
SET - the purpose of RTI is to prevent useful information being acquired by the enemy. Twenty-four hours is the accepted critical period.
The RN and RM captives were not engaged on an offensive op - they were carrying out a UN sanctioned inspection. HMS Cornwall was not engaged on any active mission against Iran, so the captives had nothing to give away.
Hence any answers they gave to questioning could not be of any risk to their shipmates, so there was no need to resist. What had they to gain by being un-cooperative? Nothing, except the possibility of prolonging the misery for all.
And yes, I do know what I'm talking about, and I'm very glad I never did it for real.
The RN and RM captives were not engaged on an offensive op - they were carrying out a UN sanctioned inspection. HMS Cornwall was not engaged on any active mission against Iran, so the captives had nothing to give away.
Hence any answers they gave to questioning could not be of any risk to their shipmates, so there was no need to resist. What had they to gain by being un-cooperative? Nothing, except the possibility of prolonging the misery for all.
And yes, I do know what I'm talking about, and I'm very glad I never did it for real.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Asia
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
parabellum;
You either dont know about or you have forgotten about the spyship USS Pueblo. The North Koreans did not bother to justify keeping the american interlopers locked up for a long time and considering the 15 were where they should not have been then they must be considered as interlopers too. The Iranians could have just as easily done the same thing.
West Coast;
Iran's actions imply " we are the good guys " and the others " the bad guys " At no cost to themselves the world sits up and takes notice. Maybe not brilliant but very very close to it.
James.
You either dont know about or you have forgotten about the spyship USS Pueblo. The North Koreans did not bother to justify keeping the american interlopers locked up for a long time and considering the 15 were where they should not have been then they must be considered as interlopers too. The Iranians could have just as easily done the same thing.
West Coast;
Iran's actions imply " we are the good guys " and the others " the bad guys " At no cost to themselves the world sits up and takes notice. Maybe not brilliant but very very close to it.
James.
More importantly we do not know what psychological pressures they were exposed to in order to co-operate. For all we know just off camera there was a squad of unshaven IRGC types brandishing rifles and looking menacing. I know how the IRGC treated the 04 captives, and frankly I think they probably applied similar pressures this time round. Given the choice between co-operating, or playing the hero and maybe facing a life sentence or execution (both possibilities based on what the regime said early on), then I know what I'd do.
I find the idea of some armchair admirals on the internet pontificating about "how I'd have done it" contributes as much to this debate as a chocolate kettle. We weren't there, we don't know what pressures they were under and until we do we cannot criticise their actions without knowing the whole story.
I find the idea of some armchair admirals on the internet pontificating about "how I'd have done it" contributes as much to this debate as a chocolate kettle. We weren't there, we don't know what pressures they were under and until we do we cannot criticise their actions without knowing the whole story.
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Set - your nice and fluffy first diatribe does in no way detract or negate the utter cr4p that you have spouted since.
I don't care if you are Bravo 2 Zero/007 whoever. These 15 were not old hand SF types. Initially, I too wondered why they were being so "we love Iran" in their last interview. Then stop and think. Until I touched down in good ol' blighty I would have said nothing - in case the sneeky buggers changed the rules.
As said, what pressure were they put under to say all this. It was cleverly stage managed by Iran, you have to admit, but at least they are almost home.
Of course, waves of attack helicopters/missiles and threats of war would have been so much better.
Let us not forget all the images out of the middle east of hostages never seen again, those filmed being killed and published for the whole ME to see.
These 15 were doing boarding patrols, which, in my mind, is clearly very risky but not a role that I would refrain from talking about slightly. Souting abou tthe amount of Daewoo's on board would not have compromised the UK nation.
Think on fella. Sorry they disappointed you. You clearly have no self preservation.
I don't care if you are Bravo 2 Zero/007 whoever. These 15 were not old hand SF types. Initially, I too wondered why they were being so "we love Iran" in their last interview. Then stop and think. Until I touched down in good ol' blighty I would have said nothing - in case the sneeky buggers changed the rules.
As said, what pressure were they put under to say all this. It was cleverly stage managed by Iran, you have to admit, but at least they are almost home.
Of course, waves of attack helicopters/missiles and threats of war would have been so much better.
Let us not forget all the images out of the middle east of hostages never seen again, those filmed being killed and published for the whole ME to see.
These 15 were doing boarding patrols, which, in my mind, is clearly very risky but not a role that I would refrain from talking about slightly. Souting abou tthe amount of Daewoo's on board would not have compromised the UK nation.
Think on fella. Sorry they disappointed you. You clearly have no self preservation.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lincs
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Set,
I don't care a jot that they did or said what they did. As far as I'm concerned, they did the right thing and remained safe and well and didn't have the crap beaten out of them for being 'rufty-tufty' and all that 'name, rank, number etc' rubbish
To all 15 I send my very best wishes and congratulate them all on keeping their cool and not going off on one. Well done to you all.
TSM
I don't care a jot that they did or said what they did. As far as I'm concerned, they did the right thing and remained safe and well and didn't have the crap beaten out of them for being 'rufty-tufty' and all that 'name, rank, number etc' rubbish
To all 15 I send my very best wishes and congratulate them all on keeping their cool and not going off on one. Well done to you all.
TSM
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: brizzle
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
set
quote 'None of them refused a change of clothes in order to stay in their own uniform'
How do you know that the Embassy didn't provide the clothes? Might be a good idea after wearing the same ones for nearly 2 weeks and then having travel in them.
Safe trip home lads and lass.
Sharmine
quote 'None of them refused a change of clothes in order to stay in their own uniform'
How do you know that the Embassy didn't provide the clothes? Might be a good idea after wearing the same ones for nearly 2 weeks and then having travel in them.
Safe trip home lads and lass.
Sharmine
Guest
Posts: n/a
I did a some RTI training whilst I was in the Marines, so at least a few of the the 15 'may' have known some of the procedure. However as has been pointed out in previous posts I doubt the resitance to white noise, stress positions and worse would have been waranted. It was a UN affair, Iran are not our enemies yet and I don't think that main aim was to play along and get out. The facts will come out and I'm sure that our poeple will be fully justified in what they did.
The interviews were with a cheeky grin fixed on the face and the letters were copied word for word with all of the bad grammer intact. I think it is obvious to anyone in the west that these were forced confessions which just makes Iran look worse.
SET I think you should have waited untill after the debriefs and the official news releases before questioning our forces integrity. And since when has refusing to strip down to nothing and get into a boiler suit etc been RTI? If your captors want you to were 1 DMS, 1 flip flop and a wedding dress you can either do it or have it done to you.
I hope that the Captains career wont be shadowed by this mess, it's happened many times when an excellent officers career can be stalled through circumstances that were of no fault of his own.
The interviews were with a cheeky grin fixed on the face and the letters were copied word for word with all of the bad grammer intact. I think it is obvious to anyone in the west that these were forced confessions which just makes Iran look worse.
SET I think you should have waited untill after the debriefs and the official news releases before questioning our forces integrity. And since when has refusing to strip down to nothing and get into a boiler suit etc been RTI? If your captors want you to were 1 DMS, 1 flip flop and a wedding dress you can either do it or have it done to you.
I hope that the Captains career wont be shadowed by this mess, it's happened many times when an excellent officers career can be stalled through circumstances that were of no fault of his own.
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I lived in Tehran for two years. Bl**dy awful place, but very hospitable people. All 15 captives were relative youngsters and, after the initial man-handling of capture, I'd imagine they were treated very well, as temporary guests. That's what they've told us and I don't think you'll hear differently when they get their feet on the ground.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Exiled in England
Age: 48
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Glad they are all safe and on they way home. Good Work lads and lasses! And to all those muppets bleating on about RTI and saying they should have resisted more, WTF would you have done when asked to "Say this or we will gang rape the lass........."
There are any number of things that could have been done to them, its not like they were out to assassinate someone or blow up a ball bearing factory now is it??
They performed what they had to do as a unit to get themselves all home safe. Job done.
Now stop your fecking moaning and SUPPORT OUR TROOPS, oh and as for that spam journo that was gobbing off about our troops lack of morale and balls etc, one name......Johnson Beharry (scuse any mis-spelling no slur intended). You think the recipients of the VC has no balls??
There are any number of things that could have been done to them, its not like they were out to assassinate someone or blow up a ball bearing factory now is it??
They performed what they had to do as a unit to get themselves all home safe. Job done.
Now stop your fecking moaning and SUPPORT OUR TROOPS, oh and as for that spam journo that was gobbing off about our troops lack of morale and balls etc, one name......Johnson Beharry (scuse any mis-spelling no slur intended). You think the recipients of the VC has no balls??
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hants
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
James Leite
At the risk of biting - you either have a lot of inside info not available to the rest of us, or more likely you are talking out of your derriere.
Your last post:
Ifs and buts......
Who said the UK Forces were where they should not have been i.e. inside Iranian territorial waters?
Oh my mistake, Iran said it, so it must be true
The Iranians could have just as easily done the same thing as you say i.e. keep them hostage for much longer, but hey, they didn't.
Why?
Us mere mortals will never know the real reason... posturing by both the Iranian State and to an extent B-liar will prevent any story from coming out that can be believed 100%.
The fact is they have been released.
No military threats from the UK needed. Was that a weak approach??
I doubt it, what could we realistically threaten Iran with? We are in several theatres of operations at the moment, our forces are stretched, how could we possibly have backed up any military threat with any degree of menace?
To threaten someone without the ability to back it up would be foolish.
We hear stories every other week about how are forces are being stretched - do you honestly think that Iran is such a back-water that they are not aware of this?
B-liar and his cronies have seen to our military demise and continue to do so - this episode should be a salient lesson to Tone that if he wants to play with the big boys he needs to invest in our forces - but I wager that will not happen.
Rest assured that whilst diplomatic channels were being used, UK assets would have been trying to collate intelligence on exactly where and how the sailors were being held. If this had become a protracted affair, it is more likely that clandestine methods would have been used instead of conventional - but the very nature of the word clandestine means we will never know what was going on in the background.
Or would you rather we just barged in willy nilly and got lots of our forces killed in a half cock attempt at a rescue?
Some countries would shoot first ask questions later, but that is not, and never has been the UK style.
The reason we still use that style is because it works.
So, the guys (and gal) have landed at Heathrow what, honestly, has Iran gained from this?
How can you even think that the world now thinks Iran are the 'good guys'??
Best you get back to cloud cuckoo land - I for one am just glad that they have returned safely - that fact alone is, in my books, a damned good result.
At the risk of biting - you either have a lot of inside info not available to the rest of us, or more likely you are talking out of your derriere.
Your last post:
You either dont know about or you have forgotten about the spyship USS Pueblo. The North Koreans did not bother to justify keeping the american interlopers locked up for a long time and considering the 15 were where they should not have been then they must be considered as interlopers too. The Iranians could have just as easily done the same thing.
Who said the UK Forces were where they should not have been i.e. inside Iranian territorial waters?
Oh my mistake, Iran said it, so it must be true
The Iranians could have just as easily done the same thing as you say i.e. keep them hostage for much longer, but hey, they didn't.
Why?
Us mere mortals will never know the real reason... posturing by both the Iranian State and to an extent B-liar will prevent any story from coming out that can be believed 100%.
The fact is they have been released.
No military threats from the UK needed. Was that a weak approach??
I doubt it, what could we realistically threaten Iran with? We are in several theatres of operations at the moment, our forces are stretched, how could we possibly have backed up any military threat with any degree of menace?
To threaten someone without the ability to back it up would be foolish.
We hear stories every other week about how are forces are being stretched - do you honestly think that Iran is such a back-water that they are not aware of this?
B-liar and his cronies have seen to our military demise and continue to do so - this episode should be a salient lesson to Tone that if he wants to play with the big boys he needs to invest in our forces - but I wager that will not happen.
Rest assured that whilst diplomatic channels were being used, UK assets would have been trying to collate intelligence on exactly where and how the sailors were being held. If this had become a protracted affair, it is more likely that clandestine methods would have been used instead of conventional - but the very nature of the word clandestine means we will never know what was going on in the background.
Or would you rather we just barged in willy nilly and got lots of our forces killed in a half cock attempt at a rescue?
Some countries would shoot first ask questions later, but that is not, and never has been the UK style.
The reason we still use that style is because it works.
So, the guys (and gal) have landed at Heathrow what, honestly, has Iran gained from this?
How can you even think that the world now thinks Iran are the 'good guys'??
Best you get back to cloud cuckoo land - I for one am just glad that they have returned safely - that fact alone is, in my books, a damned good result.
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
James Leite......
Your 1st post on this thread should have been preceeded with the letters IMHO ('In My Humble Opinion' if anyone is unsure!)!
And, in MY humble opinion, the reality is the complete opposite of what you have stated. Iran can play its games and show us how good it is at theatrics all it likes, but what they pulled with nabbing our personnel sure doesn't help them reduce the likelihood of getting whacked by the US and its buddies sometime in the future!
So was it a 'victory'?? IMHO, thier leadership just pi**ed the West off a little more! They got 2 new boats though, so not a complete waste of time! I wonder if we'l get those back?!
Your 1st post on this thread should have been preceeded with the letters IMHO ('In My Humble Opinion' if anyone is unsure!)!
And, in MY humble opinion, the reality is the complete opposite of what you have stated. Iran can play its games and show us how good it is at theatrics all it likes, but what they pulled with nabbing our personnel sure doesn't help them reduce the likelihood of getting whacked by the US and its buddies sometime in the future!
So was it a 'victory'?? IMHO, thier leadership just pi**ed the West off a little more! They got 2 new boats though, so not a complete waste of time! I wonder if we'l get those back?!
Keeping Danny in Sandwiches
Join Date: May 1999
Location: UK
Age: 76
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A previous thread directed the reader to flashearth.com Using the Mocrosoft vitual earth we were able to get a very good sat. photo of the waterway. The photo now seems to have been degraded in the area in dispute.
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And to all those muppets bleating on about RTI and saying they should have resisted more, WTF would you have done when asked to "Say this or we will gang rape the lass........."
My post a few days ago on the Jessica Starmer thread asking whether some might draw this very conclusion was promptly deleted by the moderator on the main board.
Is it a subject no one dares discuss?
A bit of a proverbial 'elephant in the room' everyone chooses to ignore?
Gents (and ladies), don't shoot the messenger. Let's discuss the issue rather than abuse me as the three or four respondents to my original post did. I know that if I was the senior officer of a group of service personnel taken by a protagonist (note that word) in circumstances similar to those where the 15 were taken, the extra burden of having a female among my 'men' would be one I'd rather do without - for the very reason quoted above.
It might not be politically correct, but in my case, it's a fact, and I'd be a liar if I tried to say otherwise.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: England
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The lads and lassy have done a great job, all back safe ...Perfick!
To all of the armchair SF people who sit there claiming they could be sat on razor blades and have their nuts sawn off with a nail file before they even whimpered.............. I dont think so
Please remember there is a lot more goes on to the breakdown of the human psyche than traditional whipping and racking. I was on an aircraft two days ago (as pax) and watched the Manchurian Candidate. Spoooky!
To all of the armchair SF people who sit there claiming they could be sat on razor blades and have their nuts sawn off with a nail file before they even whimpered.............. I dont think so
Please remember there is a lot more goes on to the breakdown of the human psyche than traditional whipping and racking. I was on an aircraft two days ago (as pax) and watched the Manchurian Candidate. Spoooky!